Variable selection in generalized estimating equations via empirical likelihood and Gaussian pseudo-likelihood

AIC and BIC based on either empirical likelihood (EAIC and EBIC) or Gaussian pseudo-likelihood (GAIC and GBIC) are proposed to select variables in longitudinal data analysis. Their performances are evaluated in the framework of the generalized estimating equations via intensive simulation studies. Our findings are: (i) GAIC and GBIC outperform other existing methods in selecting variables; (ii) EAIC and EBIC are effective in selecting covariates only when the working correlation structure is correctly specified; (iii) GAIC and GBIC perform well regardless the working correlation structure is correctly specified or not. A real dataset is also provided to illustrate the findings.     

Nonlinear regression modeling via the lasso-type regularization

We consider the problem of constructing nonlinear regression models with Gaussian basis functions, using lasso regularization. Regularization with a lasso penalty is an advantageous in that it estimates some coefficients in linear regression models to be exactly zero. We propose imposing a weighted lasso penalty on a nonlinear regression model and thereby selecting the number of basis functions effectively. In order to select tuning parameters in the regularization method, we use a deviance information criterion proposed by Spiegelhalter et al. (2002), calculating the effective number of parameters by Gibbs sampling. Simulation results demonstrate that our methodology performs well in various situations.     

Autoregressive model selection based on a prediction perspective

The autoregressive (AR) model is a popular method for fitting and prediction in analyzing time-dependent data, where selecting an accurate model among considered orders is a crucial issue. Two commonly used selection criteria are the Akaike information criterion and the Bayesian information criterion. However, the two criteria are known to suffer potential problems regarding overfit and underfit, respectively. Therefore, using them would perform well in some situations, but poorly in others. In this paper, we propose a new criterion in terms of the prediction perspective based on the concept of generalized degrees of freedom for AR model selection. We derive an approximately unbiased estimator of mean-squared prediction errors based on a data perturbation technique for selecting the order parameter, where the estimation uncertainty involved in a modeling procedure is considered. Some numerical experiments are performed to illustrate the superiority of the proposed method over some commonly used order selection criteria. Finally, the methodology is applied to a real data example to predict the weekly rate of return on the stock price of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and the results indicate that the proposed method is satisfactory.     

Bayesian D-Optimal Designs for Poisson Regression Models

By incorporating informative and/or historical knowledge of the unknown parameters, Bayesian experimental design under the decision-theory framework can combine all the information available to the experimenter so that a better design may be achieved. Bayesian optimal designs for generalized linear regression models, especially for the Poisson regression model, is of interest in this article. In addition, lack of an efficient computational method in dealing with the Bayesian design leads to development of a hybrid computational method that consists of the combination of a rough global optima search and a more precise local optima search. This approach can efficiently search for the optimal design for multi-variable generalized linear models. Furthermore, the equivalence theorem is used to verify whether the design is optimal or not.     

Selecting the regularization parameters in high-dimensional panel data models: Consistency and efficiency

This article considers panel data models in the presence of a large number of potential predictors and unobservable common factors. The model is estimated by the regularization method together with the principal components procedure. We propose a panel information criterion for selecting the regularization parameter and the number of common factors under a diverging number of predictors. Under the correct model specification, we show that the proposed criterion consistently identifies the true model. If the model is instead misspecified, the proposed criterion achieves asymptotically efficient model selection. Simulation results confirm these theoretical arguments.     

A note on the unification of the Akaike information criterion

To measure the distance between a robust function evaluated under the true regression model and under a fitted model, we propose generalized Kullback–Leibler information. Using this generalization we have developed three robust model selection criteria, AICR*, AICCR* and AICCR, that allow the selection of candidate models that not only fit the majority of the data but also take into account non-normally distributed errors. The AICR* and AICCR criteria can unify most existing Akaike information criteria; three examples of such unification are given. Simulation studies are presented to illustrate the relative performance of each criterion.     

Likelihood-based cross-validation score for selecting the smoothing parameter in maximum penalized likelihood estimation

Maximum penalized likelihood estimation is applied in non(semi)-para-metric regression problems, and enables us exploratory identification and diagnostics of nonlinear regression relationships. The smoothing parameter A controls trade-off between the smoothness and the goodness-of-fit of a function. The method of cross-validation is used for selecting A, but the generalized cross-validation, which is based on the squared error criterion, shows bad be¬havior in non-normal distribution and can not often select reasonable A. The purpose of this study is to propose a method which gives more suitable A and to evaluate the performance of it.

A method of simple calculation for the delete-one estimates in the likeli¬hood-based cross-validation (LCV) score is described. A score of similar form to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) is also derived. The proposed scores are compared with the ones of standard procedures by using data sets in liter¬atures. Simulations are performed to compare the patterns of selecting A and overall goodness-of-fit and to evaluate the effects of some factors. The LCV-scores by the simple calculation provide good approximation to the exact one if λ is not extremeiy smaii Furthermore the LCV scores by the simple size it possible to select X adaptively They have the effect, of reducing the bias of estimates and provide better performance in the sense of overall goodness-of fit. These scores are useful especially in the case of small sample size and in the case of binary logistic regression.     

Simple Formula for Calculating Bias‐corrected AIC in Generalized Linear Models

In real‐data analysis, deciding the best subset of variables in regression models is an important problem. Akaike's information criterion (AIC) is often used in order to select variables in many fields. When the sample size is not so large, the AIC has a non‐negligible bias that will detrimentally affect variable selection. The present paper considers a bias correction of AIC for selecting variables in the generalized linear model (GLM). The GLM can express a number of statistical models by changing the distribution and the link function, such as the normal linear regression model, the logistic regression model, and the probit model, which are currently commonly used in a number of applied fields. In the present study, we obtain a simple expression for a bias‐corrected AIC (corrected AIC, or CAIC) in GLMs. Furthermore, we provide an ‘R’ code based on our formula. A numerical study reveals that the CAIC has better performance than the AIC for variable selection.     

On Variational Bayes Estimation and Variational Information Criteria for Linear Regression Models

Variational Bayes (VB) estimation is a fast alternative to Markov Chain Monte Carlo for performing approximate Baesian inference. This procedure can be an efficient and effective means of analyzing large datasets. However, VB estimation is often criticised, typically on empirical grounds, for being unable to produce valid statistical inferences. In this article we refute this criticism for one of the simplest models where Bayesian inference is not analytically tractable, that is, the Bayesian linear model (for a particular choice of priors). We prove that under mild regularity conditions, VB based estimators enjoy some desirable frequentist properties such as consistency and can be used to obtain asymptotically valid standard errors. In addition to these results we introduce two VB information criteria: the variational Akaike information criterion and the variational Bayesian information criterion. We show that variational Akaike information criterion is asymptotically equivalent to the frequentist Akaike information criterion and that the variational Bayesian information criterion is first order equivalent to the Bayesian information criterion in linear regression. These results motivate the potential use of the variational information criteria for more complex models. We support our theoretical results with numerical examples.     

Information criteria for inhomogeneous spatial point processes

The theoretical foundation for a number of model selection criteria is established in the context of inhomogeneous point processes and under various asymptotic settings: infill, increasing domain and combinations of these. For inhomogeneous Poisson processes we consider Akaike's information criterion and the Bayesian information criterion, and in particular we identify the point process analogue of ‘sample size’ needed for the Bayesian information criterion. Considering general inhomogeneous point processes we derive new composite likelihood and composite Bayesian information criteria for selecting a regression model for the intensity function. The proposed model selection criteria are evaluated using simulations of Poisson processes and cluster point processes.     

Regression model selection—a residual likelihood approach

Summary. We obtain the residual information criterion RIC, a selection criterion based on the residual log-likelihood, for regression models including classical regression models, Box–Cox transformation models, weighted regression models and regression models with autoregressive moving average errors. We show that RIC is a consistent criterion, and that simulation studies for each of the four models indicate that RIC provides better model order choices than the Akaike information criterion, corrected Akaike information criterion, final prediction error, C _p and R _adj², except when the sample size is small and the signal-to-noise ratio is weak. In this case, none of the criteria performs well. Monte Carlo results also show that RIC is superior to the consistent Bayesian information criterion BIC when the signal-to-noise ratio is not weak, and it is comparable with BIC when the signal-to-noise ratio is weak and the sample size is large.     

Linearized Ridge Regression Estimator in Linear Regression

In this article, we aim to study the linearized ridge regression (LRR) estimator in a linear regression model motivated by the work of Liu (1993). The LRR estimator and the two types of generalized Liu estimators are investigated under the PRESS criterion. The method of obtaining the optimal generalized ridge regression (GRR) estimator is derived from the optimal LRR estimator. We apply the Hald data as a numerical example and then make a simulation study to show the main results. It is concluded that the idea of transforming the GRR estimator as a complicated function of the biasing parameters to a linearized version should be paid more attention in the future.     

Model selection criteria for the varying-coefficient modelling via regularized basis expansions

Varying-coefficient models (VCMs) are useful tools for analysing longitudinal data. They can effectively describe the relationship between predictors and responses repeatedly measured. VCMs estimated by regularization methods are strongly affected by values of regularization parameters, and therefore selecting these values is a crucial issue. In order to choose these parameters objectively, we derive model selection criteria for evaluating VCMs from the viewpoints of information-theoretic and Bayesian approach. Models are estimated by the method of regularization with basis expansions, and then they are evaluated by model selection criteria. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed criteria through Monte Carlo simulations and real data analysis.     

Efficiency of the QR class estimator in semiparametric regression models to combat multicollinearity

There are some classes of biased estimators for solving the multicollinearity among the predictor variables in statistical literature. In this research, we propose a modified estimator based on the QR decomposition in the semiparametric regression models, to combat the multicollinearity problem of design matrix which makes the data to be less distorted than the other methods. We derive the properties of the proposed estimator, and then, the necessary and sufficient condition for the superiority of the partially generalized QR-based estimator over partially generalized least-squares estimator is obtained. In the biased estimators, selection of shrinkage parameters plays an important role in data analysing. We use generalized cross-validation criterion for selecting the optimal shrinkage parameter and the bandwidth of the kernel smoother. Finally, the Monté-Carlo simulation studies and a real application related to bridge construction data are conducted to support our theoretical discussion.     

Adjustive Liu-Type Estimators in Linear Regression Models

In this article, we aim to put forward the notion of adjustive Liu-type estimator (ALTE) in the linear regression model. First, the explicit expression of the optimal selection of the adjustive factors is derived under the PRESS criterion through matrix techniques. Then, the results are applied to the dataset on Portland cement. Moreover, to select biasing parameters from the theoretical point of view, we extend ALTE to the generalized version (GALTE) and obtained the optimal ones. The results of the Portland cement data show that ALTE's and GALTE's can substantially improve the ordinary least squares estimator and Liu-type estimators.     

Time series forecasting with neural networks: a comparative study using the air line data

This case-study fits a variety of neural network (NN) models to the well-known air line data and compares the resulting forecasts with those obtained from the Box–Jenkins and Holt–Winters methods. Many potential problems in fitting NN models were revealed such as the possibility that the fitting routine may not converge or may converge to a local minimum. Moreover it was found that an NN model which fits well may give poor out-of-sample forecasts. Thus we think it is unwise to apply NN models blindly in 'black box' mode as has sometimes been suggested. Rather, the wise analyst needs to use traditional modelling skills to select a good NN model, e.g. to select appropriate lagged variables as the 'inputs'. The Bayesian information criterion is preferred to Akaike's information criterion for comparing different models. Methods of examining the response surface implied by an NN model are examined and compared with the results of alternative nonparametric procedures using generalized additive models and projection pursuit regression. The latter imposes less structure on the model and is arguably easier to understand.     

Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion

We consider bridge regression models, which can produce a sparse or non-sparse model by controlling a tuning parameter in the penalty term. A crucial part of a model building strategy is the selection of the values for adjusted parameters, such as regularization and tuning parameters. Indeed, this can be viewed as a problem in selecting and evaluating the model. We propose a Bayesian selection criterion for evaluating bridge regression models. This criterion enables us to objectively select the values of the adjusted parameters. We investigate the effectiveness of our proposed modeling strategy with some numerical examples.     

Focused Information Criterion and Model Averaging in Quantile Regression

In this article, we study model selection and model averaging in quantile regression. Under general conditions, we develop a focused information criterion and a frequentist model average estimator for the parameters in quantile regression model, and examine their theoretical properties. The new procedures provide a robust alternative to the least squares method or likelihood method, and a major advantage of the proposed procedures is that when the variance of random error is infinite, the proposed procedure works beautifully while the least squares method breaks down. A simulation study and a real data example are presented to show that the proposed method performs well with a finite sample and is easy to use in practice.     

Parameter changes in GARCH model

A new method for detecting the parameter changes in generalized autoregressive heteroskedasticity GARCH (1,1) model is proposed. In the proposed method, time series observations are divided into several segments and a GARCH (1,1) model is fitted to each segment. The goodness-of-fit of the global model composed of these local GARCH (1,1) models is evaluated using the corresponding information criterion (IC). The division that minimizes IC defines the best model. Furthermore, since the simultaneous estimation of all possible models requires huge computational time, a new time-saving algorithm is proposed. Simulation results and empirical results both indicate that the proposed method is useful in analysing financial data.