On the relative behavior of estimators of reliability/survivability

Based on a decomposition of mean absolute error, a twofold technique is introduced whereby a pairwise comparison of point estimators of reliability/survivability can be made. Given two such estimators, the method examines (a) the “odds” in favor of one of the estimators being closer to the true value than is the other and (b) each estimator’s average closeness to the true value not only when it is closer than is the other but also when it is not. Joint consideration of these concepts is shown to form a basis for determining which of the two estimators is preferred in a given situation. An application of the theory is made by comparing the maximum likelihood and minimum variance unbiased estimators of reliability/survivability in the exponential failure model.     

Efficiency of two classes of stochastic restricted almost unbiased type principal component estimators in linear regression model

In this paper, we introduce two new classes of estimators called the stochastic restricted almost unbiased ridge-type principal component estimator (SRAURPCE) and the stochastic restricted almost unbiased Liu-type principal component estimator (SRAURPCE) to overcome the well-known multicollinearity problem in linear regression model. For the two cases when the restrictions are true and not true, necessary and sufficient conditions for the superiority of the proposed estimators are derived and compared, respectively. Furthermore, a Monte Carlo simulation study and a numerical example are given to illustrate the performance of the proposed estimators.     

Recovery of inter-block information: extensions in a two variance component model

For a two variance component mixed linear model, it is shown that under suitable conditions there exists a nonlinear unbiased estimator that is better than a best linear unbiased estimator defined with respect to a given singular covariance matrix. It is also shown how this result applies to improving on intra-block estimators and on estimators like the unweighted means estimator in a random one-way model.     

ON NON-NEGATIVE UNBIASED ESTIMATION OF QUADRATIC FORMS IN FINITE POPULATION SAMPLING

The paper investigates non-negative quadratic unbiased (NnQU) estimators of positive semi-definite quadratic forms, for use during the survey sampling of finite population values. It examines several different NnQU estimators of the variance of estimators of population total, under various sampling designs. It identifies an optimal quadratic unbiased estimator of the variance of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator of population total.     

On the restricted almost unbiased estimators in linear regression

In this paper, the restricted almost unbiased ridge regression estimator and restricted almost unbiased Liu estimator are introduced for the vector of parameters in a multiple linear regression model with linear restrictions. The bias, variance matrices and mean square error (MSE) of the proposed estimators are derived and compared. It is shown that the proposed estimators will have smaller quadratic bias but larger variance than the corresponding competitors in literatures. However, they will respectively outperform the latter according to the MSE criterion under certain conditions. Finally, a simulation study and a numerical example are given to illustrate some of the theoretical results.     

Nonparametric measures of intraclass correlation

Three nonparametric measures of intraclass correlation based on the notion of concordance are considered. Their unbiased estimators and nonparametric tests based on the estimators are studied and it is shown that an analogue of the Kendall's tau provides small variance estimator and relatively powerful test. Furthermore, the approximate variance of the estimator is given when the correlation is small in the normal model.     

Evaluation and comparison of estimations in the generalized exponential-Poisson distribution

The uniformly minimum variance unbiased, maximum-likelihood, percentile and least-squares estimators of the probability density function and the cumulative distribution function are derived for the generalized exponential-Poisson distribution. This model has shown to be useful in reliability and lifetime data modelling, especially when the hazard rate function has a bathtub shape. Simulation studies are also carried out to show that the maximum-likelihood estimator is better than the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) and that the UMVUE is better than others.     

Estimation of common location parameter of two exponential populations based on records

Consider the problem of estimating the common location parameter of two exponential populations using record data when the scale parameters are unknown. We derive the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), the modified maximum likelihood estimator (MMLE) and the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of the common location parameter. Further, we derive a general result for inadmissibility of an equivariant estimator under the scaled-squared error loss function. Using this result, we conclude that the MLE and the UMVUE are inadmissible and better estimators are provided. A simulation study is conducted for comparing the performances of various competing estimators.     

On estimation of the PDF and CDF of the Lindley distribution

This article addresses two methods of estimation of the probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the Lindley distribution. Following estimation methods are considered: uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) and maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). Since the Lindley distribution is more flexible than the exponential distribution, the same estimators have been found out for the exponential distribution and compared. Monte Carlo simulations and a real data analysis are performed to compare the performances of the proposed methods of estimation.     

Inadmissibility of the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator of the inverse gaussian variance

The uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of the variance of the inverse Gaussian distribution is shown to be inadmissible in terms of the mean squared error, and a dominating estimator is given. A dominating estimator to the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the variance and estimators dominating the MLE's and the UMVUE's of other parameters are also given.     

Some unbiased estimators versus mean per unit and ratio estimators in finite population sample surveys

We present some unbiased estimators at the population mean in a finite population sample surveys with simple random sampling design where information on an auxiliary variance x positively correlated with the main variate y is available. Exact variance and unbiased estimate of the variance are computed for any sample size. These estimators are compared for their precision with the mean per unit and the ratio estimators. Modifications of the estimators are suggested to make them more precise than the mean per unit estimator or the ratio estimator regardless of the value of the population correlation coefficient between the variates x and y. Asymptotic distribution of our estimators and confidnece intervals for the population mean are also obtained.     

Should S Get More Press?

This note discusses a problem appropriate for a beginning mathematical statistics course. Four estimators of the standard deviation of a normal data source are compared using mean square error. Both the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator and the usual estimator are found to be inadmissible.     

ON THE CHOICE OF ESTIMATOR IN SURVERY SAMPLING*

We re-examine the criteria of “hyper-admissibility” and “necessary bestness”, for the choice of estimator, from the point of view of their relevance to the design of actual surveys. Both these criteria give rise to a unique choice of estimator (viz. the Horvitz-Thompson estimator ?_HT) whatever be the character under investigation or sample design. However, we show here that the “principal hyper-surfaces” (or “domains”) of dimension one (which are practically uninteresting)play the key role in arriving at the unique choice. A variance estimator v₁(?_HT) (due to Horvitz-Thompson), which takes negative values “often”, is shown to be uniquely “hyperadmissible” in a wide class of unbiased estimators of the variance of ?_HT. Extensive empirical evidence on the superiority of the Sen-Yates-Grundy variance estimator v₂(?_HT) over v₁(?_HT) is presented.     

Efficient estimation of the PDF and the CDF of the inverse Rayleigh distribution

In this paper, we consider the estimation of the probability density function and the cumulative distribution function of the inverse Rayleigh distribution. In this regard, the following estimators are considered: uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator, maximum likelihood (ML) estimator, percentile estimator, least squares estimator and weighted least squares estimator. To do so, analytical expressions are derived for the mean integrated squared error. As the result of simulation studies and real data applications indicate, when the sample size is not very small the ML estimator performs better than the others.     

On moments of dual generalized order statistics from Topp-Leone distribution

In this paper, we have derived exact and explicit expressions for the ratio and inverse moments of dual generalized order statistics from Topp-Leone distribution. This result includes the single and product moments of order statistics and lower records . Further, based on n dual generalized order statistics, we have deduced the expression for Maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and Uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) for the shape parameter of Topp-Leone distribution. Finally, based on order statistics and lower records, a simulation study is being carried out to check the efficiency of these estimators.     

Confidence regions based on inefficient estimators

We consider an unbiased estimator of a function of mean value parameters, which is not efficient. This inefficient estimator is correlated with a residual vector. Thus, if a unit dispersion is unknown, it is impossible to determine the correct confidence region for a function of mean value parameters via a standard estimator of an unknown dispersion with the exception of the case when the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator is considered in a model with a special covariance structure such that the OLS and the generalized least squares (GLS) estimator are the same, that is the OLS estimator is efficient. Two different estimators of a unit dispersion independent of an inefficient estimator are derived in a singular linear statistical model. Their quality was verified by simulations for several types of experimental designs. Two new estimators of the unit dispersion were compared with the standard estimators based on the GLS and the OLS estimators of the function of the mean value parameters. The OLS estimator was considered in the incorrect model with a different covariance matrix such that the originally inefficient estimator became efficient. The numerical examples led to a slightly surprising result which seems to be due to data behaviour. An example from geodetic practice is presented in the paper.     

Some conditions for optimality of the almost unbiased estimators of regression coefficients

The purpose of this paper is to examine the asymptotic properties of the operational almost unbiased estimator of regression coefficients which includes almost unbiased ordinary ridge estimator a s a special case. The small distrubance approximations for the bias and mean square error matrix of the estimator are derived. As a consequence, it is proved that, under certain conditions, the estimator is more efficient than a general class of estimators given by Vinod and Ullah (1981). Also it is shown that, if the ordinary ridge estimator (ORE) dominates the ordinary least squares estimator then the almost unbiased ordinary ridge estimator does not dominate ORE under the mean square error criterion.     

Efficient Estimation of the PDF and the CDF of the Weibull Extension Model

The Weibull extension model is a useful extension of the Weibull distribution, allowing for bathtub shaped hazard rates among other things. Here, we consider estimation of the PDF and the CDF of the Weibull extension model. The following estimators are considered: uniformly minimum variance unbiased (UMVU) estimator, maximum likelihood (ML) estimator, percentile (PC) estimator, least squares (LS) estimator, and weighted least squares (WLS) estimator. Analytical expressions are derived for the bias and the mean squared error. Simulation studies and real data applications show that the ML estimator performs better than others.     

Estimation of the variance when kurtosis is known

The unbiased estimator of a population variance σ², S ² has traditionally been overemphasized, regardless of sample size. In this paper, alternative estimators of population variance are developed. These estimators are biased and have the minimum possible mean-squared error [and we define them as the “minimum mean-squared error biased estimators” (MBBE)]. The comparative merit of these estimators over the unbiased estimator is explored using relative efficiency (RE) (a ratio of mean-squared error values). It is found that, across all population distributions investigated, the RE of the MBBE is much higher for small samples and progressively diminishes to 1 with increasing sample size. The paper gives two applications involving the normal and exponential distributions.     

Variance estimation of DEE and regression estimator when a first-phase cluster sample is restratified

We consider a variance estimation when a stratified single stage cluster sample is selected in the first phase and a stratified simple random element sample is selected in the second phase. We propose explicit formulas of (asymptotically), we propose explicit formulas of (asymptotically) unbiased variance estimators for the double expansion estimator and regression estimator. We perform a small simulation study to investigate the performance of the proposed variance estimators. In our simulation study, the proposed variance estimator showed better or comparable performance to the Jackknife variance estimator. We also extend the results to a two-phase sampling design in which a stratified pps with replacement cluster sample is selected in the first phase.