Robust test for means when population variances are unequal

We consider the problem of testing the equality of two population means when the population variances are not necessarily equal. We propose a Welch-type statistic, say T^* _c, based on Tiku!s ‘1967, 1980’ modified maximum likelihood estimators, and show that this statistic is robust to symmetric and moderately skew distributions. We investigate the power properties of the statistic T^* _c; T^* _c clearly seems to be more powerful than Yuen's ‘1974’ Welch-type robust statistic based on the trimmed sample means and the matching sample variances. We show that the analogous statistics based on the ‘adaptive’ robust estimators give misleading Type I errors. We generalize the results to testing linear contrasts among k population means     

Testing the equality of several means when the population variances are unequal

A comparative study is made of three tests, developed by James (1951), Welch (1951) and Brown & Forsythe (1974). James presented two methods of which only one is considered in this paper. It is shown that this method gives better control over the size than the other two tests. None of these methods is uniformly more powerful than the other two. In some cases the tests of James and Welch reject a false null hypothesis more often than the test of Brown & Forsythe, but there are also situations in which it is the other way around.

We conclude that for implementation in a statistical software package the very complicated test of James is the most attractive. A practical disadvantage of this method can be overcome by a minor modification.     

A heteroscedastic measurement error model based on skew and heavy-tailed distributions with known error variances

In this paper, we study inference in a heteroscedastic measurement error model with known error variances. Instead of the normal distribution for the random components, we develop a model that assumes a skew-t distribution for the true covariate and a centred Student's t distribution for the error terms. The proposed model enables to accommodate skewness and heavy-tailedness in the data, while the degrees of freedom of the distributions can be different. Maximum likelihood estimates are computed via an EM-type algorithm. The behaviour of the estimators is also assessed in a simulation study. Finally, the approach is illustrated with a real data set from a methods comparison study in Analytical Chemistry.     

A note on the estimation of the mixing parameter in a mixture of two distributions

Various classical methods of estimation are compared with those proposed by From (1989) for the estimation of the mixing parameter in a mixture of two distributions. Emphasis is put on the actual implementation of the estimation methods.     

Approximate Bayes estimation of the parameters and reliability function of a mixture of two inverse Weibull distributions under Type-2 censoring

The main goal of this paper is to develop the approximate Bayes estimation of the five-dimensional vector of the parameters and reliability function of a mixture of two inverse Weibull distributions (MTIWD) under Type-2 censoring. Usually, the posterior distribution is complicated under the scheme of Type-2 censoring and the integrals that are involved cannot be obtained in a simple explicit form. In this study, we use Lindley's [Approximate Bayesian method, Trabajos Estadist. 31 (1980), pp. 223–237] approximate form of Bayes estimation in the case of an MTIWD under Type-2 censoring. Later, we calculate the estimated risks (ERs) of the Bayes estimates and compare them with the corresponding ERs of the maximum-likelihood estimates through Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, we analyse a real data set using the findings.     

A note on a multivariate version of rolle's theorem and uniqueness of maximum likelihood roots

This note gives a multivariate version of Rolle's theorem and shows its usefulness in establishing the uniqueness of the root of the maximum likelihood equations, the so-called maximum likelihood equation estimator. The technique is used to prove uniqueness in two situations from the literature where the original proof of uniqueness was in error.     

Multivariate discrete exponential family of distributions and their properties

The paper generalizes the univariate discrete exponential family of distributions to the multivariate situation, and this generalization includes the multivariate power series distributions, the multivariate Lagrangian distributions, and the modified multivariate power-series distributions. This provides a unified approach for the study of these three classes of distributions. We obtain recurrence relations for moments and cumulants, and the maximum likelihood estimation for the discrete exponential family. These results are applied to some multivariate discrete distributions like the Lagrangian Poisson, Lagrangian (negative) multinomial, logarithmic series distributions and multivariate Lagrangian negative binomial distribution.     

The three-parameter two-piece normal family of distributions and its fitting

This note introduces a family of skew and symmetric distributions containing the normal family and indexed by three parameters with clear meanings. Another respect in which this family compares favourably with families like the Pearson family, the Bessel-Gram-Charlier family and the Johnson family is ease of maximum likelihood fitting. Fitting by the method of moments is also considered. Asymptotic distributions of maximum likelihood and moment estimators are worked out. A test of symmetry and normality is suggested.     

A new look at the difference between the GEE and the GLMM when modeling longitudinal count responses

Poisson log-linear regression is a popular model for count responses. We examine two popular extensions of this model – the generalized estimating equations (GEE) and the generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) – to longitudinal data analysis and complement the existing literature on characterizing the relationship between the two dueling paradigms in this setting. Unlike linear regression, the GEE and the GLMM carry significant conceptual and practical implications when applied to modeling count data. Our findings shed additional light on the differences between the two classes of models when used for count data. Our considerations are demonstrated by both real study and simulated data.     

Improved estimation of the smallest scale parameter of gamma distributions

In this work improved point and interval estimation of the smallest scale parameter of independent gamma distributions with known shape parameters are studied in an integrated fashion. The approach followed is based on formulating the model in such a way that enables us to treat the estimation of the smallest scale parameter as a problem of estimating an unrestricted scale parameter in the presence of a nuisance parameter. The class of improved point and interval estimators is enriched. Within this class, a subclass of generalized Bayes estimators of a simple form is identified.     

On a goodness-of-fit test for normality with unknown parameters and type-II censored data

We propose a new goodness-of-fit test for normal and lognormal distributions with unknown parameters and type-II censored data. This test is a generalization of Michael's test for censored samples, which is based on the empirical distribution and a variance stabilizing transformation. We estimate the parameters of the model by using maximum likelihood and Gupta's methods. The quantiles of the distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothesis are obtained through Monte Carlo simulations. The power of the proposed test is estimated and compared to that of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test also using simulations. The new test is more powerful than the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test in most of the studied cases. Acceptance regions for the PP, QQ and Michael's stabilized probability plots are derived, making it possible to visualize which data contribute to the decision of rejecting the null hypothesis. Finally, an illustrative example is presented.     

Modified maximum likelihood estimator under the Jones and Faddy's skew t-error distribution for censored regression model

It is well-known that classical Tobit estimator of the parameters of the censored regression (CR) model is inefficient in case of non-normal error terms. In this paper, we propose to use the modified maximum likelihood (MML) estimator under the Jones and Faddy''s skew t-error distribution, which covers a wide range of skew and symmetric distributions, for the CR model. The MML estimators, providing an alternative to the Tobit estimator, are explicitly expressed and they are asymptotically equivalent to the maximum likelihood estimator. A simulation study is conducted to compare the efficiencies of the MML estimators with the classical estimators such as the ordinary least squares, Tobit, censored least absolute deviations and symmetrically trimmed least squares estimators. The results of the simulation study show that the MML estimators work well among the others with respect to the root mean square error criterion for the CR model. A real life example is also provided to show the suitability of the MML methodology.