The Identification of Potential Longitudinal Biomarkers and Measurements of Effectiveness for Biomarkers as Surrogates in Multivariate Survival Data

A proposed method based on frailty models is used to identify longitudinal biomarkers or surrogates for a multivariate survival. This method is an extention of earlier models by Wulfsohn and Tsiatis (1997 Wulfsohn , M. S. , Tsiatis , A. A. ( 1997 ). A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error . Biometrics 53 ( 1 ): 330 – 339 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Song et al. (2002 Song , X. , Davidian , M. , Tsiatis , A. A. ( 2002 ). A Semiparametric likelihood approach to joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data . Biometrics 58 ( 4 ): 742 – 753 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). In this article, similar to Henderson et al. (2002 Henderson , R. , Diggle , P. J. , Dobson , A. ( 2002 ). Identification and efficacy of longitudinal markers for survival . Biostatistics 3 ( 1 ): 33 – 50 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), a joint likelihood function combines the likelihood functions of the longitudinal biomarkers and the multivariate survival times. We use simulations to explore how the number of individuals, the number of time points per individual and the functional form of the random effects from the longitudianl biomarkers influence the power to detect the association of a longitudinal biomarker and the multivariate survival time. The proposed method is illustrate by using the gastric cancer data.     

Bayesian Capture-Recapture Analysis: An Application in Modeling Semelparity of a Neotropical Didelphid Marsupial

We develop a series of Bayesian statistical models for estimating survival of a neotropic didelphid marsupial, the Brazilian gracile mouse opossum (Gracilinanus microtarsus). These models are based on the Cormack–Jolly–Seber model (Cormack, 1964 Cormack , R. M. ( 1964 ). Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals . Biometrika 51 : 429 – 438 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Jolly 1965 Jolly , G. M. ( 1965 ). Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration stochastic model . Biometrika 52 : 225 – 247 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Seber 1965 Seber , G. A. F. ( 1965 ). A note on the multiple recapture census . Biometrika 52 : 249 – 259 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) with both survival and recapture rates expressed as a function of covariates using a logit link. The proposed models allow taking into account heterogeneity in capture probability caused by the existence of different groups of individuals in the population. The models were applied to two cohorts (Cohort, 2000, 2001) with the first one including 14 and the second one 15 sampling occasions. The best models for each of the cohorts indicate that G. microtarsus is best described as partially semelparous, a condition in which mortality after the first mating is high but graded over time, with a fraction of males surviving for a second breeding season (Boonstra, 2005 Boonstra , R. ( 2005 ). Equipped for life: the adaptive role of the stress axis in male mammals . Journal of Mammalogy 86 : 236 – 247 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]).     

A Comparison of Procedures for Controlling the False Discovery Rate in the Presence of Small Variance Genes: A Simulation Study

The Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM; Tusher et al., 2001 Tusher , V. G. , Tibshirani , R. , Chu , G. ( 2001 ). Significance analysis of microarrys applied to the ionizing radiation response . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 : 5116 – 5121 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) method is widely used in analyzing gene expression data while controlling the FDR by using resampling-based procedure in the microarray setting. One of the main components of the SAM procedure is the adjustment of the test statistic. The introduction of the fudge factor to the test statistic aims at deflating the large value of test statistics due to the small standard error of gene-expression. Lin et al. (2008 Lin , D. , Shkedy , Z. , Burzykowski , T. , Göhlmann , H. W. H. , De Bondt , A. , Perera , T. , Geerts , T. , Bijnens , L. ( 2008 ). Significance analysis of microarray (SAM) for comparisons of several treatments with one control . Biometric Journal, MCP 50 ( 5 ): 801 – 823 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) pointed out that the fudge factor does not effectively improve the power and the control of the FDR as compared to the SAM procedure without the fudge factor in the presence of small variance genes. Motivated by the simulation results presented in Lin et al. (2008 Lin , D. , Shkedy , Z. , Burzykowski , T. , Göhlmann , H. W. H. , De Bondt , A. , Perera , T. , Geerts , T. , Bijnens , L. ( 2008 ). Significance analysis of microarray (SAM) for comparisons of several treatments with one control . Biometric Journal, MCP 50 ( 5 ): 801 – 823 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), in this article, we extend our study to compare several methods for choosing the fudge factor in the modified t-type test statistics and use simulation studies to investigate the power and the control of the FDR of the considered methods.     

A Broad Class of Partially Specified Autoregressions on Multi-Casting Data

Extending the bifurcating autoregressive (BAR) process (cf. Cowan and Staudte, 1986 Cowan , R. , Staudte , R. G. ( 1986 ). The bifurcating autoregression model in cell lineage studies . Biometrics 42 : 769 – 783 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) to multi-casting (multi-splitting) data, Hwang and Choi (2009 Hwang , S. Y. , Choi , M. S. ( 2009 ). Modeling and large sample estimation for multi-casting autoregression . Statist. Prob. Lett. 79 : 1943 – 1950 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) introduced multi-casting autoregression (MCAR, for short) defined on multi-casting tree structured data. This article is concerned with the case when the MCAR model is partially specified only through conditional mean and variance without directly imposing autoregressive (AR) structure. The resulting class of models will be referred to as P-MCAR (partially specified MCAR). The P-MCAR considerably enlarges the class of multi-casting models including (as special cases) MCAR, random coefficient MCAR, conditionally heteroscedastic multi-casting models and binomial-thinning processes. Moment structures for this broad P-MCAR class are investigated. Least squares (LS) estimation method is discussed and asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of the generalized-LS over ordinary-LS is obtained in a closed form. A simulation study is conducted to illustrate results.     

Covariate-Adjusted Partially Linear Regression Models

Motivated by covariate-adjusted regression (CAR) proposed by Sentürk and Müller (2005 Sentürk , D. , Müller , H. G. ( 2005 ). Covariate-adjusted regression . Biometrika 92 : 75 – 89 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and an application problem, in this article we introduce and investigate a covariate-adjusted partially linear regression model (CAPLM), in which both response and predictor vector can only be observed after being distorted by some multiplicative factors, and an additional variable such as age or period is taken into account. Although our model seems to be a special case of covariate-adjusted varying coefficient model (CAVCM) given by Sentürk (2006 Sentürk , D. ( 2006 ). Covariate-adjusted varying coefficient models . Biostatistics 7 : 235 – 251 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), the data types of CAPLM and CAVCM are basically different and then the methods for inferring the two models are different. In this article, the estimate method motivated by Cui et al. (2008 Cui , X. , Guo , W. S. , Lin , L. , Zhu , L. X. ( 2008 ). Covariate-adjusted nonlinear regression . Ann. Statist. 37 : 1839 – 1870 . [Google Scholar]) is employed to infer the new model. Furthermore, under some mild conditions, the asymptotic normality of estimator for the parametric component is obtained. Combined with the consistent estimate of asymptotic covariance, we obtain confidence intervals for the regression coefficients. Also, some simulations and a real data analysis are made to illustrate the new model and methods.     

Interaction Terms in Distance-Based Regression

We propose a method of including polynomial and interaction terms in Distance-Based Regression (Cuadras and Arenas, 1990 Cuadras , C. M. , Arenas , C. ( 1990 ). A distance based regression model for prediction with mixed data . Commun. Statist. A Theor. Meth. 19 : 2261 – 2279 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), relying on properties of a semi-Hadamard or Khatri-Rao product of matrices. We demonstrate its application to real data examples.     

Relative Errors of Difference-Based Variance Estimators in Nonparametric Regression

Difference-based estimators for the error variance are popular since they do not require the estimation of the mean function. Unlike most existing difference-based estimators, new estimators proposed by Müller et al. (2003 Müller , U. , Schick , A. , Wefelmeyer , W. ( 2003 ). Estimating the error variance in nonparametric regression by a covariate-matched U-statistic . Statistics 37 : 179 – 188 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Tong and Wang (2005 Tong , T. , Wang , Y. ( 2005 ). Estimating residual variance in nonparametric regression using least squares . Biometrika 92 : 821 – 830 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) achieved the asymptotic optimal rate as residual-based estimators. In this article, we study the relative errors of these difference-based estimators which lead to better understanding of the differences between them and residual-based estimators. To compute the relative error of the covariate-matched U-statistic estimator proposed by Müller et al. (2003 Müller , U. , Schick , A. , Wefelmeyer , W. ( 2003 ). Estimating the error variance in nonparametric regression by a covariate-matched U-statistic . Statistics 37 : 179 – 188 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), we develop a modified version by using simpler weights. We further investigate its asymptotic property for both equidistant and random designs and show that our modified estimator is asymptotically efficient.     

Bayesian Estimation of Parameters and Comparison of Shared Gamma Frailty Models

In this article, we introduce shared gamma frailty models with three different baseline distributions namely, Weibull, generalized exponential and exponential power distributions. We develop Bayesian estimation procedure using Markov Chain Monte Carlo(MCMC) technique to estimate the parameters involved in these models. We present a simulation study to compare the true values of the parameters with the estimated values. Also we apply these three models to a real life bivariate survival dataset of McGilchrist and Aisbett (1991 McGilchrist, C. A. and Aisbett, C. W. 1991. Regression with frailty in survival analysis. Biometrics, 47: 461–466. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) related to kidney infection data and a better model is suggested for the data.     

Tests of Multivariate Independence for Ordinal Data

Population and sample versions of Kendall and Spearman measures of association suitable for multivariate ordinal data are defined. The latter generalize the indices of dependence of Ruymgaart and van Zuijlen (1978 Ruymgaart , F. H. , van Zuijlen , M. C. A. ( 1978 ). Asymptotic normality of multivariate linear rank statistics in the non-i.i.d. case . Ann. Statist. 6 : 588 – 602 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Joe (1990 Joe , H. ( 1990 ). Multivariate concordance . J. Multivariate Anal. 35 : 12 – 30 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), and Schmid and Schmidt (2007 Schmid , F. , Schmidt , R. ( 2007 ). Multivariate extensions of Spearman's rho and related statistics . Statist. Probab. Lett. 77 : 407 – 416 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) by allowing atoms in the underlying distribution. The representation of the proposed empirical measures as U-statistics enables to establish their asymptotic normality under general distributions. A special attention is given to tests of independence for multivariate ordinal data, where the power of the new methodologies are investigated under fixed and contiguous alternatives.     

A Nonparametric Test for Symmetry Based on Freeman and Halton's Ideas on Contingency Tables

In this article, we propose a nonparametric method to test for symmetry in bivariate data. By using the extension of Fisher's exact treatment for 2 × 2 contingency tables proposed by Freeman and Halton (1951 Freeman , G. H. , Halton , J. H. ( 1951 ). Note on an exact treatment of contingency tables, goodness of fit and other problems of significance . Biometrika 38 : 141 – 149 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), we can test the hypothesis of equal distribution for two samples of integer valued variables. Then, by counting the number of observations belonging to each cell of a symmetric, appropriately built grid, we can produce the two samples of integers required to use this test for equal distribution. The resulting test for symmetry is potentially extendible to higher dimensions. A simulation study is performed to compare with some known tests (Bowker, 1948 Bowker , A. H. ( 1948 ). A test for symmetry in contingency tables . Journal of the American Statistical Association 43 : 572 – 574 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Hollander, 1971 Hollander , M. ( 1971 ). A nonparametric test for bivariate symmetry . Biometrika 58-1 : 203 – 212 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; and its improvement given in Krampe and Kuhnt, 2007 Krampe , A. , Kuhnt , S. ( 2007 ). Bowker's test for symmetry and modifications within the algebraic framework . Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51 : 4124 – 4142 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Our proposal represents a competitive option as a test for symmetry.     

Using Frailty Models to Identify the Longitudinal Biomarkers in Survival Analysis

We introduce a score test to identify longitudinal biomarkers or surrogates for a time to event outcome. This method is an extension of Henderson et al. (2000 Henderson , R. , Diggle , P. , Dobson , A. ( 2000 ). Joint modelling of longitudinal measurements and event time data . Biostatistics 1 ( 4 ): 465 – 480 .[Crossref], [PubMed] , [Google Scholar], 2002 Henderson , R. , Diggle , P. , Dobson , A. ( 2002 ). Identification and efficacy of longitudinal markers for survival . Biostatistics 3 ( 1 ): 33 – 50 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). In this article, a score test is based on a joint likelihood function which combines the likelihood functions of the longitudinal biomarkers and the survival times. Henderson et al. (2000 Henderson , R. , Diggle , P. , Dobson , A. ( 2000 ). Joint modelling of longitudinal measurements and event time data . Biostatistics 1 ( 4 ): 465 – 480 .[Crossref], [PubMed] , [Google Scholar], 2002 Henderson , R. , Diggle , P. , Dobson , A. ( 2002 ). Identification and efficacy of longitudinal markers for survival . Biostatistics 3 ( 1 ): 33 – 50 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) assumed that the same random effect exists in the longitudinal component and in the Cox model and then they can derive a score test to determine if a longitudinal biomarker is associated with time to an event. We extend this work and our score test is based on a joint likelihood function which allows other random effects to be present in the survival function.

Considering heterogeneous baseline hazards in individuals, we use simulations to explore how the factors can influence the power of a score test to detect the association of a longitudinal biomarker and the survival time. These factors include the functional form of the random effects from the longitudinal biomarkers, in the different number of individuals, and time points per individual. We illustrate our method using a prothrombin index as a predictor of survival in liver cirrhosis patients.     

Some Remarks on Testing Overdispersion in Zero-Inflated Poisson and Binomial Regression Models

This note extends the score test statistics for overdispersion in Poisson and binomial regression models (Dean, 1992 Dean , C. B. ( 1992 ). Testing for overdispersion in Poisson and binomial regression models . J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87 : 451 – 457 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) to the zero-inflated models. Some general results are obtained, and examples illustrate the application of the extended results.     

On Testing Sample Selection Bias Under the Multicollinearity Problem

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews and extends the literature on the finite sample behavior of tests for sample selection bias. Monte Carlo results show that, when the “multicollinearity problem” identified by Nawata (1993 Nawata , K. ( 1993 ). A note on the estimation of models with sample-selection biases . Economics Letters 42 : 15 – 24 . [CSA] [CROSSREF] [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) is severe, (i) the t-test based on the Heckman–Greene variance estimator can be unreliable, (ii) the Likelihood Ratio test remains powerful, and (iii) nonnormality can be interpreted as severe sample selection bias by Maximum Likelihood methods, leading to negative Wald statistics. We also confirm previous findings (Leung and Yu, 1996 Leung , S. F. , Yu , S. ( 1996 ). On the choice between sample selection and two-part models . Journal of Econometrics 72 : 197 – 229 . [CSA] [CROSSREF] [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) that the standard regression-based t-test (Heckman, 1979 Heckman , J. J. ( 1979 ). Sample selection bias as a specification error . Econometrica 47 : 153 – 161 . [CSA] [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and the asymptotically efficient Lagrange Multiplier test (Melino, 1982 Melino , A. ( 1982 ). Testing for sample selection bias . Review of Economic Studies 49 : 151 – 153 . [CSA] [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), are robust to nonnormality but have very little power.     

Tests for Multiple Outliers in an Exponential Sample

By applying the recursion of Huffer (1988 Huffer, F. 1988. Divided differences and the joint distribution of linear combinations of spacings. Journal of Applied Probability, 25: 346–354. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) repeatedly, we propose an algorithm for evaluating the null joint distribution of Dixon-type test statistics for testing discordancy of k upper outliers in exponential samples. By using the critical values of Dixon-type test statistics determined from the proposed algorithm and those of Cochran-type test statistics presented earlier by Lin and Balakrishnan (2009 Lin, C. T. and Balakrishnan, N. 2009. Exact computation of the null distribution of a test for multiple outliers in an exponential sample. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53: 3281–3290. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), we carry out an extensive Monte Carlo study to investigate the powers and the error probabilities for the effects of masking and swamping when the number of outliers k = 2 and 3. Based on our empirical findings, we recommend Rosner’s (1975 Rosner, B. 1975. On the detection of many outliers. Technometrics, 17: 221–227. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) sequential test procedure based on Dixon-type test statistics for testing multiple outliers from an exponential distribution.     

A side sensitive modified group runs control chart to detect shifts in the process mean

Gadre and Rattihalli [5 Gadre, M. P. and Rattihalli, R. N. 2006. Modified group runs control charts to detect increases in fraction non-conforming and shifts in the process mean. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput., 35: 225–240. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar]] have introduced the Modified Group Runs (MGR) control chart to identify the increases in fraction non-conforming and to detect shifts in the process mean. The MGR chart reduces the out-of-control average time-to-signal (ATS), as compared with most of the well-known control charts. In this article, we develop the Side Sensitive Modified Group Runs (SSMGR) chart to detect shifts in the process mean. With the help of numerical examples, it is illustrated that the SSMGR chart performs better than the Shewhart's X¯ chart, the synthetic chart [12 Wu, Z. and Spedding, T. A. 2000. A synthetic control chart for detecting small shifts in the process mean. J. Qual. Technol., 32: 32–38. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar]], the Group Runs chart [4 Gadre, M. P. and Rattihalli, R. N. 2004. A group runs control chart for detecting shifts in the process mean. Econ. Qual. Control, 19: 29–43. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]], the Side Sensitive Group Runs chart [6 Gadre, M. P. and Rattihalli, R. N. 2007. A side sensitive group runs control chart for detecting shifts in the process mean. Stat. Methods Appl., 16: 27–37. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar]], as well as the MGR chart [5 Gadre, M. P. and Rattihalli, R. N. 2006. Modified group runs control charts to detect increases in fraction non-conforming and shifts in the process mean. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput., 35: 225–240. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar]]. In some situations it is also superior to the Cumulative Sum chart p9 Page, E. S. 1954. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika, 41: 100–114. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar]] and the exponentially weighed moving average chart [10 Roberts, S. W. 1959. Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics, 1: 239–250. [Taylor & Francis Online] [Google Scholar]]. In the steady state also, its performance is better than the above charts.     

The Performance of Panel Cointegration Methods: Results from a Large Scale Simulation Study

This article presents results concerning the performance of both single equation and system panel cointegration tests and estimators. The study considers the tests developed in Pedroni (1999 Pedroni , P. ( 1999 ). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors . Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 : 653 – 670 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 2004 Pedroni , P. ( 2004 ). Panel cointegration. Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis . Econometric Theory 20 : 597 – 625 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Westerlund (2005 Westerlund , J. ( 2005 ). New simple tests for panel cointegration . Econometric Reviews 24 : 297 – 316 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Larsson et al. (2001 Larsson , R. , Lyhagen , J. , Löthgren , M. ( 2001 ). Likelihood-based cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels . Econometrics Journal 4 : 109 – 142 .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), and Breitung (2005 Breitung , J. ( 2005 ). A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data . Econometric Reviews 24 : 151 – 173 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and the estimators developed in Phillips and Moon (1999 Phillips , P. C. B. , Moon , H. R. ( 1999 ). Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data . Econometrica 67 : 1057 – 1111 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Pedroni (2000 Pedroni , P. ( 2000 ). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels . In: Baltagi , B. H. , ed. Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels . Amsterdam : Elsevier , pp. 93 – 130 .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), Kao and Chiang (2000 Kao , C. , Chiang , M.-H. ( 2000 ). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data . In: Baltagi , B. H. , ed. Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels . Amsterdam : Elsevier , pp. 179 – 222 .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), Mark and Sul (2003 Mark , N. C. , Sul , D. ( 2003 ). Cointegration vector estimation by panel dynamic OLS and long-run money demand . Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65 : 655 – 680 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Pedroni (2001 Pedroni , P. ( 2001 ). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels . Review of Economics and Statistics 83 : 1371 – 1375 . [Google Scholar]), and Breitung (2005 Breitung , J. ( 2005 ). A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data . Econometric Reviews 24 : 151 – 173 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). We study the impact of stable autoregressive roots approaching the unit circle, of I(2) components, of short-run cross-sectional correlation and of cross-unit cointegration on the performance of the tests and estimators. The data are simulated from three-dimensional individual specific VAR systems with cointegrating ranks varying from zero to two for fourteen different panel dimensions. The usual specifications of deterministic components are considered.     

Estimators for the Population Mean in the Case of Missing Data

We propose a class of estimators for the population mean when there are missing data in the data set. Obtaining the mean square error equations of the proposed estimators, we show the conditions where the proposed estimators are more efficient than the sample mean, ratio-type estimators, and the estimators in Singh and Horn (2000 Singh , S. , Horn , S. ( 2000 ). Compromised imputation in survey sampling . Metrika 51 : 267 – 276 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Singh and Deo (2003 Singh , S. , Deo , B. (2003). Imputation by power transformation. Statist. Pap. 44:555–579.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) in the case of missing data. These conditions are also supported by a numerical example.     

Performance Evaluation of Different Tests for Location Parameters

In this article, our objective is to evaluate the performance of different tests which are used to compare the equality of more than two location parameters. We have considered six tests (including some commonly used) in this study, one of which is parametric and the others are nonparametric. These tests include the usual F test (Fisher and Mackenzie, 1923 Fisher , R. A. , Mackenzie , M. A. ( 1923 ). Studies in crop variation. II. The manurial response of different potato . Journal of Agricultural Science 13 : 311 – 320 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Kruskal–Wallis test (Kruskall and Wallis, 1952 Kruskall , W. H. , Wallis , W. A. ( 1952 ). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis . Journal of American Statistical Association 47 : 583 – 621 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (David, 1958 David , H. T. ( 1958 ). Three-sample Kolnogorov–Smirnov test . The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29 : 842 – 851 .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), the g test (Stekler, 1987 Stekler , H. O. ( 1987 ). Who forecasters better? Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 5 : 155 – 158 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), f test (Batchelor, 1990 Batchelor , R. A. ( 1990 ). All forecasters are equal . Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 8 : 143 – 144 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), and Extension of Median test (as given in Daniel, 1990 Daniel , W. W. ( 1990 ). Applied Nonparametric Statistics. , 2nd ed. Duxbury Classic Series , Boston . [Google Scholar]). Performance of these tests are compared under different symmetric, skewed and contaminated probability distributions that include Normal, Cauchy, Uniform, Laplace, Lognormal, Exponential, Weibull, Gamma, t, Chi-square, Half Normal, Mixed Weibull, and Mixed Normal. Performances of these tests are measured in terms of power. We have suggested appropriate tests which may perform better under different situations. It is expected that researchers will find these results useful in decision making.     

Second-Order Covariance Matrix Formula for Heteroskedastic Generalized Linear Models

For the first time, we provide a matrix formula for second-order covariances of maximum likelihood estimates in heteroskedastic generalized linear models, thus generalizing the results of Cordeiro (2004 Cordeiro , G. M. ( 2004 ). Second-order covariance matrix of maximum likelihood estimates in generalized linear models . Statist. Probab. Lett. 66 : 153 – 160 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Cordeiro et al. (2006 Cordeiro , G. M. , Barroso , L. P. , Botter , D. A. (2006). Covariance matrix formula for generalized linear models with unknown dispersion. Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 35:113–120.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) related to the generalized linear models with known and unknown dispersion parameter, respectively. The covariance matrix formula does not involve cumulants of log-likelihood derivatives and can be easily obtained using simple matrix operations. We apply our main result to a simple model. Some simulations show that the second-order covariances can be quite pronounced in small to moderate samples. The usual covariances of the maximum likelihood estimates can be corrected by these second-order covariances.     

Testing the Difference of Two Binomial Proportions: Comparison of Continuity Corrections for Saddlepoint Approximation

We carried out a simulation study based on the methodology of Newcombe (1998 Newcombe , R. G. ( 1998 ). Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods . Statist. Med. 17 : 873 – 890 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) to compare tests for the difference of two binomial proportions by applying different continuity corrections on saddlepoint approximation to tail probabilities. In this article, we proposed a new continuity correction based on the least common multiple of two sample sizes. We evaluated that the best test should have the actual Type I error rates that are, on the whole, closest to α, but not exceeding α, where α is nominal level of significance.