An Optimal Multivariate Stratified Sampling Design Using Dynamic Programming

Numerous optimization problems arise in survey designs. The problem of obtaining an optimal (or near optimal) sampling design can be formulated and solved as a mathematical programming problem. In multivariate stratified sample surveys usually it is not possible to use the individual optimum allocations for sample sizes to various strata for one reason or another. In such situations some criterion is needed to work out an allocation which is optimum for all characteristics in some sense. Such an allocation may be called an optimum compromise allocation. This paper examines the problem of determining an optimum compromise allocation in multivariate stratified random sampling, when the population means of several characteristics are to be estimated. Formulating the problem of allocation as an all integer nonlinear programming problem, the paper develops a solution procedure using a dynamic programming technique. The compromise allocation discussed is optimal in the sense that it minimizes a weighted sum of the sampling variances of the estimates of the population means of various characteristics under study. A numerical example illustrates the solution procedure and shows how it compares with Cochran's average allocation and proportional allocation.     

On the Problem of Compromise Allocation in Multi-Response Stratified Sample Surveys

In stratified sample surveys, the problem of determining the optimum allocation is well known due to articles published in 1923 by Tschuprow and in 1934 by Neyman. The articles suggest the optimum sample sizes to be selected from each stratum for which sampling variance of the estimator is minimum for fixed total cost of the survey or the cost is minimum for a fixed precision of the estimator. If in a sample survey more than one characteristic is to be measured on each selected unit of the sample, that is, the survey is a multi-response survey, then the problem of determining the optimum sample sizes to various strata becomes more complex because of the non-availability of a single optimality criterion that suits all the characteristics. Many authors discussed compromise criterion that provides a compromise allocation, which is optimum for all characteristics, at least in some sense. Almost all of these authors worked out the compromise allocation by minimizing some function of the sampling variances of the estimators under a single cost constraint. A serious objection to this approach is that the variances are not unit free so that minimizing any function of variances may not be an appropriate objective to obtain a compromise allocation. This fact suggests the use of coefficient of variations instead of variances. In the present article, the problem of compromise allocation is formulated as a multi-objective non-linear programming problem. By linearizing the non-linear objective functions at their individual optima, the problem is approximated to an integer linear programming problem. Goal programming technique is then used to obtain a solution to the approximated problem.     

Optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling design in the presence of nonresponse with Gamma cost function

In multivariate stratified sample survey with L strata, let p-characteristics are defined on each unit of the population. To estimate the unknown p-population means of each characteristic, a random sample is taken out from the population. In multivariate stratified sample survey, the optimum allocation of any characteristic may not be optimum for others. Thus the problem arises to find out an allocation which may be optimum for all characteristics in some sense. Therefore a compromise criterion is needed to workout such allocation. In this paper, the procedure of estimation of p-population means is discussed in the presence of nonresponse when the use of linear cost function is not advisable. A solution procedure is suggested by using lexicographic goal programming problem. The numerical illustrations are given for its practical utility.     

Compromise allocation in multivariate stratified surveys with stochastic quadratic cost function

In many real life situations the linear cost function does not approximate the actual cost incurred adequately. The cost of traveling between the units selected in the sample within a stratum is significant, instead of linear cost function. In this paper, we have considered the problem of finding a compromise allocation for a multivariate stratified sample survey with a significant travel cost within strata is formulated as a problem of non-linear stochastic programming with multiple objective functions. The compromise solutions are obtained through Chebyshev approximation technique, D ₁- distance and goal programming. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the computational details of the proposed methods.     

On Sample Allocation in Multivariate Surveys

The problem of a sample allocation between strata in the case of multiparameter surveys is considered in this article. There are several multivariate sample allocation methods and, moreover, several criteria to deal with in such a case. A maximum coefficient of variation of estimators of the population mean of characters under study is taken as the optimality criterion. This article contains a study on a group of the methods that are easy to implement and do not need complex numerical computation; however, they all are approximate. Five such methods are presented and compared using a simulation study. Finally, it is shown which methods should be considered when designing a survey in which the multivariate sample allocation is to be involved.     

Optimum Multivariate Stratified Sampling Designs with Travel Cost: A Multiobjective Integer Nonlinear Programming Approach

The problem of optimum allocation in stratified sampling and its solution is well known in sampling literature for univariate populations (see Cochran, 1977 Cochran , W. G. ( 1977 ). Sampling Techniques. , 3rd ed. New York : Wiley . [Google Scholar]; Sukhatme et al., 1984 Sukhatme , P. V. , Sukhatme , B. V. , Sukhatme , S. , Ashok , C. ( 1984 ). Sampling Theory of Surveys With Applications. , 3rd ed. Ames , and New Delhi : Iowa State University Press and Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics . [Google Scholar]). In multivariate populations where more than one characteristics are to be studied on every selected unit of the population the problem of finding an optimum allocation becomes more complex due to conflicting behaviour of characteristics. Various authors such as Dalenius (1953 Dalenius , T. ( 1953 ). The multivariate sampling problem . Skandinavisk Actuarietidskrift 36 : 92 – 102 . [Google Scholar], 1957 Dalenius , T. ( 1957 ). Sampling in Sweden. Contributions to the Methods and Theories of Sample Survey Practice . Stockholm : Almqvist and Wicksell . [Google Scholar]), Ghosh (1958 Ghosh , S. P. ( 1958 ). A note on stratified random sampling with multiple characters . Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 8 : 81 – 89 . [Google Scholar]), Yates (1960 Yates , F. ( 1960 ). Sampling Methods for Censuses and Surveys. , 3rd ed. London : Charles Griffin . [Google Scholar]), Aoyama (1963 Aoyama , H. ( 1963 ). Stratified random sampling with optimum allocation for multivariate populations . Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 14 : 251 – 258 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Gren (1964 Gren , J. ( 1964 ). Some methods of sample allocation in multivariate stratified sampling . Przeglad Statystyczny 11 : 361 – 369 (in Polish) . [Google Scholar], 1966 Gren , J. ( 1966 ). Some application of non-linear programming in sampling methods . Przeglad Statystyczny 13 : 203 – 217 (in Polish) . [Google Scholar]), Folks and Antle (1965 Folks , J. L. , Antle , C. E. ( 1965 ). Optimum allocation of sampling units to the strata when there are r responses of interest . Journal of American Statistical Association 60 : 225 – 233 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Hartley (1965 Hartley , H. O. (1965). Multiple purpose optimum allocation in stratified sampling. Proc. Amer. Statist. Assoc. Social Statist. Sec. 258–261. [Google Scholar]), Kokan and Khan (1967 Kokan , A. R. , Khan , S. U. ( 1967 ). Optimum allocation in multivariate surveys: An analytical solution . Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 29 : 115 – 125 . [Google Scholar]), Chatterjee (1972 Chatterjee , S. ( 1972 ). A study of optimum allocation in multivariate stratified surveys . Skandinavisk Actuarietidskrift 55 : 73 – 80 . [Google Scholar]), Ahsan and Khan (1977 Ahsan , M. J. , Khan , S. U. ( 1977 ). Optimum allocation in multivariate stratified random sampling using prior information . Journal of Indian Statistical Association 15 : 57 – 67 . [Google Scholar], 1982 Ahsan , M. J. , Khan , S. U. ( 1982 ). Optimum allocation in multivariate stratified random sampling with overhead cost . Metrika 29 : 71 – 78 .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), Chromy (1987 Chromy , J. R. ( 1987 ). Design optimization with multiple objectives. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods, 194–199 . [Google Scholar]), Wywial (1988 Wywial , J. ( 1988 ). Minimizing the spectral radius of means vector from sample variance-covariance matrix sample allocation between strata. Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wroclawiu 404:223–235 (in Polish) . [Google Scholar]), Bethel (1989 Bethel , J. ( 1989 ). Sample allocation in multivariate surveys . Survey Methodology 15 : 47 – 57 . [Google Scholar]), Kreienbrock (1993 Kreienbrock , L. ( 1993 ). Generalized measures of dispersion to solve the allocation problem in multivariate stratified random sampling . Communication in Statistics—Theory and Methds 22 : 219 – 239 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Jahan et al. (1994 Jahan , N. , Khan , M. G. M. , Ahsan , M. J. ( 1994 ). A generalized compromise allocation . Journal of the Indian Statistical Association 32 : 95 – 101 . [Google Scholar]), Khan et al. (1997 Khan , M. G. M. , Ahsan , M. J. , Jahan , N. ( 1997 ). Compromise allocation in multivariate stratified sampling: An integer solution . Naval Research Logistics 44 : 69 – 79 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Khan et al. (2003 Khan , M. G. M. , Khan , E. A. , Ahsan , M. J. ( 2003 ). An optimal multivariate stratified sampling design using dynamic programming . Australian & New Zealand J. Statist. 45 : 107 – 113 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Ahsan et al. (2005 Ahsan , M. J. , Najmussehar, Khan , M. G. M. ( 2005 ). Mixed allocation in stratified sampling . Aligarh Journal of Statistics 25 : 87 – 97 . [Google Scholar]), Díaz-García and Ulloa (2006 Díaz-García , J. A. , Ulloa , C. L. ( 2006 ). Optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling: Multi-objective programming. Comunicación Técnica No. I-06-07/28-03-206 (PE/CIMAT), Guanajuato, México . [Google Scholar], 2008 Díaz-García , J. A. , Ulloa , C. L. ( 2008 ). Multi-objective optimization for optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling . Survey Methodology 34 : 215 – 222 .[Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Ahsan et al. (2009 Ansari , A. H. , Najmussehar, Ahsan , M. J. ( 2009 ). On multiple response stratified random sampling design . International Journal of Statistical Sciences , Kolkata, India, 1(1):1–11 . [Google Scholar]) etc. used different compromise criteria to work out a compromise allocation that is optimum for all characteristics in some sense.

Almost all the previous authors used some function of the sampling variances of the estimators of various characteristics to be measured as an objective that is to be minimized for a fixed cost given as a linear function of sample allocations. Because the variances are not unit free it is more logical to consider the minimization of some function of squared coefficient of variations as an objective. Previously this concept was used by Kozok (2006 Kozok , M. ( 2006 ). On sample allocation in multivariate surveys . Communication in Statistics—Simulation and Computation 35 : 901 – 910 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]).

Furthermore, investigators have to approach the sampled units in order to get the observations. This involves some travel cost. Usually this cost is neglected while constructing a cost function. This travel cost may be significant in some surveys. For example if the strata consist of some geographically difficult-to-approach areas.

The authors problem of optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling is discussed with an objective to minimize simultaneously the coefficients of variation of the estimators of various characteristics under a cost constraint that includes the measurement as well as travel cost. The formulated problem of obtaining an optimum compromise allocation turns out to be a multiobjective all-integer nonlinear programming problem. Three different approaches are considered: the value function approach, ∈ –constraint method, and Distance–based method, to obtain compromise allocations. The cost function considered also includes the travel cost within stratum to reach the selected units. Additional restrictions are placed on the sample sizes to avoid oversampling and ensure the availability of the estimates of the strata variances. Numerical examples are also presented to illustrate the computational details of the proposed methods.     

Fuzzy multi-objective optimization for optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling with quadratic cost and parabolic fuzzy numbers

This article deals with the uncertainties in a multivariate stratified sampling problem. The uncertain parameters of the problem, such as stratum standard deviations, measurement costs, travel costs and total budget of the survey, are considered as parabolic fuzzy numbers and the problem is formulated as a fuzzy multi-objective nonlinear programming problem with quadratic cost function. Using α-cut, parabolic fuzzy numbers are defuzzified and then the compromise allocations of the problem are obtained by fuzzy programming for a prescribed value of α. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed problem a numerical example is solved with the help of [LINGO User?s Guid. Lindo Systems Inc., 1415 North Dayton Street, Chicago,Illinois-60622, (USA), 2013] software and the derived compromise optimum allocation is compared with deterministic and proportional allocations.     

Compromise Allocation in Univariate Stratified Sampling

To reduce the loss of efficiency in the Neyman allocation caused by using the estimators instead of the unknown strata standard deviations of population, we suggest a compromise allocation that the Neyman allocation using an estimator of the pooled standard deviation of combined strata and the proportional allocation are used together. It is shown that the compromise allocation makes the estimator more efficient than the proportional allocation and the Neyman allocation using the estimated strata standard deviations. Simulation study is carried out for the numerical comparison and the results are reported.     

Multi-objective nonlinear programming problem approach in multivariate stratified sample surveys in the case of non-response

In multivariate cases, usually the minimization of sampling variances is considered as an objective under a cost constraint. Since the variances are not unit free, it is more logical to consider the minimization of the squared coefficients of variation as an objective. In this paper, the problem of optimum compromise allocation in multivariate stratified sampling in the case of non-response as a multi-objective all-integer nonlinear programming problem is described. A solution procedure using four different approaches is considered, namely the value function, goal programming,∈-constraint and distance based, to obtain the compromise allocation for non-response. A numerical example is also presented to illustrate the computational details.     

Optimum multivariate stratified double sampling design: Chebyshev's Goal Programming approach

In stratified sampling when strata weights are unknown a double sampling technique may be used to estimate them. A large simple random sample from the unstratified population is drawn and units falling in each stratum are recorded. A stratified random sample is then selected and simple random subsamples are obtained out of the previously selected units of the strata. This procedure is called double sampling for stratification. If the problem of non-response is there, then subsamples are divided into classes of respondents and non-respondents. A second subsample is then obtained out of the non-respondents and an attempt is made to obtain the information by increasing efforts, persuasion and call backs. In this paper, the problem of obtaining a compromise allocation in multivariate stratified random sampling is discussed when strata weights are unknown and non-response is present. The problem turns out to be a multiobjective non-linear integer programming problem. An approximation of the problem to an integer linear programming problem by linearizing the non-linear objective functions at their individual optima is worked out. Chebyshev's goal programming technique is then used to solve the approximated problem. A numerical example is also presented to exhibit the practical application of the developed procedure.     

Employment status and education/employment relationship of PhD graduates from the University of Ferrara

Two sample surveys of Post-Docs were planned and carried out at the University of Ferrara in 2004 and 2007 aimed at determining the professional status of Post-Docs, the relationship between their PhD education and employment, and their satisfaction with certain aspects of the education and research program. As part of these surveys, two methodological contributions were developed. The first concerns an extension of the non-parametric combination of dependent rankings to construct a synthesis of composite indicators measuring satisfaction with particular aspects of PhD programs [R. Arboretti Giancristofaro and L. Salmaso, Global ranking indicators with application to the evaluation of PhD programs, Atti del Convegno “Valutazione e Customer Satisfaction per la Qualità dei Servizi”, Roma, 8–9 Settembre 2005, pp. 19–22; R. Arboretti Giancristofaro, S. Bonnini, and L. Salmaso, A performance indicator for multivariate data, Quad. Stat. 9 (2007), pp. 1–29; R. Arboretti Giancristofaro, F. Pesarin, and L. Salmaso, Nonparametric approaches for multivariate testing with mixed variables and for ranking on ordered categorical variables with an application to the evaluation of PhD programs, in Real Data Analysis, S. Sawilowsky, ed., a volume in Quantitative Methods in Education and the Behavioral Sciences: Issues, Research and Teaching, Ronald C. Serlin, series ed., Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, North Carolina, 2007, pp. 355–385]. The procedure was applied to highlight differences in the interviewed Post-Docs’ multivariate satisfaction profiles in relation to two aspects: education/employment relationship; employment expectations; and opportunities. The second consists of an inferential procedure providing a solution to the problem of hypothesis testing, where the objective is to compare the heterogeneity of two populations on the basis of sampling data [G.R. Arboretti, S. Bonnini, and F. Pesarin, A permutation approach for testing heterogeneity in two-sample categorical variables, Stat. Comput. (2009) doi: 10.1007/S11222-008-9085-8.]. The procedure was applied to compare the degrees of heterogeneity of Post-Doc judgments in the two surveys with regard to the adequacy of the PhD education for the work carried out.     

Designing stratified sampling in economic and business surveys

In most economic and business surveys, the target variables (e.g. turnover of enterprises, income of households, etc.) commonly resemble skewed distributions with many small and few large units. In such surveys, if a stratified sampling technique is used as a method of sampling and estimation, the convenient way of stratification such as the use of demographical variables (e.g. gender, socioeconomic class, geographical region, religion, ethnicity, etc.) or other natural criteria, which is widely practiced in economic surveys, may fail to form homogeneous strata and is not much useful in order to increase the precision of the estimates of variables of interest. In this paper, a stratified sampling design for economic surveys based on auxiliary information has been developed, which can be used for constructing optimum stratification and determining optimum sample allocation to maximize the precision in estimate.     

Optimal stratification in stratified designs using weibull-distributed auxiliary information

Sampling has evolved into a universally accepted approach for gathering information and data mining as it is widely accepted that a reasonably modest-sized sample can sufficiently characterize a much larger population. In stratified sampling designs, the whole population is divided into homogeneous strata in order to achieve higher precision in the estimation. This paper proposes an efficient method of constructing optimum stratum boundaries (OSB) and determining optimum sample size (OSS) for the survey variable. The survey variable may not be available in practice since the variable of interest is unavailable prior to conducting the survey. Thus, the method is based on the auxiliary variable which is usually readily available from past surveys. To illustrate the application as an example using a real data, the auxiliary variable considered for this problem follows Weibull distribution. The stratification problem is formulated as a Mathematical Programming Problem (MPP) that seeks minimization of the variance of the estimated population parameter under Neyman allocation. The solution procedure employs the dynamic programming technique, which results in substantial gains in the precision of the estimates of the population characteristics.     

Efficient estimators for adaptive stratified sequential sampling

In stratified sampling, methods for the allocation of effort among strata usually rely on some measure of within-stratum variance. If we do not have enough information about these variances, adaptive allocation can be used. In adaptive allocation designs, surveys are conducted in two phases. Information from the first phase is used to allocate the remaining units among the strata in the second phase. Brown et al. [Adaptive two-stage sequential sampling, Popul. Ecol. 50 (2008), pp. 239–245] introduced an adaptive allocation sampling design – where the final sample size was random – and an unbiased estimator. Here, we derive an unbiased variance estimator for the design, and consider a related design where the final sample size is fixed. Having a fixed final sample size can make survey-planning easier. We introduce a biased Horvitz–Thompson type estimator and a biased sample mean type estimator for the sampling designs. We conduct two simulation studies on honey producers in Kurdistan and synthetic zirconium distribution in a region on the moon. Results show that the introduced estimators are more efficient than the available estimators for both variable and fixed sample size designs, and the conventional unbiased estimator of stratified simple random sampling design. In order to evaluate efficiencies of the introduced designs and their estimator furthermore, we first review some well-known adaptive allocation designs and compare their estimator with the introduced estimators. Simulation results show that the introduced estimators are more efficient than available estimators of these well-known adaptive allocation designs.     

Testing equality of generalized variances of k multivariate normal populations

Generalized variance is a measure of dispersion of multivariate data. Comparison of dispersion of multivariate data is one of the favorite issues for multivariate quality control, generalized homogeneity of multidimensional scatter, etc. In this article, the problem of testing equality of generalized variances of k multivariate normal populations by using the Bartlett's modified likelihood ratio test (BMLRT) is proposed. Simulations to compare the Type I error rate and power of the BMLRT and the likelihood ratio test (LRT) methods are performed. These simulations show that the BMLRT method has a better chi-square approximation under the null hypothesis. Finally, a practical example is given.     

The Equivalence of Neyman Optimum Allocation for Sampling and Equal Proportions for Apportioning the U.S. House of Representatives

We present a surprising though obvious result that seems to have been unnoticed until now. In particular, we demonstrate the equivalence of two well-known problems—the optimal allocation of the fixed overall sample size n among L strata under stratified random sampling and the optimal allocation of the H = 435 seats among the 50 states for apportionment of the U.S. House of Representatives following each decennial census. In spite of the strong similarity manifest in the statements of the two problems, they have not been linked and they have well-known but different solutions; one solution is not explicitly exact (Neyman allocation), and the other (equal proportions) is exact. We give explicit exact solutions for both and note that the solutions are equivalent. In fact, we conclude by showing that both problems are special cases of a general problem. The result is significant for stratified random sampling in that it explicitly shows how to minimize sampling error when estimating a total T_Y while keeping the final overall sample size fixed at n; this is usually not the case in practice with Neyman allocation where the resulting final overall sample size might be near n + L after rounding. An example reveals that controlled rounding with Neyman allocation does not always lead to the optimum allocation, that is, an allocation that minimizes variance.     

Statistical considerations in bioequivalence of two area under the concentration–time curves obtained from serial sampling data

In this paper, we study the bioequivalence (BE) inference problem motivated by pharmacokinetic data that were collected using the serial sampling technique. In serial sampling designs, subjects are independently assigned to one of the two drugs; each subject can be sampled only once, and data are collected at K distinct timepoints from multiple subjects. We consider design and hypothesis testing for the parameter of interest: the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC). Decision rules in demonstrating BE were established using an equivalence test for either the ratio or logarithmic difference of two AUCs. The proposed t-test can deal with cases where two AUCs have unequal variances. To control for the type I error rate, the involved degrees-of-freedom were adjusted using Satterthwaite's approximation. A power formula was derived to allow the determination of necessary sample sizes. Simulation results show that, when the two AUCs have unequal variances, the type I error rate is better controlled by the proposed method compared with a method that only handles equal variances. We also propose an unequal subject allocation method that improves the power relative to that of the equal and symmetric allocation. The methods are illustrated using practical examples.     

Multiobjective Stochastic Multivariate Stratified Sampling in Presence of Nonresponse

The case of nonresponse in multivariate stratified sampling survey was first introduced by Hansen and Hurwitz in 1946 considering the sampling variances and costs to be deterministic. However, in real life situations sampling variance and cost are often random (stochastic) and have probability distributions. In this article, we have formulated the multivariate stratified sampling in the presence of nonresponse with random sampling variances and costs as a multiobjective stochastic programming problem. Here, the sampling variance and costs are considered random and converted into a deterministic NLPP by using chance constraint and modified E-model. A solution procedure using three different approaches are adopted viz. goal programming, fuzzy programming, and D₁ distance method to obtain the compromise allocation for the formulated problem. An empirical study has also been provided to illustrate the computational details.     

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION IN LINEAR MODELS WITH EQUI-CORRELATED RANDOM ERRORS

Necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of maximum likelihood estimators of unknown parameters in linear models with equi‐correlated random errors are presented. The basic technique we use is that these models are, first, orthogonally transformed into linear models with two variances, and then the maximum likelihood estimation problem is solved in the environment of transformed models. Our results generalize a result of Arnold, S. F. (1981) [The theory of linear models and multivariate analysis. Wiley, New York]. In addition, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of restricted maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters. The results of Birkes, D. & Wulff, S. (2003) [Existence of maximum likelihood estimates in normal variance‐components models. J Statist Plann. Inference. 113 , 35–47] are compared with our results and differences are pointed out.     

Some robust tests of independence in symmetrical multivariate distributions

Let X =(x)^ij=(11¹, …, X,)_T, i = l, …n, be an n X random matrix having multivariate symmetrical distributions with parameters μ, Σ. The p-variate normal with mean μ and covariance matrix is a member of this family. Let be the squared multiple correlation coefficient between the first and the succeeding p₁ components, and let p² = + be the squared multiple correlation coefficient between the first and the remaining p₁ + p₂ =p – 1 components of the p-variate normal vector. We shall consider here three testing problems for multivariate symmetrical distributions. They are (A) to test p² =0 against; (B) to test against =0, 0; (C) to test against p² =0, We have shown here that for problem (A) the uniformly most powerful invariant (UMPI) and locally minimax test for the multivariate normal is UMPI and is locally minimax as p² 0 for multivariate symmetrical distributions. For problem (B) the UMPI and locally minimax test is UMPI and locally minimax as for multivariate symmetrical distributions. For problem (C) the locally best invariant (LBI) and locally minimax test for the multivariate normal is also LBI and is locally minimax as for multivariate symmetrical distributions.