A Confidence Interval and Test for the Mean of an Asymmetric Distribution

ABSTRACT

A confidence interval and test are obtained for the mean of an asymmetric distribution using a random sample of size n. The method is based on N. J. Johnson's (1978 Johnson , N. J. ( 1978 ). Modified, t tests and confidence intervals for asymmetrical populations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 73 ( 363 ): 536 – 544 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) modified t-test, where terms of Cornish–Fisher expansions involving the third moment are used to adjust the conventional statistic to have more closely a Student's t-distribution with n ? 1 degrees of freedom. Johnson's (1978 Johnson , N. J. ( 1978 ). Modified, t tests and confidence intervals for asymmetrical populations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 73 ( 363 ): 536 – 544 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) test cannot be inverted uniquely, so a corresponding confidence interval for the mean may be disjointed. However, an artificial term of small order can be added to make inversion of the test a uniquely defined operation, which prevents such disjointedness. The resulting one-sided and two-sided intervals perform better than others in the literature with skewed distributions, and have good performance with a normal distribution. The two-sided interval may be recommended for general use if the sample size is 10 or more and the nominal confidence coefficient is 95% or less, or if the sample size is 30 or more and the confidence coefficient is 99% or less.     

A Classroom Approach to the Construction of an Approximate Confidence Interval of a Poisson Mean Using One Observation

Even elementary statistical problems may give rise to a deeper and broader discussion of issues in probability and statistics. The construction of an approximate confidence interval for a Poisson mean turns out to be such a case. The simple standard two-sided Wald confidence interval by normal approximation is discussed and compared with the score interval. The discussion is partly in the form of an imaginary dialog between a teacher and a student, where the latter is supposed to have studied mathematical statistics for at least one semester.     

On the Parameter Estimation of the Asymmetric Multivariate Laplace Distribution

This article examines a family of three-parameter multivariate Laplace distributions ML _p (a, μ, Σ) which is closed under constant shifts. Parameter vectors a and μ are called shift and shape parameter, respectively, positive definite p × p-matrix Σ is a scale parameter. The first three moments are derived and used for estimating the parameters. The behavior of the obtained estimates is explored in a simulation experiment.     

Efficient Confidence Interval Methodologies for the Non Centrality Parameter of a Non Central t Distribution

This article considers the problem of constructing a confidence interval for the non centrality parameter of a non central t distribution. This has applications to the signal to noise ratio in regression problems and to the coefficient of variation for normally distributed data. A new procedure is developed that provides shorter confidence intervals than the standard procedure, and a program is available for its implementation. This new procedure will be useful for practitioners, and its development also provides some interesting theoretical results.     

Improved Confidence Statements for the Binomial Parameter

In the computation of two-sided confidence intervals for the binomial parameter p (using the binomial mass function), it is known that such intervals achieve a confidence coefficient that in general is not equal to the confidence level 1 – α, say. In this article we present some general results on the confidence coefficient and tabulate them for selected pairs (α, n = number of trials). We treat only the nominal equal tail probability case because it is the most commonly taught and used.     

Invariance,Optimality, and a 1-Observation Confidence Interval for a Normal Mean

In a 1965 Decision Theory course at Stanford University, Charles Stein began a digression with “an amusing problem”: is there a proper confidence interval for the mean based on a single observation from a normal distribution with both mean and variance unknown? Stein introduced the interval with endpoints ± c|X| and showed indeed that for c large enough, the minimum coverage probability (over all values for the mean and variance) could be made arbitrarily near one. While the problem and coverage calculation were in the author’s hand-written notes from the course, there was no development of any optimality result for the interval. Here, the Hunt–Stein construction plus analysis based on special features of the problem provides a “minimax” rule in the sense that it minimizes the maximum expected length among all procedures with fixed coverage (or, equivalently, maximizes the minimal coverage among all procedures with a fixed expected length). The minimax rule is a mixture of two confidence procedures that are equivariant under scale and sign changes, and are uniformly better than the classroom example or the natural interval X ± c|X|?.     

Lower Confidence Limits on the Generalized Exponential Distribution Percentiles Under Progressive Type-I Interval Censoring

In industrial life test and survival analysis, the percentile estimation is always a practical issue with lower confidence bound required for maintenance purpose. Sampling distributions for the maximum likelihood estimators of percentiles are usually unknown. Bootstrap procedures are common ways to estimate the unknown sampling distributions. Five parametric bootstrap procedures are proposed to estimate the confidence lower bounds on maximum likelihood estimators for the generalized exponential (GE) distribution percentiles under progressive type-I interval censoring. An intensive simulation is conducted to evaluate the performances of proposed procedures. Finally, an example of 112 patients with plasma cell myeloma is given for illustration.     

Confidence Interval for Shrinkage Parameters in Ridge Regression

In ridge regression, the estimation of ridge parameter k is an important problem. There are several methods available in the literature to do this job some what efficiently. However, no attempts were made to suggest a confidence interval for the ridge parameter using the knwoledge from the data. In this article, we propose a data dependent confidence interval for the ridge parameter k. The method of obtaining the confidence interval is illustrated with the help of a data set. A simulation study indicates that the empirical coverage probability of the suggested confidence intervals are quite high.     

Exact Interval Estimation for the Scale Family Under General Progressive Type-II Censoring

In this article, we consider a general progressively Type-II censored life test where the lifetime distribution of each test unit belongs to the scale family. We derive an exact confidence interval for the scale parameter. Using Monte Carlo simulation method, we assess the expected lower and upper limits of the proposed confidence interval for the exponential distribution. Finally, we present a numerical example to illustrate the proposed procedure.     

Modifications of the Empirical Likelihood Interval Estimation with Improved Coverage Probabilities

The empirical likelihood (EL) technique has been well addressed in both the theoretical and applied literature in the context of powerful nonparametric statistical methods for testing and interval estimations. A nonparametric version of Wilks theorem (Wilks, 1938 Wilks , S. S. ( 1938 ). The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses . Annals of Mathematical Statistics 9 : 60 – 62 .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) can usually provide an asymptotic evaluation of the Type I error of EL ratio-type tests. In this article, we examine the performance of this asymptotic result when the EL is based on finite samples that are from various distributions. In the context of the Type I error control, we show that the classical EL procedure and the Student's t-test have asymptotically a similar structure. Thus, we conclude that modifications of t-type tests can be adopted to improve the EL ratio test. We propose the application of the Chen (1995 Chen , L. ( 1995 ). Testing the mean of skewed distributions . Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 : 767 – 772 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) t-test modification to the EL ratio test. We display that the Chen approach leads to a location change of observed data whereas the classical Bartlett method is known to be a scale correction of the data distribution. Finally, we modify the EL ratio test via both the Chen and Bartlett corrections. We support our argument with theoretical proofs as well as a Monte Carlo study. A real data example studies the proposed approach in practice.     

Interval estimation for a lower-truncated distribution based on the double Type-II censored sample

ABSTRACT

The interval estimation problem is investigated for the parameters of a general lower truncated distribution under double Type-II censoring scheme. The exact, asymptotic and bootstrap interval estimates are derived for the unknown model parameter and the lower truncated threshold bound. One real-life example and a numerical study are presented to illustrate performance of our methods.     

Generalized Confidence Interval for the Scale Parameter of the Power-Law Process

The power-law process is widely used in the analysis of repairable system reliability. In this article, interval estimation for the scale parameter is investigated under some general conditions. A procedure to derive a generalized confidence interval for the scale parameter is presented. We also study the accuracy of the generalized confidence interval by Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, two examples are shown to illustrate the proposed procedure.     

Confidence interval for residual mean absolute deviation in regression models

The classic confidence interval for a residual variance is hypersensitive to minor violations of the normality assumption and its robustness does not improve with increasing sample size. An approximate confidence interval for a residual mean absolute deviation is proposed and shown to be robust to moderate violations of the normality assumption with robustness that improves with increasing sample size.     

A Stepwise Confidence Interval Procedure Under Unknown Variances Based on an Asymmetric Loss Function for Toxicological Evaluation

One of the most important issues in toxicity studies is the identification of the equivalence of treatments with a placebo. Because it is unacceptable to declare non‐equivalent treatments to be equivalent, it is important to adopt a reliable statistical method to properly control the family‐wise error rate (FWER). In dealing with this issue, it is important to keep in mind that overestimating toxicity equivalence is a more serious error than underestimating toxicity equivalence. Consequently asymmetric loss functions are more appropriate than symmetric loss functions. Recently Tao, Tang & Shi (2010) developed a new procedure based on an asymmetric loss function. However, their procedure is somewhat unsatisfactory because it assumes that the variances of various dose levels are known. This assumption is restrictive for some applications. In this study we propose an improved approach based on asymmetric confidence intervals without the restrictive assumption of known variances. The asymmetry guarantees reliability in the sense that the FWER is well controlled. Although our procedure is developed assuming that the variances of various dose levels are unknown but equal, simulation studies show that our procedure still performs quite well when the variances are unequal.     

Optimal Progressive Type-II Censoring Schemes for Nonparametric Confidence Intervals of Quantiles

In this article, optimal progressive censoring schemes are examined for the nonparametric confidence intervals of population quantiles. The results obtained can be universally applied to any continuous probability distribution. By using the interval mass as an optimality criterion, the optimization process is free of the actual observed values from the sample and needs only the initial sample size n and the number of complete failures m. Using several sample sizes combined with various degrees of censoring, the results of the optimization are presented here for the population median at selected levels of confidence (99, 95, and 90%). With the optimality criterion under consideration, the efficiencies of the worst progressive Type-II censoring scheme and ordinary Type-II censoring scheme are also examined in comparison to the best censoring scheme obtained for fixed n and m.     

On an Extension of the Exponentiated Weibull Distribution

In this article, the exponentiated Weibull distribution is extended by the Marshall-Olkin family. Our new four-parameter family has a hazard rate function with various desired shapes depending on the choice of its parameters and, thus, it is very flexible in data modeling. It also contains two mixed distributions with applications to series and parallel systems in reliability and also contains several previously known lifetime distributions. We shall study some basic distributional properties of the new distribution. Some closed forms are derived for its moment generating function and moments as well as moments of its order statistics. The model parameters are estimated by the maximum likelihood method. The stress–strength parameter and its estimation are also investigated. Finally, an application of the new model is illustrated using two real datasets.     

Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for the Mean of Multivariate Poisson Distribution: A Comparison

Haibing (2009) proposed a procedure for successive comparisons between ordered treatment effects in one-way layout and showed that the proposed procedure has greater power than the procedure proposed by Lee and Spurrier (1995). Critical constants required for the proposed procedure were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation and few values of the constants were tabulated which limit the applications of the proposed procedure. In this article, a numerical method, using recursive integration methodology, is discussed to compute the critical constants which work efficiently for a large number of treatments and extensive values of critical constants are tabulated for the use of practitioners. Power comparisons of Haibing's and Lee and Spurrier's procedure is also discussed.     

Interval Estimation of the Stress-Strength Reliability with Independent Normal Random Variables

This article develops a procedure to obtain highly accurate confidence interval estimates for the stress-strength reliability R = P(X > Y) where X and Y are data from independent normal distributions of unknown means and variances. Our method is based on third-order likelihood analysis and is compared to the conventional first-order likelihood ratio procedure as well as the approximate methods of Reiser and Guttman (1986 Reiser, B., Guttman, I. (1986). Statistical inference for Pr(Y < X): the normal case. Technometrics 28: 253257.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Guo and Krishnamoorthy (2004 Guo, H., Krishnamoorthy, K. (2004). New approximate inferential methods for the reliability parameter in a stress-strength model: the normal case. Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 33: 17151731.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). The use of our proposed method is illustrated by an empirical example and its superior accuracy in terms of coverage probability and error rate are examined through Monte Carlo simulation studies.     

Sequential Fixed-Width Confidence Interval for a Function of the Parameters

Let X₁…, X_m and Y₁…, Y_n be two independent sequences of i.i.d. random variables with distribution functions F_x(.|θ) and F_y(. | φ) respectively. Let g(θ, φ) be a real-valued function of the unknown parameters θ and φ. The purpose of this paper is to suggest a sequential procedure which gives a fixed-width confidence interval for g(θ, φ) so that the coverage probability is approximately α (preas-signed). Certain asymptotic optimality properties of the sequential procedure are established. A Monte Carlo study is presented.     

On evaluating the performance of different forecasters

In this article, we have evaluated the performance of different forecasters and tested association between their performances for different pairs of variables. We have used three data sets of track records of professional U.S. economic forecasters participating in the Blue Chip consensus forecasting service (the data sets contain the root mean square errors (RMSE) of different forecasters for different years). To evaluate the performance of forecasters we have covered three well-known tests, namely the usual F test (cf. Fisher (1923 Fisher, R. A., Mackenzie, M. A. (1923). Studied in crop variation II. The manurial response of different potato. Journal of Agricultural Science 13:311–320. [Google Scholar])), Kruskal Wallis test (cf. Kruskal and Wallis (1952 Kruskall, W. H., Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of American Statistical Association 47:583–621. [Google Scholar])), and Extension of Median test (cf. Daniel (1990 Daniel, W. W. (1990). Applied Nonparametric Statistics. Duxbury Classic Series. (2nd Ed.), Boston. [Google Scholar])). To test the association between the forecaster's performances for different pairs of variables, we have considered Gini mean correlation coefficient r_g1 (cf. Yitzhaki, S., and Olkin, I. (1991 Yitzhaki, S., Olkin, I. (1991). Concentration indices and concentration curves, in K. Mosler and M. Scarsini (eds.), Stochastic Orders and Decisions under Risk, Institute of Mathematical Statistics: Lecture-Notes Monograph Series, 19, 1991, 380–392. [Google Scholar]) and Yitzhaki (2003 Yitzaki, S. (2003). Gini mean difference: A superior measure of variability for non normal distribution. Metron-International Journal of Statistics, LXI:285–316. [Google Scholar])), Modified rank correlation coefficient (cf. Zimmerman (1994 Zimmerman, D. W. (1994). A Note on modified rank correlation. Journal of educational and Behavioral Statistics 19:357–362. [Google Scholar])) and three modifications of Spearman rank correlation coefficient. We have observed that different forecasters do not necessarily offer same average performance. Moreover, an evidence of association between two criteria does not always lead us reaching at the same decision. The outcomes of the study may help the practitioners in selecting the best forecaster(s) for policymaking purposes.