Probability density function of quotient of order statistics from the pareto,power and weibull distributions

This paper deals with the probability density functions of quotient of order statistics. We use the Mellin transform technique, to find the distribution of the quotient Z= X/Xwhere X.,X(i < j) are the ith and jth order statistics from the Pareto, Power and Weibull distributions     

The order statistics of exponential,power function and pareto distributions and some applications

Some relations between the exponential, the Pareto and the Power function distributions and their order statistics are given. These relations are employed to obtain some characterization theorems of Pareto and Power distributions.     

Multilevel maximum likelihood estimation with application to covariance matrices

The asymptotic variance of the maximum likelihood estimate is proved to decrease when the maximization is restricted to a subspace that contains the true parameter value. Maximum likelihood estimation allows a systematic fitting of covariance models to the sample, which is important in data assimilation. The hierarchical maximum likelihood approach is applied to the spectral diagonal covariance model with different parameterizations of eigenvalue decay, and to the sparse inverse covariance model with specified parameter values on different sets of nonzero entries. It is shown computationally that using smaller sets of parameters can decrease the sampling noise in high dimension substantially.     

Optimum linear unbiased estimation of the scale parameter by absolute values of order statistics in the double exponential and the double weibull distributions

The first two moments and product moments of absolute values of order statistics are obtained for the double exponential and the double Weibull distributions. In both of the distributions an optimum linear unbiased estimator of the scale parameter, by absolute values of the order statistics, is obtained from complete and censored samples of size n=3(1)10. It is found that the new estimator is generally more efficient than the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) of the scale parameter by order statistcs in both of the distributions.     

On the maximum likelihood estimation of the location and scale parameters of exponential distribution based on multiply Type II censored samples

The maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of the location and scale parameters of an exponential distribution based on singly and doubly censored samples is given. When the sample is multiply censored (some middle observations being censored), however, the ML method does not admit explicit solutions. In this case we present a simple approximation to the likelihood equation and derive explicit estimators which are linear functions of order statistics. Finally, we present some examples to illustrate this method of estimation.     

Linear estimation of the location and scale parameters based on selected order statistics

This paper gives a review of the best linear estimates of the location and/or scale parameters based on a few order statistics selected from a complete or censored sample. Small sample and large sample cases are considered and compared. Some examples of the practical applications of the estimates are outlined.     

Bayesian estimation and prediction with multiply Type-II censored samples of sequential order statistics from one- and two-parameter exponential distributions

Based on multiply Type-II censored samples of sequential order statistics, Bayesian estimators are derived for the parameters of one- and two-parameter exponential distributions. In the one-parameter set-up, the posterior density is obtained under the assumption that the prior distribution is given by an inverse Gamma distribution, and the Bayes estimator with respect to squared error loss is calculated. Its performance is illustrated by a numerical example and compared with two non-Bayesian estimators, namely the BLUE and the approximate maximum likelihood estimator (AMLE). Moreover, prediction of future failure times is considered. Minimum risk equivariant estimators and predictors are deduced from the given results. Finally, similar results are presented for the two-parameter situation.     

A useful property of order statistics and its application to UMVU estimation

Consider a random sample of sizen drawn from a continuous parent distributionF. A basic and useful known property associated with such sample is the following: the conditional distribution of thej ^th order statistic given a valuet of thei ^th order statistics, (j>i), coincides with the distribution of the(j?i) ^th order statistic in a sample of size (n?i) drawn from the parent distributionF truncated at the left att. In this article we mention some applications of this property, and provide a new application to the construction of an Uniformly Minimum Variance Unbiased (UMVU) estimator in the case of two-truncation parameters family of distributions.     

Some aspects of maximum likelihood estimation of multistage cancer dose-response odels with application

Quantitative cancer dose-response models play an important role in cancer risk assessment. They also play a role in regulatory processes associated with potential occupational or environmental exposures. The multistage model is currently the most widely used cancer dose-response model. This paper describes the construction of the likelihood function in the special case of the multistage cancer dose-response models. The concavity of the likelihood function is also established. A criterion is developed to determine the degree of the polynomial portion of the multistage model. Finally, the restricted and unrestricted maximum likelihood estimators are considered and applied to some experimental data sets.     

Unimodality of the pareto distribution likelihood function for multicensored samples and implications for estimation

This paper discusses maximum likelihood parameter estimation in the Pareto distribution for multicensored samples. In particu-

lar, the modality of the associated conditional log-likelihood function is investigated in order to resolve questions concerninc

the existence and uniqurneas of the lnarimum likelihood estimates.For the cases with one parameter known, the maximum likelihood

estimates of the remaining unknown parameters are shown to exist and to be unique. When both parameters are unknown, the maximum likelihood estimates may or may not exist and be unique. That is, their existence and uniqueness would seem to depend solely upon the information inherent in the sample data. In viav of the possible nonexistence and/or non-uniqueness of the maximum likelihood estimates when both parameters are unknown, alternatives to standard iterative numerical methods are explored.     

Improved estimation of common location of two exponential populations with order restricted scale parameters using censored samples

ABSTRACT

Estimation of common location parameter of two exponential populations is considered when the scale parameters are ordered using type-II censored samples. A general inadmissibility result is proved which helps in deriving improved estimators. Further, a class of estimators dominating the MLE has been derived by an application of integrated expression of risk difference (IERD) approach of Kubokawa. A discussion regarding extending the results to a general k( ? 2) populations has been done. Finally, all the proposed estimators are compared through simulation.     

On maximum likelihood estimation of the semi-parametric Cox model with time-varying covariates

Including time-varying covariates is a popular extension to the Cox model and a suitable approach for dealing with non-proportional hazards. However, partial likelihood (PL) estimation of this model has three shortcomings: (i) estimated regression coefficients can be less accurate in small samples with heavy censoring; (ii) the baseline hazard is not directly estimated and (iii) a covariance matrix for both the regression coefficients and the baseline hazard is not easily produced.We address these by developing a maximum likelihood (ML) approach to jointly estimate regression coefficients and baseline hazard using a constrained optimisation ensuring the latter''s non-negativity. We demonstrate asymptotic properties of these estimates and show via simulation their increased accuracy compared to PL estimates in small samples and show our method produces smoother baseline hazard estimates than the Breslow estimator.Finally, we apply our method to two examples, including an important real-world financial example to estimate time to default for retail home loans. We demonstrate using our ML estimate for the baseline hazard can give much clearer corroboratory evidence of the ‘humped hazard’, whereby the risk of loan default rises to a peak and then later falls.     

Maximum likelihood estimators of the location and scale parameters of the exponential distribution from a censored sample

In this note explicit expressions are given for the maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters of the two-parameter exponential distribution, when a doubly censored sample is available.     

Semiparametric sieve maximum likelihood estimation under cure model with partly interval censored and left truncated data for application to spontaneous abortion

Lifetime Data Analysis - This work was motivated by observational studies in pregnancy with spontaneous abortion (SAB) as outcome. Clearly some women experience the SAB event but the rest do not....     

Bayes estimation for exponential distributions with common location parameter and applications to multi-state reliability models

This paper considers the estimation of the stress–strength reliability of a multi-state component or of a multi-state system where its states depend on the ratio of the strength and stress variables through a kernel function. The article presents a Bayesian approach assuming the stress and strength as exponentially distributed with a common location parameter but different scale parameters. We show that the limits of the Bayes estimators of both location and scale parameters under suitable priors are the maximum likelihood estimators as given by Ghosh and Razmpour [15 M. Ghosh and A. Razmpour, Estimation of the common location parameter of several exponentials, Sankhyā, Ser. A 46 (1984), pp. 383–394. [Google Scholar]]. We use the Bayes estimators to determine the multi-state stress–strength reliability of a system having states between 0 and 1. We derive the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimators of the reliability function. Interval estimation using the bootstrap method is also considered. Under the squared error loss function and linex loss function, risk comparison of the reliability estimators is carried out using extensive simulations.     

A comparison of bayes and maximum likelihood estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient

Two methods of estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient (p) for the one-way random effects model were compared in several simulation experiments using balanced and unbalanced designs. Estimates based on a Bayes approach and a maximum likelihood approach were compared on the basis of their biases (differences between estimates and true values of p) and mean square errors (mean square errors of estimates of p) in each of the simulation experiments. The Bayes approach used the median of a conditional posterior density as its estimator.     

The combined dynamically weighted modified maximum likelihood estimators of the location and scale parameters

In this study, two new types of estimators of the location and scale parameters are proposed having high efficiency and robustness; the dynamically weighted modified maximum likelihood (DWMML) and the combined dynamically weighted modified maximum likelihood (CDWMML) estimators. Three pairs of the DWMML and two pairs of the CDWMML estimators of the location and scale parameters are produced, namely, the DWMML1, the DWMML2 and the DWMML3, and the CDWMML1 and the CDWMML2 estimators, respectively. Based on the simulation results, the DWMML1 estimators of the location and scale parameters are almost fully efficient (under normality) and robust at the same time. The DWMML3 estimators are asymptotically fully efficient and more robust than the M-estimators. The DWMML2 estimators are a compromise between efficiency and robustness. The CDWMML1 and CDWMML2 estimators are jointly very efficient and robust. Particularly, the CDWMML1 and CDWMML2 estimators of the scale parameter are superior compared to the other estimators of the scale parameter.     

The biases associated with maximum likelihood methods of estimation of the multivariate logistic risk function

The posterior probability of an object belonging to one of two populations can be estimated using multivariate logistic regression. The bias associated with this procedure is derived In the context of normal populations with different mean vectors and a common covariance matrix and is compared with the bias of the classical method based on this normality assumption, -It Is found that the bias of the more robust procedure of logistic regression is of a lower order than that of the normality based method.     

Marginal maximum likelihood estimation methods for the tuning parameters of ridge,power ridge,and generalized ridge regression

This study introduces fast marginal maximum likelihood (MML) algorithms for estimating the tuning (shrinkage) parameter(s) of the ridge and power ridge regression models, and an automatic plug-in MML estimator for the generalized ridge regression model, in a Bayesian framework. These methods are applicable to multicollinear or singular covariate design matrices, including matrices where the number of covariates exceeds the sample size. According to analyses of many real and simulated datasets, these MML-based ridge methods tend to compare favorably to other tuning parameter selection methods, in terms of computation speed, prediction accuracy, and ability to detect relevant covariates.     

A comparison of maximum likelihood and least squares for the estimation of a cumulative distribution

Monte Carlo methods are used to compare the methods of maximum likelihood and least squares to estimate a cumulative distribution function. When the probabilistic model used is correct or nearly correct, the two methods produce similar results with the MLE usually slightly superior When an incorrect model is used, or when the data is contaminated, the least squares technique often gives substantially superior results.