Selecting the Best Exponential Population When the Scale Parameters are Bounded

Consider k (≥ 2) independent exponential populations with different location and scale parameters. Call a population associated with largest of unknown location parameters as the best population. For the goal of selecting the best population, it is established that if the scale parameters are completely unknown, then the indifference-zone probability requirement can not be guaranteed by any single sample decision rule which is just and translation invariant. Under the assumption that the scale parameters are bounded above by a known constant, a single sample selection procedure is proposed for which the indifference-zone probability requirement can be guaranteed. Under the same assumption, 100P*% simultaneous upper confidence intervals for all distances from the largest location parameter are also obtained.     

The simultaneous confidence intervals for all distances from the extreme populations for two-parameter exponential populations based on the multiply type II censored samples

Among k independent two-parameter exponential distributions which have the common scale parameter, the lower extreme population (LEP) is the one with the smallest location parameter and the upper extreme population (UEP) is the one with the largest location parameter. Given a multiply type II censored sample from each of these k independent two-parameter exponential distributions, 14 estimators for the unknown location parameters and the common unknown scale parameter are considered. Fourteen simultaneous confidence intervals (SCIs) for all distances from the extreme populations (UEP and LEP) and from the UEP from these k independent exponential distributions under the multiply type II censoring are proposed. The critical values are obtained by the Monte Carlo method. The optimal SCIs among 14 methods are identified based on the criteria of minimum confidence length for various censoring schemes. The subset selection procedures of extreme populations are also proposed and two numerical examples are given for illustration.     

SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR SCALE PARAMETERS USING TWO-SAMPLE U-STATISTICS

Let be k independent populations having the same known quantile of order p (0 p 1) and let F(x)=F(x/_i) be the absolutely continuous cumulative distribution function of the ith population indexed by the scale parameter ₁, i = 1,…, k. We propose subset selection procedures based on two-sample U-statistics for selecting a subset of k populations containing the one associated with the smallest scale parameter. These procedures are compared with the subset selection procedures based on two-sample linear rank statistics given by Gill & Mehta (1989) in the sense of Pitman asymptotic relative efficiency, with interesting results.     

A closed testing procedure for comparing successive exponential populations with respect to location parameter

Consider k independent random samples such that i^th sample is drawn from a two-parameter exponential population with location parameter μ_i and scale parameter θ_i,?i = 1, …, k. For simultaneously testing differences between location parameters of successive exponential populations, closed testing procedures are proposed separately for the following cases (i) when scale parameters are unknown and equal and (ii) when scale parameters are unknown and unequal. Critical constants required for the proposed procedures are obtained numerically and the selected values of the critical constants are tabulated. Simulation study revealed that the proposed procedures has better ability to detect the significant differences and has more power in comparison to exiting procedures. The illustration of the proposed procedures is given using real data.     

Studentized robust statistics for,main effects in a two-factor manova

Multiresponse experiments in two-faoior manova are considered. StalibLical procedures of the test and estimation, based on studentized robust statistics. for location parameters in the models arc piupused. Large sample properties of their procedures as the cell sizes tend to infinity are investigated. Although Fisher's consistency is assumed in the theory ol ili-estimators, it is not needed. in this paper. For the univariate case, it is found that the asymptotic relative efficiencies (ARE's) of the proposed procedures relative to classical procedures agrees with the classical A/Sisresults of Huber's one sample Mestimator relative to the sample mean. By simulation studies, it can be seen that the proposed estimators are more efficient than the least squares estimators except for the case where the underlying distribution is normal     

TESTS FOR DETECTING MORE NBU-NESS AT A SPECIFIC AGE

This paper proposes a class of non‐parametric test procedures for testing the null hypothesis that two distributions, F and G, are equal versus the alternative hypothesis that F is ‘more NBU (new better than used) at specified age t₀’ than G. Using Hoeffding's two‐sample U‐statistic theorem, it establishes the asymptotic normality of the test statistics and produces a class of asymptotically distribution‐free tests. Pitman asymptotic efficacies of the proposed tests are calculated with respect to the location and shape parameters. A numerical example is provided for illustrative purposes.     

Simultaneous upper confidence bounds for distances from the best two-parameter exponentlal distribution

Consider k independent exponential distributions possibly with different location parameters and a common scale parameter. If the best population is defined to be the one having the largest mean or equivalently having the largest location parameter, we then derive a set of simultaneous upper confidence bounds for all distances of the means from the largest one. These bounds not only can serve as confidence intervals for all distances from the largest parameter but they also can be used to identify the best population. Relationships to ranking and selection procedures are pointed out. Cases in which scale parameters are known or unknown and samples are complete or type II censored are considered. Tables to implement this procedure are given.     

Modified BLUEs and BLIEs of the location and scale parameters and the population mean using ranked set sampling

Ranked set sampling (RSS) is a sampling procedure that can be used to improve the cost efficiency of selecting sample units of an experiment or a study. In this paper, RSS is considered for estimating the location and scale parameters a and b>0, as well as the population mean from the family F((x?a)/b). Modified best linear unbiased estimators (BLUEs) and best linear invariant estimators (BLIEs) are considered. Numerical computations with different location-scale distributions and different sample sizes are conducted to assess the efficiency of the suggested estimators. It is found that the modified BLIEs are uniformly higher than that of BLUEs for all distributions considered in this study. The modified BLUE and BLIE are more efficient when the underlying distribution is symmetric.     

SELECTING THE t BEST POPULATIONS — SCALE PARAMETER CASE

Selection from k independent populations of the t (< k) populations with the smallest scale parameters has been considered under the Indifference Zone approach by Bechhofer k Sobel (1954). The same problem has been considered under the Subset Selection approach by Gupta & Sobel (1962a) for the normal variances case and by Carroll, Gupta & Huang (1975) for the more general case of stochastically increasing distributions. This paper uses the Subset Selection approach to place confidence bounds on the probability of selecting all “good” populations, or only “good” populations, for the Case of scale parameters, where a “good” population is defined to have one of the t smallest scale parameters. This is an extension of the location parameter results obtained by Bofinger & Mengersen (1986). Special results are obtained for the case of selecting normal populations based on variances and the necessary tables are presented.     

Lower bounds for expected sample size of sequential procedures for the multinomial selection problems

In this article, lower bounds for expected sample size of sequential selection procedures are constructed for the problem of selecting the most probable event of k-variate multinomial distribution. The study is based on Volodin’s universal lower bounds for expected sample size of statistical inference procedures. The obtained lower bounds are used to estimate the efficiency of some selection procedures in terms of their expected sample sizes.     

The skew generalized t distribution as the scale mixture of a skew exponential power distribution and its applications in robust estimation

In this paper, we consider the family of skew generalized t (SGT) distributions originally introduced by Theodossiou [P. Theodossiou, Financial data and the skewed generalized t distribution, Manage. Sci. Part 1 44 (12) ( 1998), pp. 1650–1661] as a skew extension of the generalized t (GT) distribution. The SGT distribution family warrants special attention, because it encompasses distributions having both heavy tails and skewness, and many of the widely used distributions such as Student's t, normal, Hansen's skew t, exponential power, and skew exponential power (SEP) distributions are included as limiting or special cases in the SGT family. We show that the SGT distribution can be obtained as the scale mixture of the SEP and generalized gamma distributions. We investigate several properties of the SGT distribution and consider the maximum likelihood estimation of the location, scale, and skewness parameters under the assumption that the shape parameters are known. We show that if the shape parameters are estimated along with the location, scale, and skewness parameters, the influence function for the maximum likelihood estimators becomes unbounded. We obtain the necessary conditions to ensure the uniqueness of the maximum likelihood estimators for the location, scale, and skewness parameters, with known shape parameters. We provide a simple iterative re-weighting algorithm to compute the maximum likelihood estimates for the location, scale, and skewness parameters and show that this simple algorithm can be identified as an EM-type algorithm. We finally present two applications of the SGT distributions in robust estimation.     

Selecting logistic populations using the sample medians

This paper is concerned primarily with subset selection procedures based on the sample mediansof logistic populations. A procedure is given which chooses a nonempty subset from among kindependent logistic populations, having a common known variance, so that the populations with thelargest location parameter is contained in the subset with a pre‐specified probability. Theconstants required to apply the median procedure with small sample sizes (≤= 19) are tabulated and can also be used to construct simultaneous confidence intervals. Asymptotic formulae are provided for application with larger sample sizes. It is shown that, under certain situations, rules based on the median are substantially more efficient than analogous procedures based either on sample means or on the sum of joint ranks.     

Pareto analysis based on records

Estimation of the parameters of an exponential distribution based on record data has been treated by Samaniego and Whitaker [On estimating population characteristics from record-breaking observations, I. Parametric results, Naval Res. Logist. Q. 33 (1986), pp. 531–543] and Doostparast [A note on estimation based on record data, Metrika 69 (2009), pp. 69–80]. Recently, Doostparast and Balakrishnan [Optimal record-based statistical procedures for the two-parameter exponential distribution, J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 81(12) (2011), pp. 2003–2019] obtained optimal confidence intervals as well as uniformly most powerful tests for one- and two-sided hypotheses concerning location and scale parameters based on record data from a two-parameter exponential model. In this paper, we derive optimal statistical procedures including point and interval estimation as well as most powerful tests based on record data from a two-parameter Pareto model. For illustrative purpose, a data set on annual wages of a sample of production-line workers in a large industrial firm is analysed using the proposed procedures.     

A comparison of estimation techniques for the three parameter pareto distribution

This paper compares minimum distance estimation with best linear unbiased estimation to determine which technique provides the most accurate estimates for location and scale parameters as applied to the three parameter Pareto distribution. Two minimum distance estimators are developed for each of the three distance measures used (Kolmogorov, Cramer‐von Mises, and Anderson‐Darling) resulting in six new estimators. For a given sample size 6 or 18 and shape parameter 1(1)4, the location and scale parameters are estimated. A Monte Carlo technique is used to generate the sample sets. The best linear unbiased estimator and the six minimum distance estimators provide parameter estimates based on each sample set. These estimates are compared using mean square error as the evaluation tool. Results show that the best linear unbaised estimator provided more accurate estimates of location and scale than did the minimum estimators tested.     

On Two Forms of Fisher's Measure of Information

ABSTRACT

Fisher's information number is the second moment of the “score function” where the derivative is with respect to x rather than Θ. It is Fisher's information for a location parameter, and also called shift-invariant Fisher information. In recent years, Fisher's information number has been frequently used in several places regardless of parameters of the distribution or of their nature. Is this number a nominal, standard, and typical measure of information? The Fisher information number is examined in light of the properties of classical statistical information theory. It has some properties analogous to those of Fisher's measure, but, in general, it does not have good properties if used as a measure of information when Θ is not a location parameter. Even in the case of location parameter, the regularity conditions must be satisfied. It does not possess the two fundamental properties of the mother information, namely the monotonicity and invariance under sufficient transformations. Thus the Fisher information number should not be used as a measure of information (except when Θ a location parameter). On the other hand, Fisher's information number, as a characteristic of a distribution f(x), has other interesting properties. As a byproduct of its superadditivity property a new coefficient of association is introduced.     

On grouping sets of exponential populations

Suppose we have k random samples each of size n from a two parameter exponential distribution with location parameters μ _i i=1,…,k, and where each item has the same, unknown scale parameter. A multistage procedure is developed to determine t≦k groups such that in any one group the distributions have μ_i's that are not appreciably different. The method yields a unique grouping and extends the approach of the Kumar and Pate1 test.The emphasis is on the development of a procedure based on the null sampling distribution of the maximum gap of the ordered first order statistics from exponential distributions. The procedure is based on complete ordered samples or censored (of any or of all) samples.     

On shrinkage estimation of the exponential location parameter

Under the assumption that the exponential distribution is a reasonable model for a given population, some shrinkage estimators for the location parameter based on type 1 and type II censored samples have been derived. It is shown that these estimators dominate maximum likelihood estimators (MLE's) asymptotically under the mean squared error (MSE) criterion. A Monte Carlo study shows a significant improvement of our estimators over MLE's in terms of MSE for small samples.     

Selection from uniform populations based on sample mtdranges and an associated estimation after selection

Selection of the uniform population having the largest location parameter (point of symmetry) is considered using both the indifference zone and subset selection formulations. For the indifference zone rule selecting one of the population as the best, estimation of the parameter of the selected population is considered in the case of two given populations.     

Normalization of the origin-shifted exponential distribution for control chart construction

This study demonstrates that a location parameter of an exponential distribution significantly influences normalization of the exponential. The Kullback–Leibler information number is shown to be an appropriate index for measuring data normality using a location parameter. Control charts based on probability limits and transformation are compared for known and estimated location parameters. The probabilities of type II error (β-risks) and average run length (ARL) without a location parameter indicate an ability to detect an out-of-control signal of an individual chart using a power transformation similar to using probability limits. The β-risks and ARL of control charts with an estimated location parameter deviate significantly from their theoretical values when a small sample size of n≤50 is used. Therefore, without taking into account of the existence of a location parameter, the control charts result in inaccurate detection of an out-of-control signal regardless of whether a power or natural logarithmic transformation is used. The effects of a location parameter should be eliminated before transformation. Two examples are presented to illustrate these findings.     

ON ESTIMATION FOLLOWING SELECTION FROM NONREGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS

Independent random samples are drawn from k (≥ 2) populations, having probability density functions belonging to a general truncation parameter family. The populations associated with the smallest and the largest truncation parameters are called the lower extreme population (LEP) and the upper extreme population (UEP), respectively. For the goal of selecting the LEP (UEP), we consider the natural selection rule, which selects the population corresponding to the smallest (largest) of k maximum likelihood estimates as the LEP (UEP), and study the problem of estimating the truncation parameter of the selected population. We unify some of the existing results, available in the literature for specific distributions, by deriving the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) for the truncation parameter of the selected population. The conditional unbiasedness of the UMVUE is also checked. The cases of the left and the right truncation parameter families are dealt with separately. Finally, we consider an application to the Pareto probability model, where the performances of the UMVUE and three other natural estimators are compared with each other, under the mean squared error criterion.