Female and male undergraduates' attributions for sexual offending against children

This study examined gender differences in undergraduates' attributions for child sex offending. One hundred and sixty-four undergraduates were asked to give the reasons why they think men sexually offend against children and to rate them using Benson's Attributional Scale across four dimensions: stability, locus, controllability and globality. A Grounded Theory methodology was applied to these reasons and a set of nine categories derived from the data. The results showed that undergraduates' reasons for child sexual abuse strongly parallel contemporary scientific theories of abuse, and that there were significant gender differences in the frequency with which participants cited various types of reasons given for sexual abuse. Females endorsed significantly more victim reasons than males, and also more power and control reasons than did males. In contrast, males endorsed significantly more sexual reasons for offending than did females. Furthermore, significant gender differences were found between the ways in which participants construed the reasons for sexual abuse, with females seeing the phenomenon as significantly more stable and internal than males. No significant gender differences were found on the dimensions of controllability and globality.     

Community corrections officers' attributions for sexual offending against children

The present research examined gender differences in community corrections officers' (CCOs') attributions for child sexual offending. Eighty-five CCOs were asked to write down the reasons why they thought men sexually abused children, and then rate their reasons using Benson's Attributional Dimensions Scale. The results found that CCOs' reasons regarding why men sexually abuse children strongly paralleled current scientific theories on the etiology of child sexual abuse. Also, significant gender differences were found regarding the frequency with which participants cited certain types of reasons for child sexual abuse. Female CCOs were more likely to cite power and control as a reason, while male CCOs were more likely to cite psychopathology as a reason for child sexual abuse. No other gender differences were found. The research, clinical, and educational implications pertaining to these findings are discussed.     

An estimate of nationwide incidence of sexual offenses against children.

Complete data are lacking for accurately estimating sexual offenses against children on a national scale, but projections from statistics available indicate the magnitude of the social problem.     

Book Review

Book reviews in this article. Forgotten children: the secret abuse scandal in children's homes by Christian Wolmar     

Book Review

Book reviewed in this article:
Daniel P. M oynihan , Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding: Community Action in the War on Poverty. N.Y.: Free Press, 1969. xxi, 218 pp. $5.95.     

Book Review

AIDS AND THE NEW ORPHANS COPING WITH DEATH. Barbara O. Dane & Carol Levine (Eds.). Westport, Connecticut: Auburn House, 1994, 158 pp.; $49.95 (hardback) or $17.95 (paperback).     

Book Review

Book reviews in this article. Out of hearing: representing children in care proceedings. By Judith Masson and Maureen Winn Oakley.     

Book Review

Abstract

Zarnowski, Myra. 2003. History Makers: A Questioning Approach to Reading and Writing Biographies. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.     

Book Review

Book reviews in this article. Parents as care managers: the experiences of those caring for young children with cerebral palsy Preeti Manuel     

Book Review

No abstract available for this article.