A Restricted Subset Selection Rule for Selecting at Least One of the t Best Normal Populations in Terms of Their Means When Their Common Variance is Known,Case II

Consider k( ? 2) normal populations with unknown means μ₁, …, μ_k, and a common known variance σ². Let μ_[1] ? ??? ? μ_[k] denote the ordered μ_i.The populations associated with the t(1 ? t ? k ? 1) largest means are called the t best populations. Hsu and Panchapakesan (2004) proposed and investigated a procedure R_HPfor selecting a non empty subset of the k populations whose size is at most m(1 ? m ? k ? t) so that at least one of the t best populations is included in the selected subset with a minimum guaranteed probability P* whenever μ_{[k ? t + 1]} ? μ_{[k ? t]} ? δ*, where P*?and?δ* are specified in advance of the experiment. This probability requirement is known as the indifference-zone probability requirement. In the present article, we investigate the same procedure R_HP for the same goal as before but when k ? t < m ? k ? 1 so that at least one of the t best populations is included in the selected subset with a minimum guaranteed probability P* whatever be the configuration of the unknown μ_i. The probability requirement in this latter case is termed the subset selection probability requirement. Santner (1976) proposed and investigated a different procedure (R_S) based on samples of size n from each of the populations, considering both cases, 1 ? m ? k ? t and k ? t < m ? k. The special case of t = 1 was earlier studied by Gupta and Santner (1973) and Hsu and Panchapakesan (2002) for their respective procedures.     

On selecting a subset which contains all populations better than a control

Let π₁…, π_k denote k(≥ 2) populations with unknown means μ₁ , …, μ_k and variances σ₁ ² , …, σ_k ² , respectively and let π_o denote the control population having mean μ_o and variance σ_o ² . It is assumed that these populations are normally distributed with correlation matrix {ρ_ij}. The goal is to select a subset, of populations of π₁ , …, π_k which contains all the populations with means larger than or equal to the mean of the control one. Procedures are given for selecting such a subset so that the probability that all the populations with means larger than or equal to the mean of the control one are included in the selected subset is at least equal to a predetermined value P?(l/k < P? < 1). The goal treated here is a first step screening procedure that allows the experimenter to choose a subset and withhold judgement about which one has the largest mean. Then, if the one with the largest mean is desired it can be chosen from the selected subset on the basis of cost and other considerations. Percentage points are also included.     

A Subset Selection Procedure for Selecting the Exponential Population Having the Longest Mean Lifetime When the Guarantee Times are the Same

ABSTRACT

Consider k(≥ 2) independent exponential populations Π₁, Π₂, …, Π _k , having the common unknown location parameter μ ∈ (?∞, ∞) (also called the guarantee time) and unknown scale parameters σ₁, σ₂, …σ _k , respectively (also called the remaining mean lifetimes after the completion of guarantee times), σ _i  > 0, i = 1, 2, …, k. Assume that the correct ordering between σ₁, σ₂, …, σ _k is not known apriori and let σ_[i], i = 1, 2, …, k, denote the ith smallest of σ _j s, so that σ_[1] ≤ σ_[2] ··· ≤ σ_[k]. Then Θ _i  = μ + σ _i is the mean lifetime of Π _i , i = 1, 2, …, k. Let Θ_[1] ≤ Θ_[2] ··· ≤ Θ_[k] denote the ranked values of the Θ _j s, so that Θ_[i] = μ + σ_[i], i = 1, 2, …, k, and let Π_(i) denote the unknown population associated with the ith smallest mean lifetime Θ_[i] = μ + σ_[i], i = 1, 2, …, k. Based on independent random samples from the k populations, we propose a selection procedure for the goal of selecting the population having the longest mean lifetime Θ_[k] (called the “best” population), under the subset selection formulation. Tables for the implementation of the proposed selection procedure are provided. It is established that the proposed subset selection procedure is monotone for a general k (≥ 2). For k = 2, we consider the loss measured by the size of the selected subset and establish that the proposed subset selection procedure is minimax among selection procedures that satisfy a certain probability requirement (called the P*-condition) for the inclusion of the best population in the selected subset.     

A two stage procedure for selecting δ∗-optimal means in the normal model

Suppose π₁,…,π_k are k normal populations with π_i having unknown mean μ_i and unknown variance σ². The population π_i will be called δ^?-optimal (or good) if μ_i is within a specified amountδ? of the largest mean. A two stage procedure is proposed which selects a subset of the k populations and guarantees with probability at least P^? that the selected subset contains only δ?-optimal π_i ’s. In addition to screening out non-good populations the rule guarantees a high proportion of sufficiently good π_i’S will be selected.     

A class of fixed-width confidence intervals for a ranked normal mean

Suppose that we are given k(≥ 2) independent and normally distributed populations π₁, …, π_k where π_i has unknown mean μ_i and unknown variance σ² _i (i = 1, …, k). Let μ_[i] (i = 1, …, k) denote the i^th smallest one of μ₁, …, μ_k. A two-stage procedure is used to construct lower and upper confidence intervals for μ_[i] and then use these to obtain a class of two-sided confidence intervals on μ_[i] with fixed width. For i = k, the interval given by Chen and Dudewicz (1976) is a special case. Comparison is made between the class of two-sided intervals and a symmetric interval proposed by Chen and Dudewicz (1976) for the largest mean, and it is found that for large values of k at least one of the former intervals requires a smaller total sample size. The tables needed to actually apply the procedure are provided.     

Confidence intervals for the largest mean from k correlated normal populations

Let X= (X₁,…, X_k)’ be a k-variate (k ≥ 2) normal random vector with unknown population mean vector μ = (μ₁ ,…, μ_k)’ and covariance matrix Σ of order k and let μ_[1] ≤ … ≤ μ_[k] be the ordered values of the μ ’ s. No prior knowledge of the pairing of the μ_[i] with the X_j. (or μ_[i] with the σ_j ²) is assumed for any i and j (1 ≤ i, j ≤ k). Based on a random sample of N independent vector observations on X, this paper considers both upper and lower (one-sided) and two-sided 100γ% (0 < γ < 1) confidence intervals for μ_[k] and μ_[1], the largest and the smallest mean, respectively, when Σ is known and when Σ is equal to σ²R with common unknown variance σ² > 0 and correlation matrix R known, respectively. An optimum two-sided confidence interval via finding the shortest length from this class is also considered. Necessary tables and computer program to actually apply these procedures are provided.     

New procedures for selecting the k-best exponential populations

Suppose exponential populations π_i with parameters (μ_i,σ_i) (i = 1, 2, …, K) are given. The σ_i can be unknown and unequal. This article discusses how to select the k (≥1) best populations. Under the subset selection formulation, a one-stage procedure is proposed. Under the indifference zone formulation, a two-stage procedure is proposed. An appealing feature of these procedures is that no statistical tables are needed for their implementation.     

Single-stage sampling procedure of the t best populations under heteroscedasticity

Given k( ? 3) independent normal populations with unknown means and unknown and unequal variances, a single-stage sampling procedure to select the best t out of k populations is proposed and the procedure is completely independent of the unknown means and the unknown variances. For various combinations of k and probability requirement, tables of procedure parameters are provided for practitioners.     

Estimation of the location parameter and the average worth of the selected subset of two parameter exponential populations under LINEX loss function

Suppose a subset of populations is selected from k exponential populations with unknown location parameters θ₁, θ₂, …, θ_k and common known scale parameter σ. We consider the estimation of the location parameter of the selected population and the average worth of the selected subset under an asymmetric LINEX loss function. We show that the natural estimator of these parameters is biased and find the uniformly minimum risk-unbiased (UMRU) estimator of these parameters. In the case of k = 2, we find the minimax estimator of the location parameter of the smallest selected population. Furthermore, we compare numerically the risk of UMRU, minimax, and the natural estimators.     

SELECTING THE m POPULATIONS WITH LARGEST MEANS FROM k NORMAL POPULATIONS WITH UNKNOWN VARIANCES

This paper gives a two-sample procedure for selecting the m populations with the largest means from k normal populations with unknown variances. The method is a generalization of a recent work by Ofosu [1973] and hence should find wider practical applications. The experimenter takes an initial sample of preset size N₀ from each population and computes an unbiased estimate of its variance. From this estimate he determines the second sample size for the population according to a table presented for this purpose. The populations associated with the m largest overall sample means will be selected. The procedure is shown to satisfy a confidence requirement similar to that of Ofosu.     

Procedures for Selecting Good Exponential Populations

Suppose exponential populations π _i with parameters (μ_i , σ_i ) (i = 1,2,…,k) are given. This article discusses how to select “good” populations in the sense of [Lam (1986 Lam, K. 1986. A new procedure for selecting good populations. Biometrika, 73(1): 201–206. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). A new procedure for selecting good populations. Biometrika 73(1):201–206]. Depending on whether the σ _i 's are known or unknown, several one-stage and a two-stage procedure of selection are proposed. The two-stage procedure can be replaced by a one-stage procedure if the second-stage sample is proved intangible. An attracting feature of these procedures is that they need no new statistical tables to implement.     

ON TESTING AGAINST RESTRICTED ALTERNATIVES FOR THE VARIANCES OF GAUSSIAN MODELS

Let π₁,…,π_p be p independent normal populations with means μ₁…, μ_p and variances σ²₁,…, σ²_p respectively. Let X(n_i) be a simple random sample of size n_i from π_i, i = 1,…,p. Given the simple random samples X(n₁),…, X(n_p) from π₁,…,π_p respectively, a test has been proposed for testing the homogeneity of variances H₀: σ²₁=…σ²_p, against the restricted alternative, H₁: σ²₁≥…≥σ²_p, with at least one strict inequality. Some properties of the test are discussed and critical values are tabulated.     

Estimating Average Worth of the Selected Subset from Two-Parameter Exponential Populations

ABSTRACT

Suppose independent random samples are available from k(k ≥ 2) exponential populations ∏₁,…,∏ _k with a common location θ and scale parameters σ₁,…,σ _k , respectively. Let X _i and Y _i denote the minimum and the mean, respectively, of the ith sample, and further let X = min{X ₁,…, X _k } and T _i  = Y _i  ? X; i = 1,…, k. For selecting a nonempty subset of {∏₁,…,∏ _k } containing the best population (the one associated with max{σ₁,…,σ _k }), we use the decision rule which selects ∏ _i if T _i  ≥ c max{T ₁,…,T _k }, i = 1,…, k. Here 0 < c ≤ 1 is chosen so that the probability of including the best population in the selected subset is at least P* (1/k ≤ P* < 1), a pre-assigned level. The problem is to estimate the average worth W of the selected subset, the arithmetic average of means of selected populations. In this article, we derive the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of W. The bias and risk function of the UMVUE are compared numerically with those of analogs of the best affine equivariant estimator (BAEE) and the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE).     

Lower percentage points of hartley's extremal quotient statistic and their applications

Consider K(>2) independent populations π₁,..,π _k such that observations obtained from π _k are independent and normally distributed with unknown mean µ _i and unknown variance θ _i i = 1,…,k. In this paper, we provide lower percentage points of Hartley's extremal quotient statistic for testing an interval hypothesisH ₀ θ _[k] θ _[k] > δ vs. H _a : θ _[k] θ _[1] ≤ δ , where δ ≥ 1 is a predetermined constant and θ _[k](θ _[1]) is the max (min) of the θ_i,…,θ _k . The least favorable configuration (LFC) for the test under H ₀ is determined in order to obtain the lower percentage points. These percentage points can also be used to construct an upper confidence bound for θ_[k]/θ_[1].     

Nonparametric comparison of curves with dependent errors

Suppose that data {(x _l,i,n , y _l,i,n ): l?=?1, …, k; i?=?1, …, n} are observed from the regression models: Y _l,i,n ?=?m _l (x _l,i,n )?+?? _l,i,n , l?=?1, …, k, where the regression functions {m _l } _l=1 ^k are unknown and the random errors {? _l,i,n } are dependent, following an MA(∞) structure. A new test is proposed for testing the hypothesis H ₀: m ₁?=?·?·?·?=?m _k , without assuming that {m _l } _l=1 ^k are in a parametric family. The criterion of the test derives from a Crámer-von-Mises-type functional based on different distances between {[mcirc]} _l and {[mcirc]} _s , l?≠?s, l, s?=?1, …, k, where {[mcirc] _l } _l=1 ^k are nonparametric Gasser–Müller estimators of {m _l } _l=1 ^k . A generalization of the test to the case of unequal design points, with different sample sizes {n _l } _l=1 ^k and different design densities {f _l } _l=1 ^k , is also considered. The asymptotic normality of the test statistic is obtained under general conditions. Finally, a simulation study and an analysis with real data show a good behavior of the proposed test.     

Some subset selection problems

Consider that we have a collection of k populations π₁, π₂…,π_k. The quality of the ith population is characterized by a real parameter θ_i and the population is to be designated as superior or inferior depending on how much the θ_i differs from θ_max = max{θ₁, θ₂,…,θ_k}. From the set {π₁, π₂,…,π_k}, we wish to select the subset of superior populations. In this paper we devise rules of selection which have the property that their selected set excludes all the inferior populations with probability at least 1?α, where a is a specified number.     

On the maxima of heterogeneous gamma variables

In this article, we establish some new results on stochastic comparisons of the maxima of two heterogenous gamma variables with different shape and scale parameters. Let X₁ and X₂ [X*₁ and X*₂] be two independent gamma variables with X_i?[X*_i] having shape parameter r_i?[r*_i] and scale parameter λ_i?[λ*_i], i = 1, 2. It is shown that the likelihood ratio order holds between the maxima, X_{2: 2} and X*_{2: 2} when λ₁ = λ*₁ ? λ₂ = λ*₂ and r₁ ? r*₁ ? r₂ = r*₂. We also prove that, if r_i, r*_i ∈ (0, 1], (r₁, r₂) majorizes (r*₁, r₂*), and (λ₁, λ₂) is p-larger than (λ*₁, λ₂*), then X_{2: 2} is larger than X*_{2: 2} in the sense of the hazard rate order [dispersive order]. Some numerical examples are provided to illustrate the main results. The new results established here strengthen and generalize some of the results known in the literature.     

D-Optimal Axial Designs for Quadratic and Cubic Additive Mixture Models

The paper discusses D-optimal axial designs for the additive quadratic and cubic mixture models σ_1≤i≤q(β_ix_i + β_iix²_i) and σ_1≤i≤q(β_ix_i + β_iix²_i + β_iiix³_i), where x_i≥ 0, x₁ + . . . + x_q = 1. For the quadratic model, a saturated symmetric axial design is used, in which support points are of the form (x₁, . . . , x_q) = [1 ? (q?1)δ_i, δ_i, . . . , δ_i], where i = 1, 2 and 0 ≤δ₂ <_{δ1 ≤} 1/(q ?1). It is proved that when 3 ≤q≤ 6, the above design is D-optimal if δ₂ = 0 and δ₁ = 1/(q?1), and when q≥ 7 it is D-optimal if δ₂ = 0 and δ₁ = [5q?1 ? (9q²?10q + 1)^1/2]/(4q²). Similar results exist for the cubic model, with support points of the form (x₁, . . . , x_q) = [1 ? (q?1)δ_i, δ_i, . . . , δ_i], where i = 1, 2, 3 and 0 = δ₃ <_δ2 < δ_{1 ≤}1/(q?1). The saturated D-optimal axial design and D-optimal design for the quadratic model are compared in terms of their efficiency and uniformity.     

Testing multiple slippages

A class of invariant Bayes rules is derived for testing homogeneity of k (≥2) different populations against (^k_t) slippage alternatives that some (unknown) subset of size t of the given populations has parameter larger than the remaining k-t, where t is a given integer between 1 and k-1. For a similar problem in nonparametric situations, locally best tests based on ranks are derived.