Equal-tailed and shortest Bayesian tolerance intervals based on exponential k-records

The problem of constructing the equal-tailed and shortest Bayesian tolerance intervals that control percentages in both tails of the exponential distribution based on k-record values is considered. Equal-tailed and shortest Bayesian tolerance factors are derived. Practical examples using real and simulated k-record values are given to illustrate the proposed results.     

Usual and Shortest Confidence Intervals on Odds Ratios from Logistic Regression

Based on the large-sample normal distribution of the sample log odds ratio and its asymptotic variance from maximum likelihood logistic regression, shortest 95% confidence intervals for the odds ratio are developed. Although the usual confidence interval on the odds ratio is unbiased, the shortest interval is not. That is, while covering the true odds ratio with the stated probability, the shortest interval covers some values below the true odds ratio with higher probability. The upper and lower limits of the shortest interval are shifted to the left of those of the usual interval, with greater shifts in the upper limits. With the log odds model γ + Xβ, in which X is binary, simulation studies showed that the approximate average percent difference in length is 7.4% for n (sample size) = 100, and 3.8% for n = 200. Precise estimates of the covering probabilities of the two types of intervals were obtained from simulation studies, and are compared graphically. For odds ratio estimates greater (less) than one, shortest intervals are more (less) likely to include one than are the usual intervals. The usual intervals are likelihood-based and the shortest intervals are not. The usual intervals have minimum expected length among the class of unbiased intervals. Shortest intervals do not provide important advantages over the usual intervals, which we recommend for practical use.     

A Simple Approximate Procedure for Constructing Binomial and Poisson Tolerance Intervals

The problems of constructing tolerance intervals for the binomial and Poisson distributions are considered. Closed-form approximate equal-tailed tolerance intervals (that control percentages in both tails) are proposed for both distributions. Exact coverage probabilities and expected widths are evaluated for the proposed equal-tailed tolerance intervals and the existing intervals. Furthermore, an adjustment to the nominal confidence level is suggested so that an equal-tailed tolerance interval can be used as a tolerance interval which includes a specified proportion of the population, but does not necessarily control percentages in both tails. Comparison of such coverage-adjusted tolerance intervals with respect to coverage probabilities and expected widths indicates that the closed-form approximate tolerance intervals are comparable with others, and less conservative, with minimum coverage probabilities close to the nominal level in most cases. The approximate tolerance intervals are simple and easy to compute using a calculator, and they can be recommended for practical applications. The methods are illustrated using two practical examples.     

Two-sided Bayesian and frequentist tolerance intervals: general asymptotic results with applications

It is well known that that the construction of two-sided tolerance intervals is far more challenging than that of their one-sided counterparts. In a general framework of parametric models, we derive asymptotic results leading to explicit formulae for two-sided Bayesian and frequentist tolerance intervals. In the process, probability matching priors for such intervals are characterized and their role in finding frequentist tolerance intervals via a Bayesian route is indicated. Furthermore, in situations where matching priors are hard to obtain, we develop purely frequentist tolerance intervals as well. The findings are applied to real data. Simulation studies are seen to lend support to the asymptotic results in finite samples.     

Shortest Confidence Intervals for Families of Distributions Involving Truncation Parameters

Statistical inferences for probability distributions involving truncation parameters have received recent attention in the literature. One aspect of these inferences is the question of shortest confidence intervals for parameters or parametric functions of these models. The topic is a classical one, and the approach follows the usual theory. In all literature treatments the authors consider specific models and derive confidence intervals (not necessarily shortest). All of these models can, however, be considered as special cases of a more general one. The use of this model enables one to obtain easily shortest confidence intervals and unify the different approaches. In addition, it provides a useful technique for classroom presentation of the topic.     

Confidence Intervals for Quantiles of a Two-parameter Exponential Distribution under Progressive Type-II Censoring

Confidence intervals for the pth-quantile Q of a two-parameter exponential distribution provide useful information on the plausible range of Q, and only inefficient equal-tail confidence intervals have been discussed in the statistical literature so far. In this article, the construction of the shortest possible confidence interval within a family of two-sided confidence intervals is addressed. This shortest confidence interval is always shorter, and can be substantially shorter, than the corresponding equal-tail confidence interval. Furthermore, the computational intensity of both methodologies is similar, and therefore it is advantageous to use the shortest confidence interval. It is shown how the results provided in this paper can apply to data obtained from progressive Type II censoring, with standard Type II censoring as a special case. The applications of more complex confidence interval constructions through acceptance set inversions that can employ prior information are also discussed.     

Simultaneous tolerance intervals in the random one-way model with covariates

Simultaneous tolerance intervals developed by Limam and Thomas (19881, for the normal regression model, are generalized to the random one-way model with covariates. Simultaneous tolerance intervals for unit means are developed for the balanced model. A simulation study is used to estimate the exact confidence of the tolerance intervals for models with one covariate.     

Regression Tolerance Intervals

In this article, we discuss the utility of tolerance intervals for various regression models. We begin with a discussion of tolerance intervals for linear and nonlinear regression models. We then introduce a novel method for constructing nonparametric regression tolerance intervals by extending the well-established procedure for univariate data. Simulation results and application to real datasets are presented to help visualize regression tolerance intervals and to demonstrate that the methods we discuss have coverage probabilities very close to the specified nominal confidence level.     

A Monte Carlo simulation study of two-sided tolerance intervals in balanced one-way random effects model for non-normal errors

Recently, Ong and Mukerjee [Probability matching priors for two-sided tolerance intervals in balanced one-way and two-way nested random effects models. Statistics. 2011;45:403–411] developed two-sided Bayesian tolerance intervals, with approximate frequentist validity, for a future observation in balanced one-way and two-way nested random effects models. These were obtained using probability matching priors (PMP). On the other hand, Krishnamoorthy and Lian [Closed-form approximate tolerance intervals for some general linear models and comparison studies. J Stat Comput Simul. 2012;82:547–563] studied closed-form approximate tolerance intervals by the modified large-sample (MLS) approach. We compare the performances of these two approaches for normal as well as non-normal error distributions. Monte Carlo simulation methods are used to evaluate the resulting tolerance intervals with regard to achieved confidence levels and expected widths. It turns out that PMP tolerance intervals are less conservative for data with large number of classes and small number of observations per class and the MLS procedure is preferable for smaller sample sizes.     

Approximate tolerance intervals for the discrete Poisson–Lindley distribution

The Poisson–Lindley distribution is a compound discrete distribution that can be used as an alternative to other discrete distributions, like the negative binomial. This paper develops approximate one-sided and equal-tailed two-sided tolerance intervals for the Poisson–Lindley distribution. Practical applications of the Poisson–Lindley distribution frequently involve large samples, thus we utilize large-sample Wald confidence intervals in the construction of our tolerance intervals. A coverage study is presented to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed tolerance intervals. The tolerance intervals are also demonstrated using two real data sets. The R code developed for our discussion is briefly highlighted and included in the tolerance package.     

On shortest confidence intervals and their relation with uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimators

The aim of this paper is to investigate the possibility of constructing shortest-lenght confidence intervals and give some results and aspects concerning shortest confidence intervals and uniformly minimum variance unbiased (UMVU) estimators.     

More on Shortest and Equal Tails Confidence Intervals

An interesting topic in mathematical statistics is that of constructing confidence intervals. Two types of intervals, both based on the method of pivotal quantity, are available: the Shortest Confidence Interval (SCI) and the Equal Tails Confidence Interval (ETCI). The aims of this article are: (i) to clarify and comment on methods of finding such intervals; (ii) to investigate the relationship between these types of intervals; (iii) to point out that confidence intervals with the shortest length do not always exist, even when the distribution of the pivotal quantity is symmetric; and finally, (iv) to give similar results when the Bayesian approach is used.     

Simultaneous one-sided tolerance intervals for sets of contrasts from normal populations

This paper considers the problem of constructing simultaneous prediction and tolerance intervals for sets of contrasts of normal variables in situations where simultaneous intervals are available. Tables are given with critical values used in simultaneous tolerance bounds for two classes of contrasts: pairwise many-one and profile type.     

βExpectation and β-content tolerance intervals for dependent observations

Methods of constructing exact tolerance intervals (β-expectation and β-content) for independent observations are well known. For the case of dependent observations, obtaining exact results is not possible. In this article we provide an approximate method of constructing β-expectation tolerance intervals via a Taylor series expansion. Examples of independent observations are considered to compare the intervals constructed with those obtained by the exact method. For the case of non-stationary type processes we have proposed a method of constructing approximate β-content tolerance intervals. Once again an example is given to illustrate the results.     

Shortest confidence and prediction intervals for the log-normal

We provide the shortest prediction interval for X, and the shortest confidence interval for the median of X, when X has the log-normal distribution for both the case σ², the variance of log X, known and unknown. Tables are given to assist the practitioner in constructing these intervals. A real-life example is provided to illustrate the results.     

Simultaneous Two-Sided Tolerance Intervals for a Univariate Linear Regression Model

In this article we deal with simultaneous two-sided tolerance intervals for a univariate linear regression model with independent normally distributed errors. We present a method for determining the intervals derived by the general confidence-set approach (GCSA), i.e. the intervals are constructed based on a specified confidence set for unknown parameters of the model. The confidence set used in the new method is formed based on a suggested hypothesis test about all parameters of the model. The simultaneous two-sided tolerance intervals determined by the presented method are found to be efficient and fast to compute based on a preliminary numerical comparison of all the existing methods based on GCSA.     

Distribution-free confidence intervals for quantiles and tolerance intervals in terms of k-records

In this paper, we consider the problem of determining non-parametric confidence intervals for quantiles when available data are in the form of k-records. Distribution-free confidence intervals as well as lower and upper confidence limits are derived for fixed quantiles of an arbitrary unknown distribution based on k-records of an independent and identically distributed sequence from that distribution. The construction of tolerance intervals and limits based on k-records is also discussed. An exact expression for the confidence coefficient of these intervals are derived. Some tables are also provided to assist in choosing the appropriate k-records for the construction of these confidence intervals and tolerance intervals. Some simulation results are presented to point out some of the features and properties of these intervals. Finally, the data, representing the records of the amount of annual rainfall in inches recorded at Los Angeles Civic Center, are used to illustrate all the results developed in this paper and also to demonstrate the improvements that they provide on those based on either the usual records or the current records.     

Validation of tolerance interval

The tolerance interval receives very much attention in literature and is widely applied in industry. However, it is generally constructed through the criterion of minimum width by Eisenhart et al. (1947). Although effort for clarification of several prediction related intervals has been made recently by Huang et al. (2010), the appropriateness of the tolerance interval for its role in industry applications is insufficiently discussed. According to manufacturers' requests, a concept of admissibility of tolerance intervals is defined in this paper and we show that these types of tolerance intervals are not admissible due to short of confidence. We further prove that a 100(1−α)% confidence interval of a γ-coverage interval is admissible and is appropriate for use.     

A procedure for approximate negative binomial tolerance intervals

In this article, we present a procedure for approximate negative binomial tolerance intervals. We utilize an approach that has been well-studied to approximate tolerance intervals for the binomial and Poisson settings, which is based on the confidence interval for the parameter in the respective distribution. A simulation study is performed to assess the coverage probabilities and expected widths of the tolerance intervals. The simulation study also compares eight different confidence interval approaches for the negative binomial proportions. We recommend using those in practice that perform the best based on our simulation results. The method is also illustrated using two real data examples.     

Confidence intervals for the scale parameter of exponential distribution based on Type II doubly censored samples

This paper deals with the problem of interval estimation of the scale parameter in the two-parameter exponential distribution subject to Type II double censoring. Base on a Type II doubly censored sample, we construct a class of interval estimators of the scale parameter which are better than the shortest length affine equivariant interval both in coverage probability and in length. The procedure can be repeated to make further improvement. The extension of the method leads to a smoothly improved confidence interval which improves the interval length with probability one. All improved intervals belong to the class of scale equivariant intervals.