Asymptotic and Bootstrap Inference for AR(∞) Processes with Conditional Heteroskedasticity

The main contribution of this paper is a proof of the asymptotic validity of the application of the bootstrap to AR(∞) processes with unmodelled conditional heteroskedasticity. We first derive the asymptotic properties of the least-squares estimator of the autoregressive sieve parameters when the data are generated by a stationary linear process with martingale difference errors that are possibly subject to conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form. These results are then used in establishing that a suitably constructed bootstrap estimator will have the same limit distribution as the least-squares estimator. Our results provide theoretical justification for the use of either the conventional asymptotic approximation based on robust standard errors or the bootstrap approximation of the distribution of autoregressive parameters. A simulation study suggests that the bootstrap approach tends to be more accurate in small samples.     

Asymptotic and Bootstrap Inference for AR(∞) Processes with Conditional Heteroskedasticity

The main contribution of this paper is a proof of the asymptotic validity of the application of the bootstrap to AR(∞) processes with unmodelled conditional heteroskedasticity. We first derive the asymptotic properties of the least-squares estimator of the autoregressive sieve parameters when the data are generated by a stationary linear process with martingale difference errors that are possibly subject to conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form. These results are then used in establishing that a suitably constructed bootstrap estimator will have the same limit distribution as the least-squares estimator. Our results provide theoretical justification for the use of either the conventional asymptotic approximation based on robust standard errors or the bootstrap approximation of the distribution of autoregressive parameters. A simulation study suggests that the bootstrap approach tends to be more accurate in small samples.     

Bootstrap confidence regions computed from autoregressions of arbitrary order

Given a linear time series, e.g. an autoregression of infinite order, we may construct a finite order approximation and use that as the basis for confidence regions. The sieve or autoregressive bootstrap, as this method is often called, is generally seen as a competitor with the better-understood block bootstrap approach. However, in the present paper we argue that, for linear time series, the sieve bootstrap has significantly better performance than blocking methods and offers a wider range of opportunities. In particular, since it does not corrupt second-order properties then it may be used in a double-bootstrap form, with the second bootstrap application being employed to calibrate a basic percentile method confidence interval. This approach confers second-order accuracy without the need to estimate variance. That offers substantial benefits, since variances of statistics based on time series can be difficult to estimate reliably, and—partly because of the relatively small amount of information contained in a dependent process—are notorious for causing problems when used to Studentize. Other advantages of the sieve bootstrap include considerably greater robustness against variations in the choice of the tuning parameter, here equal to the autoregressive order, and the fact that, in contradistinction to the case of the block bootstrap, the percentile t version of the sieve bootstrap may be based on the 'raw' estimator of standard error. In the process of establishing these properties we show that the sieve bootstrap is second order correct.     

Obtaining prediction intervals for FARIMA processes using the sieve bootstrap

The sieve bootstrap (SB) prediction intervals for invertible autoregressive moving average (ARMA) processes are constructed using resamples of residuals obtained by fitting a finite degree autoregressive approximation to the time series. The advantage of this approach is that it does not require the knowledge of the orders, p and q, associated with the ARMA(p, q) model. Up until recently, the application of this method has been limited to ARMA processes whose autoregressive polynomials do not have fractional unit roots. The authors, in a 2012 publication, introduced a version of the SB suitable for fractionally integrated autoregressive moving average (FARIMA (p,d,q)) processes with 0<d<0.5 and established its asymptotic validity. Herein, we study the finite sample properties this new method and compare its performance against an older method introduced by Bisaglia and Grigoletto in 2001. The sieve bootstrap (SB) method is a numerically simpler alternative to the older method which requires the estimation of p, d, and q at every bootstrap step. Monte-Carlo simulation studies, carried out under the assumption of normal, mixture of normals, and exponential distributions for the innovations, show near nominal coverages for short-term and long-term SB prediction intervals under most situations. In addition, the sieve bootstrap method yields better coverage and narrower intervals compared to the Bisaglia–Grigoletto method in some situations, especially when the error distribution is a mixture of normals.     

Using the Bootstrap to Test for Symmetry Under Unknown Dependence

This article considers tests for symmetry of the one-dimensional marginal distribution of fractionally integrated processes. The tests are implemented by using an autoregressive sieve bootstrap approximation to the null sampling distribution of the relevant test statistics. The sieve bootstrap allows inference on symmetry to be carried out without knowledge of either the memory parameter of the data or of the appropriate norming factor for the test statistic and its asymptotic distribution. The small-sample properties of the proposed method are examined by means of Monte Carlo experiments, and applications to real-world data are also presented.     

Robustness of residual-based bootstrap to the composition of serially correlated errors

In a simple autoregressive model with serially correlated errors, we evaluate size distortions resulting from the residual bootstrap when the Wold innovation is serially dependent and hence is expected to contaminate the inference. The small distortions caused by the presence of strong conditional heteroskedasticity or other nonlinearities can be partly removed further by using the wild bootstrap.     

Using the Bootstrap as an Aid in Choosing the Approximate Representation for Vector Time Series

In this article, a procedure is presented to use the bootstrap in choosing the best approximation in terms of forecasting performance for the equivalent state-space representation of a vector autoregressive model. It is found that the proposed procedure, which uses each approximant's forecasting performance, can enhance considerably an approach based simply on the estimated Hankel singular values.     

SOME PROPERTIES OF PROFILE BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

We consider the problem of finding an equi-tailed confidence interval, with coverage probability (1-α), for a scalar parameter θ₀ in the presence of a (possibly infinite dimensional) nuisance parameter ψ₀. It is supposed that the value taken by θ₀ does not restrict the value that ψ₀ may take and vice-versa. Given a sensible estimate ψ_n of ψ₀, profile bootstrap confidence interval for θ₀ is defined to be the exact equi-tailed confidence interval with coverage probability (1-α) assuming that ψ₀=ψ_n. We compare the properties of the profile bootstrap confidence interval and the ordinary bootstrap confidence interval when they are based on studentised and unstudentised quantities. Under mild regularity conditions the profile bootstrap confidence interval is always a subset of the set of allowable values of θ₀ and is transformation-respecting when based on either an unstudentised quantity or a studentised quantity satisfying certain restrictions. As a confidence interval for the autoregressive parameter of an AR(1) process, the profile bootstrap confidence interval has important advantages over the ordinary bootstrap confidence interval based on a studentised quantity.     

Statistical Inference on the Parametric Component in Partially Linear Spatial Autoregressive Models

A statistical test procedure is proposed to check whether the parameters in the parametric component of the partially linear spatial autoregressive models satisfy certain linear constraint conditions, in which a residual-based bootstrap procedure is suggested to derive the p-value of the test. Some simulations are conducted to assess the performance of the test and the results show that the bootstrap approximation to the null distribution of the test statistic is valid and the test is of satisfactory power. Furthermore, a real-world example is given to demonstrate the application of the proposed test.     

Testing a linear relationship in varying coefficient spatial autoregressive models

In this article, we propose a test to check a linear relationship in varying coefficient spatial autoregressive models, in which a residual-based bootstrap procedure is suggested to approximate the null distribution of the resulting test statistic. We conduct simulation studies to assess the performance of the test, including the validity of the bootstrap approximation to the null distribution of the test statistic and the power of the test. The simulation results demonstrate that the residual-based bootstrap procedure gives very accurate estimate of the null distribution of the test statistic and the test is of satisfactory power. Furthermore, a real example is given to demonstrate the application of the proposed test.     

Bootstrap-based inferential improvements in beta autoregressive moving average model

We consider the issue of performing accurate small sample inference in beta autoregressive moving average model, which is useful for modeling and forecasting continuous variables that assume values in the interval (0,?1). The inferences based on conditional maximum likelihood estimation have good asymptotic properties, but their performances in small samples may be poor. This way, we propose bootstrap bias corrections of the point estimators and different bootstrap strategies for confidence interval improvements. Our Monte Carlo simulations show that finite sample inference based on bootstrap corrections is much more reliable than the usual inferences. We also presented an empirical application.     

Simultaneous bootstrap for all three parameters in random coefficient autoregressive models

In this paper we consider autoregressive processes with random coefficients and develop bootstrap approaches that asymptotically work for the distribution of estimated autoregressive parameter as well as for the distribution of estimated variances of the innovation noise and the disturbance noise. We discuss how to obtain approximative residuals of the process and how to separate between the innovation and the disturbance noise in order to be able to extend the classical residual bootstrap for autoregressive processes to the situation considered in this paper. Thereafter, we propose a wild bootstrap procedure as a variation of the residual bootstrap that uses estimated densities of the innovation and the disturbance noise to generate bootstrap replicates of the data generating process. The consistency of the bootstrap approaches is established and their performance is illustrated by a simulation study.     

Rates of convergence for U-statistic processes and their bootstrapped versions

U-statistic processes are often used to detect a possible change in the distributions of the observations. We obtain the exact rate of convergence in some limit theorems for U-statistics. We discuss the application of the weighted bootstrap to change-point analysis. We show that the bootstrap approximation for U-statistics is as good as the large sample approximations using Gaussian processes. However, the bootstrap approximation is much better when the limit distributions are extreme values.     

空间经济计量滞后模型Bootstrap Moran检验功效的模拟分析

 当误差项不服从独立同分布时,利用Moran’s I统计量的渐近检验,无法有效判断空间经济计量滞后模型2SLS估计残差间存在空间关系与否。本文采用两种基于残差的Bootstrap方法,诊断空间经济计量滞后模型残差中的空间相关关系。大量Monte Carlo模拟结果显示,从功效角度看,无论误差项服从独立同分布与否,与渐近检验相比,Bootstrap Moran检验都具有更好的有限样本性质,能够更有效地进行空间相关性检验。尤其是,在样本量较小和空间衔接密度较高情况下,Bootstrap Moran检验的功效显著大于渐近检验。     

Asymptotic properties of the bootstrap unit root test statistic under possibly infinite variance

ABSTRACT

In this article, the unit root test for the AR(1) model is discussed, under the condition that the innovations of the model are in the domain of attraction of the normal law with possibly infinite variances. By using residual bootstrap with sample size m < n (n being the size of the original sample), we bootstrap the least-squares estimator of the autoregressive parameter. Under some mild assumptions, we prove that the null distribution of the unit root test statistic based on the least-square estimator of the autoregressive parameter can be approximated by using residual bootstrap.     

Improving the finite sample performance of autoregression estimators in dynamic factor models: A bootstrap approach

We investigate the finite sample properties of the estimator of a persistence parameter of an unobservable common factor when the factor is estimated by the principal components method. When the number of cross-sectional observations is not sufficiently large, relative to the number of time series observations, the autoregressive coefficient estimator of a positively autocorrelated factor is biased downward, and the bias becomes larger for a more persistent factor. Based on theoretical and simulation analyses, we show that bootstrap procedures are effective in reducing the bias, and bootstrap confidence intervals outperform naive asymptotic confidence intervals in terms of the coverage probability.     

Bootstrap mean squared error of a small-area EBLUP

Concerning the estimation of linear parameters in small areas, a nested-error regression model is assumed for the values of the target variable in the units of a finite population. Then, a bootstrap procedure is proposed for estimating the mean squared error (MSE) of the EBLUP under the finite population setup. The consistency of the bootstrap procedure is studied, and a simulation experiment is carried out in order to compare the performance of two different bootstrap estimators with the approximation given by Prasad and Rao [Prasad, N.G.N. and Rao, J.N.K., 1990, The estimation of the mean squared error of small-area estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 163–171.]. In the numerical results, one of the bootstrap estimators shows a better bias behavior than the Prasad–Rao approximation for some of the small areas and not much worse in any case. Further, it shows less MSE in situations of moderate heteroscedasticity and under mispecification of the error distribution as normal when the true distribution is logistic or Gumbel. The proposed bootstrap method can be applied to more general types of parameters (linear of not) and predictors.     

Valid Resampling of Higher-Order Statistics Using the Linear Process Bootstrap and Autoregressive Sieve Bootstrap

We show that the linear process bootstrap (LPB) and the autoregressive sieve bootstrap (AR sieve) are, in general, not valid for statistics whose large-sample distribution depends on moments of order higher than two, irrespective of whether the data come from a linear time series or not. Inspired by the block-of-blocks bootstrap, we circumvent this non-validity by applying the LPB and AR sieve to suitably blocked data and not to the original data itself. In a simulation study, we compare the LPB, AR sieve, and moving block bootstrap applied directly and to blocked data.