An inclusion-consistent solution to the problem of absurd confidence statements: 2. Consistent nonexact-confidence-interval estimation

Two consistent nonexact-confidence-interval estimation methods, both derived from the consistency-equivalence theorem in Plante (1991), are suggested for estimation of problematic parametric functions with no consistent exact solution and for which standard optimal confidence procedures are inadequate or even absurd, i.e., can provide confidence statements with a 95% empty or all-inclusive confidence set. A belt C(·) from a consistent nonexact-belt family, used with two confidence coefficients (γ = inf_θ P_θ [ θ ? C(X)] and γ⁺ = sup_θ P_θ[θ ? C(X)], is shown to provide a consistent nonexact-belt solution for estimating μ₂ -μ₁ in the Behrens-Fisher problem. A rule for consistent behaviour enables any confidence belt to be used consistently by providing each sample point with best upper and lower confidence levels [δ⁺(x) ≥ γ⁺, δ(x) ≤ γ], which give least-conservative consistent confidence statements ranging from practically exact through informative to noninformative. The rule also provides a consistency correction L(x) = δ⁺(x)-δ(X) enabling alternative confidence solutions to be compared on grounds of adequacy; this is demonstrated by comparing consistent conservative sample-point-wise solutions with inconsistent standard solutions for estimating μ₂/μ₁ (Creasy-Fieller-Neyman problem) and $\sqrt {\mu _1^2 + \mu _2^2 }$, a distance-estimation problem closely related to Stein's 1959 example     

Fixed-width sequential confidence interval for the correlation coefficient of a bivariate normal distribution

A sequential confidence interval of fixed width 2d d > 0, is constructed for the correlation coefficient of a bivariate normal distribution. It is shown that the coverage probability is approximately equal to a preassigned number γ, 0 < γ < as d → 0.     

An asymptotic confidence interval for the process capability index Cpm

Abstract

The use of indices as an estimation tool of process capability is long-established among the statistical quality professionals. Numerous capability indices have been proposed in last few years. C_pm constitutes one of the most widely used capability indices and its estimation has attracted much interest. In this paper, we propose a new method for constructing an approximate confidence interval for the index C_pm. The proposed method is based on the asymptotic distribution of the index C_pm obtained by the Delta Method. Under some regularity conditions, the distribution of an estimator of the process capability index C_pm is asymptotically normal.     

Estimated confidence under ancillary statistic everywhere-valid constraint

Consider the problem of estimating the coverage function of an usual confidence interval for a randomly chosen linear combination of the elements of the mean vector of a p-dimensional normal distribution. The usual constant coverage probability estimator is shown to be admissible under the ancillary statistic everywhere-valid constraint. Note that this estimator is not admissible under the usual sense if p⩾5. Since the criterion of admissibility under the ancillary statistic everywhere-valid constraint is a reasonable one, that the constant coverage probability estimator has been commonly accepted is justified.     

Reliable confidence intervals for assessing normal process incapability

This study aims to provide a reliable confidence interval for assessing the process incapability index [C_pp]. The concept of the generalized pivotal quantities is utilized for constructing the generalized confidence interval for [C_pp]. And, simulations are performed for demonstrating our proposed method and one existent method. The results show that the empirical confidences of these two methods are significantly affected by the degree of process departure. Therefore, we suggest the practitioners to select proper one for capability testing purpose based on the information of degree of process departure.     

The minimum coverage probability of confidence intervals in regression after a preliminary F test

Consider a linear regression model with regression parameter β=(β₁,…,β_p) and independent normal errors. Suppose the parameter of interest is θ=a^Tβ, where a is specified. Define the s-dimensional parameter vector τ=C^Tβ−t, where C and t are specified. Suppose that we carry out a preliminary F test of the null hypothesis H₀:τ=0 against the alternative hypothesis H₁:τ≠0. It is common statistical practice to then construct a confidence interval for θ with nominal coverage 1−α, using the same data, based on the assumption that the selected model had been given to us a priori (as the true model). We call this the naive 1−α confidence interval for θ. This assumption is false and it may lead to this confidence interval having minimum coverage probability far below 1−α, making it completely inadequate. We provide a new elegant method for computing the minimum coverage probability of this naive confidence interval, that works well irrespective of how large s is. A very important practical application of this method is to the analysis of covariance. In this context, τ can be defined so that H₀ expresses the hypothesis of “parallelism”. Applied statisticians commonly recommend carrying out a preliminary F test of this hypothesis. We illustrate the application of our method with a real-life analysis of covariance data set and a preliminary F test for “parallelism”. We show that the naive 0.95 confidence interval has minimum coverage probability 0.0846, showing that it is completely inadequate.     

Generalized confidence limits for the performance index of the exponentially distributed lifetime

Under a two-parameter exponential distribution, this study constructs the generalized lower confidence limit of the lifetime performance index C_L based on type-II right-censored data. The confidence limit has to be numerically obtained; however, the required computations are simple and straightforward. Confidence limits of C_L computed under the generalized paradigm are compared with those of C_L computed under the classical paradigm, citing an illustrative example with real data and two examples with simulated data, to demonstrate the merits and advantages of the proposed generalized variable method over the classical method.     

A note on the asymptotic distribution of the process capability index C pmk

Process capability indices have been widely used to evaluate the process performance to the continuous improvement of quality and productivity. The distribution of the estimator of the process capability index C _pmk is very complicated and the asymptotic distribution is proposed by Chen and Hsu [The asymptotic distribution of the processes capability index C _pmk , Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 24(5) (1995), pp. 1279–1291]. However, we found a critical error for the asymptotic distribution when the population mean is not equal to the midpoint of the specification limits. In this paper, a correct version of the asymptotic distribution is given. An asymptotic confidence interval of C _pmk by using the correct version of asymptotic distribution is proposed and the lower bound can be used to test if the process is capable. A simulation study of the coverage probability of the proposed confidence interval is shown to be satisfactory. The relation of six sigma technique and the index C _pmk is also discussed in this paper. An asymptotic testing procedure to determine if a process is capable based on the index of C _pmk is also given in this paper.     

A modified kernel quantile estimator under censoring

Based on right-censored data from a lifetime distribution F₀, a modification of the kernel quantile estimator is proposed. The advantage of this estimator is that the data play a role in the degree of smoothing of the estimator while retaining the desirable features of the kernel estimator. Convergence in probability and almost sure convergence of the estimator are discussed. Also, asymptotic normality and confidence bands are presented and some examples are given.     

Pseudo confidence regions for the solution of a multivariate linear functional relationship

The problem of finding confidence regions (CR) for a q-variate vector γ given as the solution of a linear functional relationship (LFR) Λγ = μ is investigated. Here an m-variate vector μ and an m × q matrix Λ = (Λ₁, Λ₂,…, Λ_q) are unknown population means of an m(q+1)-variate normal distribution $\text{N}{}_{\mathrm{m(q+1)}}\text{(ζΩ?Σ)}$, where ζ′ = (μ′, Λ₁′, Λ₂′,…, Λ_q′Σ is an unknown, symmetric and positive definite m × m matrix and Ω is a known, symmetric and positive definite (q+1) × (q+1) matrix and ? denotes the Kronecker product. This problem is a generalization of the univariate special case for the ratio of normal means.A CR for γ with level of confidence 1 ? α, is given by a quadratic inequality, which yields the so-called ‘pseudo’ confidence regions (PCR) valid conditionally in subsets of the parameter space. Our discussion is focused on the ‘bounded pseudo’ confidence region (BPCR) given by the interior of a hyperellipsoid. The two conditions necessary for a BPCR to exist are shown to be the consistency conditions concerning the multivariate LFR. The probability that these conditions hold approaches one under ‘reasonable circumstances’ in many practical situations. Hence, we may have a BPCR with confidence approximately 1 ? α. Some simulation results are presented.     

Lower confidence bounds as precision measure for truncated processes

Process capability index C_p has been the most popular one used in the manufacturing industry to provide numerical measures on process precision. For normally distributed processes with automatic fully inspections, the inspected processes follow truncated normal distributions. In this article, we provide the formulae of moments used for the Edgeworth approximation on the precision measurement C_p for truncated normally distributed processes. Based on the developed moments, lower confidence bounds with various sample sizes and confidence levels are provided and tabulated. Consequently, practitioners can use lower confidence bounds to determine whether their manufacturing processes are capable of preset precision requirements.     

Bootstrap confidence intervals of CNpk for inverse Rayleigh and log-logistic distributions

In this article bootstrap confidence intervals of process capability index as suggested by Chen and Pearn [An application of non-normal process capability indices. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 1997;13:355–360] are studied through simulation when the underlying distributions are inverse Rayleigh and log-logistic distributions. The well-known maximum likelihood estimator is used to estimate the parameter. The bootstrap confidence intervals considered in this paper consists of various confidence intervals. A Monte Carlo simulation has been used to investigate the estimated coverage probabilities and average widths of the bootstrap confidence intervals. Application examples on two distributions for process capability indices are provided for practical use.     

Buehler confidence limits and nesting

The Buehler 1 –α upper confidence limit is as small as possible, subject to the constraints that its coverage probability is at least 1 –α and that it is a non‐decreasing function of a pre‐specified statistic T. This confidence limit has important biostatistical and reliability applications. Previous research has examined the way the choice of T affects the efficiency of the Buehler 1 –α upper confidence limit for a given value of α. This paper considers how T should be chosen when the Buehler limit is to be computed for a range of values of α. If T is allowed to depend on α then the Buehler limit is not necessarily a non‐increasing function of α, i.e. the limit is ‘non‐nesting’. Furthermore, non‐nesting occurs in standard and practical examples. Therefore, if the limit is to be computed for a range [α_L, α_U]of values of α, this paper suggests that T should be a carefully chosen approximate 1 –α_L upper limit for θ. The choice leads to Buehler limits that have high statistical efficiency and are nesting.     

An inclusion-consistent solution to the problem of absurd confidence statements: 1. Consistent exact confidence-interval estimation

An example is given of a uniformly most accurate unbiased confidence belt which yields absurd confidence statements with 100% occurrence. In several known examples, as well as in the 100%-occurrence counterexample, an optimal confidence belt provides absurd statements because it is inclusion-inconsistent with either a null or an all-inclusive belt or both. It is concluded that confidence-theory optimality criteria alone are inadequate for practice, and that a consistency criterion is required. An approach based upon inclusion consistency of belts [C(x) C C C(x), for some x, implies γ ≤ γ for confidence coefficients] is suggested for exact interval estimation in continuous parametric models. Belt inclusion consistency, the existence of a proper-pivotal vector [a pivotal vector T(X, θ) such that the effective range of T(x,.) is independent of x], and the existence of a confidence distribution are proven mutually equivalent. This consistent approach being restrictive, it is shown, using Neyman's anomalous 1954 example, how to determine whether any given parametric function can be estimated consistently and exactly or whether a consistent nonexact solution must be attempted.     

On confidence regions of semiparametric nonlinear reproductive dispersion models

This article investigates the confidence regions for semiparametric nonlinear reproductive dispersion models (SNRDMs), which is an extension of nonlinear regression models. Based on local linear estimate of nonparametric component and generalized profile likelihood estimate of parameter in SNRDMs, a modified geometric framework of Bates and Wattes is proposed. Within this geometric framework, we present three kinds of improved approximate confidence regions for the parameters and parameter subsets in terms of curvatures. The work extends the previous results of Hamilton et al. [in Accounting for intrinsic nonlinearity in nonlinear regression parameter inference regions, Ann. Statist. 10, pp. 386–393, 1982], Hamilton [in Confidence regions for parameter subset in nonlinear regression, Biometrika, 73, pp. 57–64, 1986], Wei [in On confidence regions of embedded models in regular parameter families (a geometric approch), Austral. J. Statist. 36, pp. 327–338, 1994], Tang et al. [in Confidence regions in quasi-likelihood nonlinear models: a geometric approach, J. Biomath. 15, pp. 55–64, 2000b] and Zhu et al. [in On confidence regions of semiparametric nonlinear regression models, Acta. Math. Scient. 20, pp. 68–75, 2000].     

Counting by weighing: construction of two-sided confidence intervals

Counting by weighing is widely used in industry and often more efficient than counting manually which is time consuming and prone to human errors especially when the number of items is large. Lower confidence bounds on the numbers of items in infinitely many future bags based on the weights of the bags have been proposed recently in Liu et al. [Counting by weighing: Know your numbers with confidence, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C 65(4) (2016), pp. 641–648]. These confidence bounds are constructed using the data from one calibration experiment and for different parameters (or numbers), but have the frequency interpretation similar to a usual confidence set for one parameter only. In this paper, the more challenging problem of constructing two-sided confidence intervals is studied. A simulation-based method for computing the critical constant is proposed. This method is proven to give the required critical constant when the number of simulations goes to infinity, and shown to be easily implemented on an ordinary computer to compute the critical constant accurately and quickly. The methodology is illustrated with a real data example.     

Approximate confidence bounds for ratios of variance components in two-way unbalanced crossed models with interactions

Consider the general unbalanced two-factor crossed components-of-variance model with interaction given by Y_ijk: = μ+A_i: +B_j: + C_ij: +E_ijk: (i = 1,2, … a; j = 1,…,b; k = 1,…,.n_ij:=0) A_i:,B_j:, C_ij: and E_ijk: are independent unobservable random variables. Also A_i:sim; N(0,σ² _A),B_j: ～ N(0,σ² _B), C_ij:～N(0,s² _C:) and E_ijk:～N(0,s² _E:). In this paper approximate confidence bounds are obtained for ρ_A: = ρ² _A/² and ρ_B: = ρ² _B:/ρ² (where σ² = σ² _A:+ σ² _B+σ² _Cσ² _E) for special cases of the above model. The balanced incomplete block model is studied as a special case.     

Robust M-estimators of scale: Minimax bias versus maximal variance

In the location-scale estimation problem, we study robustness properties of M-estimators of the scale parameter under unknown ?-contamination of a fixed symmetric unimodal error distribution F₀. Within a general class of M-estimators, the estimator with minimax asymptotic bias is shown to lie within the subclass of α-interquantile ranges of the empirical distribution symmetrized about the sample median. Our main result is that as ? → 0, the limiting minimax asymptotic bias estimator is sometimes (e.g., when F_o is Cauchy), but not always, the median absolute deviation about the median. It is also shown that contamination in the neighbourhood of a discontinuity of the influence function of a minimax bias estimator can sometimes inflate the asymptotic variance beyond that achieved by placing all the ?-contamination at infinity. This effect is quantified by a new notion of asymptotic efficiency that takes into account the effect of infinitesimal contamination of the parametric model for the error distribution.     

Best exact nonparametric confidence intervals for quantiles

Well-known nonparametric confidence intervals for quantiles are of the form (X _{i : n} , X _{j : n} ) with suitably chosen order statistics X _{i : n} and X _{j : n} , but typically their coverage levels differ from those prescribed. It appears that the coverage level of the confidence interval of the form (X _{i : n} , X _{j : n} ) with random indices I and J can be rendered equal, exactly to any predetermined level γ?∈?(0, 1). Best in the sense of minimum E(J???I), i.e., ‘the shortest’, two-sided confidence intervals are constructed. If no two-sided confidence interval exists for a given γ, the most accurate one-sided confidence intervals are constructed.     

Exact confidence region for the parameters of the gamma distribution based on two independent samples

The gamma distribution has been discussed by many authors. This article proposes an exact confidence region for the parameters of a two-parameter gamma distribution. The result is based on the fact that the percentiles of the F-distribution, with equal degrees of freedom k, are monotonic in k.