L(p,q)-labeling of sparse graphs

Let p and q be positive integers. An L(p,q)-labeling of a graph G with a span s is a labeling of its vertices by integers between 0 and s such that adjacent vertices of G are labeled using colors at least p apart, and vertices having a common neighbor are labeled using colors at least q apart. We denote by λ _p,q (G) the least integer k such that G has an L(p,q)-labeling with span k. The maximum average degree of a graph G, denoted by $\operatorname {Mad}(G)$ , is the maximum among the average degrees of its subgraphs (i.e. $\operatorname {Mad}(G) = \max\{\frac{2|E(H)|}{|V(H)|} ; H \subseteq G \}$ ). We consider graphs G with $\operatorname {Mad}(G) < \frac{10}{3}$ , 3 and $\frac{14}{5}$ . These sets of graphs contain planar graphs with girth 5, 6 and 7 respectively. We prove in this paper that every graph G with maximum average degree m and maximum degree Δ has:

λ _p,q (G)≤(2q?1)Δ+6p+10q?8 if $m < \frac{10}{3}$ and p≥2q.

λ _p,q (G)≤(2q?1)Δ+4p+14q?9 if $m < \frac{10}{3}$ and 2q>p.

λ _p,q (G)≤(2q?1)Δ+4p+6q?5 if m<3.

λ _p,q (G)≤(2q?1)Δ+4p+4q?4 if $m < \frac{14}{5}$ .

We give also some refined bounds for specific values of p, q, or Δ. By the way we improve results of Lih and Wang (SIAM J. Discrete Math. 17(2):264–275, 2003).     

Parity and strong parity edge-colorings of graphs

A parity walk in an edge-coloring of a graph is a walk along which each color is used an even number of times. A parity edge-coloring (respectively, strong parity edge-coloring) is an edge-coloring in which there is no nontrivial parity path (respectively, open parity walk). The parity edge-chromatic number p(G) (respectively, strong parity edge-chromatic number $\widehat{p}(G)$ ) is the least number of colors in a parity edge-coloring (respectively, strong parity edge-coloring) of G. Notice that $\widehat{p}(G) \ge p(G) \ge \chi'(G) \ge \Delta(G)$ for any graph G. In this paper, we determine $\widehat{p}(G)$ and p(G) for some complete bipartite graphs and some products of graphs. For instance, we determine $\widehat{p}(K_{m,n})$ and p(K _m,n ) for m≤n with n≡0,?1,?2 (mod 2^?lg?m?).     

On the outer-connected domination in graphs

A set S of vertices of a graph G is an outer-connected dominating set if every vertex not in S is adjacent to some vertex in S and the subgraph induced by V?S is connected. The outer-connected domination number $\widetilde{\gamma}_{c}(G)$ is the minimum size of such a set. We prove that if δ(G)≥2 and diam?(G)≤2, then $\widetilde{\gamma}_{c}(G)\le (n+1)/2$ , and we study the behavior of $\widetilde{\gamma}_{c}(G)$ under an edge addition.     

An upper bound on the total restrained domination number of a tree

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A set of vertices S?V is a total restrained dominating set if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in S and every vertex of $V-\nobreak S$ is adjacent to a vertex in V?S. The total restrained domination number of G, denoted by γ _tr (G), is the smallest cardinality of a total restrained dominating set of G. A support vertex of a graph is a vertex of degree at least two which is adjacent to a leaf. We show that $\gamma_{\mathit{tr}}(T)\leq\lfloor\frac{n+2s+\ell-1}{2}\rfloor$ where T is a tree of order n≥3, and s and ? are, respectively, the number of support vertices and leaves of T. We also constructively characterize the trees attaining the aforementioned bound.     

Objective functions with redundant domains

Let $(E,{ \mathcal{A}})$ be a set system consisting of a finite collection ${ \mathcal{A}}$ of subsets of a ground set E, and suppose that we have a function ? which maps ${ \mathcal{A}}$ into some set S. Now removing a subset K from E gives a restriction ${ \mathcal{A}}(\bar{K})$ to those sets of ${ \mathcal{A}}$ disjoint from K, and we have a corresponding restriction $\phi|_{\hspace {.02in}{ \mathcal{A}}(\bar{K})}$ of our function ?. If the removal of K does not affect the image set of ?, that is $\mbox {Im}(\phi|_{\hspace {.02in}{ \mathcal{A}}(\bar{X})})=\mbox {Im}(\phi)$ , then we will say that K is a kernel set of ${ \mathcal{A}}$ with respect to ?. Such sets are potentially useful in optimisation problems defined in terms of ?. We will call the set of all subsets of E that are kernel sets with respect to ? a kernel system and denote it by $\mathrm {Ker}_{\phi}({ \mathcal{A}})$ . Motivated by the optimisation theme, we ask which kernel systems are matroids. For instance, if ${ \mathcal{A}}$ is the collection of forests in a graph G with coloured edges and ? counts how many edges of each colour occurs in a forest then $\mathrm {Ker}_{\phi}({ \mathcal{A}})$ is isomorphic to the disjoint sum of the cocycle matroids of the differently coloured subgraphs; on the other hand, if ${ \mathcal{A}}$ is the power set of a set of positive integers, and ? is the function which takes the values 1 and 0 on subsets according to whether they are sum-free or not, then we show that $\mathrm {Ker}_{\phi}({ \mathcal{A}})$ is essentially never a matroid.     

Popularity at minimum cost

We consider an extension of the popular matching problem in this paper. The input to the popular matching problem is a bipartite graph $G = (\mathcal{A}\cup\mathcal{B},E)$ , where $\mathcal{A}$ is a set of people, $\mathcal{B}$ is a set of items, and each person $a \in\mathcal{A}$ ranks a subset of items in order of preference, with ties allowed. The popular matching problem seeks to compute a matching M ^? between people and items such that there is no matching M where more people are happier with M than with M ^?. Such a matching M ^? is called a popular matching. However, there are simple instances where no popular matching exists. Here we consider the following natural extension to the above problem: associated with each item $b \in\mathcal{B}$ is a non-negative price cost(b), that is, for any item b, new copies of b can be added to the input graph by paying an amount of cost(b) per copy. When G does not admit a popular matching, the problem is to “augment” G at minimum cost such that the new graph admits a popular matching. We show that this problem is NP-hard; in fact, it is NP-hard to approximate it within a factor of $\sqrt{n_{1}}/2$ , where n ₁ is the number of people. This problem has a simple polynomial time algorithm when each person has a preference list of length at most 2. However, if we consider the problem of constructing a graph at minimum cost that admits a popular matching that matches all people, then even with preference lists of length 2, the problem becomes NP-hard. On the other hand, when the number of copies of each item is fixed, we show that the problem of computing a minimum cost popular matching or deciding that no popular matching exists can be solved in O(mn ₁) time, where m is the number of edges.     

(p,q)-total labeling of complete graphs

Given a graph G and positive integers p,q with p≥q, the (p,q)-total number $\lambda_{p,q}^{T}(G)$ of G is the width of the smallest range of integers that suffices to label the vertices and the edges of G such that the labels of any two adjacent vertices are at least q apart, the labels of any two adjacent edges are at least q apart, and the difference between the labels of a vertex and its incident edges is at least p. Havet and Yu (Discrete Math 308:496–513, 2008) first introduced this problem and determined the exact value of $\lambda_{p,1}^{T}(K_{n})$ except for even n with p+5≤n≤6p ²?10p+4. Their proof for showing that $\lambda _{p,1}^{T}(K_{n})\leq n+2p-3$ for odd n has some mistakes. In this paper, we prove that if n is odd, then $\lambda_{p}^{T}(K_{n})\leq n+2p-3$ if p=2, p=3, or $4\lfloor\frac{p}{2}\rfloor+3\leq n\leq4p-1$ . And we extend some results that were given in Havet and Yu (Discrete Math 308:496–513, 2008). Beside these, we give a lower bound for $\lambda_{p,q}^{T}(K_{n})$ under the condition that q<p<2q.     

The adjacent vertex distinguishing total coloring of planar graphs

An adjacent vertex distinguishing total coloring of a graph G is a proper total coloring of G such that any pair of adjacent vertices have distinct sets of colors. The minimum number of colors needed for an adjacent vertex distinguishing total coloring of G is denoted by $\chi''_{a}(G)$ . In this paper, we characterize completely the adjacent vertex distinguishing total chromatic number of planar graphs G with large maximum degree Δ by showing that if Δ≥14, then $\varDelta+1\leq \chi''_{a}(G)\leq \varDelta+2$ , and $\chi''_{a}(G)=\varDelta+2$ if and only if G contains two adjacent vertices of maximum degree.     

Independent dominating sets in regular graphs

Let G be a simple, regular graph of order n and degree δ. The independent domination number i(G) is defined to be the minimum cardinality among all maximal independent sets of vertices of G. We establish new upper bounds, as functions of n and δ, for the independent domination number of regular graphs with $n/6<\delta< (3-\sqrt{5})n/2$ . Our two main theorems complement recent results of Goddard et al. (Ann. Comb., 2011) for larger values of δ.     

Spanning 3-connected index of graphs

For an integer $s>0$ and for $u,v\in V(G)$ with $u\ne v$ , an $(s;u,v)$ -path-system of G is a subgraph H of G consisting of s internally disjoint (u, v)-paths, and such an H is called a spanning $(s;u,v)$ -path system if $V(H)=V(G)$ . The spanning connectivity $\kappa ^{*}(G)$ of graph G is the largest integer s such that for any integer k with $1\le k \le s$ and for any $u,v\in V(G)$ with $u\ne v$ , G has a spanning ( $k;u,v$ )-path-system. Let G be a simple connected graph that is not a path, a cycle or a $K_{1,3}$ . The spanning k-connected index of G, written $s_{k}(G)$ , is the smallest nonnegative integer m such that $L^m(G)$ is spanning k-connected. Let $l(G)=\max \{m:\,G$ has a divalent path of length m that is not both of length 2 and in a $K_{3}$ }, where a divalent path in G is a path whose interval vertices have degree two in G. In this paper, we prove that $s_{3}(G)\le l(G)+6$ . The key proof to this result is that every connected 3-triangular graph is 2-collapsible.     

Paired-domination number of claw-free odd-regular graphs

A paired-dominating set of a graph G is a dominating set of vertices whose induced subgraph has a perfect matching, while the paired-domination number is the minimum cardinality of a paired-dominating set in the graph, denoted by \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\). Let G be a connected \(\{K_{1,3}, K_{4}-e\}\)-free cubic graph of order n. We show that \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\le \frac{10n+6}{27}\) if G is \(C_{4}\)-free and that \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\le \frac{n}{3}+\frac{n+6}{9(\lceil \frac{3}{4}(g_o+1)\rceil +1)}\) if G is \(\{C_{4}, C_{6}, C_{10}, \ldots , C_{2g_o}\}\)-free for an odd integer \(g_o\ge 3\); the extremal graphs are characterized; we also show that if G is a 2 -connected, \(\gamma _{pr}(G) = \frac{n}{3} \). Furthermore, if G is a connected \((2k+1)\)-regular \(\{K_{1,3}, K_4-e\}\)-free graph of order n, then \(\gamma _{pr}(G)\le \frac{n}{k+1} \), with equality if and only if \(G=L(F)\), where \(F\cong K_{1, 2k+2}\), or k is even and \(F\cong K_{k+1,k+2}\).     

The total domination subdivision number in graphs with no induced 3-cycle and 5-cycle

A set S of vertices of a graph G=(V,E) without isolated vertex is a total dominating set if every vertex of V(G) is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number γ _t (G) is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. The total domination subdivision number $\mathrm{sd}_{\gamma_{t}}(G)$ is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the total domination number. Favaron, Karami, Khoeilar and Sheikholeslami (J. Comb. Optim. 20:76–84, 2010a) conjectured that: For any connected graph G of order n≥3, $\mathrm{sd}_{\gamma_{t}}(G)\le \gamma_{t}(G)+1$ . In this paper we use matching to prove this conjecture for graphs with no 3-cycle and 5-cycle. In particular this proves the conjecture for bipartite graphs.     

Signed Roman domination in graphs

In this paper we continue the study of Roman dominating functions in graphs. A signed Roman dominating function (SRDF) on a graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{?1,1,2} satisfying the conditions that (i) the sum of its function values over any closed neighborhood is at least one and (ii) for every vertex u for which f(u)=?1 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v)=2. The weight of a SRDF is the sum of its function values over all vertices. The signed Roman domination number of G is the minimum weight of a SRDF in G. We present various lower and upper bounds on the signed Roman domination number of a graph. Let G be a graph of order n and size m with no isolated vertex. We show that $\gamma _{\mathrm{sR}}(G) \ge\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{n} - n$ and that γ _sR(G)≥(3n?4m)/2. In both cases, we characterize the graphs achieving equality in these bounds. If G is a bipartite graph of order n, then we show that $\gamma_{\mathrm{sR}}(G) \ge3\sqrt{n+1} - n - 3$ , and we characterize the extremal graphs.     

Hardness results and approximation algorithm for total liar’s domination in graphs

In this paper, we initiate the study of total liar’s domination of a graph. A subset L?V of a graph G=(V,E) is called a total liar’s dominating set of G if (i) for all v∈V, |N _G (v)∩L|≥2 and (ii) for every pair u,v∈V of distinct vertices, |(N _G (u)∪N _G (v))∩L|≥3. The total liar’s domination number of a graph G is the cardinality of a minimum total liar’s dominating set of G and is denoted by γ _TLR (G). The Minimum Total Liar’s Domination Problem is to find a total liar’s dominating set of minimum cardinality of the input graph G. Given a graph G and a positive integer k, the Total Liar’s Domination Decision Problem is to check whether G has a total liar’s dominating set of cardinality at most k. In this paper, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a total liar’s dominating set in a graph. We show that the Total Liar’s Domination Decision Problem is NP-complete for general graphs and is NP-complete even for split graphs and hence for chordal graphs. We also propose a 2(lnΔ(G)+1)-approximation algorithm for the Minimum Total Liar’s Domination Problem, where Δ(G) is the maximum degree of the input graph G. We show that Minimum Total Liar’s Domination Problem cannot be approximated within a factor of $(\frac{1}{8}-\epsilon)\ln(|V|)$ for any ?>0, unless NP?DTIME(|V|^loglog|V|). Finally, we show that Minimum Total Liar’s Domination Problem is APX-complete for graphs with bounded degree 4.     

Adjacent vertex-distinguishing edge coloring of graphs with maximum degree Δ

An adjacent vertex-distinguishing edge coloring, or avd-coloring, of a graph G is a proper edge coloring of G such that no pair of adjacent vertices meets the same set of colors. Let $\operatorname {mad}(G)$ and Δ(G) denote the maximum average degree and the maximum degree of a graph G, respectively. In this paper, we prove that every graph G with Δ(G)≥5 and $\operatorname{mad}(G) < 3-\frac {2}{\Delta}$ can be avd-colored with Δ(G)+1 colors. This completes a result of Wang and Wang (J. Comb. Optim. 19:471–485, 2010).     

Improved upper bound for acyclic chromatic index of planar graphs without 4-cycles

Let $\chi'_{a}(G)$ and Δ(G) denote the acyclic chromatic index and the maximum degree of a graph G, respectively. Fiam?ík conjectured that $\chi'_{a}(G)\leq \varDelta (G)+2$ . Even for planar graphs, this conjecture remains open with large gap. Let G be a planar graph without 4-cycles. Fiedorowicz et al. showed that $\chi'_{a}(G)\leq \varDelta (G)+15$ . Recently Hou et al. improved the upper bound to Δ(G)+4. In this paper, we further improve the upper bound to Δ(G)+3.     

The decycling number of outerplanar graphs

For a graph G, let τ(G) be the decycling number of G and c(G) be the number of vertex-disjoint cycles of G. It has been proved that c(G)≤τ(G)≤2c(G) for an outerplanar graph G. An outerplanar graph G is called lower-extremal if τ(G)=c(G) and upper-extremal if τ(G)=2c(G). In this paper, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for an outerplanar graph being upper-extremal. On the other hand, we find a class $\mathcal{S}$ of outerplanar graphs none of which is lower-extremal and show that if G has no subdivision of S for all $S\in \mathcal{S}$ , then G is lower-extremal.     

Minimum 2-distance coloring of planar graphs and channel assignment

A 2-distance k-coloring of a graph G is a proper k-coloring such that any two vertices at distance two get different colors. \(\chi _{2}(G)\)=min{k|G has a 2-distance k-coloring}. Wegner conjectured that for each planar graph G with maximum degree \(\Delta \), \(\chi _2(G) \le 7\) if \(\Delta \le 3\), \(\chi _2(G) \le \Delta +5\) if \(4\le \Delta \le 7\) and \(\chi _2(G) \le \lfloor \frac{3\Delta }{2}\rfloor +1\) if \(\Delta \ge 8\). In this paper, we prove that: (1) If G is a planar graph with maximum degree \(\Delta \le 5\), then \(\chi _{2}(G)\le 20\); (2) If G is a planar graph with maximum degree \(\Delta \ge 6\), then \(\chi _{2}(G)\le 5\Delta -7\).     

Embeddings into almost self-centered graphs of given radius

A graph is almost self-centered (ASC) if all but two of its vertices are central. An almost self-centered graph with radius r is called an r-ASC graph. The r-ASC index \(\theta _r(G)\) of a graph G is the minimum number of vertices needed to be added to G such that an r-ASC graph is obtained that contains G as an induced subgraph. It is proved that \(\theta _r(G)\le 2r\) holds for any graph G and any \(r\ge 2\) which improves the earlier known bound \(\theta _r(G)\le 2r+1\). It is further proved that \(\theta _r(G)\le 2r-1\) holds if \(r\ge 3\) and G is of order at least 2. The 3-ASC index of complete graphs is determined. It is proved that \(\theta _3(G)\in \{3,4\}\) if G has diameter 2 and for several classes of graphs of diameter 2 the exact value of the 3-ASC index is obtained. For instance, if a graph G of diameter 2 does not contain a diametrical triple, then \(\theta _3(G) = 4\). The 3-ASC index of paths of order \(n\ge 1\), cycles of order \(n\ge 3\), and trees of order \(n\ge 10\) and diameter \(n-2\) are also determined, respectively, and several open problems proposed.     

Some results on the injective chromatic number of?graphs

A k-coloring of a graph G=(V,E) is a mapping c:V??{1,2,??,k}. The coloring c is injective if, for every vertex v??V, all the neighbors of v are assigned with distinct colors. The injective chromatic number ?? _i (G) of G is the smallest k such that G has an injective k-coloring. In this paper, we prove that every K ₄-minor free graph G with maximum degree ????1 has $\chi_{i}(G)\le \lceil \frac{3}{2}\Delta\rceil$ . Moreover, some related results and open problems are given.