基于分层模型的缺失数据插补方法研究

大规模抽样调查多采用复杂抽样设计,得到具有分层嵌套结构的调查数据集,其中不可避免会遇到数据缺失问题,针对分层结构含缺失数据集的插补策略目前鲜有研究。本文将Gibbs算法应用到分层含缺失数据集的多重插补过程中,分别研究了固定效应模型插补法和随机效应模型插补法,进而通过理论推导和数值模拟,在不同组内相关系数、群组规模、数据缺失比例等情形下,从参数估计结果的无偏性和有效性两方面,比较不同方法的插补效果,给出插补模型的选择建议。研究结果表明,采用随机效应模型作为插补模型时,得到的参数估计结果更准确,而固定效应模型作为插补模型操作相对简便,在数据缺失比例较小、组内相关系数较大、群组规模较大等情形下,可以采用固定效应插补模型,否则建议采用随机效应插补模型。     

Prediction in Some Poisson Errors in Variables Models

Predictive distributions are developed and illustrated for prediction in some Poisson errors in variables models. Two different situations in which multiplicative treatment effects are appropriate are considered within the context of predicting counts of road accidents. Hierarchical prior structures are investigated, and numerical integration and Gibbs sampling routines are used to derive the predictive and posterior probabilities. Examples of analyses are provided with data from road accidents in Sweden.     

Some Remarks on Latent Variable Models in Categorical Data Analysis

We present an overview of some important and/or interesting contributions to the latent variable literature for the analysis of multivariate categorical responses, beginning with Lazarsfeld's introduction of latent class models. There is by now an enormous literature on latent variable models for categorical responses, especially in the context of including random effects in generalized linear mixed models, so this is necessarily a highly selective overview. Due to space considerations, we summarize the main ideas, suppressing details. As part of our presentation, we raise a couple of questions that may suggest future research work.     

The effects of model mis-specifications in linear measurement error models

In the literature, there are many results on the consequences of mis-specified models for linear models with error in the response only, see, e.g., Seber(1977). There are also discussions of estimation for the model writh errors both in the response and in the predictor variables (called measurement error models; see, e.g., Fuller(1987)). In this paper, we consider the problem of model mis-specification for measurement error models. Only a few special cases have been tackled in the past (Edland, 1996; Carroll and Ruppert, 1996 and Lakshminarayanan Amp; Gunst, 1984); we deal with the situation here in some generality. Results have been obtained as follows: (a) When a model is under-fitted, the estimate of the variance of the measurement error will be asymptotically biased, as will the regression coefficients, and the asymptotic biases in the estimates of the regression coefficients will always exist for under-fitted models. Even orthogonality of the variables in the model will not make the biases vanish. (b)For over-fitting, the estimates of the variances of measurement errors and of the regression coefficients are asymptotically unbiased. However, the variance of the estimated regression coefficients will increase. Over-fitting will cause larger changes in the variances of the estimated parameters in measurement error models than in no measurement error models.