On the minimum mean squared error estimators in a regression model

In this paper we analyze the properties of two estimators oroposed by Farebrother (1975) for linear regression models.     

On the almost unbiased ridge regression estimator

The purpose of this paper is two-fold. One is to compare the almost unbiased generalized ridge regression (AUGRR) estimator proposed by Singh, Chaubey and Dwivedi (1986) with the generalized ridge regression (GRR) estimator and with the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator in terms of the mean squared error criterion. Second is to examine small sample properties of the operational almost unbiased ordinary ridge regression (AUORR) estimator by Monte Carlo experiments.     

A comparison of mixed and minimax estimators of linear models

In this paper the stochastic properties of two estimators of linear models, mixed and minimax, based on different types of prior information, are compared using quadratic risk as the criterion for superiority. A necessary and sufficient condition for the minimax estimator to be superior to the comparable mixed estimator is derived as well as a simpler necessary but not sufficient condition.     

Ridge estimation in logistic regression

The variance of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) of the slope parameter in a logistic regression model becomes large as the degree of collinearity among the explanatory variables increases. In a Monte Carlo study, we observed that a ridge type estimator is at least as good as, and often much better than, the MLE in terms of Total and Prediction Mean Squared Error criteria. Using a set of medical data it is illustrated that the ridge trace of the estimator considered here is a useful diagnostic tool in logistic regression analysis.     

Nonparametric Shrinkage Estimation for Aalen's Additive Hazards Model

Aalen's nonparametric additive model in which the regression coefficients are assumed to be unspecified functions of time is a flexible alternative to Cox's proportional hazards model when the proportionality assumption is in doubt. In this paper, we incorporate a general linear hypothesis into the estimation of the time‐varying regression coefficients. We combine unrestricted least squares estimators and estimators that are restricted by the linear hypothesis and produce James‐Stein‐type shrinkage estimators of the regression coefficients. We develop the asymptotic joint distribution of such restricted and unrestricted estimators and use this to study the relative performance of the proposed estimators via their integrated asymptotic distributional risks. We conduct Monte Carlo simulations to examine the relative performance of the estimators in terms of their integrated mean square errors. We also compare the performance of the proposed estimators with a recently devised LASSO estimator as well as with ridge‐type estimators both via simulations and data on the survival of primary billiary cirhosis patients.     

Chain ratio and regression type estimators for median estimation in survey sampling

In this paper, we consider chain ratio and regression type estimators for estimating median in survey sampling. We find expressions for the variance of the chain-ratio and chain-regression type estimators considered in the present investigation. The optimum values of the first phase and second phase sample sizes are also obtained for the fixed cost of survey. The relative efficiency of chain-ratio and chain-regression type estimators have been studied in comparison to ratio and regression type estimators of median proposed by Singh, Joarder and Tracy (2001).     

Minimax designs for approximately linear models with AR(1) errors

We obtain designs for linear regression models under two main departures from the classical assumptions: (1) the response is taken to be only approximately linear, and (2) the errors are not assumed to be independent, but to instead follow a first-order autoregressive process. These designs have the property that they minimize (a modification of) the maximum integrated mean squared error of the estimated response, with the maximum taken over a class of departures from strict linearity and over all autoregression parameters ρ,|ρ,| < 1, of fixed sign. Specific methods of implementation are discussed. We find that an asymptotically optimal procedure for AR(1) models consists of choosing points from that design measure which is optimal for uncorrelated errors, and then implementing them in an appropriate order.     

A relationship between generalized and integrated mean square errors

Generalised Mean squared error is a flexible measure of the adequancy of ? repression estimator. It allows specific characteristics of the regression model and its intended use to be In-corportated in the measure itself. Similarly, integrated mean squared error enables a researcher to stipulate particular regions of interest and wi ighting functions in the assessment of a prediction equation. The appeal of both measures is their ability to allow design or model characteristics to directly influence the evaluation of fitted regression models. In this note an e-quivalence of the two measures is established for correctly specified models.     

Rank-based ridge estimation in multiple linear regression

Multicollinearity and model misspecification are frequently encountered problems in practice that produce undesirable effects on classical ordinary least squares (OLS) regression estimator. The ridge regression estimator is an important tool to reduce the effects of multicollinearity, but it is still sensitive to a model misspecification of error distribution. Although rank-based statistical inference has desirable robustness properties compared to the OLS procedures, it can be unstable in the presence of multicollinearity. This paper introduces a rank regression estimator for regression parameters and develops tests for general linear hypotheses in a multiple linear regression model. The proposed estimator and the tests have desirable robustness features against the multicollinearity and model misspecification of error distribution. Asymptotic behaviours of the proposed estimator and the test statistics are investigated. Real and simulated data sets are used to demonstrate the feasibility and the performance of the estimator and the tests.     

A pseudo‐empirical best linear unbiased prediction approach to small area estimation using survey weights

The authors develop a small area estimation method using a nested error linear regression model and survey weights. In particular, they propose a pseudo‐empirical best linear unbiased prediction (pseudo‐EBLUP) estimator to estimate small area means. This estimator borrows strength across areas through the model and makes use of the survey weights to preserve the design consistency as the area sample size increases. The proposed estimator also has a nice self‐benchmarking property. The authors also obtain an approximation to the model mean squared error (MSE) of the proposed estimator and a nearly unbiased estimator of MSE. Finally, they compare the proposed estimator with the EBLUP estimator and the pseudo‐EBLUP estimator proposed by Prasad & Rao (1999), using data analyzed earlier by Battese, Harter & Fuller (1988).     

Small sample properties of isotonic estimators — bias and mean squared error of linear combinations under normality

Bias and mean squared error for linear combinations of the isotonic regression estimators are computed. The case of sampling three distinct populations and the case of sampling seven or fewer populations having common mean are studied in detail. Numerical results are given, and comparisons between isotonic and unbiased estimation procedures are made.     

Developing a restricted two-parameter Liu-type estimator: A comparison of restricted estimators in the binary logistic regression model

In the context of estimating regression coefficients of an ill-conditioned binary logistic regression model, we develop a new biased estimator having two parameters for estimating the regression vector parameter β when it is subjected to lie in the linear subspace restriction Hβ = h. The matrix mean squared error and mean squared error (MSE) functions of these newly defined estimators are derived. Moreover, a method to choose the two parameters is proposed. Then, the performance of the proposed estimator is compared to that of the restricted maximum likelihood estimator and some other existing estimators in the sense of MSE via a Monte Carlo simulation study. According to the simulation results, the performance of the estimators depends on the sample size, number of explanatory variables, and degree of correlation. The superiority region of our proposed estimator is identified based on the biasing parameters, numerically. It is concluded that the new estimator is superior to the others in most of the situations considered and it is recommended to the researchers.     

Matrix mean squared error comparisons of some biased estimators with two biasing parameters

To deal with multicollinearity problem, the biased estimators with two biasing parameters have recently attracted much research interest. The aim of this article is to compare one of the last proposals given by Yang and Chang (2010 Yang, H., and X. Chang. 2010. A new two-parameter estimator in linear regression. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 39 (6):923–34.[Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) with Liu-type estimator (Liu 2003 Liu, K. 2003. Using Liu-type estimator to combat collinearity. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 32 (5):1009–20.[Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and k ? d class estimator (Sakallioglu and Kaciranlar 2008 Sakallioglu, S., and S. Kaciranlar. 2008. A new biased estimator based on ridge estimation. Statistical Papers 49:669–89.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) under the matrix mean squared error criterion. As well as giving these comparisons theoretically, we support the results with the extended simulation studies and real data example, which show the advantages of the proposal given by Yang and Chang (2010 Yang, H., and X. Chang. 2010. A new two-parameter estimator in linear regression. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 39 (6):923–34.[Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) over the other proposals with increasing multicollinearity level.     

On adaptive linear regression

Ordinary least squares (OLS) is omnipresent in regression modeling. Occasionally, least absolute deviations (LAD) or other methods are used as an alternative when there are outliers. Although some data adaptive estimators have been proposed, they are typically difficult to implement. In this paper, we propose an easy to compute adaptive estimator which is simply a linear combination of OLS and LAD. We demonstrate large sample normality of our estimator and show that its performance is close to best for both light-tailed (e.g. normal and uniform) and heavy-tailed (e.g. double exponential and t ₃) error distributions. We demonstrate this through three simulation studies and illustrate our method on state public expenditures and lutenizing hormone data sets. We conclude that our method is general and easy to use, which gives good efficiency across a wide range of error distributions.     

Bootstrap variance and bias estimation in linear models

Let θ be a nonlinear function of the regression parameters and θ be its estimator based on the least-squares method. This paper studies the bootstrap estimators of the variance and bias of θ. The bootstrap estimators are shown to be consistent and asymptotically unbiased under some conditions. Asymptotic orders of the mean squared errors of the bootstrap estimators are also obtained. The bootstrap and the classical linearization method are compared in a simulation study. Discussions about when to use the bootstrap are given.     

Restricted ridge estimator in generalized linear models: Monte Carlo simulation studies on Poisson and binomial distributed responses

It is known that collinearity among the explanatory variables in generalized linear models (GLMs) inflates the variance of maximum likelihood estimators. To overcome multicollinearity in GLMs, ordinary ridge estimator and restricted estimator were proposed. In this study, a restricted ridge estimator is introduced by unifying the ordinary ridge estimator and the restricted estimator in GLMs and its mean squared error (MSE) properties are discussed. The MSE comparisons are done in the context of first-order approximated estimators. The results are illustrated by a numerical example and two simulation studies are conducted with Poisson and binomial responses.     

Superiority comparisons of homogeneous linear estimators

In the paper homogeneous linear estimators of the parameter vector of the general linear model are compared in terms of their MSE matrices. A necessary and sufficient condition for the difference of two MSE matrices to be positive definite is obtained and its practical existence discussed. The non-negative definiteness of the difference also receives attention, and conditions for this case are discussed. The absence of any conditions of the above type is taken into consideration as well.     

Penalized contrast estimation in functional linear models with circular data

Our aim is to estimate the unknown slope function in the functional linear model when the response Y is real and the random function X is a second-order stationary and periodic process. We obtain our estimator by minimizing a standard (and very simple) mean-square contrast on linear finite dimensional spaces spanned by trigonometric bases. Our approach provides a penalization procedure which allows to automatically select the adequate dimension, in a non-asymptotic point of view. In fact, we can show that our penalized estimator reaches the optimal (minimax) rate of convergence in the sense of the prediction error. We complete the theoretical results by a simulation study and a real example that illustrates how the procedure works in practice.