共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
以企业经理与联盟企业人员间个人关系在企业内传递共享为出发点,探讨个人层次关系转换为企业联盟层次关系的机制。基于国内企业联盟数据的实证统计研究显示,个人关系在企业内传递共享对企业联盟关系起正向促进作用,个人关系在企业内制度化是这一正向促进作用的中介因素,联盟双方资源与能力互补性削弱个人关系传递共享与制度化之间的关系。 相似文献
4.
新经济背景下合资企业与战略联盟的区别 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
从企业战略角度,以合作战略的两种形式--合资战略(joint venture strategies)和战略联盟战略(strategic alliance strategies)的差别性为分析对象,尝试认识在新经济背景下企业战略创造价值的两种不同方式.合资战略和战略联盟作为两种战略行动,共性是基于合作行为的资源配置方式,属于合作战略的范畴;但两者的差别体现出对企业而言截然不同的价值创造过程.合资战略本质上是企业组织内部化战略的结果,即在组织形式上趋向于母子公司之间关系,价值创造呈降低成本导向机理;战略联盟本质上是企业间关系变化的结果,这种企业间关系以协调为特征,既不同于市场交易关系,也不同于组织内部的层级关系,是内部层级市场和外部产权交换不可替代的产物,价值创造呈潜在的利润导向机理. 相似文献
5.
联盟企业的战略导向与知识获取——控制机制使用的中介与干预作用 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
探讨了联盟企业的控制机制使用对于其战略导向与知识获取间关系的中介与干预作用.目的在于揭示不同控制机制使用对于联盟企业的战略导向与知识获取间关系的影响效果及作用机制.通过对389家联盟企业的实证研究发现,信任控制是市场导向与知识获取的中介变量,也是企业家导向与知识获取的正干预变量;契约控制是企业家导向与知识获取的中介变量,却不是市场导向与知识获取的负干预变量.该项研究结论对于发展战略联盟管理文献、促进联盟企业的知识获取具有重要的理论价值与实践指导意义. 相似文献
6.
从网络战略联盟到战略联盟网络:企业战略联盟的演进路径及其对我国企业的启示 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
文章在回顾企业战略联盟及其网络研究的基础上分析了企业竞争中由“关系企业”组成网络战略联盟、再由网络战略联盟到战略联盟网络的演进路径,进而提出了企业间竞争的三种形态,最后指出了网络战略联盟和战略联盟网络发展对我国企业的几点启示。 相似文献
7.
8.
融资方式和发展战略是影响高新技术企业发展的重要因素.本文分析了高新技术企业创新类型、融资方式与联盟战略三者之间的关系,并进一步分析创新类型和融资方式的组合效应对高新技术企业联盟战略的影响,通过对多个地区的高新技术企业数据进行实证分析.结果表明:突变创新类型高新技术企业倾向于采用风险资本融资,渐进创新型企业倾向于银行债务融资;风险投资对联盟战略影响显著,表现在对企业建立技术联盟和市场联盟都有正向作用;创新类型对联盟战略也有显著影响;此外风险投资和突变创新对企业联盟战略的组合效应也有显著的正向作用. 相似文献
9.
10.
联盟过程管理视角的联盟能力与联盟治理关系研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
作为企业层次的一种重要组织能力,联盟能力尽管因其显著的绩效推动力受到相当重视,但对治理决策影响的相关研究却难以推进。本文基于资源基础理论和交易成本理论,从联盟过程管理的视角,研究了联盟不同阶段企业所具有的联盟能力与联盟治理的重要关系,能为联盟企业根据所处联盟阶段具有的联盟能力来选择恰当的联盟治理策略提供依据。 相似文献
11.
TD-SCDMA与电信行业标准竞争的战略选择 总被引:12,自引:0,他引:12
本文以第3代移动通信标准TD-SCDMA及其产业化过程为对象,运用理论分析、案例研究和网络分析的方法,研究了TD-SCDMA标准产业化过程及其影响因素,分析了联盟策略、政府作用对于产业链成熟度的影响。比较了TD-SCDMA标准与其他两大产业标准的网络结构。分析了电信行业标准竞争的战略选择和效果。 相似文献
12.
借鉴实验经济学的研究方法,研究了监管、学习和声誉机制对联盟成员机会主义行为的影响。实验用囚徒困境模型表示联盟成员间的合作竞争关系,通过控制监管力度,逐步引入学习机制和声誉机制来比较分析各机制的作用及关系。结果表明,监管越完善,越有利于控制机会主义行为,但其成本也越高;学习机制的引入,可以进一步减少机会主义行为,但联盟中的学习者也可借助信息优势,在监管严格时回避风险,在监管放松时采取机会主义行为获取短期超额收益;声誉机制的加入使得机会主义行为进一步减少,联盟企业借助信息优势获取超额收益的副作用也被消除。 相似文献
13.
Improving alliance performance is a critical issue that both managers and researchers have attempted to resolve. Recently scholars have suggested that firms can use alliance commitment and process controls to improve alliance performance. Yet research has only found weak support for these direct effects. In this paper we examine the mediating role of process controls on the relationship between alliance commitment and alliance performance. When tested on samples of SMEs we find support for our theoretical predictions. We then discuss the managerial implications of using commitment and process controls in SME international alliances. 相似文献
14.
Due to dramatically increasing global competition and in the light of Europe '92, companies have to concentrate on their particular competitive advantages and on those business activities they know well. The market, however, asks for an ever increasing range of products and services. ‘System deals’ include — along with a product — attractive sideline services, like project management, system implementation or supply of related products. In many cases, entering these markets or achieving technological breakthroughs is only possible with a strong partner.These recent developments forced corporations to consider alternative company structures. The failure of many strategic alliances, however, has clearly shown that understanding the development process of the alliance is critical for success. Christoph Bronder and Rudolf Pritzl present a structured procedure for developing strategic alliances that outlines four critical phases: strategic decision for an alliance, alliance configuration, partner selection, and alliance management. 相似文献
15.
16.
《Journal of International Management》2001,7(1):1-29
The literature on the strategic alliance structuring process does not provide an adequate view of the role of decision-makers in that process, especially about how alliance partners form their structural preferences. Given the critical role of structure in alliance management, the decision-making process regarding the choice of an appropriate alliance structure deserves particular research attention. We propose a model of strategic alliance structuring that has managerial risk perception as its core. Our model consists of the following parts: the antecedents of risk perception, relational risk and performance risk, risk perception and structural preference, and the resolution of preferences. We suggest that the structural preferences of partners are based on their perceptions of relational risk and performance risk, and the overall objective is to minimize the total risk. We also develop a number of propositions as elaboration of the model to facilitate empirical research and the effective management of the structuring process. 相似文献
17.
18.
创新联盟是开放式创新的实践基础,选择适宜的合作伙伴缔结创新联盟是组织面对的重要决策问题。本文以组织间知识转移为线索,考虑一个由知识源、知识转化中介与信息服务机构组成的知识链,以知识产权交易为合作机制设计序贯博弈模型,分析了不同的联盟策略对组织的知识创造与创新收益的影响。研究表明:缔结创新联盟能够产生双赢效应,即同时提高联盟内部成员与非联盟成员的知识创造及创新收益;知识链在集中决策时的整体创新收益与知识创造均高于分散决策;由知识源与信息服务机构组建创新联盟是分散决策下知识链的最优联盟策略。研究结论有助于揭示开放式创新的知识转移对组织联盟策略的作用机理。 相似文献
19.
Dr. Oliver Schilke 《Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft》2009,79(4):527-550
Strategic alliances have become an essential part of business strategy and a central source of competitive advantage for almost any firm. Existing research has mainly focused on the isolated analysis of single alliances. This paper addresses the gap in the literature by analyzing organizational-level determinants of alliances success. Based on survey data from 302 firms, four organizational success factors of alliance management are identified and integrated in a structural model. 相似文献
20.
In a study of life science firms, we find that, in accordance with predictions drawn from agency theory and behavioral agency theory, CEO stock ownership is negatively associated with licensing while CEO stock options are positively associated with licensing. Furthermore, by combining theoretical insights from the capabilities literature with both agency theory and behavioral agency theory, we predict that a key measure of capabilities in the licensing context—a firm's alliance experience—significantly influences the ways in which CEO equity incentives impact licensing. More specifically, we find that, in accordance with our theoretical predictions, alliance experience positively (negatively) moderates the relationship between CEO stock ownership (CEO stock options) and licensing. Our study contributes to the wider literature on the determinants of licensing by examining whether licensing is sensitive to CEO equity incentives. We also extend the capabilities literature on licensing by examining the contrasting influences of a firm's alliance experience on the relationship between CEO equity incentives and licensing. Our findings also inform behavioral agency-based research on the effects of equity incentives by highlighting the usefulness of a capabilities perspective in augmenting our understanding of the behavioral role of CEO equity incentives. 相似文献