A jackknife-based versatile test for two-sample problems with right-censored data

For testing the equality of two survival functions, the weighted logrank test and the weighted Kaplan–Meier test are the two most widely used methods. Actually, each of these tests has advantages and defects against various alternatives, while we cannot specify in advance the possible types of the survival differences. Hence, how to choose a single test or combine a number of competitive tests for indicating the diversities of two survival functions without suffering a substantial loss in power is an important issue. Instead of directly using a particular test which generally performs well in some situations and poorly in others, we further consider a class of tests indexed by a weighted parameter for testing the equality of two survival functions in this paper. A delete-1 jackknife method is implemented for selecting weights such that the variance of the test is minimized. Some numerical experiments are performed under various alternatives for illustrating the superiority of the proposed method. Finally, the proposed testing procedure is applied to two real-data examples as well.     

A Generalization of Shapiro–Wilk's Test for Multivariate Normality

A goodness-of-fit test for multivariate normality is proposed which is based on Shapiro–Wilk's statistic for univariate normality and on an empirical standardization of the observations. The critical values can be approximated by using a transformation of the univariate standard normal distribution. A Monte Carlo study reveals that this test has a better power performance than some of the best known tests for multinormality against a wide range of alternatives.     

A moment test to identify uniformity

An omnibus test of uniformity based upon the ratios of sample moments and population moments is introduced. Results of a monte carlo power study show that for two types of alternatives considered, the proposed test has good power in comparison with Neyman's test N ₂Greenwood's test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and Chi-squared test.     

Generalized orthogonal contrast tests for homogeneity of ordered means

Several procedures have been proposed for testing equality of ordered means. The best-known of these is the likelihood-ratio test introduced by Bartholomew, which possesses generally superior power characteristics to those of its competitors. Difficulties in implementing this test have led to the development of alternative approaches, such as tests based on single and multiple contrasts. Some recent approaches have utilized approximations to the polyhedral cone defining the restricted parameter space, including those of Akkerboom (circular cone) and Mudholkar & McDermott (orthant). This article proposes a class of tests based on an improved orthant approximation to the polyhedral cone. These tests may be viewed as generalizations of the orthogonal contrast test proposed by Mukerjee, Robertson & Wright. Studies of the power functions of several competing tests indicate that the generalized orthogonal contrast tests are effective alternatives to the likelihood-ratio test, especially when the latter is difficult to implement.     

Tests for compound periodicities and estimating a non linear function

We propose two tests for testing compound periodicities which are the uniformly most powerful invariant decision procedures against simple periodicities. The second test can provide an excellent estimation of a compound periodic non linear function from observed data. These tests were compared with the tests proposed by Fisher and Siegel by Monte Carlo studies and we found that all the tests showed high power and high probability of a correct decision when all the amplitudes of underlying periods were the same. However, if there are at least several different periods with unequal amplitudes, then the second test proposed always showed high power and high probability of a correct decision, whereas the tests proposed by Fisher and Siegel gave 0 for the power and 0 for the probability of a correct decision, whatever the standard deviation of pseudo normal random numbers. Overall, the second test proposed is the best of all in view of the probability of a correct decision and power.     

Adaptive plotting position and test of normality

The quantile–quantile plot is widely used to check normality. The plot depends on the plotting positions. Many commonly used plotting positions do not depend on the sample values. We propose an adaptive plotting position that depends on the relative distances of the two neighbouring sample values. The correlation coefficient obtained from the adaptive plotting position is used to test normality. The test using the adaptive plotting position is better than the Shapiro–Wilk W test for small samples and has larger power than Hazen's and Blom's plotting positions for symmetric alternatives with shorter tail than normal and skewed alternatives when n is 20 or larger. The Brown–Hettmansperger T* test is designed for detecting bad tail behaviour, so it does not have power for symmetric alternatives with shorter tail than normal, but it is generally better than the other tests when β₂ is greater than 3.25.     

Linear rank tests for censored survival data

We describe a class of rank test procedures for the two-sample problem with right censored survival data. The class of tests is directly generalized from the linear rank tests by assigning each observation a rank according to its corresponding Wilcoxon scores. It allows a flexible choice of score functions, in particular, those powerful against scale differences between the two survival distributions. Monte Carlo simulations have shown that some members of this class have great power in detecting crossing-curve alternatives (alternatives where underlying survival curves cross over). The class also contains tests essentially equivalent to the Gehan-Wilcoxon and the logrank tests.     

A maxmin linear test of normal means and its application to lachin’s data

For stochastic ordering tests for normal distributions there exist two well known types of tests. One of them is based on the maximum likelihood ratio principle, the other is the most stringent somewhere most powerful test of Schaafsma and Smid(for a comprehensive treatment see Robertson, Wright and Dykstra(1988), for the latter test also Shi and Kudo(1987)). All these tests are in general numerically tedious. Wei, Lachin(1984)and particularly Lachin(1992)formulate a simple and easily computable test. However, it is not known so far for which sort of ordered alternatives his test is optimal

In this paper it is shown that his procedure is a maxmin test for reasonable subalternatives, provided the covariance matrix has nonnegative row sums. If this property is violated then his procedure can be altered in such a manner that the resul ting test again is a maxmin test. An example is glven where the modified procedure even in the least favourable case leads to a nontrifling increase in power. The fact that Lachins test resp. the modified version are maxmin tests on appropriate subalternatives amounts to the property that they are maxmin tests on subhypotheses which are relevant in practical applications.     

Nonparametric tests of hypotheses for umbrella alternatives

The author proposes a general method for constructing nonparametric tests of hypotheses for umbrella alternatives. Such alternatives are relevant when the treatment effect changes in direction after reaching a peak. The author's class of tests is based on the ranks of the observations. His general approach consists of defining two sets of rankings: the first is induced by the alternative and the other by the data itself. His test statistic measures the distance between the two sets. The author determines the asymptotic distribution for some special cases of distances under both the null and the alternative hypothesis when the location of the peak is known or unknown. He shows the good power of his tests through a limited simulation study     

Tests for Equality of Survival Distributions Against Non-Location Alternatives

We propose new two andk-sample tests for evaluating the equality of survival distributions against alternatives that include crossing of survival functions, and proportional and monotone hazard ratios. The tests allow for right censored data. The asymptotic power against local alternatives is investigated. Simulation results demonstrate that the new tests are more powerful than known tests when survival functions cross. We apply the tests to a well known study of chemo- and radio-therapy conducted by the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. TheP-values for both proposed tests are much smaller than for other known tests.     

A powerful and interpretable alternative to the Jarque–Bera test of normality based on 2nd-power skewness and kurtosis,using the Rao's score test on the APD family

We introduce the 2nd-power skewness and kurtosis, which are interesting alternatives to the classical Pearson's skewness and kurtosis, called 3rd-power skewness and 4th-power kurtosis in our terminology. We use the sample 2nd-power skewness and kurtosis to build a powerful test of normality. This test can also be derived as Rao's score test on the asymmetric power distribution, which combines the large range of exponential tail behavior provided by the exponential power distribution family with various levels of asymmetry. We find that our test statistic is asymptotically chi-squared distributed. We also propose a modified test statistic, for which we show numerically that the distribution can be approximated for finite sample sizes with very high precision by a chi-square. Similarly, we propose a directional test based on sample 2nd-power kurtosis only, for the situations where the true distribution is known to be symmetric. Our tests are very similar in spirit to the famous Jarque–Bera test, and as such are also locally optimal. They offer the same nice interpretation, with in addition the gold standard power of the regression and correlation tests. An extensive empirical power analysis is performed, which shows that our tests are among the most powerful normality tests. Our test is implemented in an R package called PoweR.     

Large sample power of absolute moment tests

Sample kurtosis is a member of the large class of absolute moment tests of normality. We compare kurtosis to other absolute moment tests to determine which are the most powerful at detecting long‐tailed symmetric departures from normality for large samples. The large sample power of the tests is calculated using Geary's (1947) approximations of the moments of the test statistics. Using the system of Gram-Charlier symmetric distributions as alternatives, the most power is obtained using a moment in the range 2.5 ‐ 3.5.     

Data-driven smooth tests for the extreme value distribution

In this paper we present data-driven smooth tests for the extreme value distribution. These tests are based on a general idea of construction of data-driven smooth tests for composite hypotheses introduced by Inglot, T., Kallenberg, W. C. M. and Ledwina, T. [(1997). Data-driven smooth tests for composite hypotheses. Ann. Statist., 25, 1222–1250] and its modification for location-scale family proposed in Janic-Wróblewska, A. [(2004). Data-driven smooth test for a location-scale family. Statistics, in press]. Results of power simulations show that the newly introduced test performs very well for a wide range of alternatives and is competitive with other commonly used tests for the extreme value distribution.     

A Comparative Study of Some Modified Chi-Squared Tests

Some recent results in the theory and applications of modified chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests are briefly discussed. It seems that for the first time power of modified chi-squared type tests for the logistic and three-parameter Weibull distributions based on moment type estimators is studied. Power of different modified tests against some alternatives for equiprobable fixed or random grouping intervals, and for Neyman–Pearson classes is investigated. It is shown that power of test statistic essentially depends on the quantity of Fisher's sample information this statistic uses. Some recommendations on implementing modified chi-squared type tests are given.     

Test of Normality Against Generalized Exponential Power Alternatives

The family of symmetric generalized exponential power (GEP) densities offers a wide range of tail behaviors, which may be exponential, polynomial, and/or logarithmic. In this article, a test of normality based on Rao's score statistic and this family of GEP alternatives is proposed. This test is tailored to detect departures from normality in the tails of the distribution. The main interest of this approach is that it provides a test with a large family of symmetric alternatives having non-normal tails. In addition, the test's statistic consists of a combination of three quantities that can be interpreted as new measures of tail thickness. In a Monte-Carlo simulation study, the proposed test is shown to perform well in terms of power when compared to its competitors.     

Exponentiality test based on Renyi distance between equilibrium distributions

ABSTRACT

On the basis of Csiszar's φ-divergence discrimination information, we propose a measure of discrepancy between equilibriums associated with two distributions. Proving that a distribution can be characterized by associated equilibrium distribution, a Renyi distance of the equilibrium distributions is constructed that made us to propose an EDF-based goodness-of-fit test for exponential distribution. For comparing the performance of the proposed test, some well-known EDF-based tests and some entropy-based tests are considered. Based on the simulation results, the proposed test has better powers than those of competing entropy-based tests for the alternatives with decreasing hazard rate function. The use of the proposed test is evaluated in an illustrative example.     

A NEW TEST FOR EQUALITY OF VARIANCES FOR k NORMAL POPULATIONS

ABSTRACT

A simple test based on Gini's mean difference is proposed to test the hypothesis of equality of population variances. Using 2000 replicated samples and empirical distributions, we show that the test compares favourably with Bartlett's and Levene's test for the normal population. Also, it is more powerful than Bartlett's and Levene's tests for some alternative hypotheses for some non-normal distributions and more robust than the other two tests for large sample sizes under some alternative hypotheses. We also give an approximate distribution to the test statistic to enable one to calculate the nominal levels and P-values.     

Tests for exponentiality against new better than old in expectation and new better than some used in expectation alternatives

We present statistical procedures for testing exponentiality againt New Better than Old in Expectation (NBOE) and New Better than Some Used in Expectation (NBSUE) alternatives. The test statistics devised for the purpose are U-Statistics and hence asymptotically normally distributed. Pitman's asymptotic relative efficiency results have been obtained and Monte Carlo study presented to compare power of the test proposed with the other tests.     

On the assessment of variability in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies

A procedure is proposed for the assessment of bioequivalence of variabilities between two formulations in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies. This procedure is essentially a two one-sided Pitman-Morgan’s tests procedure which is based on the correlation between crossover differences and subject totals. The nonparametric version of the proposed test is also discussed. A dataset of AUC from a 2×2 crossover bioequivalence trial is presented to illustrate the proposed procedures.     

Improvement of goodness-of-fit test for normal distribution based on entropy and power comparison

Vasicek's entropy test for normality is based on sample entropy and a parametric entropy estimator. These estimators are known to have bias in small samples. The use of Vasicek's test could affect the capability of detecting non-normality to some extent. This paper presents an improved entropy test, which uses bias-corrected entropy estimators. A Monte Carlo simulation study is performed to compare the power of the proposed test under several alternative distributions with some other tests. The results report that as anticipated, the improved entropy test has consistently higher power than the ordinary entropy test in nearly all sample sizes and alternatives considered, and compares favorably with other tests.