Testing for a unit root in a stationary ESTAR process

This article develops a statistic for testing the null of a linear unit root process against the alternative of a stationary exponential smooth transition autoregressive model. The asymptotic distribution of the test is shown to be nonstandard but nuisance parameter-free and hence critical values are obtained by simulations. Simulations show that the proposed statistic has considerable power under various data generating scenarios. Applications to real exchange rates also illustrate the ability of our test to reject null of unit root when some of the alternative tests do not.     

Tests for Unit-Root versus Threshold Specification With an Application to the Purchasing Power Parity Relationship

We consider modeling the real exchange rate by a stationary three-regime self-exciting threshold autoregressive (SETAR) model with possibly a unit root in the middle regime. This representation is consistent with purchasing power parity in the presence of trading costs. Our main contribution is to provide statistical tools for testing unit root versus a SETAR. First, we show that a SETAR with a unit root in the middle regime is stationary and mixing under reasonable assumptions. Second, we derive analytically the asymptotic distribution of our unit-root test under the null. Using monthly real exchange rate data, our test rejects the null of unit-root against a threshold process for five European series.     

Stationary mixture transition distribution (MTD) models via predictive distributions

This paper combines two ideas to construct autoregressive processes of arbitrary order. The first idea is the construction of first order stationary processes described in Pitt et al. [(2002). Constructing first order autoregressive models via latent processes. Scand. J. Statist.29, 657–663] and the second idea is the construction of higher order processes described in Raftery [(1985). A model for high order Markov chains. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B.47, 528–539]. The resulting models provide appealing alternatives to model non-linear and non-Gaussian time series.     

Likelihood ratio tests for variance components in linear mixed models

Although the asymptotic distributions of the likelihood ratio for testing hypotheses of null variance components in linear mixed models derived by Stram and Lee [1994. Variance components testing in longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50, 1171–1177] are valid, their proof is based on the work of Self and Liang [1987. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood tests under nonstandard conditions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82, 605–610] which requires identically distributed random variables, an assumption not always valid in longitudinal data problems. We use the less restrictive results of Vu and Zhou [1997. Generalization of likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. Ann. Statist. 25, 897–916] to prove that the proposed mixture of chi-squared distributions is the actual asymptotic distribution of such likelihood ratios used as test statistics for null variance components in models with one or two random effects. We also consider a limited simulation study to evaluate the appropriateness of the asymptotic distribution of such likelihood ratios in moderately sized samples.     

Unit Root Tests under Time-Varying Variances

The paper provides a general framework for investigating the effects of permanent changes in the variance of the errors of an autoregressive process on unit root tests. Such a framework - which is based on a novel asymptotic theory for integrated and near integrated processes with heteroskedastic errors - allows to evaluate how the variance dynamics affect the size and the power function of unit root tests. Contrary to previous studies, it is shown that non-constant variances can both inflate and deflate the rejection frequency of the commonly used unit root tests, both under the null and under the alternative, with early negative and late positive variance changes having the strongest impact on size and power. It is also shown that shifts smoothed across the sample have smaller impacts than shifts occurring as a single abrupt jump, while periodic variances have a negligible effect even when a small number of cycles take place over a given sample. Finally, it is proved that the locally best invariant (LBI) test of a unit root against level stationarity is robust to heteroskedasticity of any form under the null hypothesis.     

A gamma goodness-of-fit test based on characteristic independence of the mean and coefficient of variation

Characterization theorems in probability and statistics are widely appreciated for their role in clarifying the structure of the families of probability distributions. Less well known is the role characterization theorems have as a natural, logical and effective starting point for constructing goodness-of-fit tests. The characteristic independence of the mean and variance and of the mean and the third central moment of a normal sample were used, respectively, by Lin and Mudholkar [1980. A simple test for normality against asymmetric alternatives. Biometrika 67, 455–461] and by Mudholkar et al. [2002a. Independence characterizations and testing normality against skewness-kurtosis alternatives. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 104, 485–501] for developing tests of normality. The characteristic independence of the maximum likelihood estimates of the population parameters was similarly used by Mudholkar et al. [2002b. Independence characterization and inverse Gaussian goodness-of-fit. Sankhya A 63, 362–374] to develop a test of the composite inverse Gaussian hypothesis. The gamma models are extensively used for applied research in the areas of econometrics, engineering and biomedical sciences; but there are few goodness-of-fit tests available to test if the data indeed come from a gamma population. In this paper we employ Hwang and Hu's [1999. On a characterization of the gamma distribution: the independence of the sample mean and the sample coefficient of variation. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 51, 749–753] characterization of the gamma population in terms of the independence of sample mean and coefficient of variation for developing such a test. The asymptotic null distribution of the proposed test statistic is obtained and empirically refined for use with samples of moderate size.     

Normal tests for unit roots based on instrumental variable estimators

For estimating unit roots of autoregressive processes, we introduce a new instrumental variable (IV) method which discounts large values of regressors corresponding to the unit roots. Based on the IV estimator, we propose new unit root tests whose limiting null distributions are standard normal. Observation at time t is adjusted for mean recursively by the sample mean of observations up to the time t. The powers of the proposed tests are better than those of the Dickey–Fuller tests and are comparable to those of the tests based on the weighted symmetric estimator, which are known to have the best power against stationary alternatives.     

Asymptotics of the weighted least squares estimation for AR(1) processes with applications to confidence intervals

For the first-order autoregressive model, we establish the asymptotic theory of the weighted least squares estimations whether the underlying autoregressive process is stationary, unit root, near integrated or even explosive under a weaker moment condition of innovations. The asymptotic limit of this estimator is always normal. It is shown that the empirical log-likelihood ratio at the true parameter converges to the standard chi-square distribution. An empirical likelihood confidence interval is proposed for interval estimations of the autoregressive coefficient. The results improve the corresponding ones of Chan et al. (Econ Theory 28:705–717, 2012). Some simulations are conducted to illustrate the proposed method.     

Controlling Bayes directional false discovery rate in random effects model

Starting with a decision theoretic formulation of simultaneous testing of null hypotheses against two-sided alternatives, a procedure controlling the Bayesian directional false discovery rate (BDFDR) is developed through controlling the posterior directional false discovery rate (PDFDR). This is an alternative to Lewis and Thayer [2004. A loss function related to the FDR for random effects multiple comparison. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 125, 49–58.] with a better control of the BDFDR. Moreover, it is optimum in the sense of being the non-randomized part of the procedure maximizing the posterior expectation of the directional per-comparison power rate given the data, while controlling the PDFDR. A corresponding empirical Bayes method is proposed in the context of one-way random effects model. Simulation study shows that the proposed Bayes and empirical Bayes methods perform much better from a Bayesian perspective than the procedures available in the literature.     

Asymptotic properties of the bootstrap unit root test statistic under possibly infinite variance

ABSTRACT

In this article, the unit root test for the AR(1) model is discussed, under the condition that the innovations of the model are in the domain of attraction of the normal law with possibly infinite variances. By using residual bootstrap with sample size m < n (n being the size of the original sample), we bootstrap the least-squares estimator of the autoregressive parameter. Under some mild assumptions, we prove that the null distribution of the unit root test statistic based on the least-square estimator of the autoregressive parameter can be approximated by using residual bootstrap.     

Test of fit for Marshall–Olkin distributions with applications

Marshall and Olkin [1967. A multivariate exponential distribution. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 62, 30–44], introduced a bivariate distribution with exponential marginals, which generalizes the simple case of a bivariate random variable with independent exponential components. The distribution is popular under the name ‘Marshall–Olkin distribution’, and has been extended to the multivariate case. L2-type statistics are constructed for testing the composite null hypothesis of the Marshall–Olkin distribution with unspecified parameters. The test statistics utilize the empirical Laplace transform with consistently estimated parameters. Asymptotic properties pertaining to the null distribution of the test statistic and the consistency of the test are investigated. Theoretical results are accompanied by a simulation study, and real-data applications.     

Testing stationarity and trend stationarity against the unit root hypothesis

In this paper we propose a family of relativel simple nonparametrics tests for a unit root in a univariate time series. Almost all the tests proposed in the literature test the unit root hypothesis against the alternative that the time series involved is stationarity or trend stationary. In this paper we take the (trend) stationarity hypothesis as the null and the unit root hypothesis as the alternative. The order differnce with most of the tests proposed in the literature is that in all four cases the asymptotic null distribution is of a well-known type, namely standard Cauchy. In the first instance we propose four Cauchy tests of the stationarity hypothesis against the unit root hypothesis. Under H1 these four test statistics involved, divided by the sample size n, converge weakly to a non-central Cauchy distribution, to one, and to the product of two normal variates, respectively. Hence, the absolute values of these test statistics converge in probability to infinity 9at order n). The tests involved are therefore consistent against the unit root hypothesis. Moreover, the small sample performance of these test are compared by Monte Carlo simulations. Furthermore, we propose two additional Cauchy tests of the trend stationarity hypothesis against the alternative of a unit root with drift.     

检验式设定错误对时间序列单位根检验小样本性质的影响

首先对单位根检验的两类常见的数据生成系统进行比较，然后利用蒙特卡洛实验研究了时间序列单位根检验式的设定问题。研究发现在利用DF检验和DF-GLS检验进行时间序列的单位根检验时，检验式设定错误直接影响着检验结果，尤其在推断时间序列是趋势平稳过程还是有时间趋势项的随机游走过程或有二阶时间趋势多项式的随机游走过程时，检验式的错误设定很容易将趋势平稳过程误判为非平稳过程。     

The Disappointing Properties of GLS-Based Unit Root Tests in the Presence of Structural Breaks

Abstract

It is well known that prior application of GLS detrending, as advocated by Elliot et al. [Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T., Stock, J. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64:813–836], can produce a significant increase in power to reject the unit root null over that obtained from a conventional OLS-based Dickey and Fuller [Dickey, D., Fuller, W. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 74:427–431] testing equation. However, this paper employs Monte Carlo simulation to demonstrate that this increase in power is not necessarily obtained when breaks occur in either level or trend. It is found that neither OLS nor GLS-based tests are robust to level or trend breaks, their size and power properties both deteriorating as the break size increases.     

Testing for Unit Root Against Stationarity Using the Likelihood Ratio Test

In a first-order autoregressive model with drift, we derive the likelihood ratio test for a unit root against the stationary alternative. We also derive the test in a state space model with trend. Finite sample and asymptotic critical values are obtained by Monte Carlo simulations. A simulation study investigates the power performance of the likelihood ratio test and we also examine how a bias correction of the test affects the results.     

F-tests for seasonal differencing with a break-point

The classification between stochastic trend stationarity and deterministic broken trend stationarity is important because incorrect inferences can follow if a stationary series with a broken trend is incorrectly classified as integrated. In this paper, we consider joint tests for regular and seasonal unit roots null hypothesis against broken trend stationarity alternatives where the location of the break is known or unknown. Based on the F-test proposed by Hasza and Fuller (1982, Ann. Statist. 10, 1209–1216), we develop testing procedures for distinguishing these two types of process. The asymptotic distributions of test statistics are derived as functions of Wiener processes. A response surface regression analysis directed to relating the finite sample distributions and the breaking position is studied. Simulation experiments suggest that the power of the test is reasonable. The testing procedure is illustrated by the Canadian consumer price index series.     

Separated hypotheses testing for autoregressive models with non-negative residuals

Normal residual is one of the usual assumptions in autoregressive model but sometimes in practice we are faced with non-negative residuals. In this paper, we have derived modified maximum likelihood estimators of parameters of the residuals and autoregressive coefficient. Also asymptotic distribution of modified maximum likelihood estimators in both stationary and non-stationary models are computed. So that, we can derive asymptotic distribution of unit root, Vuong's and Cox's tests statistics in stationary situation. Using simulation, it shows that Akaike information criterion and Vuong's test work to select the optimal autoregressive model with non-negative residuals. Sometimes Vuong's test select two competing models as equivalent models. These models may be suitable or unsuitable equivalent models. So we consider Cox's test to make inference after model selection. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test confirms our results. Also we have computed tracking interval for competing models to choosing between two close competing models when Vuong's test and Cox's test cannot detect the differences.     

Lagrange multiplier unit root test in the presence of a break in the innovation variance

We show that the Lagrange multiplier (LM) unit root test exhibits size distortions when a break in the innovation variance exists but is ignored. We develop a modified LM unit root test that is based on a generalized least-squares transformation of the original series. The asymptotic null distribution of the new modified LM unit root test is derived. Finite-sample simulation evidence shows that the modified LM unit root test maintains its size and has reasonable power against the trend stationary alternative.     

A new unit root test against ESTAR based on a class of modified statistics

This paper proposes a new unit root test against a nonlinear exponential smooth transition autoregressive model. This model receives much attention in international macroeconomics as it has been successfully applied to a variety of financial time series. The new test is build upon the nonstandard testing approach of Abadir and Distaso (J Econom 140:695–718, 2007) who introduce a class of modified statistics for testing joint hypotheses when one of the alternatives is one-sided. The asymptotic properties of the suggested unit root test are derived. In a Monte Carlo study the popular Dickey–Fuller-type test proposed by Kapetanios et al. (J Econom 112:359–379, 2003) is compared to the new test. The results suggest that the new test is generally superior in terms of power. An application to a real effective exchange rate underlines its usefulness.     

Modified Stationarity Tests With Data-Dependent Model-Selection Rules

We describe some simple methods for improving the performance of stationarity tests (i.e., tests that have a stationary null and a unit-root alternative). Specifically, we increase the rate of convergence of the test under the unit-root alternative from O _p(T) to O _p (T ²), then suggest an optimal method of selecting the order of the autoregressive component in the fitted autoregressive integrated moving average model on which the test is based. Simulation evidence suggests that these modifications work well. We apply the modified procedure to U.S. monthly macroeconomic data and uncover new evidence of a unit root in unemployment.