基于风险偏好差异性假设的动态决策过程研究

针对风险偏好差异性决策者共存时的决策过程进行研究,提出边求解边对决策者分类决策再进行信息融合的动态决策策略.从客观数据角度基于属性值相似关系提取有效属性并对有效属性进行赋权;根据决策者对决策活动的选择判断逐步嵌入风险偏好(风险偏好型、风险中立型、风险规避型);基于属性值之间的可能度与相似度,构建相应类型的风险偏好预期理论模型;在决策信息集结与决策对象排序过程中,根据决策者的风险偏好特征选择相适应的算法模型;针对风险偏好差异性决策者共存的情形,基于决策结果公平效用最大化的角度提出新的信息融合模型构建算法;通过实际案例进行分析并验证这一新方法的科学合理性.     

风险偏好与属性约简在决策问题中的应用研究

将决策者风险偏好与属性约简算法应用到具有大量属性的决策问题,提出先对决策者分类再进行决策的策略． 根据决策者的风险偏好特征将其分为风险规避型、风险中立型、风险偏好型,针对不同类型的决策者分别采取相应的算法,提取有效属性并利用有效属性进行决策; 针对不同风险偏好的决策者,提出相应的风险偏好预期规则; 提出基于优势关系辨析矩阵的属性赋权算法及基于属性值优势度矩阵的进行信息融合与排序算法; 最后通过属性值为实数与区间数的两个实际案例表明该算法的科学合理性．     

基于心理阈值的多属性决策问题目标调整研究

将决策者在决策指标上存在心理阈值的现状应用到多属性决策问题,提出先对决策目标调整再进行决策的方法。首先,对效益型、成本型、中间型指标构建相应的指标满意度函数和算法,针对不同类型的指标选择相应的算法,计算决策者在每个备选方案存在心理阈值属性上的满意度;其次,根据决策者满意度与心理阈值,调整决策目标组建新的决策信息表;再次,提出基于决策者满意度的属性赋权与信息集结算法模型,获得最优决策方案;最后,通过一个实际生活中的决策者购房案例,表明该方法的科学合理性。     

属性值为区间数的多属性决策对象排序研究

多属性决策问题的实质利用已有决策信息,通过一定方式对备选方案进行排序和择优。针对属性值为区间数的多属性决策对象排序问题,首先,提出决策对象优势关系这一概念,再次,得出决策对象的优势关系与其属性值两端点的实数值之和存在等价关系;最后,利用属性值为区间数的多属性决策实例对该算法进行了实例分析,并利用优势关系对决策对象进行排序并择优。     

考虑决策者心理行为的混合型随机多属性决策方法

针对混合型随机多属性决策问题,提出一种考虑决策者心理行为的决策分析方法。在该方法中,首先将具有离散型随机变量、灰色型随机变量和语言型变量形式的属性值规范化到区间内;然后将决策者给出的针对不同时期的属性期望视为参照点,并通过计算方案属性值与参照点的距离构建方案的益损矩阵;进一步地,依据累计前景理论,计算方案在不同属性上的收益和损失价值,并在此基础上,通过集结不同属性和不同时期的方案前景值确定各方案的综合前景值,进而依据得到的综合前景值确定方案排序结果。最后,通过一个算例说明了该方法的有效性和可行性。     

语言多属性决策的目标规划模型

研究了只有部分属性权重信息、属性值以语言变量或不确定语言变量形式给出且决策者对方案有偏好信息的语言多属性决策问题.给出了语言变量和不确定语言变量的运算法则,以及不确定语言变量之间比较的可能度公式,定义了语言变量的偏离度概念.在属性值以1)语言变量和2)不确定语言变量,这两种形式给出的情形下,分别建立了一个基于偏离度的目标规划模型,并通过求解这两种模型分别获得相应的属性权重.然后对于情形1),利用语言加权平均(LWA)算子,对语言决策信息进行加权集成,继而对方案进行排序和择优;对于情形2),利用不确定语言加权平均(ULWA)算子,对不确定语言决策信息进行加权集成,并利用可能度公式构造可能度矩阵(互补判断矩阵),继而利用互补判断矩阵排序公式对决策方案进行排序和择优.最后进行了实例分析.     

权重信息未知情况下的多属性群决策方法及其拓展

本文针对群决策中专家权重及指标权重难以确定的问题,提出一种在权重信息完全未知情况下的基于证据距离和模糊熵权变换的多属性群决策方法,其核心在于如何仅通过决策矩阵客观地确定决策者权重及指标权重。通过信息熵和证据距离确定专家权重,并利用模糊变换原理,将专家权重向量与指标熵权矩阵合成,得到统一的群体决策指标权重;最后使用线性加权法集成所有专家对备选方案的评价信息,得到整个方案集的排序。实验结果及相关讨论表明,该方法概念清晰,计算量适中,具有较强的客观性,而且易于机器实现,是一种可行、有效的多属性群决策方法。最后将该方法推广到属性值由精确数、语言值、区间数、直觉模糊数等多种形式构成的混合型多属性群决策中。     

群决策中基于二元语义的主客观权重集成方法

针对一类属性值和属性权重信息均以语言评价信息形式给出的多属性群决策问题,提出了一种基于二元语义信息处理的主客观属性权重集成方法.首先运用二元语义集成算子计算属性的主观权重,然后给出一种基于最小偏差的属性客观权重计算方法,该方法根据决策者给出的语言决策矩阵计算决策群体对属性判断的偏差,偏差越大,表明决策者对该属性评价意见的分歧越大,则应赋给该属性越小的权重值,以提高群体意见的一致性.在此基础上,对属性的主、客观权重信息进行集成,得到属性综合权重.最后通过算例说明了该方法的有效性和实用性.     

基于两类残缺偏好信息的交互式群决策方法研究

提出不同残缺偏好信息的交互式群决策方法。利用矩阵元素之间的可达性关系,给出区间数判断矩阵残缺元素的确定方法。定义了不同偏好信息的群体满意度,基于群体判断与决策个体判断之问的偏离程度,与决策者进行交互,使得决策者的意见尽可能协调一致。根据修正意见求解得到方案排序,并通过算例说明方法的有效性。     

考虑决策者损失规避的异质信息多属性变权决策方法

现实中存在大量异质信息（或数据）和需要考虑权重随属性值变化的多属性决策问题。针对这类异质信息多属性决策问题，本文提出了一种基于前景理论的变权综合求解方法。首先，构建了异质信息的统一距离计算公式，进而计算各个决策方案的相对贴近度；然后，提出基于不同类型效用函数的变权向量构造方法；其次，以初始权重为参考点，计算变权向量相对于参考点的益损决策矩阵，进而计算考虑决策者权重损失和收益的风险态度的各个决策方案的前景综合值，据此确定方案优劣排序和最优方案。通过数值例子的计算分析说明，文中所提决策模型与方法具有较好的有效性和合理性，可为解决复杂情景的决策问题提供理论依据与方法支持。     

Screening alternatives graphically by an extended case-based distance approach

Screening is a helpful process of multiple criteria decision aid (MCDA) to reduce a larger set of alternatives into a smaller one containing the best alternatives; thereby, decision makers are able to concentrate on evaluating alternatives within a smaller set. Therefore, determining how to assist decision makers in screening is an important issue for MCDA. This study proposes an extended case-based distance approach incorporating the advantages of a case-based distance method, a mixed-integer programming approach of discriminant analysis, and a multidimensional scaling technique to help decision makers screen alternatives visually in MCDA. The proposed approach can screen alternatives by evaluating sets of cases selected by decision makers, providing visual aids to observe decision context, reducing the number of misclassifications, and improving multiple solution problems. An interactive screening procedure is also developed to provide flexibility so that decision makers can check and adjust screening results iteratively.     

Strategic Assessment Model (SAM): A Multiple Criteria Decision Support System for Evaluation of Strategic Alternatives*

The evaluation of strategic alternatives is a particularly difficult task. This difficulty is due to the complexities inherent in the evaluation process and the lack of structured information. The evaluation process must consider a multitude of relevant information from both the internal and external environments of the organization. Various analytical and normative models have helped decision makers utilize large volumes of information in strategic evaluation; however, most of these models have some limitations. We present a multiple criteria decision support system, called strategic assessment model (SAM), that addresses some of the limitations inherent in the existing models. SAM captures the decision maker's beliefs through a series of sequential, rational, and analytical processes. The environmental forces—decomposed into internal, task, general opportunities, and threats—are used along with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), subjective probabilities, the entropy concept, and utility theory to enhance the decision maker's intuition in evaluating a set of strategic alternatives.     

RANK GENERATION,PRESERVATION, AND REVERSAL IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY DECISION PROCESS

Decision making has the objective of finding the best alternative or set of alternatives by considering a number of goals, objectives, criteria, competitors, and other important factors. The analytic hierarchy process is a decision aid used to assist a decision maker in sorting out the complexity of a decision problem and making use of his or her judgments. A decision maker must be assured that the arithmetic operations of any such decision process are the right ones—that they surface the correct ranking and values of the alternatives and preserve or alter ranks appropriately when new alternatives are added or deleted. In this paper it will be shown that with absolute measurement, rank always is preserved, with relative measurement, rank changes with nspect to scveral criteria only because of the structural dependence (involving both numbers and measurements) of criteria on alternatives. A discussion of the effect on rank of replicas and near replicas of the alternatives also is given.     

一种语言评价信息不完全的多属性群决策方法

针对语言评价信息不完全的多属性群决策问题,提出了一种基于D-S理论的新决策方法。该方法首先对多个决策者给出不完全的语言评价信息进行分析,得到不同属性下各焦元的基本概率分配函数值,然后通过Dempster-Shafer合成法则对其值进行合成,计算决策方案的信度函数和似真函数值,并据此对所有决策方案进行排序。最后,通过一个算例验证该方法的可行性和有效性。     

PAHAP: A Pairwise Aggregated Hierarchical Analysis of Ratio-Scale Preferences

In this paper, we present a Pairwise Aggregated Hierarchical Analysis of Ratio-Scale Preferences (PAHAP), a new method for solving discrete alternative multicriteria decision problems. Following the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), PAHAP uses pairwise preference judgments to assess the relative attractiveness of the alternatives. By first aggregating the pairwise judgment ratios of the alternatives across all criteria, and then synthesizing based on these aggregate measures, PAHAP determines overall ratio scale priorities and rankings of the alternatives which are not subject to rank reversal, provided that certain weak consistency requirements are satisfied. Hence, PAHAP can serve as a useful alternative to the original AHP if rank reversal is undesirable, for instance when the system is open and criterion scarcity does not affect the relative attractiveness of the alternatives. Moreover, the single matrix of pairwise aggregated ratings constructed in PAHAP provides useful insights into the decision maker's preference structure. PAHAP requires the same preference information as the original AHP (or, altematively, the same information as the Referenced AHP, if the criteria are compared based on average (total) value of the alternatives). As it is easier to implement and interpret than previously proposed variants of the conventional AHP which prevent rank reversal, PAHAP also appears attractive from a practitioner's viewpoint.     

期权定价理论的基本思路、方法及其在企业战略投资领域的应用

期权定价理论(OPT)在企业战略投资领域的应用代表近期西方管理决策研究方面的一大突破。该理论为决策者评价投资的战略价值并争取管理运作中的灵活度,提供了新的思路与量化工具。本文运作期权定价理论的基本思路方法,对一个简化的企业案例作具体分析,试探讨结合我国国情的应用性研究途径。     

EVALUATING MULTIPLE CRITERIA—MODELS FOR TWO-CRITERIA SITUATIONS

A general procedure is given for evaluating various alternatives (e.g., investments, projects, systems, etc.) involving two criteria of evaluation. The method involves the detailed questioning of decision makers as to preferences between various combinations of pre-selected sets of alternatives under various conditions. From the responses to such questions, a mathematical function which can be applied repeatedly for implementing choices between other alternatives is established. An example of the application of the procedure is given, along with discussion of certain ramifications of the example. In addition to the specific application, potential extensions of the technique are discussed briefly.