A comparison of several adaptive tests for paired data

In the last few years, two adaptive tests for paired data have been proposed. One test proposed by Freidlin et al. [On the use of the Shapiro–Wilk test in two-stage adaptive inference for paired data from moderate to very heavy tailed distributions, Biom. J. 45 (2003), pp. 887–900] is a two-stage procedure that uses a selection statistic to determine which of three rank scores to use in the computation of the test statistic. Another statistic, proposed by O'Gorman [Applied Adaptive Statistical Methods: Tests of Significance and Confidence Intervals, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 2004], uses a weighted t-test with the weights determined by the data. These two methods, and an earlier rank-based adaptive test proposed by Randles and Hogg [Adaptive Distribution-free Tests, Commun. Stat. 2 (1973), pp. 337–356], are compared with the t-test and to Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. For sample sizes between 15 and 50, the results show that the adaptive test proposed by Freidlin et al. and the adaptive test proposed by O'Gorman have higher power than the other tests over a range of moderate to long-tailed symmetric distributions. The results also show that the test proposed by O'Gorman has greater power than the other tests for short-tailed distributions. For sample sizes greater than 50 and for small sample sizes the adaptive test proposed by O'Gorman has the highest power for most distributions.     

The Asymptotic Power Of Jonckheere-Type Tests For Ordered Alternatives

For the c -sample location problem with ordered alternatives, the test proposed by Barlow et al . (1972 p. 184) is an appropriate one under the model of normality. For non-normal data, however, there are rank tests which have higher power than the test of Barlow et al ., e.g. the Jonckheere test or so-called Jonckheere-type tests recently introduced and studied by Büning & Kössler (1996). In this paper the asymptotic power of the Jonckheere-type tests is computed by using results of Hájek (1968) which may be considered as extensions of the theorem of Chernoff & Savage (1958). Power studies via Monte Carlo simulation show that the asymptotic power values provide a good approximation to the finite ones even for moderate sample sizes.     

Testing for symmetry in multivariate distributions

Using the empirical characteristic function, a Cramér–von Mises test for reflected symmetry about an unspecified point is derived for multivariate distributions. The test statistic is based on an empirical process for which the weak convergence is established. The null properties of the test are studied as well as its power and local power. Estimators for the unknown symmetric point are previously proposed. Their consistency and asymptotical normality are proved by studying the weak convergence of some multidimensional empirical process. A simulation experiment shows that the estimators of the symmetric point are good, and that the test performs well on the examples tested. The new test is compared to the one derived in [N. Henze, B. Klar, S.G. Meintanis, Invariant tests for symmetry about an unspecified point based on empirical characteristic function, J. Multivariate. Anal. 87 (2003) 275–297].     

A weighted spatial median for clustered data

A weighted spatial median is proposed for the multivariate one-sample location problem with clustered data. Its limiting distribution is derived under mild conditions (no moment assumptions) and it is shown to be multivariate normal. Asymptotic as well as finite sample efficiencies and breakdown properties are considered, and the theoretical results are supplied with illustrative examples. It turns out that there is a potential for meaningful gains in estimation efficiency: the weighted spatial median has superior efficiency to the unweighted spatial median particularly when the cluster sizes are widely disparate and in the presence of strong intracluster correlation. The unweighted spatial median for clustered data was considered earlier by Nevalainen et al. (Can J Statist, in press, 2007). The proposed weighted estimators provide companion estimates to the weighted affine invariant sign test proposed recently by Larocque et al. (Biometrika, in press, 2007). An affine equivariant weighted spatial median is discussed in parallel.     

Some count-based nonparametric tests for circular symmetry of a bivariate distribution

In this paper, we revisit the problem of testing of the hypothesis of circular symmetry of a bivariate distribution. We propose some nonparametric tests based on sector counts. These include tests based on chi-square goodness-of-fit test, the classical likelihood ratio, mean deviation, and the range. The proposed tests are easy to implement and the exact null distributions for small sample sizes of the test statistics are obtained. Two examples with small and large data sets are given to illustrate the application of the tests proposed. For small and moderate sample sizes, the performances of the proposed tests are evaluated using empirical powers (empirical sizes are also reported). Also, we evaluate the performance of these count-based tests with adaptations of several well-known tests such as the Kolmogorov–Smirnov-type tests, tests based on kernel density estimator, and the Wilcoxon-type tests. It is observed that among the count-based tests the likelihood ratio test performs better.     

Improvement of goodness-of-fit test for normal distribution based on entropy and power comparison

Vasicek's entropy test for normality is based on sample entropy and a parametric entropy estimator. These estimators are known to have bias in small samples. The use of Vasicek's test could affect the capability of detecting non-normality to some extent. This paper presents an improved entropy test, which uses bias-corrected entropy estimators. A Monte Carlo simulation study is performed to compare the power of the proposed test under several alternative distributions with some other tests. The results report that as anticipated, the improved entropy test has consistently higher power than the ordinary entropy test in nearly all sample sizes and alternatives considered, and compares favorably with other tests.     

Simple and Exact Empirical Likelihood Ratio Tests for Normality Based on Moment Relations

The empirical likelihood (EL) technique is a powerful nonparametric method with wide theoretical and practical applications. In this article, we use the EL methodology in order to develop simple and efficient goodness-of-fit tests for normality based on the dependence between moments that characterizes normal distributions. The new empirical likelihood ratio (ELR) tests are exact and are shown to be very powerful decision rules based on small to moderate sample sizes. Asymptotic results related to the Type I error rates of the proposed tests are presented. We present a broad Monte Carlo comparison between different tests for normality, confirming the preference of the proposed method from a power perspective. A real data example is provided.     

A wide review on exponentiality tests and two competitive proposals with application on reliability

In this paper, two new statistics based on comparison of the theoretical and empirical distribution functions are proposed to test exponentiality. Critical values are determined by means of Monte Carlo simulations for various sample sizes and different significance levels. Through an extensive simulation study, 50 selected exponentiality tests are studied for a wide collection of alternative distributions. From the empirical power study, it is concluded that, firstly, one of our proposals is preferable for IFR (increasing failure rate) and UFR (unimodal failure rate) alternatives, whereas the other one is preferable for DFR (decreasing failure rate) and BFR (bathtub failure rate) alternatives and, secondly, the new tests can be considered serious and powerful competitors to other existing proposals, since they have the same (or higher) level of performance than the best tests in the statistical literature.     

Power and sample size determination for a stepwise test procedure for finding the maximum safe dose

This paper addresses the problem of power and sample size calculation for a stepwise multiple test procedure (SD2PC) proposed in Tamhane et al. [2001. Multiple test procedures for identifying the maximum safe dose. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96, 835–843] to identify the maximum safe dose of a compound. A general expression for the power of this procedure is derived. It is used to find the minimum overall power and minimum power under the constraint that the dose response function is bounded from below by a linear response function. It is shown that the two minima are attained under step and linear response functions, respectively. The sample sizes necessary on the zero dose control and each of the positive doses to guarantee a specified power requirement are calculated under these two least favorable configurations. A technique involving a continuous approximation to the sample sizes is used to reduce the number of quantities that need to be tabled, and to derive the asymptotically optimal allocation of the total sample size between the zero dose and the positive doses. An example is given to illustrate use of the tables. Extensions of the basic formulation are noted.     

A Goodness-of-Fit Test for Location-Scale Max-Stable Distributions

In this article, a technique based on the sample correlation coefficient to construct goodness-of-fit tests for max-stable distributions with unknown location and scale parameters and finite second moment is proposed. Specific details to test for the Gumbel distribution are given, including critical values for small sample sizes as well as approximate critical values for larger sample sizes by using normal quantiles. A comparison by Monte Carlo simulation shows that the proposed test for the Gumbel hypothesis is substantially more powerful than some other known tests against some alternative distributions with positive skewness coefficient.     

Goodness-of-fit test based on empirical characterisitc function

This paper discusses a goodness-of-fit test that uses the integral of the squared modulus of the difference between the empirical characteristic function of the sample data and the characteristic function of the hypothesized distribution. Monte Carlo procedures are employed to obtain the empirical percentage points for testing the fit of normal, logistic and exponential distributions with unknown location and scale parameters. Results of Monte Carlo power comparisons with other well-developed goodness-of-fit tests are summarized. Tne proposed test is shown to have superior power for testing the fit of the logistic distibotion (for moderate sample sizes) against a wide range of alternative distributions.     

Robust Tests Against Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models

In this paper, we consider testing for linearity against a well-known class of regime switching models known as the smooth transition autoregressive (STAR) models. Apart from the model selection issues, one reason for interest in testing for linearity in time-series models is that non-linear models such as the STAR are considerably more difficult to use. This testing problem is non-standard because a nuisance parameter becomes unidentified under the null hypothesis. In this paper, we further explore the class of tests proposed by Luukkonen, Saikonnen and Terasvirta (1988). Luukkonen et al . (1988) proposed LM tests for linearity against STAR models. A potential difficulty here is that the linear approximation introduces high leverage points, and hence outliers are likely to be quite influential. To overcome this difficulty, we use the same approximating linear model of Luukkonen et al . (1988), but we apply Wald and F -tests based on l 1 - and bounded influence estimates. The efficiency gains of this procedure cannot be easily deduced from the existing theoretical results because the test is based on a misspecified model under H 1 . Therefore, we carried out a simulation study, in which we observed that the robust tests have desirable properties compared to the test of Luukkonen et al . (1988) for a range of error distributions in the STAR model, in particular the robust tests have power advantages over the LM test.     

Goodness-of-fit tests for progressively Type-II censored data from location–scale distributions

In this article, we propose several goodness-of-fit methods for location–scale families of distributions under progressively Type-II censored data. The new tests are based on order statistics and sample spacings. We assess the performance of the proposed tests for the normal and Gumbel models against several alternatives by means of Monte Carlo simulations. It has been observed that the proposed tests are quite powerful in comparison with an existing goodness-of-fit test proposed for progressively Type-II censored data by Balakrishnan et al. [Goodness-of-fit tests based on spacings for progressively Type-II censored data from a general location–scale distribution, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 53 (2004), pp. 349–356]. Finally, we illustrate the proposed goodness-of-fit tests using two real data from reliability literature.     

Adaptive Jonckheere-type tests for ordered alternatives

Testing against ordered alternatives in the c -sample location problem plays an important role in statistical practice. The parametric test proposed by Barlow et al .-in the following, called the 'B-test'-is an appropriate test under the model of normality. For non-normal data, however, there are rank tests which have higher power than the B-test, such as the Jonckheere test or so-called Jonckheere-type tests introduced and studied by Buning and Kossler. However, we usually have no information about the underlying distribution. Thus, an adaptive test should be applied which takes into account the given data set. Two versions of such an adaptive test are proposed, which are based on the concept introduced by Hogg in 1974. These adaptive tests are compared with each of the single Jonckheere-type tests in the adaptive scheme and also with the B-test. It is shown via Monte Carlo simulation that the adaptive tests behave well over a broad class of symmetric distributions with short, medium and long tails, as well as for asymmetric distributions.     

Distribution-free tests in randomized blocks

Classes of distribution-free tests are proposed for testing homogeneity against order restricted as well as unrestricted alternatives in randomized block designs with multiple observations per cell. Allowing for different interblock scoring schemes, these tests are constructed based on the method of within block rankings. Asymptotic distributions (cell sizes tending to infinity) of these tests are derived under the assumption of homogeneity. The Pitman asymptotic relative efficiencies relative to the least squares statistics are studied. It is shown that when blocks are governed by different distributions, adaptive choice of scores within each block results in asymptotically more efficient tests as compared with methods that ignore such information. Monte Carlo simulations of selected designs indicate that the method of within block rankings is more power robust with respect to differing block distributions.     

Some robustness issues for comparing multiple logistic regression slopes to a control for small samples

For comparing several logistic regression slopes to that of a control for small sample sizes, Dasgupta et al. (2001) proposed an "asymptotic" small-sample test and a "pivoted" version of that test statistic. Their results show both methods perform well in terms of Type I error control and marginal power when the response is related to the explanatory variable via a logistic regression model. This study finds, via Monte Carlo simulations, that when the underlying relationship is probit, complementary log-log, linear, or even non-monotonic, the "asymptotic" and the "pivoted" small-sample methods perform fairly well in terms of Type I error control and marginal power. Unlike their large sample competitors, they are generally robust to departures from the logistic regression model.     

Large‐sample tests of extreme‐value dependence for multivariate copulas

Starting from the characterization of extreme‐value copulas based on max‐stability, large‐sample tests of extreme‐value dependence for multivariate copulas are studied. The two key ingredients of the proposed tests are the empirical copula of the data and a multiplier technique for obtaining approximate p‐values for the derived statistics. The asymptotic validity of the multiplier approach is established, and the finite‐sample performance of a large number of candidate test statistics is studied through extensive Monte Carlo experiments for data sets of dimension two to five. In the bivariate case, the rejection rates of the best versions of the tests are compared with those of the test of Ghoudi et al. (1998) recently revisited by Ben Ghorbal et al. (2009). The proposed procedures are illustrated on bivariate financial data and trivariate geological data. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 39: 703–720; 2011. © 2011 Statistical Society of Canada     

Discussion on the common threshold of several exponential distributions with different rates

The integration of results of independent studies in order to make inferences about a common threshold is an important problem with many practical applications. In this article, we apply the generalized variable method to make inferences on the common threshold of several exponential distributions when the scale (or rate) parameters are unknown and unequal. The merits of the proposed method are computed numerically and compared with other existing methods. Numerical results of both simulation studies and real data analyses show that the proposed method is applicable and its performance is better than other methods even when sample sizes are small.     

A review of tests for exponentiality with Monte Carlo comparisons

In this paper, 91 different tests for exponentiality are reviewed. Some of the tests are universally consistent while others are against some special classes of life distributions. Power performances of 40 of these different tests for exponentiality of datasets are compared through extensive Monte Carlo simulations. The comparisons are conducted for different sample sizes of 10, 25, 50 and 100 for different groups of distributions according to the shape of their hazard functions at 5 percent level of significance. Also, the techniques are applied to two real-world datasets and a measure of power is employed for the comparison of the tests. The results show that some tests which are very good under one group of alternative distributions are not so under another group. Also, some tests maintained relatively high power over all the groups of alternative distributions studied while some others maintained poor power performances over all the groups of alternative distributions. Again, the result obtained from real-world datasets agree completely with those of the simulation studies.KEYWORDS: Classes of life distributions, empirical power of a test, exponentiality, goodness-of-fit test, Monte Carlo simulationSubject Classifications: 62E10, 62E20, 62F03