Bayesian model selection for life time data under type II censoring

This paper considers the Bayesian model selection problem in life-time models using type-II censored data. In particular, the intrinsic Bayes factors are calculated for log-normal, exponential, and Weibull lifetime models using noninformative priors under type-II censoring. Numerical examples are given to illustrate our results.     

Objective Bayesian multiple comparisons for normal variances

This paper considers the multiple comparisons problem for normal variances. We propose a solution based on a Bayesian model selection procedure to this problem in which no subjective input is considered. We construct the intrinsic and fractional priors for which the Bayes factors and model selection probabilities are well defined. The posterior probability of each model is used as a model selection tool. The behaviour of these Bayes factors is compared with the Bayesian information criterion of Schwarz and some frequentist tests.     

Intrinsic Priors for Testing Two Normal Means with Intrinsic Bayes Factors

ABSTRACT

In this article we consider the problem of comparing two normal means with unknown common variance using a Bayesian approach. Conventional Bayes factors with improper non informative priors are not well defined. The intrinsic Bayes factors are used to overcome such a difficulty. We derive intrinsic priors whose Bayes factors are asymptotically equivalent to the corresponding intrinsic Bayes factors. We illustrate our results with numerical examples.     

Model determination for the variance component model using reference priors

For the balanced variance component model when the inference concerning intraclass correlation coefficient is of interest, Bayesian analysis is often appropriate. However, the question remains is to choose the appropriate prior. In this paper, we consider testing of the intraclass correlation coefficient under a default prior specification. Berger and Bernardo's (1992) On the development of the reference prior method. In: Bernardo, J.M., Berger, J.O., Dawid, A.P., Smith, A.F.M. (Eds.), Bayesian Statist. Vol. 4. Oxford University Press, London, pp. 35–60 reference priors are developed and are used to obtain the intrinsic Bayes factor (Berger and Pericchi, 1996) The intrinsic Bayes factor for model selection and prediction. J. Amer. statist. Assoc. 91, 109–122 for the nested models. Influence diagnostics using intrinsic Bayes factors are also developed. Finally, one simulated data is provided which illustrates the proposed methodology with appropriate simulation based on computational formulas. Then in order to overcome the difficulty in Bayesian computation, MCMC method, such as Gibbs sampler and Metropolis–Hastings algorithm, is employed.     

Posterior robustness with more than one sampling model

In order to robustify posterior inference, besides the use of large classes of priors, it is necessary to consider uncertainty about the sampling model. In this article we suggest that a convenient and simple way to incorporate model robustness is to consider a discrete set of competing sampling models, and combine it with a suitable large class of priors. This set reflects foreseeable departures of the base model, like thinner or heavier tails or asymmetry. We combine the models with different classes of priors that have been proposed in the vast literature on Bayesian robustness with respect to the prior. Also we explore links with the related literature of stable estimation and precise measurement theory, now with more than one model entertained. To these ends it will be necessary to introduce a procedure for model comparison that does not depend on an arbitrary constant or scale. We utilize a recent development on automatic Bayes factors with self-adjusted scale, the ‘intrinsic Bayes factor’ (Berger and Pericchi, Technical Report, 1993).     

Objective Bayesian hypothesis testing in regression models with first-order autoregressive residuals

This article considers the objective Bayesian testing in the normal regression models with first-order autoregressive residuals. We propose some solutions based on a Bayesian model selection procedure to this problem where no subjective input is considered. We construct the proper priors for testing the autocorrelation coefficient based on measures of divergence between competing models, which is called the divergence-based (DB) priors and then propose the objective Bayesian decision-theoretic rule, which is called the Bayesian reference criterion (BRC). Finally, we derive the intrinsic test statistic for testing the autocorrelation coefficient. The behavior of the Bayes factor-based DB priors is examined by comparing with the BRC in a simulation study and an example.     

Alternative Bayes factors for model selection

Several alternative Bayes factors have been recently proposed in order to solve the problem of the extreme sensitivity of the Bayes factor to the priors of models under comparison. Specifically, the impossibility of using the Bayes factor with standard noninformative priors for model comparison has led to the introduction of new automatic criteria, such as the posterior Bayes factor (Aitkin 1991), the intrinsic Bayes factors (Berger and Pericchi 1996b) and the fractional Bayes factor (O'Hagan 1995). We derive some interesting properties of the fractional Bayes factor that provide justifications for its use additional to the ones given by O'Hagan. We further argue that the use of the fractional Bayes factor, originally introduced to cope with improper priors, is also useful in a robust analysis. Finally, using usual classes of priors, we compare several alternative Bayes factors for the problem of testing the point null hypothesis in the univariate normal model.     

Equality and inequality constrained multivariate linear models: Objective model selection using constrained posterior priors

In objective Bayesian model selection, a well-known problem is that standard non-informative prior distributions cannot be used to obtain a sensible outcome of the Bayes factor because these priors are improper. The use of a small part of the data, i.e., a training sample, to obtain a proper posterior prior distribution has become a popular method to resolve this issue and seems to result in reasonable outcomes of default Bayes factors, such as the intrinsic Bayes factor or a Bayes factor based on the empirical expected-posterior prior.     

Consistent fractional Bayes factor for nested normal linear models

In the Bayesian approach to parametric model comparison, the use of improper priors is problematic due to the indeterminacy of the resulting Bayes factor (BF). The need for developing automatic and robust methods for model comparison has led to the introduction of alternative BFs. Intrinsic Bayes factors (Berger and Pericchi, 1996a) and fractional Bayes factors (FBF) (O'Hagan, 1995) are two alternative strategies for default model selection. We show in this paper that the FBF can be inconsistent. To overcome this problem, we propose a generalization of the FBF approach that leads to the usual FBF or to some variants of it in some special cases. As an important problem, we consider and discuss this generalization for model selection in nested linear models.     

Intrinsic Bayes factor approach to a test for the power law process

The versatile new criterion called the intrinsic Bayes factor (IBF), introduced by Berger and Pericchi [J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91 (1996) 109–122], has made it possible to perform model selection and hypotheses testing using standard (improper) noninformative priors in a variety of situations. In this paper, we use their methodology to test several hypotheses regarding the shape parameter of the power law process, which has been widely used to model failure times of repairable systems. Assuming that we have data from the process according to the time-truncation sampling scheme, we derive the arithmetic IBFs using four default priors, including the reference and Jeffreys priors. We establish the frequentist probability matching properties of these priors. We also identify two priors that are justifiable under both time-truncation and failure-truncation schemes, so that the IBFs for both schemes can be unified. Deducing the intrinsic priors of a certain canonical form, as the time of truncation tends to infinity, we show that the arithmetic IBFs correspond asymptotically to actual Bayes factors. We also discuss the expected IBFs, which are useful with small samples. We then use these results to analyze an actual data set on the interruption times of a transmission line, summarizing our results under the default priors.     

Objective Bayesian Testing of a Poisson Mean

We consider testing hypotheses about a single Poisson mean. When prior information is not available, use of objective priors is of interest. We provide intrinsic priors based on the arithmetic intrinsic and fractional Bayes factors, and evaluate their characteristics.     

Default Bayesian analysis of the Behrens–Fisher problem

In the Bayesian approach, the Behrens–Fisher problem has been posed as one of estimation for the difference of two means. No Bayesian solution to the Behrens–Fisher testing problem has yet been given due, perhaps, to the fact that the conventional priors used are improper. While default Bayesian analysis can be carried out for estimation purposes, it poses difficulties for testing problems. This paper generates sensible intrinsic and fractional prior distributions for the Behrens–Fisher testing problem from the improper priors commonly used for estimation. It allows us to compute the Bayes factor to compare the null and the alternative hypotheses. This default procedure of model selection is compared with a frequentist test and the Bayesian information criterion. We find discrepancy in the sense that frequentist and Bayesian information criterion reject the null hypothesis for data, that the Bayes factor for intrinsic or fractional priors do not.     

A bayesian method in determining the order of a finite state markov chain

In this paper, we use the Bayesian method in the application of hypothesis testing and model selection to determine the order of a Markov chain. The criteria used are based on Bayes factors with noninformative priors. Com¬parisons with the commonly used AIC and BIC criteria are made through an example and computer simulations. The results show that the proposed method is better than the AIC and BIC criteria, especially for Markov chains with higher orders and larger state spaces.     

Objective priors for hypothesis testing in one-way random effects models

The Bayes factor is a key tool in hypothesis testing. Nevertheless, the important issue of which priors should be used to develop objective Bayes factors remains open. The authors consider this problem in the context of the one-way random effects model. They use concepts such as orthogonality, predictive matching and invariance to justify a specific form of the priors for common parameters and derive the intrinsic and divergence based prior for the new parameter. The authors show that both intrinsic priors or divergence-based priors produce consistent Bayes factors. They illustrate the methods and compare them with other proposals.     

On asymptotic properties of Bayesian partially linear models

In this paper, we present large sample properties of a partially linear model from the Bayesian perspective, in which responses are explained by the semiparametric regression model with the additive form of the linear component and the nonparametric component. For this purpose, we investigate asymptotic behaviors of posterior distributions in terms of consistency. Specifically, we deal with a specific Bayesian partially linear regression model with additive noises in which the nonparametric component is modeled using Gaussian process priors. Under the Bayesian partially linear model using Gaussian process priors, we focus on consistency of posterior distribution and consistency of the Bayes factor, and extend these results to generalized additive regression models and study their asymptotic properties. In addition we illustrate the asymptotic properties based on empirical analysis through simulation studies.     

INTRINSIC PRIORS FOR TWO-SAMPLE TESTS IN NORMAL POPULATIONS

ABSTRACT

There have been considerable amounts of work regarding the development of various default Bayes factors in model selection and hypothesis testing. Two commonly used criteria, the intrinsic Bayes factor and the fractional Bayes factor are compared to test two independent normal means and variances. We also derive several intrinsic priors whose Bayes factors are asymptotically equivalent to the respective Bayes factors. We demonstrate our results in simulated datasets.     

Jeffreys priors for survival models with censored data

When prior information on model parameters is weak or lacking, Bayesian statistical analyses are typically performed with so-called “default” priors. We consider the problem of constructing default priors for the parameters of survival models in the presence of censoring, using Jeffreys’ rule. We compare these Jeffreys priors to the “uncensored” Jeffreys priors, obtained without considering censored observations, for the parameters of the exponential and log-normal models. The comparison is based on the frequentist coverage of the posterior Bayes intervals obtained from these prior distributions.     

Intrinsic Bayesian inference on a Poisson rate and on the ratio of two Poisson rates

Our purpose is to explore the intrinsic Bayesian inference on the rate of a Poisson distribution and on the ratio of the rates of two independent Poisson distributions, with the natural conjugate family of priors in the first case and the semi-conjugate family of priors defined by Laurent and Legrand (2011) in the second case. Intrinsic Bayesian inference is derived from the Bayesian decision theory framework based on the intrinsic discrepancy loss function. We cover in particular the case of some objective Bayesian procedures suggested by Bernardo when considering reference priors.     

Bayesian spectral analysis models for quantile regression with Dirichlet process mixtures

This paper presents a Bayesian analysis of partially linear additive models for quantile regression. We develop a semiparametric Bayesian approach to quantile regression models using a spectral representation of the nonparametric regression functions and the Dirichlet process (DP) mixture for error distribution. We also consider Bayesian variable selection procedures for both parametric and nonparametric components in a partially linear additive model structure based on the Bayesian shrinkage priors via a stochastic search algorithm. Based on the proposed Bayesian semiparametric additive quantile regression model referred to as BSAQ, the Bayesian inference is considered for estimation and model selection. For the posterior computation, we design a simple and efficient Gibbs sampler based on a location-scale mixture of exponential and normal distributions for an asymmetric Laplace distribution, which facilitates the commonly used collapsed Gibbs sampling algorithms for the DP mixture models. Additionally, we discuss the asymptotic property of the sempiparametric quantile regression model in terms of consistency of posterior distribution. Simulation studies and real data application examples illustrate the proposed method and compare it with Bayesian quantile regression methods in the literature.     

Choosing Priors for Constrained Analysis of Variance: Methods Based on Training Data

Abstract. This article combines the best of both objective and subjective Bayesian inference in specifying priors for inequality and equality constrained analysis of variance models. Objectivity can be found in the use of training data to specify a prior distribution, subjectivity can be found in restrictions on the prior to formulate models. The aim of this article is to find the best model in a set of models specified using inequality and equality constraints on the model parameters. For the evaluation of the models an encompassing prior approach is used. The advantage of this approach is that only a prior for the unconstrained encompassing model needs to be specified. The priors for all constrained models can be derived from this encompassing prior. Different choices for this encompassing prior will be considered and evaluated.