Comparison of design for quadratic regression on cubes

Designs for quadratic regression are considered when the possible choices of the controllable variable are points x=(x₁,x₂,…,x_q) in the q-dimensional cube of side 2. The designs that are optimum with respect to such criteria as those of D-, A-, and E-optimality are compared in their performance relative to these and other criteria. Some of the results are developed algebraically; others, numerically. The possible supports of E-optimum designs are much more numerous than the D-optimum supports characterized earlier. The A-optimum design appears to be fairly robust in its efficiency, under variation of criterion.     

Comparison of designs equivalent under one or two criteria

Two designs equivalent under one or two criteria may be compared under other criteria. For certain configurations of eigenvalues of the information matrices, we decide which design is the better of the two for many other such criteria. The relationship to universal optimality (in the case of equivalence under one criterion) is indicated. For two criteria, applications are given to weighing and treatment-with-covariate settings.     

Optimal discrimination designs for exponential regression models

We investigate optimal designs for discriminating between exponential regression models of different complexity, which are widely used in the biological sciences; see, e.g., Landaw [1995. Robust sampling designs for compartmental models under large prior eigenvalue uncertainties. Math. Comput. Biomed. Appl. 181–187] or Gibaldi and Perrier [1982. Pharmacokinetics. Marcel Dekker, New York]. We discuss different approaches for the construction of appropriate optimality criteria, and find sharper upper bounds on the number of support points of locally optimal discrimination designs than those given by Caratheodory's Theorem. These results greatly facilitate the numerical construction of optimal designs. Various examples of optimal designs are then presented and compared to different other designs. Moreover, to protect the experiment against misspecifications of the nonlinear model parameters, we adapt the design criteria such that the resulting designs are robust with respect to such misspecifications and, again, provide several examples, which demonstrate the advantages of our approach.     

Bayesian D-optimal designs for exponential regression models

We consider the Bayesian D-optimal design problem for exponential growth models with one, two or three parameters. For the one-parameter model conditions on the shape of the density of the prior distribution and on the range of its support are given guaranteeing that a one-point design is also Bayesian D-optimal within the class of all designs. In the case of two parameters the best two-point designs are determined and for special prior distributions it is proved that these designs are Bayesian D-optimal. Finally, the exponential growth model with three parameters is investigated. The best three-point designs are characterized by a nonlinear equation. The global optimality of these designs cannot be proved analytically and it is demonstrated that these designs are also Bayesian D-optimal within the class of all designs if gamma-distributions are used as prior distributions.     

Saturated designs for multivariate cubic regression

This paper deals with the problem of finding saturated designs for multivariate cubic regression on a cube which are nearly D-optimal. A finite class of designs is presented for the k dimensional cube having the property that the sequence of the best designs in this class for each k is asymptotically efficient as k increases. A method for constructing good designs in this class is discussed and the construction is carried out for 1?k?8. These numerical results are presented in the last section of the paper.     

Robust designs for nearly linear regression

In this paper we seek designs and estimators which are optimal in some sense for multivariate linear regression on cubes and simplexes when the true regression function is unknown. More precisely, we assume that the unknown true regression function is the sum of a linear part plus some contamination orthogonal to the set of all linear functions in the L₂ norm with respect to Lebesgue measure. The contamination is assumed bounded in absolute value and it is shown that the usual designs for multivariate linear regression on cubes and simplices and the usual least squares estimators minimize the supremum over all possible contaminations of the expected mean square error. Additional results for extrapolation and interpolation, among other things, are discussed. For suitable loss functions optimal designs are found to have support on the extreme points of our design space.     

On the robustness of the optimum balanced 2m factorial designs of resolution v (given by Srivastava and Chopra) in the presence of outliers

In this paper we study the sensitivity of the optimum balanced resolution V plans for 2^m factorials, to outliers, using the measure suggested by Box and Drapper (1975). We observe that the designs are robust, i.e., have low sensitivity.     

On the optimality of chemical balance weighing designs

In this paper we consider the problem of optimally weighing n objects with N weighings on a chemical balance. Several previously known results are generalized. In particular, the designs shown by Ehlich (1964a) and Payne (1974) to be D-optimal in various classes of weighing designs where N≡2 (mod4) are shown to be optimal with respect to any optimality criterion of Type I as defined in Cheng (1980). Several results on the E-optimality of weighing designs are also given.     

D-optimal minimax regression designs on discrete design space

One classical design criterion is to minimize the determinant of the covariance matrix of the regression estimates, and the designs are called D-optimal designs. To reflect the nature that the proposed models are only approximately true, we propose a robust design criterion to study response surface designs. Both the variance and bias are considered in the criterion. In particular, D-optimal minimax designs are investigated and constructed. Examples are given to compare D-optimal minimax designs with classical D-optimal designs.     

Robust designs for ratio and regression estimation

The purpose of this paper is to introduce a class of robust designs to be used with ratio estimators and extend them to regression estimators. Robustness is to be achieved against departures from a model for which the estimator is ‘optimal’. Practical implementation of the design is indicated both for large and small samples.     

Robust prediction and extrapolation designs for misspecified generalized linear regression models

We study minimax robust designs for response prediction and extrapolation in biased linear regression models. We extend previous work of others by considering a nonlinear fitted regression response, by taking a rather general extrapolation space and, most significantly, by dropping all restrictions on the structure of the regressors. Several examples are discussed.     

Robust designs and optimality of least squares for regression problems

Unbiased linear estimators are considered for the model

$\text{Y(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)=θ}{}_0\text{+}\text{∑k}\text{j=1}\text{θ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{+ψ(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)+ε}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{, i=1,2,…,n,}$

where ψ(x) is an unknown contamination. It is assumed that |ψ(x)|?φ(6x6) where φ is a convex function. Minimax analogues of Φ_p-optimality criteria are introduced. It is shown that, under certain (sufficient) conditions, the least squares estimators and corresponding designs are optimal in the class of all unbiased linear estimators and designs. It is also shown that, in the case when least squares estimators with symmetric design do not lead to an optimal solution, the relative efficiency of optimal least squares is not diminishing and has a uniform lower bound.     

Cyclic designs for a covariate model

A linear model with one treatment at V levels and first order regression on K continuous covariates with values on a K-cube is considered. We restrict our attention to classes of designs d for which the number of observations N to be taken is a multiple of V, i.e. N = V × R with R ≥2, and each treatment level is observed R times. Among these designs, called here equireplicated, there is a subclass characterized by the following: the allocation matrix of each treatment level (for short, allocation matrix) is obtained through cyclic permutation of the columns of the allocation matrix of the first treatment level. We call these designs cyclic. Besides having easy representation, the most efficient cyclic designs are often D-optimal in the class of equireplicated designs. A known upper bound for the determinant of the information matrix M(d) of a design, in the class of equireplicated ones, depends on the congruences of N and V modulo 4. For some combinations of parameter moduli, we give here methods of constructing families of D-optimal cyclic designs. Moreover, for some sets of parameters (N, V,K = V), where the upper bound on ∣M(d)∣ (for that specific combination of moduli) is not attainable, it is also possible to construct highly D-efficient cyclic designs. Finally, for N≤24 and V≤6, computer search was used to determine the most efficient design in the class of cyclic ones. They are presented, together with their respective efficiency in the class of equireplicated designs.     

Construction of (M,S)-optimal design for block size 3

(M,S)-optimal designs are constructed for block size three when the number of treatments is of the form 6t + 3.     

Optimum covariate designs in partially balanced incomplete block (PBIB) design set-ups

The use of covariates in block designs is necessary when the covariates cannot be controlled like the blocking factor in the experiment. In this paper, we consider the situation where there is some flexibility for selection in the values of the covariates. The choice of values of the covariates for a given block design attaining minimum variance for estimation of each of the parameters has attracted attention in recent times. Optimum covariate designs in simple set-ups such as completely randomised design (CRD), randomised block design (RBD) and some series of balanced incomplete block design (BIBD) have already been considered. In this paper, optimum covariate designs have been considered for the more complex set-ups of different partially balanced incomplete block (PBIB) designs, which are popular among practitioners. The optimum covariate designs depend much on the methods of construction of the basic PBIB designs. Different combinatorial arrangements and tools such as orthogonal arrays, Hadamard matrices and different kinds of products of matrices viz. Khatri–Rao product, Kronecker product have been conveniently used to construct optimum covariate designs with as many covariates as possible.     

Asymptotic relative efficiency of designs for factorial paired comparison experiments

A general approach for comparing designs of paired comparison experiments on the basis of the asymptotic relative efficiencies, in the Bahadur sense, of their respective likelihood ratio tests is discussed and extended to factorials. Explicit results for comparing five designs of 2^q factorial paired comparison experiments are obtained. These results indicate that some of the designs which require comparison of fewer distinct pairs of treatments than does the completely balanced design are, generally, more efficient for detecting main effects and/or certain interactions. The developments of this paper generalize the work of Littell and Boyett (1977) for comparing two designs of R x C factorial paired comparison experiments.     

On group divisible response surface (GDRS) designs

In this paper some experimental situations are identified corresponding to which suitable response surface designs do not exist. A class of response surface designs is introduced to cope with these situations. Their analysis with and without blocking and methods of construction is discussed.     

On optimality properties of simple block designs in the approximate design theory

Optimality properties of approximate block designs are studied under variations of (1) the class of competing designs, (2) the optimality criterion, (3) the parametric function of interest, and (4) the statistical model. The designs which are optimal turn out to be the product of their treatment and block marginals, and uniform designs when the support is specified in advance. Optimality here means uniform, universal, and simultaneous j_p-optimality. The classical balanced incomplete block designs are embedded into this approach, and shown to be simultaneously j_p-optimal for a maximal system of identifiable parameters. A geometric account of universal optimality is given which applies beyond the context of block designs.     

Some sufficient conditions for establishing (M,S)-optimality

Two sufficient conditions are given for an incomplete block design to be (M,S- optimal. For binary designs the conditions are (i) that the elements in each row, excluding the diagonal element, of the association matrix differ by at most one, and (ii) that the off-diagonal elements of the block characteristic matrix differ by at most one. It is also shown how the conditions can be utilized for nonbinary designs and that for blocks of size two the sufficient condition in terms of the association matrix can be attained.