基于TDAR模型的VaR估计方法及应用

文献中, 在险值估计方法一般基于线性假设, 但是该假设在实际中很难满足,需要为此提出非线性的在险值估计方法。与以往传统模型一般假定变化发生在"时间"点上不同,门限双自回归 (TDAR)因状态空间的不同而建立不同模型来对非对称性、结构变点等非线性现象进行刻画,并同时允许均值和波动率过程的结构变化。本文首次基于TDAR建立TDAR-VaR方法,并对上证指数和香港恒生指数进行了实证研究和对杠杆效应进行了分析。实证分析发现TDAR-VaR较好地预测了市场风险。     

股市回报率分布的厚尾性与风险估测模型的绩效探讨

当金融时间序列具有分布的厚尾性、波动的集聚性等特征时,传统的方法将难以胜任对风险的准确度量.除了讨论在厚尾分布下如何应用条件极值与无条件极值来度量风险外,还利用历史模拟、风险矩阵、条件正态模型等方法进行风险值估计,最后运用五项评估指标对各种模型的预测效果进行了比较分析.     

非平移收益曲线的风险免疫策略

在债券收益曲线呈刚体运动的假设条件下,引入Fisher&Weil久期的概念.从收益曲线的运动分析出发,提出了非平移收益曲线的风险免疫模型,基于该模型研究了风险最小化债券组合的对冲技术和方法.通过数值模拟实验,采用风险值VaR次序统计量估计技术对不同免疫策略下债券组合的风险敞口进行了分析.结果表明,所提出的风险免疫策略能有效地防范和控制无违约债券的利率风险.     

经济政策不确定性与股票风险特征

构建了包含经济政策不确定性的随机贴现模型,通过参数校准、静态比较等方法,探讨了不同政策不确定性下股票风险的动态特征.在此基础上,通过实证模拟分析政策不确定性影响股票风险的传导机制,并通过组合分析法检验政策不确定性在股票风险形成中的作用,以此验证该理论模型在中国的适用性.最后,运用面板数据回归模型对政策不确定性与股票风险的关系进行量化分析.结果表明:1)政策不确定性能够通过企业现金流、贴现因子和相关系数等途径提高股票风险,该效应在控制传统风险因子、企业异质性因素和外部环境因素后依然显著;2)具有非国有性质、较低盈利能力和低资产增长率的企业股票更易受政策不确定性的影响;3)在经济萧条和改革幅度较大的阶段,政策不确定性对股票风险的溢出效应显著增强.     

经济政策不确定性与股票风险特征北大核心CSCDCSSCI

构建了包含经济政策不确定性的随机贴现模型,通过参数校准、静态比较等方法,探讨了不同政策不确定性下股票风险的动态特征.在此基础上,通过实证模拟分析政策不确定性影响股票风险的传导机制,并通过组合分析法检验政策不确定性在股票风险形成中的作用,以此验证该理论模型在中国的适用性.最后,运用面板数据回归模型对政策不确定性与股票风险的关系进行量化分析.结果表明:1)政策不确定性能够通过企业现金流、贴现因子和相关系数等途径提高股票风险,该效应在控制传统风险因子、企业异质性因素和外部环境因素后依然显著;2)具有非国有性质、较低盈利能力和低资产增长率的企业股票更易受政策不确定性的影响;3)在经济萧条和改革幅度较大的阶段,政策不确定性对股票风险的溢出效应显著增强.     

金融衍生品投资与企业现金流波动风险研究

为了揭示金融衍生品对企业现金流波动风险的影响机制与效应,以我国沪深A股2015~2018年制造业上市公司为研究对象,运用Heckman两阶段回归模型进行实证研究。研究发现:公司使用金融衍生品降低了现金流波动风险;当经营风险大、信息不对称程度高以及代理冲突严重时,其降低幅度更高,揭示出金融衍生品的主体需求和效应差异。进一步分析发现,外汇衍生品和商品衍生品发挥了降低现金流波动风险的作用,而利率衍生品的效应不显著;金融衍生品加剧了特质风险但对系统性风险无显著作用,并且对公司价值未产生显著影响。     

金融高管薪酬与公司绩效关系实证研究

应用方程估计与曲线拟合的方法,在国内外高管薪酬快速增长的背景下,以2001-2008为时间窗口,研究了沪深两市金融类上市公司高管薪酬结构和薪酬水平与公司绩效的相关性问题,通过绩效评价模型和回归模型的求解,实证研究发现,我国金融类上市公司高管薪酬水平和薪酬结构与公司绩效均基本无关,国有金融类上市公司高管薪酬明显高于非国有金融类上市公司高管薪酬,而其绩效差异却不显著,说明我国政府对国有金融类上市公司高管薪酬实行限制,符合市场经济发展规律和基本要求,但在非国有金融类上市公司内及其他垄断性行业内,高管薪酬的差别也较大。因此,也有必要将这种限制拓展到非国有金融企业以及其它垄断性行业。     

期望效用视角下的风险对冲效率

与传统文献将风险下降比率作为风险对冲效率指标不同,本文引入期望效用理论来比较最小方差对冲策略、最小在险价值(VaR)对冲策略和最小条件在险价值(CVaR)对冲策略的对冲效率,从而将人们的风险态度同对冲策略选择联系起来,以实现不同风险态度的投资者选择不同风险对冲策略的目的。借用风险中性效用函数、二次效用函数和CARA效用函数,本文严格证明:在这三种对冲策略中,最小方差对冲策略过于保守,最小VaR对冲策略最为激进,风险厌恶程度大的投资者偏好最小方差对冲策略,风险中性投资者和风险厌恶程度小的投资者更偏好最小VaR对冲策略,最小CVaR对冲策略介于二者之间。     

"安则兼善天下":董责险与企业社会责任履行北大核心

履行企业社会责任是公司管理层的核心任务,故构建促进管理层履行社会责任的机制至关重要.本文利用2010-2020年沪深A股上市公司数据,验证董责险是否是管理层履行社会责任的促进机制.研究结果表明:公司管理层"安则兼善天下",具体表现为:第一,董责险可提升管理层履行企业社会责任积极性,且公司所在地区法治环境越差,董责险提升企业社会责任履行作用越显著;第二,董责险主要通过提升管理层乐观度来促进其履行社会责任.进一步研究发现,董责险对企业社会责任履行的促进作用主要体现在员工、供应链和环境责任;国有企业和大规模公司购买董责险更能促进管理层履行企业社会责任.研究为构建企业社会责任履行促进机制提供了新视角,也为资本市场全面认识董责险功能,进而借力董责险促进上市公司高质量发展提供新思路.     

考虑事件风险的在险价值研究

本文讨论了考虑事件风险的资产的在险价值方法,并以此对上海股票指数作了实证研究。这种方法用跳跃来描述事件风险,用跳跃-扩散过程来描述收益率过程。通过模拟退火算法来估计模型参数,利用随机模拟方法求得资产收益率的模拟分布,进而计算组合的在险价值。通过对上海指数的实证研究表明,资产的事件风险是不可忽略的,考虑事件风险的在险价值更加合理。     

Trust,Emotion, Sex,Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield

Risk management has become increasingly politicized and contentious. Polarized views, controversy, and conflict have become pervasive. Research has begun to provide a new perspective on this problem by demonstrating the complexity of the concept risk and the inadequacies of the traditional view of risk assessment as a purely scientific enterprise. This paper argues that danger is real, but risk is socially constructed. Risk assessment is inherently subjective and represents a blending of science and judgment with important psychological, social, cultural, and political factors. In addition, our social and democratic institutions, remarkable as they are in many respects, breed distrust in the risk arena. Whoever controls the definition of risk controls the rational solution to the problem at hand. If risk is defined one way, then one option will rise to the top as the most cost-effective or the safest or the best. If it is defined another way, perhaps incorporating qualitative characteristics and other contextual factors, one will likely get a different ordering of action solutions. Defining risk is thus an exercise in power. Scientific literacy and public education are important, but they are not central to risk controversies. The public is not irrational. Their judgments about risk are influenced by emotion and affect in a way that is both simple and sophisticated. The same holds true for scientists. Public views are also influenced by worldviews, ideologies, and values; so are scientists' views, particularly when they are working at the limits of their expertise. The limitations of risk science, the importance and difficulty of maintaining trust, and the complex, sociopolitical nature of risk point to the need for a new approach—one that focuses upon introducing more public participation into both risk assessment and risk decision making in order to make the decision process more democratic, improve the relevance and quality of technical analysis, and increase the legitimacy and public acceptance of the resulting decisions.     

Why Study Risk Perception?

Studies of risk perception examine the opinions people express when they are asked, in various ways, to characterize and evaluate hazardous activities and technologies. This research aims to aid risk analysis and societal decision making by (i) improving methods for eliciting opinions about risk, (ii) providing a basis for understanding and anticipating public responses to hazards, and (iii) improving the communication of risk information among laypeople, technical experts, and policy makers.     

Taxonomic Analysis of Perceived Risk: Modeling Individual and Group Perceptions Within Homogeneous Hazard Domains

Previous studies of risk perception have typically focused on the mean judgments of a group of people regarding the riskiness (or safety) of a diverse set of hazardous activities, substances, and technologies. This paper reports the results of two studies that take a different path. Study 1 investigated whether models within a single technological domain were similar to previous models based on group means and diverse hazards. Study 2 created a group taxonomy of perceived risk for only one technological domain, railroads, and examined whether the structure of that taxonomy corresponded with taxonomies derived from prior studies of diverse hazards. Results from Study 1 indicated that the importance of various risk characteristics in determining perceived risk differed across individuals and across hazards, but not so much as to invalidate the results of earlier studies based on group means and diverse hazards. In Study 2, the detailed analysis of railroad hazards produced a structure that had both important similarities to, and dissimilarities from, the structure obtained in prior research with diverse hazard domains. The data also indicated that railroad hazards are really quite diverse, with some approaching nuclear reactors in their perceived seriousness. These results suggest that information about the diversity of perceptions within a single domain of hazards could provide valuable input to risk-management decisions.     

相关性下的银行风险集成研究综述

银行风险之间的相关关系会使风险之间相互转化，相互影响，令风险呈现出放大或者缩小的趋势，显著影响着银行风险度量结果的准确性。银行风险集成致力于在充分考虑银行风险相关关系的基础上，对银行风险进行较为准确的度量。但是银行风险具有相关关系种类繁多、表现形式复杂、以及数据的可获得性差等显著特征，导致银行风险的集成度量领域存在诸多挑战。本文对相关性下的银行风险集成研究进行综述，具体从集成对象、集成方法和集成数据三个层次系统展开。首先对银行风险及其蕴含的种类繁多的相关关系类型进行解析，然后分析银行风险相关关系表征出的多种复杂特性，根据对这些特性的刻画能力对银行风险的集成方法进行划分和比较，最后总结了获取银行风险集成数据的多种途径。在此基础上，进一步分析了银行风险集成研究的难点和未来趋势。     

The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health

No strategy for countermeasure design or future directions of research in the areas of human behavior which leads to traffic accidents or lifestyle-related diseases can be rationally developed without an acceptable working theory of human behavior in these domains. For this purpose, an attempt has been made to conceptually integrate the available evidence with respect to the role of human behavior in the causation of road accidents. From this integrative effort it would seem that the accident rate is ultimately dependent on one factor only, the target level of risk in the population concerned which acts as the reference variable in a homeostatic process relating accident rate to human motivation. Various policy tactics for the purpose of modifying this target level of risk have been pointed out and the theory of risk homeostasis has been speculatively extended to the areas of lifestyle-dependent morbidity and mortality.     

Risk Framework for an Organizational System With Major Components

Many large organizations accomplish their various functions through interactions across their major components. Components refers to functional entities within a large complex organization, such as business sectors, academic departments, or regional divisions. The dependency between the various components can cause risk to propagate through their overall system. This article presents a risk assessment framework that integrates risk across a diverse set of components to the overall organization functions. This project addresses three major challenges: aggregating risk, estimating component interdependencies including cycles of dependencies, and propagating risk across components. The framework aggregates risk assessments through a value function for severity that is evaluated at the expected outcome of accomplishing planned goals in terms of performance, schedule, and resources. The value function, which represents risk tolerance, scales between defined points corresponding to failure and success. Different risk assessment may be aggregated together. This article presents a novel approach to establishing relationships between the various components. This article develops and compares three network risk propagation models that characterize the overall organizational risk. The U.S. Air Force has applied this risk framework to evaluate success in hypothetical future wars. The analysts employing this risk framework have informed billions of dollars of strategic investment decisions.     

Risk analysis under attack: How risk science can address the legal,social, and reputational liabilities faced by risk analysts

The role of the risk analyst is critical in understanding and managing uncertainty. However, there is another type of uncertainty that is rarely discussed: The legal, social, and reputational liabilities of the risk analyst. Recent events have shown that professionals participating in risk analysis can be held personally liable. It is timely and important to ask: How can risk science guide risk analysis with consideration of those liabilities, particularly in response to emerging and unprecedented risk. This paper studies this topic by: (1) Categorizing how professionals with risk analysis responsibilities have historically been held liable, and (2) developing a framework to address uncertainty related to those potential liabilities. The result of this framework will enable individual analysts and organizations to investigate and manage the expectations of risk analysts and others as they apply risk principles and methods. This paper will be of interest to risk researchers, risk professionals, and industry professionals who seek maturity within their risk programs.     

Risk Comparisons, Conflict, and Risk Acceptability Claims

Despite many claims for and against the use of risk comparisons in risk communication, few empirical studies have explored their effect. Even fewer have examined the public's relative preferences among different kinds of risk comparisons. Two studies, published in this journal in 1990 and 2003, used seven measures of "acceptability" to examine public reaction to 14 examples of risk comparisons, as used by a hypothetical factory manager to explain risks of his ethylene oxide plant. This study examined the effect on preferences of scenarios involving low or high conflict between the factory manager and residents of the hypothetical town (as had the 2003 study), and inclusion of a claim that the comparison demonstrated the risks' acceptability. It also tested the Finucane et al. (2000) affect hypothesis that information emphasizing low risks-as in these risk comparisons-would raise benefits estimates without changing risk estimates. Using similar but revised scenarios, risk comparison examples (10 instead of 14), and evaluation measures, an opportunity sample of 303 New Jersey residents rated the comparisons, and the risks and benefits of the factory. On average, all comparisons received positive ratings on all evaluation measures in all conditions. Direct and indirect measures showed that the conflict manipulation worked; overall, No-Conflict and Conflict scenarios evoked scores that were not significantly different. The attachment to each risk comparison of a risk acceptability claim ("So our factory's risks should be acceptable to you.") did not worsen ratings relative to conditions lacking this claim. Readers who did or did not see this claim were equally likely to infer an attempt to persuade them to accept the risk from the comparison. As in the 2003 article, there was great individual variability in inferred rankings of the risk comparisons. However, exposure to the risk comparisons did not reduce risk estimates significantly (while raising benefit estimates), and Conflict-Claim respondents found the risk of the hypothetical factory less acceptable than No-Conflict respondents. Results suggest that neither risk comparisons nor risk acceptability claims are automatically anathema to audiences, but they may have tiny or unintended effects on audience judgments about risky situations.     

风险相关性下的信用风险、市场风险和操作风险集成度量

商业银行各种风险之间相关性的存在,对其整体风险的度量产生重要影响。本文针对商业银行的信用风险、市场风险和操作风险这三类主要风险,在考虑相关性基础上给出了风险集成过程,通过copula函数和蒙特卡洛模拟方法计算了商业银行的整体风险,同时研究了风险分散化效应和在不同copula函数下整体风险的变化情况。最后以主流文献中的数据做了实证分析,结果显示本文提出方法能够很好的描述风险损失之间的相关性,同时在能够抵御相同风险的情况下考虑相关性下的在险值与简单相加得到的在险值相比要小,这能为银行业提高资金利用率提供了一定的理论和方法依据。     

A general guideline for management of risk from carcinogens

A simple relationship is formulated that helps to discriminate between acceptable and unacceptable individual lifetime risks (RL) to populations that are exposed to chemical carcinogens. The relationship is an empirical one and is developed using objective risk data as well as subjective risk levels that have found substantial acceptance among those concerned with carcinogenic risk assessment issues. The expression sets acceptable levels of lifetime carcinogenic risk and is a function of the total population exposed to the carcinogen. Its use in risk assessment and risk management provides guidance in distinguishing those carcinogens that should be regulated because of the health hazard they pose from those whose regulation may not be needed.