基于AHP-DEA方法的区域科技创业人才生态系统评价研究

区域科技创业人才生态系统的完善程度直接影响科技创业人才的创业活动。现有的创业生态系统评价研究文献中对创业人才的作用研究不多。文章提出了区域科技创业人才生态系统评价体系,依据层次分析法和数据包络分析法各自特点,构造了两者结合的综合评价模型对科技创业人才生态系统进行综合评价,选取了主体要素、服务与支持要素和环境要素3个一级指标,10个二级指标和39个三级指标,建立评价指标系统,运用层次分析法确定各影响因素的权重,在此基础上,运用数据包络分析法,对15个城市2010年科技创业人才生态系统的技术效率、纯技术效率和规模效率进行评价。最后,提出优化区域科技创业人才生态系统的对策建议。     

基于层次分析法的核电调试人员筛选的评价体系

本文介绍了在层次分析法的基础上建立核电调试人员筛选的评价体系,并对该体系的实证分析方法进行了说明。该方法基于业务能力、健康状况、心理素质、交流沟通和现场环境作为评价指标来建立层次分析模型,构造了比较矩阵和不同准则的方案层判断矩阵,通过计算层次单排序的权向量得到不同调试人员对总目标权值的大小来筛选调试人员。通过实证分析可以看到,层次分析法是对人才评价的有效工具并给出了与实际情况符合有较好的结果。基于实证分析的调试人员筛选评级体系为调试单位提供了一种合适完善的模型,使得调试人员的筛选更加数字化、合理化、公平化。     

基于AHP的新疆综合开发治理战略决策分析

本文基于已有的研究及调研结果,运用层次分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process,AHP)和专家咨询相结合的方法建立了新疆综合开发治理战略决策结构模型,按总目标、战略目标、发展战略、制约因素四个层次,分析了各层次间的相互联系与相互制约关系,确定了各级指标的权重,从而得出这些因素对实现总目标的影响或重要程度。研究表明,运用层次分析方法对新疆综合开发治理战略决策进行定量分析,可以有效指导新疆未来的发展战略,这对于新疆综合开发治理战略的实施具有重要的理论和实践价值。     

基于层次分析法的艺术品交易网站评价研究

随着中国经济的不断发展,以互联网为基础的艺术品交易市场迅速发展起来,形成了一批从事艺术品交易的网站。本文主要运用层次分析法,统筹考虑艺术品交易网站的特性和各种指标属性,建立网站的评价指标体系,构造评价模型,并且利用层次分析法计算出各指标权重,评价现在比较热门的几个网站,定量分析各网站的综合性能。     

基于AHP-灰色关联度的配送中心选址决策研究

针对配送中心选址问题中的多种影响因素,建立了配送中心备选地址的因素评价体系并对评价指标进行了规范化的处理。在此基础上运用层次分析法确定评价指标的权值,以候选地址间的灰色关联度作为评价的准则,建立一种对多候选地址的配送中心决策模型。     

基于技术嵌入度的分包管理模式研究

引入"技术嵌入度"概念,建立了用于分包管理模式研究用的施工总包企业技术嵌入度评价指标;并应用层次分析法进行评价分析,在技术的视角下量化界定了现有的不同分包模式。最后以"施工方案"指标为例进行具体说明,给出了分包模式划分的具体评价结果。研究表明,施工方案、施工作业指导书、技术人员、施工进度计划、技术(安全)交底5个指标可以较好地描述技术嵌入度;层次分析法可以有效确定不同分包模式之间所对应的技术嵌入度临界值;"施工方案"评价指标下,技术嵌入度值0.87为纯劳务分包与劳务分包划分的临界值,0.13为劳务分包与专业分包划分的临界值。     

上市公司董事会治理评价模型设置

为研究我国上市公司董事会治理状况,根据我国上市公司的特点,选取五个二级指标,十五个三级指标,作为董事会治理状况分析的量化指标,建立符合中国实际的董事会治理评价模型,而在评价指标权重的确定上采用层次分析法,并对其有效性进行检验,根据评价模型可以更好的研究与考察我国上市公司董事会治理状况。     

基于层次分析和图论模型的旅游线路设计及其评估

旅游线路设计是开发旅游产品一个重要环节。对海南主要景点选取交通条件、知名度和环境与服务质量作为评价指标,其中交通条件和环境与服务质量利用模糊集表示,知名度用访问数量表示。通过隶属度函数和极差化标准公式将数据进行归一化处理,然后利用层次分析法确定三个评价指标的权重,最后建立综合评价模型(CEM)进行品质综合评价。针对文化历史游、生活享受游、风景区游三种典型特色旅游路线,我们提出利用谷歌地图的最短路径、最短时间和图论模型。为了保证所设计线路的质量,引进层次分析法(AHP)模型,将所设计的线路与已知的线路进行对比及相似性评估。     

AHP在建筑施工企业信息化综合评价中的应用

本文通过对建筑施工企业信息化工作进行分析研究,建立了建筑施工企业信息化水平的综合评价指标体系。该指标体系由5个分指标构成:信息化战略、基础设施、应用状况、人力资源和经济效益;并利用层次分析法构造建筑施工企业信息化水平的层次分析结构模型,最后进行了实例分析。     

港口物流功能评价模型构建与实证研究

港口物流的发展越来越受到重视,为提升港口的竞争力,需要对港口物流的功能进行评价。本文建立港口物流功能评价模型．运用层次分析法和模糊综合评价法相结合的方法,首先确定模型中各指标的权重,然后对港口物流功能进行评价．用实证研究验证评价模型的正确性。实证研究结果表明,该模型能对港口物流功能进行评价,且计算简单．具有一定的实用性。     

基于灰色理论的项目多目标决策模型及在造船工程中的应用

针对项目实施中多目标决策的复杂问题,以方案的灰色关联度作为评价准则,建立了灰色关联决策模型,并针对模型中如何确定相对理想方案的问题提出了解决方法。最后文章对该方法在造船工程中的应用进行了研究。     

An innovation knowledge game piloted by merger and acquisition of technological assets: A case study

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) play a significant role in technological strategic deployment. This case study describes a methodology applying two-stage grey decision-making to help businesses recognize the role of technology in creation of wealth to acquire opportunities for technology push. The study results show that the application can effectively assist corporations in controlling selection of technological assets and tailor a technological asset investment mode for them.     

灰色关联决策方法研究

以灰色决策分析理论为基础,探讨了经典灰色关联决策方法的优势和不足。提出了基于理想方案的最大关联度方法、基于临界方案的最小关联度方法,以及同时考虑理想方案和临界方案的综合关联度方法及其相关概念。建立了灰色区间关联系数公式和灰色区间相对关联系数公式。运用分析技巧,构建了上述3种关联度决策算法。指出了灰色区间关联系数公式和最大关联度方法分别是经典灰色关联系数公式和灰色关联决策方法的推广,而最小关联度方法和综合关联度方法是经典灰色关联决策方法的拓展。文中实例说明了所提出的灰色关联决策方法的合理性及其算法的有效性。     

The Relationship between Procedural Rationality and Political Behavior in Strategic Decision Making

Despite the central place of rationality and political behavior in the decision-making literature, we know little about the relationship between these two dimensions. Can decisions be made using both rational and political methods, or must managers use one approach or the other? These questions were addressed in a study of 61 strategic decisions in 24 companies using a multiple-informant, structured interview protocol. Results indicate that procedural rationality and political behavior are independent dimensions of the strategic decision-making process. The implications of our findings for future strategic decision-making research are discussed.     

基于对应分析的生态评价模型及典型省份的实证研究

利用"驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应(DPSIR)"五因素模型构建了生态系统综合评价指标体系的框架,应用离差最大化的方法确定指标权重,应用灰色关联的方法为指标打分,应用对应分析方法建立差别生态改进模型,建立了基于对应分析的综合评价模型。本文的创新与特色一是通过采用DPSIR概念框架构建指标体系,将人的需求、经济发展和社会进步等要素纳入到生态系统评价中,克服了现有生态评价只片面关注环境与资源状况或者只关注环境保护与治理状况的不足。二是通过对应分析同时对典型省和生态指标进行R型和Q型因子分析,在损失最小的情况下,利用最少的维度表示样本和指标的信息。三是通过对应分析图,得出差别生态改进具体方案,以达到有针对性且投资少见效快的生态改观的目的。四是通过在压力准则层中加入自然灾害指数反映自然灾害对生态的影响,改进了DPSIR模型只考虑到人类的活动对于自然环境和资源的压力的片面性。     

考虑后悔规避的灰色群体偏离靶心度决策方法

针对指标值、指标权重以及状态概率均为区间灰数的风险型多指标群决策问题，考虑决策者的后悔规避的心理行为，提出基于后悔理论和区间灰数信息的群体偏离靶心度决策方法。该方法将后悔理论融入到群决策过程中，建立了各决策者的综合灰色感知效用矩阵，由此定义了群体灰色正负靶心以及灰色群体偏离靶心度；以灰色群体偏离靶心度综合值最大化为目标、同时结合极大熵原理构建优化模型并解出最优专家权重向量，利用灰色群体偏离靶心度大小对方案进行排序；最后，通过具体算例验证了该方法的有效性和实用性。     

基于区间灰色区间数的多准则决策方法

将灰色模糊数扩展,定义了区间灰色区间数及其距离.针对准则值为区间灰色区间数的信息不完全的多准则决策问题,提出了一种基于目标规划法的灰色模糊多准则决策方法,求得最优权重向量,从而得到各方案的排序.最后给出一个算例说明方法的可行性和有效性.     

Fast and rigorous: Configurational determinants of strategic decision-making balance

A longstanding debate in the strategic decision-making literature has focused on whether top management teams (TMTs) can effectively balance speed and comprehensiveness when making important decisions. In our research, we build on early insights and pivot from considering whether TMTs can engage indecision-making that balances these tensions to focus instead on when certain types of TMTs are able to achieve such balance. We employ a novel configurational analytical approach and a theoretical framework built from role theory to examine the CEO-TMT interface in a new way. In so doing, we are able to identify specific CEO-TMT constellations that support decision-making that is both fast and rigorous. Using a unique primary dataset and an abductive, configurational approach grounded in fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), we identify six specific leader-team configurations that each facilitate decision processes characterized by rigorous intra-team debate, meaningful reconciliation of divergent ideas, and fast decision speed (which we describe as strategic decision-making balance). The range of CEO-TMT configurations that emerge from our analyses contribute new theory and findings for the strategic decision-making and interface literatures more broadly, as well as the specific research streams on executive gender, humility, and TMT structure.     

Job-related diversity: the comprehensiveness and speed of board decision-making processes—an upper echelons approach

Strategic decision-making processes influence firm-level outcomes. Using the theory of upper echelons, this study investigates how diversity in directors’ skills, knowledge, and industry experience influence board decision-making processes that may impact overall strategic decision-making processes. Such diversity has been commonly accepted to be a ‘double-edged sword’—enhancing comprehensiveness but hindering the speed of decision-making. On the contrary, we used an existing large survey database to show that directors’ diverse educational background, functional background, and industry experience (job-related diversity) have a positive effect on comprehensiveness as well as the speed of board decision-making. In addition, our results indicate that board processes (directors’ use of their knowledge and skills) play an important role by transmitting the positive effects of diversity. The study is in a tradition of exploring how boards may influence firms’ strategic decision-making processes. Our findings provide additional arguments for adding job-related diversity to boards of directors.     

Intercultural differences in issue interpretation: Effects of emotions and framing

The interpretation of strategic issues as threats or opportunities influences strategic actions and firm performance. The extant research identifies cultural differences as an important driver of strategic issue interpretation. Specifically, research from a socio-cognitive perspective shows that differences in cognitive styles across cultures lead to differences in the interpretation of strategic issues by East Asian and Western managers. Based on cross-cultural research on emotions and decision-making, we argue that cultural affordances also lead to differences in emotional experiences and behavioral consequences across cultures which affect the strategic issue interpretation of managers from East Asian and Western cultures in different ways. We theorize that Chinese managers are similarly affected by fear and happiness in their strategic issue interpretation, while German managers are only affected by fear. For German managers, this effect is moderated by issue framing, which is not the case for Chinese managers. A vignette-based decision experiment involving 194 German and 174 Chinese executives offers support for our hypotheses. These findings have implications for cross-cultural research on strategic issue interpretation and for cross-cultural research on strategic decision-making in general.