Construction and selection of tightened–normal–tightened variables sampling scheme of type TNTVSS (n 1, n 2; k)

This paper provides tables for the construction and selection of tightened–normal–tightened variables sampling scheme of type TNTVSS (n ₁, n ₂; k). The method of designing the scheme indexed by (AQL, α) and (LQL, β) is indicated. The TNTVSS (n _T , n _N; k) is compared with conventional single sampling plans for variables and with TNT (n ₁, n ₂; c) scheme for attributes, and it is shown that the TNTVSS is more efficient.     

Designing and selection of two-plan variables scheme indexed by crossover point

In this paper, the scheme of the inspection plan, namely the tightened normal tightened (n_T, n_N; k) is considered and procedures and necessary tables are developed for the selection of the variables sampling scheme, indexed through crossover point (COP). The importance of COP, the properties and advantages of the operating characteristic curve with respect to COP are studied.     

Some complex variable transformations and exact power comparisons of two-sided tests of equality of two Hermitian covariance matrices

Power studies of tests of equality of covariance matrices of two p-variate complex normal populations σ₁ = σ₂ against two-sided alternatives have been made based on the following five criteria: (1) Roy's largest root, (2) Hotelling's trace, (4) Wilks' criterion and (5) Roy's largest and smallest roots. Some theorems on transformations and Jacobians in the two-sample complex Gaussian case have been proved in order to obtain a general theorem for establishing the local unbiasedness conditions connecting the two critical values for tests (1)–(5). Extensive unbiased power tabulations have been made for p=2, for various values of n₁, n₂, λ₁ and λ₂ where n₁ is the df of the SP matrix from the ith sample and λ₁ is the ith latent root of σ₁σ^-1₂ (i=1, 2). Equal tail areas approach has also been used further to compute powers of tests (1)–(4) for p=2 for studying the bias and facilitating comparisons with powers in the unbiased case. The inferences have been found similar to those in the real case. (Chu and Pillai, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 31.     

Asymptotic expaxsioxs for the joint distribution of cirrelated hotellings t2 statlstics under normality

Let T² _i=z′_iS^?1z_i, i==,…k be correlated Hotelling's T² statistics under normality. where z=(z′_i,…,z′_k)′ and nS are independently distributed as N_kp((O,ρ?∑) and Wishart distribution W_p(∑, n), respectively. The purpose of this paper is to study the distribution function F(x₁,…,x_k) of (T² _i,…,T² _k) when n is large. First we derive an asymptotic expansion of the characteristic function of (T² _i,…,T² _k) up to the order n^?2. Next we give asymptotic expansions for (T² _i,…,T² _k) in two cases (i)ρ=I_k and (ii) k=2 by inverting the expanded characteristic function up to the orders n^?2 and n^?1, respectively. Our results can be applied to the distribution function of max (T² _i,…,T² _k) as a special case.     

Determination of Single Sampling Plans by Attributes Under the Conditions of Zero-Inflated Poisson Distribution

When the manufacturing process is well monitored, occurrence of nondefects would be a frequent event in sampling inspection. The appropriate probability distribution of the number of defects is a zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) distribution. In this article, determination of single sampling plans (SSPs) by attributes using unity values is considered, when the number of defects follows a ZIP distribution. The operating characteristic (OC) function of the sampling plan is derived. Plan parameters are obtained for some sets of values of (p₁, α, p₂, β). Numerical illustrations are given to describe the determination of SSP under ZIP distribution and to study its performance in comparison with Poisson SSP.     

Determination of a new mixed variable lot-size multiple dependent state sampling plan based on the process capability index

This article proposes a new mixed variable lot-size multiple dependent state sampling plan in which the attribute sampling plan can be used in the first stage and the variables multiple dependent state sampling plan based on the process capability index will be used in the second stage for the inspection of measurable quality characteristics. The proposed mixed plan is developed for both symmetric and asymmetric fraction non conforming. The optimal plan parameters can be determined by considering the satisfaction levels of the producer and the consumer simultaneously at an acceptable quality level and a limiting quality level, respectively. The performance of the proposed plan over the mixed single sampling plan based on C_pk and the mixed variable lot size plan based on C_pk with respect to the average sample number is also investigated. Tables are constructed for easy selection of plan parameters for both symmetric and asymmetric fraction non conforming and real world examples are also given for the illustration and practical implementation of the proposed mixed variable lot-size plan.     

Developing a variables two-plan sampling system for product acceptance determination

In this paper, a variables tightened-normal-tightened (TNT) two-plan sampling system based on the widely used capability index C_pk is developed for product acceptance determination when the quality characteristic of products has two-sided specification limits and follows a normal distribution. The operating procedure and operating characteristic (OC) function of the variables TNT two-plan sampling system, and the conditions for solving plan parameters are provided. The behavior of OC curves for the variables TNT sampling system under various parameters is also studied, and compared with the variables single tightened inspection plan and single normal inspection plan.     

Robust statistics for testing mean vectors of multivariate distributions

We develop a ‘robust’ statistic T² _R, based on Tiku's (1967, 1980) MML (modified maximum likelihood) estimators of location and scale parameters, for testing an assumed meam vector of a symmetric multivariate distribution. We show that T² _R is one the whole considerably more powerful than the prominenet Hotelling T² statistics. We also develop a robust statistic T² _D for testing that two multivariate distributions (skew or symmetric) are identical; T² _D seems to be usually more powerful than nonparametric statistics. The only assumption we make is that the marginal distributions are of the type (1/σ_k)f((x-μ_k)/σ_k) and the means and variances of these marginal distributions exist.     

On moments of the supremum of normed weighted averages

Let {X, X_n; n ≥ 1} be a sequence of real-valued iid random variables, 0 < r < 2 and p > 0. Let D = { A = (a_nk; 1 ≤ k ≤ n, n ≥ 1); a_nk, ? R and sup_{n, k} |a_n,k| < ∞}. Set S_n( A ) = ∑ⁿ_k=1a_{n, k}X_k for A ? D and n ≥ 1. This paper is devoted to determining conditions whereby E{sup_{n ≥ 1}, |S_n( A )|/n^1/r}^p < ∞ or E{sup_{n ≥ 2} |S_n( A )|/2n log n)^1/2}^p < ∞ for every A ? D. This generalizes some earlier results, including those of Burkholder (1962), Choi and Sung (1987), Davis (1971), Gut (1979), Klass (1974), Siegmund (1969) and Teicher (1971).     

Estimating Average Worth of the Selected Subset from Two-Parameter Exponential Populations

ABSTRACT

Suppose independent random samples are available from k(k ≥ 2) exponential populations ∏₁,…,∏ _k with a common location θ and scale parameters σ₁,…,σ _k , respectively. Let X _i and Y _i denote the minimum and the mean, respectively, of the ith sample, and further let X = min{X ₁,…, X _k } and T _i  = Y _i  ? X; i = 1,…, k. For selecting a nonempty subset of {∏₁,…,∏ _k } containing the best population (the one associated with max{σ₁,…,σ _k }), we use the decision rule which selects ∏ _i if T _i  ≥ c max{T ₁,…,T _k }, i = 1,…, k. Here 0 < c ≤ 1 is chosen so that the probability of including the best population in the selected subset is at least P* (1/k ≤ P* < 1), a pre-assigned level. The problem is to estimate the average worth W of the selected subset, the arithmetic average of means of selected populations. In this article, we derive the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of W. The bias and risk function of the UMVUE are compared numerically with those of analogs of the best affine equivariant estimator (BAEE) and the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE).     

Randomly weighted sums of linearly wide quadrant-dependent random variables with heavy tails

This paper investigates tail behavior of the randomly weighted sum ∑ⁿ_{k = 1}θ_kX_k and reaches an asymptotic formula, where X_k, 1 ? k ? n, are real-valued linearly wide quadrant-dependent (LWQD) random variables with a common heavy-tailed distribution, and θ_k, 1 ? k ? n, independent of X_k, 1 ? k ? n, are n non-negative random variables without any dependence assumptions. The LWQD structure includes the linearly negative quadrant-dependent structure, the negatively associated structure, and hence the independence structure. On the other hand, it also includes some positively dependent random variables and some other random variables. The obtained result coincides with the existing ones.     

Exact two-sided Lieberman-Resnikoff sampling plans

We deal sith sampling by variables with two-way-protection in the case of aN(μσ²) distributed characteristic with unknown σ². For the sampling plan by Lieberman and Resnikoff (1955), which is based on the MVU estimator of the percent defective, we prove a formula for the OC. If the sampling parametersp ₁ (AQL),p ₂ (LQ) and α, β (type I, II errors) are given, we are able to compute the true type I and II errors of the usual (one-sided) approximation plans. Furthermore it is possible to compute exact two-sided Lieberman-Resnikoff sampling plans.     

Distribution of record statistics in a geometrically increasing population

The probability function and binomial moments of the number _Nn$N_n$ of (upper) records up to time (index) n in a geometrically increasing population are obtained in terms of the signless q-Stirling numbers of the first kind, with q   being the inverse of the proportion λ$\lambda$ of the geometric progression. Further, a strong law of large numbers and a central limit theorem for the sequence of random variables _Nn$N_n$, n=1,2,…,$n=1,2,\dots ,$ are deduced. As a corollary the probability function of the time _Tk$T_k$ of the kth record is also expressed in terms of the signless q  -Stirling numbers of the first kind. The mean of _Tk$T_k$ is obtained as a q  -series with terms of alternating sign. Finally, the probability function of the inter-record time _Wk=_Tk-_Tk-1$W_k=T_k-T_{k-1}$ is obtained as a sum of a finite number of terms of q  -numbers. The mean of _Wk$W_k$ is expressed by a q-series. As k   increases to infinity the distribution of _Wk$W_k$ converges to a geometric distribution with failure probability q. Additional properties of the q-Stirling numbers of the first kind, which facilitate the present study, are derived.     

Combined Bayesian estimates for the equicorrelation coefficient

Combined Bayesian estimates for equicorrelation covariance matrices are considered. The case of a common equicorrelation p and possibly different standard deviations σ_l,σ_k among k experimental groups is examined first, and the Bayesian estimation of (σ, σ₁,σ_k) is discussed. Secondly, under the assumption of a common standard deviation and possibly different equicorrelations, the Bayesian estimation of (ρ₁,ρ_k,σ) is considered.     

Distributions of patterns of two successes separated by a string of <Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis>-2 failures

Let Z ₁, Z ₂, . . . be a sequence of independent Bernoulli trials with constant success and failure probabilities p = Pr(Z _t  = 1) and q = Pr(Z _t  = 0) = 1 − p, respectively, t = 1, 2, . . . . For any given integer k ≥ 2 we consider the patterns E₁{\mathcal{E}_{1}}: two successes are separated by at most k−2 failures, E₂{\mathcal{E}_{2}}: two successes are separated by exactly k −2 failures, and E₃{\mathcal{E}_{3}} : two successes are separated by at least k − 2 failures. Denote by N_n,k⁽ⁱ⁾{ N_{n,k}^{(i)}} (respectively M_n,k⁽ⁱ⁾{M_{n,k}^{(i)}}) the number of occurrences of the pattern E_i{\mathcal{E}_{i}} , i = 1, 2, 3, in Z ₁, Z ₂, . . . , Z _n when the non-overlapping (respectively overlapping) counting scheme for runs and patterns is employed. Also, let T_r,k⁽ⁱ⁾{T_{r,k}^{(i)}} (resp. W_r,k⁽ⁱ⁾){W_{r,k}^{(i)})} be the waiting time for the r − th occurrence of the pattern E_i{\mathcal{E}_{i}}, i = 1, 2, 3, in Z ₁, Z ₂, . . . according to the non-overlapping (resp. overlapping) counting scheme. In this article we conduct a systematic study of N_n,k⁽ⁱ⁾{N_{n,k}^{(i)}}, M_n,k⁽ⁱ⁾{M_{n,k}^{(i)}}, T_r,k⁽ⁱ⁾{T_{r,k}^{(i)}} and W_r,k⁽ⁱ⁾{W_{r,k}^{(i)}} (i = 1, 2, 3) obtaining exact formulae, explicit or recursive, for their probability generating functions, probability mass functions and moments. An application is given.     

Some robust tests of independence in symmetrical multivariate distributions

Let X =(x)^ij=(11¹, …, X,)_T, i = l, …n, be an n X random matrix having multivariate symmetrical distributions with parameters μ, Σ. The p-variate normal with mean μ and covariance matrix is a member of this family. Let be the squared multiple correlation coefficient between the first and the succeeding p₁ components, and let p² = + be the squared multiple correlation coefficient between the first and the remaining p₁ + p₂ =p – 1 components of the p-variate normal vector. We shall consider here three testing problems for multivariate symmetrical distributions. They are (A) to test p² =0 against; (B) to test against =0, 0; (C) to test against p² =0, We have shown here that for problem (A) the uniformly most powerful invariant (UMPI) and locally minimax test for the multivariate normal is UMPI and is locally minimax as p² 0 for multivariate symmetrical distributions. For problem (B) the UMPI and locally minimax test is UMPI and locally minimax as for multivariate symmetrical distributions. For problem (C) the locally best invariant (LBI) and locally minimax test for the multivariate normal is also LBI and is locally minimax as for multivariate symmetrical distributions.     

Optimum invariant tests for random manova models

Consider the canonical-form MANOVA setup with X: n × p = (+ E, X_i n_i × p, i = 1, 2, 3, M_i: n_i × p, i = 1, 2, n₁ + n₂ + n₃) p, where E is a normally distributed error matrix with mean zero and dispersion I_n (> 0 (positive definite). Assume (in contrast with the usual case) that M₁i is normal with mean zero and dispersion I_n1) and M₂2 is either fixed or random normal with mean zero and different dispersion matrix I_n2 (being unknown. It is also assumed that M₁ E, and M₂ (if random) are all independent. For testing H₀) = 0 versus H₁: (> 0, it is shown that when either n₂ = 0 or M₂ is fixed if n₂ > 0, the trace test of Pillai (1955) is uniformly most powerful invariant (UMPI) if min(n₁, p)= 1 and locally best invariant (LBI) if min(n₁ p) > 1 underthe action of the full linear group Gl (p). When p > 1, the LBI test is also derived under a somewhat smaller group G_T(p) of p × p lower triangular matrices with positive diagonal elements. However, such results do not hold if n₂ > 0 and M₂ is random. The null, nonnull, and optimality robustness of Pillai's trace test under Gl(p) for suitable deviations from normality is pointed out.     

Pmc-optimal nonparametric quantile estimator

According to Pitman's Measure of Closeness, if T₁and T₂are two estimators of a real parameter $[d], then T₁is better than T₂if Po[d]{\T₁-o[d] < \T₂-0[d]\} > 1/2 for all 0[d]. It may however happen that while T₁is better than T₂and T₂is better than T₃, T₃is better than T₁. Given q ? (0,1) and a sample X₁, X₂, ..., X_nfrom an unknown F ? F, an estimator T* = T*(X₁,X₂...X_n)of the q-th quantile of the distribution F is constructed such that P_F{\F(T*)-q\ <[d] \F(T)-q\} >[d] 1/2 for all F?F and for all T€T, where F is a nonparametric family of distributions and T is a class of estimators. It is shown that T* =X_j:n'for a suitably chosen jth order statistic.     

Comment on J. Berkson's paper “in dispraise of the exact test”

This paper rejects the preference expressed by Berkson for the heuristic test statistic T_N with standard normal distribution testing equality of two binomial probabilities in favour of Fisher's conditional exact test statistic T_E. Conditioning upon k₁ + k₂ = k shows that T_N admits too large first kind error probabilities. But also unconditionally T_N is systematically too large compared to T_E, giving too small critical levels at given experimental outcomes and power which is misleadingly too large. This is mainly due to the fact that T_N is not suitably corrected for continuity (at small sample sizes).