Minimax designs for estimating slopes in a trigonometric regression model

Abstract

Designs for the first order trigonometric regression model over an interval on the real line are considered for the situation where estimation of the slope of the response surface at various points in the factor space is of primary interest. Minimization of the variance of the estimated slope at a point maximized over all points in the region of interest is taken as the design criterion. Optimal designs under the minimax criterion are derived for the situation where the design region and the region of interest are identical and a symmetric “partial cycle”. Some comparisons of the minimax designs with the traditional D- and A-optimal designs are provided. Efficiencies of some exact designs under the minimax criterion are also investigated.     

Optimal minimax designs for prediction in heteroscedastic models

We construct optimal designs for heteroscedastic models when the goal is to make efficient prediction over a compact interval. It is assumed that the point or points which are interesting to predict are not known before the experiment is run. Two minimax strategies for minimizing the maximum fitted variance and maximum predictive variance across the interval of interest are proposed and, optimal designs are found and compared. An algorithm for generating these designs is included.     

Minimax A-, c-, and I-optimal regression designs for models with heteroscedastic errors

It is well known that it is difficult to construct minimax optimal designs. Furthermore, since in practice we never know the true error variance, it is important to allow small deviations and construct robust optimal designs. We investigate a class of minimax optimal regression designs for models with heteroscedastic errors that are robust against possible misspecification of the error variance. Commonly used A-, c-, and I-optimality criteria are included in this class of minimax optimal designs. Several theoretical results are obtained, including a necessary condition and a reflection symmetry for these minimax optimal designs. In this article, we focus mainly on linear models and assume that an approximate error variance function is available. However, we also briefly discuss how the methodology works for nonlinear models. We then propose an effective algorithm to solve challenging nonconvex optimization problems to find minimax designs on discrete design spaces. Examples are given to illustrate minimax optimal designs and their properties.     

Optimal designs for estimating the slope of a regression

In the common linear model with quantitative predictors we consider the problem of designing experiments for estimating the slope of the expected response in a regression. We discuss locally optimal designs, where the experimenter is only interested in the slope at a particular point, and standardized minimax optimal designs, which could be used if precise estimation of the slope over a given region is required. General results on the number of support points of locally optimal designs are derived if the regression functions form a Chebyshev system. For polynomial regression and Fourier regression models of arbitrary degree the optimal designs for estimating the slope of the regression are determined explicitly for many cases of practical interest.     

D-optimal minimax regression designs on discrete design space

One classical design criterion is to minimize the determinant of the covariance matrix of the regression estimates, and the designs are called D-optimal designs. To reflect the nature that the proposed models are only approximately true, we propose a robust design criterion to study response surface designs. Both the variance and bias are considered in the criterion. In particular, D-optimal minimax designs are investigated and constructed. Examples are given to compare D-optimal minimax designs with classical D-optimal designs.     

Restricted minimax robust designs for misspecified regression models

The authors propose and explore new regression designs. Within a particular parametric class, these designs are minimax robust against bias caused by model misspecification while attaining reasonable levels of efficiency as well. The introduction of this restricted class of designs is motivated by a desire to avoid the mathematical and numerical intractability found in the unrestricted minimax theory. Robustness is provided against a family of model departures sufficiently broad that the minimax design measures are necessarily absolutely continuous. Examples of implementation involve approximate polynomial and second order multiple regression.     

D-optimal minimax design criterion for two-level fractional factorial designs

A D-optimal minimax design criterion is proposed to construct two-level fractional factorial designs, which can be used to estimate a linear model with main effects and some specified interactions. D-optimal minimax designs are robust against model misspecification and have small biases if the linear model contains more interaction terms. When the D-optimal minimax criterion is compared with the D-optimal design criterion, we find that the D-optimal design criterion is quite robust against model misspecification. Lower and upper bounds derived for the loss functions of optimal designs can be used to estimate the efficiencies of any design and evaluate the effectiveness of a search algorithm. Four algorithms to search for optimal designs for any run size are discussed and compared through several examples. An annealing algorithm and a sequential algorithm are particularly effective to search for optimal designs.     

A semi-infinite programming based algorithm for finding minimax optimal designs for nonlinear models

Minimax optimal experimental designs are notoriously difficult to study largely because the optimality criterion is not differentiable and there is no effective algorithm for generating them. We apply semi-infinite programming (SIP) to solve minimax design problems for nonlinear models in a systematic way using a discretization based strategy and solvers from the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS). Using popular models from the biological sciences, we show our approach produces minimax optimal designs that coincide with the few theoretical and numerical optimal designs in the literature. We also show our method can be readily modified to find standardized maximin optimal designs and minimax optimal designs for more complicated problems, such as when the ranges of plausible values for the model parameters are dependent and we want to find a design to minimize the maximal inefficiency of estimates for the model parameters.     

Minimax Design for the Difference Between Estimated Responses for the Quadratic Model Over Hypercubic Regions

Abstract

A second-order model involving the intercept and only the pure quadratic terms is considered for regression over hypercubes. Minimization of the variance of the difference between estimated responses at two points, maximized over all pairs of points in the region of interest in factor space, is taken as the design criterion. Optimal design under the minimax criterion is derived and found to be the one which is also simultaneously A-, D-, and E-optimal for the parameters excluding the intercept. The minimax design is compared with other standard designs and is found to perform extremely well.     

D‐optimal minimax fractional factorial designs

The D‐optimal minimax criterion is proposed to construct fractional factorial designs. The resulting designs are very efficient, and robust against misspecification of the effects in the linear model. The criterion was first proposed by Wilmut & Zhou (2011); their work is limited to two‐level factorial designs, however. In this paper we extend this criterion to designs with factors having any levels (including mixed levels) and explore several important properties of this criterion. Theoretical results are obtained for construction of fractional factorial designs in general. This minimax criterion is not only scale invariant, but also invariant under level permutations. Moreover, it can be applied to any run size. This is an advantage over some other existing criteria. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 41: 325–340; 2013 © 2013 Statistical Society of Canada     

Optimal designs for exponential regression

This paper is concerned with the optimal design problem for the particular case of non-linear parametrisation:the parameters to be estimated are included in exponents.Some properties of locally optimal designs as functions of estimated parameters are investigated and a table of such designs in given.We consider also designs to be optimal in the sense of minimax approach.     

Discrete M-robust designs for regression models

M-robust designs are defined and constructed for misspecified linear regression models with possibly autocorrelated errors on a discrete design space. These designs minimize the mean-squared errors if linear regression models are correct with uncorrelated errors, subject to two robust constraints which control the change of the bias and the change of variance under model departures. Simulated annealing algorithm is applied to construct M-robust designs. Examples are given to show M-robust designs and compare them with minimax robust designs.     

Minimax prediction in finite populations

In this paper, minimax predictors are considered for some population quantities of interest, under some specific superpopulation models. Minimax predictors are derived under a binomial superpopulation model. The well known ratio estimator is shown to be minimax under the usual simple regression normal model. Nonparametric minimax predictors are considered under some models. Some of the predictors considered also shown to be admis s ible.     

Wavelet designs for estimating nonparametric curves with heteroscedastic error

In this paper, we discuss the problem of constructing designs in order to maximize the accuracy of nonparametric curve estimation in the possible presence of heteroscedastic errors. Our approach is to exploit the flexibility of wavelet approximations to approximate the unknown response curve by its wavelet expansion thereby eliminating the mathematical difficulty associated with the unknown structure. It is expected that only finitely many parameters in the resulting wavelet response can be estimated by weighted least squares. The bias arising from this, compounds the natural variation of the estimates. Robust minimax designs and weights are then constructed to minimize mean-squared-error-based loss functions of the estimates. We find the periodic and symmetric properties of the Euclidean norm of the multiwavelet system useful in eliminating some of the mathematical difficulties involved. These properties lead us to restrict the search for robust minimax designs to a specific class of symmetric designs. We also construct minimum variance unbiased designs and weights which minimize the loss functions subject to a side condition of unbiasedness. We discuss an example from the nonparametric literature.     

Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials that incorporate the expected sample size under the alternative hypothesis

two‐stage studies may be chosen optimally by minimising a single characteristic like the maximum sample size. However, given that an investigator will initially select a null treatment e?ect and the clinically relevant di?erence, it is better to choose a design that also considers the expected sample size for each of these values. The maximum sample size and the two expected sample sizes are here combined to produce an expected loss function to ?nd designs that are admissible. Given the prior odds of success and the importance of the total sample size, minimising the expected loss gives the optimal design for this situation. A novel triangular graph to represent the admissible designs helps guide the decision‐making process. The H ₀‐optimal, H ₁‐optimal, H ₀‐minimax and H ₁‐minimax designs are all particular cases of admissible designs. The commonly used H ₀‐optimal design is rarely good when allowing stopping for e?cacy. Additionally, the δ‐minimax design, which minimises the maximum expected sample size, is sometimes admissible under the loss function. However, the results can be varied and each situation will require the evaluation of all the admissible designs. Software to do this is provided. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A relaxation procedure for calculating (G–)minimax optimal designs

Summary: In nonlinear statistical models, standard optimality functions for experimental designs depend on the unknown parameters of the model. An appealing and robust concept for choosing a design is the minimax criterion. However, so far, minimax optimal designs have been calculated efficiently under various restrictive conditions only. We extend an iterative relaxation scheme originally proposed by Shimizu and Aiyoshi (1980) and prove its convergence under very general assumptions which cover a variety of situations considered in experimental design. Application to different specific design criteria is discussed and issues of practical implementation are addressed. First numerical results suggest that the method may be very efficient with respect to the number of iterations required.*Supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We are grateful to a referee for his constructive suggestions.     

On estimating the mean of the selected normal population in two-stage adaptive designs

Adaptive design is widely used in clinical trials. In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating the mean of the selected normal population in two-stage adaptive designs. Under the LINEX and L₂ loss functions, admissibility and minimax results are derived for some location invariant estimators of the selected normal mean. The naive sample mean estimator is shown to be inadmissible under the LINEX loss function and to be not minimax under both loss functions.     

Two-stage k-sample designs for the ordered alternative problem

In preclinical studies and clinical dose-ranging trials, the Jonckheere-Terpstra test is widely used in the assessment of dose-response relationships. Hewett and Spurrier (1979) presented a two-stage analog of the test in the context of large sample sizes. In this paper, we propose an exact test based on Simon's minimax and optimal design criteria originally used in one-arm phase II designs based on binary endpoints. The convergence rate of the joint distribution of the first and second stage test statistics to the limiting distribution is studied, and design parameters are provided for a variety of assumed alternatives. The behavior of the test is also examined in the presence of ties, and the proposed designs are illustrated through application in the planning of a hypercholesterolemia clinical trial. The minimax and optimal two-stage procedures are shown to be preferable as compared with the one-stage procedure because of the associated reduction in expected sample size for given error constraints.     

Minimax A‐ and D‐optimal integer‐valued wavelet designs for estimation

The author discusses integer‐valued designs for wavelet estimation of nonparametric response curves in the possible presence of heteroscedastic noise using a modified wavelet version of the Gasser‐Müller kernel estimator or weighted least squares estimation. The designs are constructed using a minimax treatment and the simulated annealing algorithm. The author presents designs for three case studies in experiments for investigating Gompertz's theory on mortality rates, nitrite utilization in bush beans and the impact of crash helmets in motorcycle accidents.     

I-robust and D-robust designs on a finite design space

We present and discuss the theory of minimax I- and D-robust designs on a finite design space, and detail three methods for their construction that are new in this context: (i) a numerical search for the optimal parameters in a provably minimax robust parametric class of designs, (ii) a first-order iterative algorithm similar to that of Wynn (Ann Math Stat 5:1655–1664, 1970), and (iii) response-adaptive designs. These designs minimize a loss function, based on the mean squared error of the predicted responses or the parameter estimates, when the regression response is possibly misspecified. The loss function being minimized has first been maximized over a neighbourhood of the approximate and possibly inadequate response being fitted by the experimenter. The methods presented are all vastly more economical, in terms of the computing time required, than previously available algorithms.