AN ANALYSIS OF CAPACITY PLANNING PROCEDURES FOR A MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS PLANNING SYSTEM*

This paper is concerned with planning work-center capacity levels in manufacturing firms that employ a material requirements planning (MRP) system. It presents four procedures for developing work-center capacity plans designed to insure the production of components and assemblies as specified by the MRP plan and the master production schedule (MPS). These procedures (capacity planning using overall factors, capacity bills, resource profiles, and capacity requirements planning) are compared using simulation analysis. The results indicate that the performance of a procedure when measured against the MPS depends on the operating conditions of the manufacturing system. The results also indicate that the choice of a particular procedure often represents a compromise among the benefits of improved MPS performance, the costs of preparing and processing data, and the premium expenses required for more frequent adjustments in work-center capacity levels.     

An Experimental Analysis of Capacity-Sensitive Setup Parameters for MRP Lot Sizing

Most material requirements planning (MRP) systems apply standard costing (absorption costing) approaches to define setup costs that are used as fixed (time invariant) setup parameters in single-level lot-sizing methods. This paper presents a computationally simple approach for estimating more appropriate setup parameters based on estimates of work-center shadow prices. These setup parameters then are used in traditional single-level MRP lot-sizing procedures. The shadow price of capacity at each work center is calculated as the increase in the overall inventory carrying cost for each additional hour of capacity lost to setups. The opportunity cost of a setup for an order subsequently is determined based on the routing information for each order and is used by traditional MRP lot-sizing procedures to calculate lot sizes. A simulation experiment compares the performance period order quantity lot sizing with capacity-sensitive setup parameters with the fixed accounting-based setup parameters. The simulation replicates the planning and control functions of a typical MRP system. The results of the experiment show that capacity-sensitive setup parameters can make significant reductions in both carrying cost and lateness and can achieve many of the benefits of optimized production technology in the context of an MRP system.     

A simulation study of performance of MRP based systems under interaction effects

This paper pertains to a study carried out on a typical Material Requirements Planning (MRP) based system. An integrated MRP based system was developed. This integrated package facilitates studying the effects of variations in Master Production Schedules (MPS), Bill of Materials (BOM) structure, inventory supports, lot sizing, capacity planning, scheduling rules and shop floor conditions. The system behaviour is captured using simulation. The direct and interacting roles of uncertainties, capacity variations, scheduling rules and lot sizing rules on the system performance have been studied in detail. The details of the system, the modules and their capabil-iiies and the analyses of results are presented in this paper.     

MRP system performance under lumpy demand environments

Material requirements planning (MRP) systems are deemed to deal with master schedules with lumpy demand patterns better than any other production scheduling system. Past studies have advocated important advantages of using MRP systems. The objective of this paper is to look into the impact of patterns of demand lumpiness on the performance of MRP systems by a simulation study. Results show that there is an important threshold point in terms of degree of lumpiness at which MRP system performance starts to deteriorate in the operating conditions considered. If master production schedules (MPS) can be controlled by manufacturers, MRP users should exercise caution to introduce demand lumpiness in MPS to improve system performance. If not, MRP users should then examine the given lumpiness and choose an appropriate lot-sizing rule that has been shown to take advantage of the effect of demand lumpiness.     

RFID as an Enabler of Improved Manufacturing Performance*

The use of radio frequency identification (RFID) versus bar coding has been debated with little quantitative research about how to best use RFID's capabilities and when RFID is more advantageous. This article responds to that need by qualitatively and quantitatively analyzing how RFID facilitates increased traceability and control in manufacturing, which in turn enables the use of more lot splitting and smaller lot sizes. We develop insights about operating policies (RFID vs. bar‐code tracking mechanisms, extent of lot splitting, and dispatching rules) and an operating condition (setup to processing time ratio) that affect the mean flow time and proportion of jobs tardy in a job shop. A simulation model is used to control factors in the experimental design and the output is evaluated using analysis of variance. The results show the following: (i) performance worsens when bar coding is used with extensive lot splitting, (ii) process changes such as extensive lot splitting may be required to justify RFID use instead of bar coding, (iii) the earliest operation due date dispatching rule offers an attractive alternative to other rules studied in previous lot splitting research, and (iv) the performance improvements with RFID and increased lot splitting are larger when the setup to processing time ratio is smaller. In a broader context, we fill a research void by quantitatively showing how RFID can be used as an advanced manufacturing technology that enables more factory automation and better performance along several dimensions. The article concludes by summarizing the results and identifying ideas for future research.     

Setups and effective capacity: the impact of lot sizing techniques in an MRP environment

This study investigates how lot sizing techniques influence the profit performance, inventory level, and order lardiness of an assembly job shop controlled by MRP. Four single-level lot sizing techniques are compared by simulation analysis under two levels of master schedule instability and two levels of end item demand. A second analysis investigates the influence of a multilevel lot sizing technique, the generalized constrained-K (GCK) cost modification, on the four single-level techniques at low demand and low nervousness. The analyses reveal a previously unreported phenomenon. Given the same inventory costs, the single-level lot sizing techniques generate substantially different average batch sizes. The lot sizing techniques maintain the following order of increasing average batch size (and decreasing total setup time):

economic order quantity (EOQ)

period order quantity (POQ)

least total cost (LTC)

Silver-Meal heuristic (SML)

The causes for different average batch sizes among the lot sizing techniques are analysed and explained. Demand lumpiness, inherent in multilevel manufacturing systems controlled by MRP, is found to be a major factor. The number of setups each lot sizing technique generates is the primary determinant of profit performance, inventory level, and order tardiness. EOQ, a fixed order quantity technique, is less sensitive to nervousness than the discrete lot sizing techniques. EOQ_, however, generates the smallest average batch size, and, therefore, the most setups. Since setups consume capacity, EOQ, is more sensitive to higher demand. SML generates the largest average batch sizes, and is, therefore, less sensitive to increased demand. At low demand, the other lot sizing techniques perform better on all criteria. They generate smaller batches and, therefore, shorter actual lead times. The GCK cost modification increases the average batch size generated by each lot sizing technique. GCK improves the profit and customer service level of EOQ the lot sizing technique with the smallest batches. GCK causes the other lot sizing techniques to generate excessively large batches and, therefore, excessively long actual lead times.     

Resource-constrained materials requirements planning- MRP rc

Computerized MRP systems used in industrial practice have been criticized by researchers as well as industrial users with respect to their limited ability to generate feasible production schedules. In this paper the lot size planning stage of a typical MRP system is considered. Several modelling alternatives for multi-level lot sizing are discussed with the help of a small example. A resourceconstrained approach to lot sizing- called MRP rc- is presented that cooperates with standard production planning and control systems. In this approach the item-by-item lot size planning is substituted by the heuristic solution of a multi-level multi-item dynamic capacitated lot sizing problem with setup times for general product structures.     

Literature review of material flow control mechanisms

We review mechanisms which control the flow or material into and within a manufacturing line. These material flow control (MFC) mechanisms address the problem of when to release material into a manufacturing line and when workcentres should be authorized to produce. The MFC mechanisms reviewed include: Kanban, CONWIP, workload regulating, starvation avoidance, BORA, maximum load limit, MRP, the base stock system, workload control, and production authorization cards.     

Replenishment Analysis in Distribution Requirements Planning*

Most research on lot sizing has been for the case of a manufacturing system. In this paper, analogous issues are studied for a distribution network. Specifically, we consider the choice of shipment quantities within distribution requirements planning (DRP). A simulation model of DRP in a multi-echelon, rolling-schedule environment is used to examine, in conditions of both certain and uncertain demand, the performance of five lot-sizing rules. We conducted a full-factorial experiment in which four additional parameters were varied: distribution network structure (two options), demand distribution (three options), forecast error distribution (three options), and ordering cost (three values), as suggested by the consulting study which motivated our research. We found that for DRP, contrary to the “shop floor” wisdom on MRP, the choice of lot-sizing method can be important. Generally the Silver-Meal and Bookbinder-Tan heuristics were significantly better than the other methods.     

AN EVALUATION OF FORECAST ERROR IN MASTER PRODUCTION SCHEDULING FOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS PLANNING SYSTEMS.

Typical forecast-error measures such as mean squared error, mean absolute deviation and bias generally are accepted indicators of forecasting performance. However, the eventual cost impact of forecast errors on system performance and the degree to which cost consequences are explained by typical error measures have not been studied thoroughly. The present paper demonstrates that these typical error measures often are not good predictors of cost consequences in material requirements planning (MRP) settings. MRP systems rely directly on the master production schedule (MPS) to specify gross requirements. These MRP environments receive forecast errors indirectly when the errors create inaccuracies in the MPS. Our study results suggest that within MRP environments the predictive capabilities of forecast-error measures are contingent on the lot-sizing rule and the product components structure When forecast errors and MRP system costs are coanalyzed, bias emerges as having reasonable predictive ability. In further investigations of bias, loss functions are evaluated to explain the MRP cost consequences of forecast errors. Estimating the loss functions of forecast errors through regression analysis demonstrates the superiority of loss functions as measures over typical forecast error measures in the MPS.     

Replanning the Master Production Schedule for a Capacity-Constrained Job Shop

This research examines the use of both frozen and replanning intervals for planning the master production schedule (MPS) for a capacity-constrained job shop. The results show that forecast error, demand lumpiness, setup time, planned lead time, and order size have a greater impact on the mean total backlog, total inventory, and number of setups than the frozen and replanning intervals. The study also shows that a repetitive lot dispatching rule reduces the importance of lot sizing, and a combination of repetitive lot dispatching rule and single-period order size consistently produces the lowest mean total backlog and total inventory. The results also indicate that rescheduling the open orders every period produces a lower mean total backlog and total inventory when the forecast errors are large relative to the order sizes. This result suggests that the due date of an open order should be updated only when a significant portion of the order is actually needed on the new due date.     

Dynamic performance of a hybrid inventory system with a Kanban policy in remanufacturing process

In this paper we study a hybrid system with both manufacturing and remanufacturing. The inventory control strategy we use in the manufacturing loop is an automatic pipeline, inventory and order based production control system (APIOBPCS). In the remanufacturing loop we employ a Kanban policy to represent a typical pull system. The methodology adopted uses control theory and simulation. The aim of the research is to analyse the dynamic (as distinct from the static) performance of the specified hybrid system. Dynamics have implications on total costs in terms of inventory holding, capacity utilisation and customer service failures. We analyse the parameter settings to find preferred “nominal”, “fast” and “slow” values in terms of system dynamics performance criteria such as rise time, settling time and overshoot. Based on these parameter settings, we investigate the robustness of the system to changes in return yield and the manufacturing/remanufacturing lead time. Our results clearly show that the system is robust with respect to the system dynamics performance and the remanufacturing process can help to improve system dynamics performance. Thus, the perceived benefits of remanufacturing of products, both environmentally and economically, as quoted in the literature are found not to be detrimental to system dynamics performance when a Kanban policy is used to control the remanufacturing process.     

Order Promising and the Master Production Schedule*

Previous research on material requirements planning (MRP) systems has rarely considered the impact of the master production scheduling method used to promise customer orders and to allocate production capacity. Based on a simulation study of an MRP environment, we show that the correct selection of a master production schedule (MPS) method depends on the variance of end-item demand. In addition, we find evidence that the effectiveness of a particular MPS method can be enhanced by holding buffer inventory at the same level in the product structure as in the MPS.     

A new MRP/GT lot sizing heuristic: A simulation study

This paper studies the lot-sizing problem in Material Requirements Planning/Group Technology (MRP/GT) systems. A GT production cell is designed to produce many families of components. A major setup is required when switching from manufacturing one family of components to another family, and a minor setup is needed when switching from manufacturing a component type to another component type within the same family. Inventory holding cost is incurred if inventory level is positive, and inventory shortage cost is incurred if inventory level is negative, that is, backordering. The objective of the proposed lot-sizing problem is to minimize the sum of major and minor setup costs, holding and shortage costs, and regular production cost, and to meet simultaneously the demand requirements. The proposed problem is modelled into a linear integer program, a heuristic method to solve the problem is proposed, and a simulation experiment conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed heuristic and some existing heuristics. The computational results show that the proposed heuristic is useful to reduce the total cost significantly over a wide variety of simulated environments.     

The shape of protective capacity in unbalanced production systems with unplanned machine downtime

Several studies have shown that when both statistical fluctuations and dependent events exist, unbalanced production lines out-perform balanced lines. By definition, unbalanced lines have some amount of protective capacity built into them; however, little research exists to address the question of quantity and position of protective capacity necessary to counteract the impact of variation on system performance. This research seeks to improve our understanding concerning the shape of protective capacity in unbalanced lines when faced with variation in the form of unplanned machine downtime. Both Kanban and drum-buffer-rope (DBR) controlled lines are investigated. Results show that balancing the protective capacity yields superior results over both increasing and decreasing protective capacity shapes (holding average protective capacity equal). Results also show that Kanban lines behave differently than DBR lines.     

The sensitivity of job mix and load capacity bottlenecks on inventory and due date performance in a manufacturing system

Based on a benchmark job-lot manufacturing system a simulation study was carried out to compare the performance of just-in-time (JIT) shop control system Kanban with conventional job-shop control procedures. The shop control policies were tested under a good manufacturing environment and the effects of job mix and load capacity bottlenecks on various shop control policies were tested. From the simulation results, it is inferred that there are shop control procedures that perform better than the Kanban in a job shop. It has been observed that even with adequate capacity, bottleneck areas surface due to fluctuations in the shop load. Kanban is not appropriate in such a situation because capacity bottlenecks can significantly reduce the ell'ectiveness of a pull system. The disparateness in the processing requirements for jobs can seriously undermine the performance of the shop. This is the type of shop environment where the shop control procedures will be most effective. Although Kanban came out best when the load capacity bottlenecks and the disparateness of the job mix were removed, the selected shop control variable combinations closely approximated the Kanban result. Although many features of JIT can be implemented in any system, companies trying to adopt JIT should remember that Kanban requires a rigid system intolerant of any deviation.     

Effect of forecast errors on rolling horizon master production schedule cost performance for various replanning intervals

Master production schedules are usually updated by the use of a rolling schedule. Previous studies on rolling schedules seem to form the consensus that frequent replanning of a master production schedule (MPS) can increase costs and schedule instability. Building on previous research on rolling schedules, this study addresses the impact of overestimation or underestimation of demand on the rolling horizon MPS cost performance for various replanning frequencies. The MPS model developed in this paper is based on actual data collected from a paint company. Results indicate that under both the forecast errors conditions investigated in this study, a two-replanning interval provided the best MPS cost performance for this company environment. However, results from the sensitivity analysis performed on the MPS model indicate that when the setup and inventory carrying costs are high, a 1-month replanning frequency (frequent replanning) seems more appropriate for both of the above forecast error scenarios.     

Partitioning Work Centers for Group Technology: Analytical Extension and Shop-Level Simulation Investigation*

This paper investigates the effects of partitioning job shop work centers to implement cellular manufacturing. Analytical models are utilized to show that partitioning leads to adverse effects on flow characteristics. The setup reduction introduced in partitioned systems has to overcome these adverse effects before leading to the benefits associated with cellular manufacturing. It is shown that partitioned systems with an insufficient degree of setup reduction are inferior to unpartitioned systems. Two new parameters relevant to this context, the breakeven setup reduction factor and flow ratio, are introduced for the design of viable cellular manufacturing systems. These insights are verified using a shop-level simulation experiment, assuming non-Markovian conditions. The experimental factors include lot size, setup reduction factor, cell size and allowance of inter-cell movements. It is shown that the results are consistent with analytical insights in indicating the range of parameters in which cellular manufacturing may compare favorably with the best of the functional-layout systems.     

Managing demand variability and operational effectiveness: case of lean improvement programmes and MRP planning integration

Although a lean focus is widely popular in general manufacturing environments, there are limited studies that empirically investigate how lean improvement programmes can be integrated with a material requirement planning (MRP) system. The aim of this research is to examine if the integration of lean improvement programmes with a MRP system has a positive effect on operational effectiveness when manufacturers are experiencing high levels of customer demand variability. Based on the contingency theory perspective and using data collected from the international manufacturing strategy survey (IMSS-V), a sample of 382 international manufacturing companies are first divided into two groups based on the degree of their customer demand fluctuation. Moderated hierarchical regression is then applied to each group to empirically test the research hypotheses. Statistical results suggest that operational effectiveness significantly improves when lean improvement programmes support MRP systems as manufacturers are experiencing high levels of fluctuations in demand.     

A COMPARISON OF DIRECT COST SAVINGS BETWEEN FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION AND LABOR WITH LEARNING

This paper compares flexible automation with labor‐intensive manufacturing processes in a batch production environment and considers learning, forgetting, inventory carrying costs, setup costs, production demand volume, previous production experience, and the proportion of material to labor cost. While flexible automation typically can reduce setup times, and therefore inventory carrying costs through smaller optimal batch sizes, the results of this research show that the effect of forgetting on relative cost savings is difficult to predict in some situations. When using optimal lot sizes in both the automated and labor environments, cost savings from flexible automation may be smaller than expected or may occur in different ways than anticipated.