Remainder modified systematic sampling in the presence of linear trend

If the population size is not a multiple of the sample size, then the usual linear systematic sampling design is unattractive, since the sample size obtained will either vary, or be constant and different to the required sample size. Only a few modified systematic sampling designs are known to deal with this problem and in the presence of linear trend, most of these designs do not provide favorable results. In this paper, a modified systematic sampling design, known as remainder modified systematic sampling (RMSS), is introduced. There are seven cases of RMSS and the results in this paper suggest that the proposed design is favorable, regardless of each case, while providing linear trend-free sampling results for three of the seven cases. To obtain linear trend-free sampling for the other cases and thus improve results, an end corrections estimator is constructed.     

Some remarks on the traditional way of circular and diagonal circular systematic sampling schemes

ABSTRACT

In this paper, some deficiencies in traditional selection procedure of circular version of systematic sampling schemes are investigated and alternative methods are proposed. We also suggest some rules of thumb for coincidence of units in the sample. The end corrections proposed by Bellhouse and Rao (1975 Bellhouse, D.R., Rao, J.N.K. (1975). Systematic sampling in the presence of a trend. Biometrika. 62:694–697.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Sampath and Varalakshmi (2008) for circular systematic sampling and diagonal circular systematic sampling, respectively, are also modified.     

Remainder Markov systematic sampling

Systematic sampling is the simplest and easiest of the most common sampling methods. However, when the population size N cannot be evenly divided by the sampling size n, systematic sampling cannot be performed. Not only is it difficult to determine the sampling interval k equivalent to the sampling probability of the sampling unit, but also the sample size will be inconstant and the sample mean will be a biased estimator of the population mean. To solve this problem, this paper introduces an improved method for systematic sampling: the remainder Markov systematic sampling method. This new method involves separately finding the first-order and second-order inclusion probabilities. This approach uses the Horvitz-Thompson estimator as an unbiased estimator of the population mean to find the variance of the estimator. This study examines the effectiveness of the proposed method for different super-populations.     

Double bootstrap estimation of variance under systematic sampling with probability proportional to size

Variance estimation under systematic sampling with probability proportional to size is known to be a difficult problem. We attempt to tackle this problem by the bootstrap resampling method. It is shown that the usual way to bootstrap fails to give satisfactory variance estimates. As a remedy, we propose a double bootstrap method which is based on certain working models and involves two levels of resampling. Unlike existing methods which deal exclusively with the Horvitz–Thompson estimator, the double bootstrap method can be used to estimate the variance of any statistic. We illustrate this within the context of both mean and median estimation. Empirical results based on five natural populations are encouraging.     

Pseudo-Bayes and pseudo-empirical Bayes estimators in randomized response sampling

In this article, new pseudo-Bayes and pseudo-empirical Bayes estimators for estimating the proportion of a potentially sensitive attribute in a survey sampling have been introduced. The proposed estimators are compared with the recent estimator proposed by Odumade and Singh [Efficient use of two decks of cards in randomized response sampling, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 38 (2009), pp. 439–446] and Warner [Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 60 (1965), pp. 63–69].     

Properties of designs for sampling continuous spatial resources from a triangular grid

Precision of systematic designs for sampling continuous response variables defined over a continuous spatial region have been extensively investigated. Estimation of variance, particularly for triangular grids, has been given less attention. Two of the designs proposed for sampling environmental resources in the Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) are based on a triangular grid. Implementation of either design requires derivation and evaluation of a variance estimator adequate for the purposes of EMAP. The performance of the proposed variance estimator was assessed under various surface model representations of the continuous response variable. Of the designs examined, a tessellation-stratified design permitted better estimation of variance, and was generally more precise, than a strict systematic design.     

Estimation under systematic sampling schemes for parabolic populations

In this paper, three sampling-estimating strategies involving linear, balanced and modified systematic sampling are considered for the estimation of a finite population total in the presence of parabolic trend. Using appropriate super-population models, their performances are evaluated. For super-population models with constant variance, Yates corrected estimator under linear systematic sampling is shown to perform well. Choices of variance functions under which modified and balanced systematic sampling perform well are also identified based on extensive numerical studies.     

Equally spaced design points in polynomial regression: A comparison of systematic sampling methods with the optimal design of experiments

In some situations an experimenter may desire to have equally spaced design points. Three methods of obtaining such points on the interval [—1,1]—namely systematic random sampling, centrally located systematic sampling, and a purposive systematic sampling method which includes the endpoints - 1 and 1 as two of the design points-are evaluated under the D-optimal and G-optimal criteria. These methods are also compared to the optimal designs in polynomial regression and to the limiting designs of Kiefer and Studden (1976).     

Generalized franklin's model for randomized response sampling

In this paper we introduce two estimators of a population proportion when randomized response sampling with a normal randomizing distribution is used* The estimators have been obtained by using the method of moments. Both of the proposed estimators are shown to be more efficient than the corresponding estimators of Eranklin (1989 b).     

Variance estimation with randomized response

Presenting a general procedure of eliciting a randomized response (RR) from selected persons in order to estimate the total of a sensitive variable related to a finite survey population, we consider two estimators along with variance estimators treating the case of sampling with probabilities proportional to (known) size measures (PPS) with replacement (WR), drawing analogies with multi-stage sampling and note their relative efficacies.     

Effect of systematic sampling on arima models

Given a general homogeneous non-stationary autoregressive integrated moving average process ARIMA(p,d,q), the corresponding model for the subseries obtained by a systematic sampling is derived. The article then shows that the sampled subseries approaches approximately to an integrated moving average process IMA(d,l), l≤(d-l), regardless of the autoregressive and moving average structures in the original series. In particular, the sampled subseries from an ARIMA (p,l,q) process approaches approximately to a simple random walk model.     

Systematic sampling of periodic functions

Using Fourier series expansions of functions of one and two variables, we find the variances of the sample mean for random and systematic sampling methods in one and two dimensions.     

Multiple-start balanced modified systematic sampling in the presence of linear trend

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a sampling design termed as multiple-start balanced modified systematic sampling (MBMSS), which involves the supplementation of two or more balanced modified systematic samples, thus permitting us to obtain an unbiased estimate of the associated sampling variance. There are five cases for this design and in the presence of linear trend only one of these cases is optimal. To further improve results for the other cases, we propose an estimator that removes linear trend by applying weights to the first and last sampling units of the selected balanced modified systematic samples and is thus termed as the MBMSS with end corrections (MBMSSEC) estimator. By assuming a linear trend model averaged over a super-population model, we will compare the expected mean square errors (MSEs) of the proposed sample means, to that of simple random sampling (SRS), linear systematic sampling (LSS), stratified random sampling (STR), multiple-start linear systematic sampling (MLSS), and other modified MLSS estimators. As a result, MBMSS is optimal for one of the five possible cases, while the MBMSSEC estimator is preferred for three of the other four cases.     

A review of optimal designs in survey sampling

Results in five areas of survey sampling dealing with the choice of the sampling design are reviewed. In Section 2, the results and discussions surrounding the purposive selection methods suggested by linear regression superpopulation models are reviewed. In Section 3, similar models to those in the previous section are considered; however, random sampling designs are considered and attention is focused on the optimal choice of π_j. Then in Section 4, systematic sampling methods obtained under autocorrelated superpopulation models are reviewed. The next section examines minimax sampling designs. The work in the final section is based solely on the randomization. In Section 6 methods of sample selection which yield inclusion probabilities π_j = n/N and π_ij = n(n - 1)/N(N - 1), but for which there are fewer than _NC_n possible samples, are mentioned briefly.     

A perspective of composite sampling

Composite samples are formed by physically mixing samples. Usually, composite samples are used to reduce the overall cost associated with analytical procedures that must be performed on each sample, but they can also be used to protect the privacy of individuals.

Composite sampling can reduce the cost of identifying individual cases that have a certain trait, such as those with a rare disease or those exceeding pollution-level standards. Not much is lost by applying this method as long as the trait is relatively rare.

Composite sampling can reduce the cost of estimating the mean of some process. When samples are composited, the ability to estimate the variance is lost. In spite of this, the potential savings are so great that composite samples have been used.

Much of this paper deasl with the variance of estimators based on composite sampling when the porportions of hte original samples comprising the composite sample are actually random. Taking repeated samples and measurements on several composite samples complicates the prodcedure, but allows the estimation of between and within variation as well as measurement error.     

An alternative estimator for randomized response sampling with continuous distributions from a dichotomous population

In this paper, we introduce an alternative estimator of a population proportion from a dichotomous population when using randomized response sampling with continuous randomizing distributions. We also propose the alternative use of exponential randomizing densities. The estimator is obtained by method of moments and is compared with Franklin's (1989) estimator using normal and exponential distributions. The proposed estimator is more efficient than Franklin's (1989) estimator under suitable conditions for the two distributions.     

Estimation of mean and variance of stigmatized quantitative variable using distinct units in randomized response sampling

Received: April 6, 1998; revised version: July 12, 1999     

A New Sampling Design for Systematic Sampling

A sampling design called “Modified Systematic Sampling (MSS)” is proposed. In this design each unit has an equal probability of selection. Moreover, it works for both situations: N = nk or N ≠ nk. Consequently, the Linear Systematic Sampling (LSS) and Circular Systematic Sampling (CSS) become special cases of the proposed MSS design.     

The nearest proportional to size sampling design

The construction of a proportional to size sampling design nearest to a given design is introduced. The realization of the new design can be easily made with the help of the original one.