Comparison of different estimation techniques for portfolio selection

The main problem in applying the mean-variance portfolio selection consists of the fact that the first two moments of the asset returns are unknown. In practice the optimal portfolio weights have to be estimated. This is usually done by replacing the moments by the classical unbiased sample estimators. We provide a comparison of the exact and the asymptotic distributions of the estimated portfolio weights as well as a sensitivity analysis to shifts in the moments of the asset returns. Furthermore we consider several types of shrinkage estimators for the moments. The corresponding estimators of the portfolio weights are compared with each other and with the portfolio weights based on the sample estimators of the moments. We show how the uncertainty about the portfolio weights can be introduced into the performance measurement of trading strategies. The methodology explains the bad out-of-sample performance of the classical Markowitz procedures.     

On the existence of unbiased estimators for the portfolio weights obtained by maximizing the Sharpe ratio

We consider the problem of estimating the portfolio weights obtained by maximizing the Sharpe ratio. Assuming that the underlying asset returns are independent and multivariate normally distributed, Okhrin and Schmid (J. Econom. 134:235–256, 2006) showed that the frequently used sample estimators of these weights do not have a first moment. This paper proves that an unbiased estimator of the Sharpe ratio portfolio weights does not exist at all. Moreover, we show that there is no asymptotically unbiased estimator of these weights within the family of estimators which are bounded by cylinder functions.     

Construction of improved estimators of multinomial proportions

The improved large sample estimation theory for the probabilities of multi¬nomial distribution is developed under uncertain prior information (UPI) that the true proportion is a known quantity. Several estimators based on pretest and the Stein-type shrinkage rules are constructed. The expressions for the bias and risk of the proposed estimators are derived and compared with the maximum likelihood (ml) estimators. It is demonstrated that the shrinkage estimators are superior to the ml estimators. It is also shown that none of the preliminary test and shrinkage estimators dominate each other, though they perform y/ell relative to the ml estimators. The relative dominance picture of the estimators is presented. A simulation study is carried out to assess the performance of the estimators numerically in small samples.     

A note on classical Stein-type estimators in elliptically contoured models

In this paper the conditions under which a broad class of Stein-type estimators dominates the best invariant unbiased estimator of the mean of an elliptically contoured population have been established. The superiority conditions are derived for both known and unknown scale structures. Also an example is given when the general scale matrix is assumed to be known in linear regression.     

Estimating the error variance in nonparametric regression by a covariate-matched u-statistic

For nonparametric regression models with fixed and random design, two classes of estimators for the error variance have been introduced: second sample moments based on residuals from a nonparametric fit, and difference-based estimators. The former are asymptotically optimal but require estimating the regression function; the latter are simple but have larger asymptotic variance. For nonparametric regression models with random covariates, we introduce a class of estimators for the error variance that are related to difference-based estimators: covariate-matched U-statistics. We give conditions on the random weights involved that lead to asymptotically optimal estimators of the error variance. Our explicit construction of the weights uses a kernel estimator for the covariate density.     

Multiple Regression Model Averaging and the Focused Information Criterion With an Application to Portfolio Choice

ABSTRACT

We consider multiple regression (MR) model averaging using the focused information criterion (FIC). Our approach is motivated by the problem of implementing a mean-variance portfolio choice rule. The usual approach is to estimate parameters ignoring the intention to use them in portfolio choice. We develop an estimation method that focuses on the trading rule of interest. Asymptotic distributions of submodel estimators in the MR case are derived using a localization framework. The localization is of both regression coefficients and error covariances. Distributions of submodel estimators are used for model selection with the FIC. This allows comparison of submodels using the risk of portfolio rule estimators. FIC model averaging estimators are then characterized. This extension further improves risk properties. We show in simulations that applying these methods in the portfolio choice case results in improved estimates compared with several competitors. An application to futures data shows superior performance as well.     

Semiparametric Stein estimators

Stein [Stein, C. (1956). Inadmissibility of the usual estimator for the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. In Proc. 3rd Berkeley symp. math. statist. and pro. (pp. 197–206). University of California Press], in his seminal paper, came up with the surprising discovery that the sample mean is an inadmissible estimator of the population mean in three or higher dimensions under squared error loss. The past five decades have witnessed multiple extensions and variations of Stein’s results. In this paper we develop Stein-type estimators in a semiparametric framework and prove their coordinatewise asymptotic dominance over the sample mean in terms of Bayes risks.     

Pitman nearness comparisons of Stein-type estimators for regression coefficients in replicated experiments

This paper presents a comparative study of the performance properties of one unbiased and two Stein-type estimators for combining the estimates of coefficients in a linear regression model when data sets are available from replicated experiments conducted at possibly different stations.     

Merging data from multiple sources: pretest and shrinkage perspectives

In this article, we have developed asymptotic theory for the simultaneous estimation of the k means of arbitrary populations under the common mean hypothesis and further assuming that corresponding population variances are unknown and unequal. The unrestricted estimator, the Graybill-Deal-type restricted estimator, the preliminary test, and the Stein-type shrinkage estimators are suggested. A large sample test statistic is also proposed as a pretest for testing the common mean hypothesis. Under the sequence of local alternatives and squared error loss, we have compared the asymptotic properties of the estimators by means of asymptotic distributional quadratic bias and risk. Comprehensive Monte-Carlo simulation experiments were conducted to study the relative risk performance of the estimators with reference to the unrestricted estimator in finite samples. Two real-data examples are also furnished to illustrate the application of the suggested estimation strategies.     

Resampling estimation when observations are m–dependent

For m–dependent, identically distributed random observation, the bootstrap method provides inconsistent estimators of the distribution and variance of the sample mean. This paper proposes an alternative resampling procedure. For estimating the distribution and variance of a function of the sample mean, the proposed resampling estimators are shown to be strongly consistent.     

Unbiased estimation of the MSE matrices of improved estimators in linear regression

Stein-rule and other improved estimators have scarcely been used in empirical work. One major reason is that it is not easy to obtain precision measures for these estimators. In this paper, we derive unbiased estimators for both the mean squared error (MSE) and the scaled MSE matrices of a class of Stein-type estimators. Our derivation provides the basis for measuring the estimators' precision and constructing confidence bands. Comparisons are made between these MSE estimators and the least squares covariance estimator. For illustration, the methodology is applied to data on energy consumption.     

Calibrated estimators in two-stage sampling

We consider the problem of the estimation of the population mean of a study variable by assuming that the population means of an auxiliary variable are known at both stages of sample selection. The design weights at the first and second stages of sample selection are calibrated by optimizing the chi-squared type distance between the design weights and the new weights at both the first and second stages of sample selection. The regression type estimator in two-stage sampling is shown to be a special case. An application of the proposed estimators using a real data set is discussed.     

Shrinkage Estimation Under Multivariate Elliptic Models

The estimation of the location vector of a p-variate elliptically contoured distribution (ECD) is considered using independent random samples from two multivariate elliptically contoured populations when it is apriori suspected that the location vectors of the two populations are equal. For the setting where the covariance structure of the populations is the same, we define the maximum likelihood, Stein-type shrinkage and positive-rule shrinkage estimators. The exact expressions for the bias and quadratic risk functions of the estimators are derived. The comparison of the quadratic risk functions reveals the dominance of the Stein-type estimators if p ≥ 3. A graphical illustration of the risk functions under a “typical” member of the elliptically contoured family of distributions is provided to confirm the analytical results.     

Outlier-detection tests and robust estimators based on signs of residuals

The asymptotic structure of a vector of weighted sums of signs of residuals, in the general linear model, is studied. The vector can be used as a basis for outlier-detection tests, or alternatively, setting the vector to zero and solving for the parameter yields a class of robust estimators which are analogues of the sample median. Asymptotic results for both estimates and tests are obtained. The question of optimal weights is investigated, and the optimal estimators in the case of simple linear regression are found to coincide with estimators introduced by Adichie.     

Estimation of the shape parameter of a Pareto distribution

We consider the problem of estimating the shape parameter of a Pareto distribution with unknown scale under an arbitrary strictly bowl-shaped loss function. Classes of estimators improving upon minimum risk equivariant estimator are derived by adopting Stein, Brown, and Kubokawa techniques. The classes of estimators are shown to include some known procedures such as Stein-type and Brewster and Zidek-type estimators from literature. We also provide risk plots of proposed estimators for illustration purpose.     

Pooling reliability functions

In this article large sample pooling procedures for reliability functions of an exponential life testing model is considered. Asymptotic properties of shrinkage estimation procedure subsequent to preliminary tests are developed. It is shown that the proposed estimator possesses substantially snakker asymptotic mean squared error than the usual estimator in a region of the lparameter space. Relative efficiencies of the purposed estimators to the usual estimators are obtained and recommendations of the level of the preliminary tests are provided. Relative dominance picture of the estimators is presented. It is shown that the proposed estimator provides a wider dominance range over usual estimator than the usual preliminary test estimator. More importantly, the size of the preliminary test is meaningful. Simulation studies is also carried out to appraise the performance of the estimators when samples are small.     

Linearly admissible estimators of the common mean parameter under balanced loss function

Admissibility of linear estimators of the common mean parameter is investigated in the context of a linear model under balanced loss function. Sufficient and necessary conditions for linear estimators to be admissible in classes of homogeneous and non homogeneous linear estimators are obtained, respectively.     

Best linear unbiased estimates in ranked-set sampling with particular reference to imperfect ordering

SUMMARY Ranked-set sampling is a widely used sampling procedure when sample observations are expensive or difficult to obtain. It departs from simple random sampling by seeking to spread the observations in the sample widely over the distribution or population. This is achieved by ranking methods which may need to employ concomitant information. The ranked-set sample mean is known to be more efficient than the corresponding simple random sample mean. Instead of the ranked-set sample mean, this paper considers the corresponding optimal estimator: the ranked-set best linear unbiased estimator. This is shown to be more efficient, even for normal data, but particularly for skew data, such as from an exponential distribution. The corresponding forms of the estimators are quite distinct from the ranked-set sample mean. Improvement holds where the ordering is perfect or imperfect, with this prospect of improper ordering being explored through the use of concomitants. In addition, the corresponding optimal linear estimator of a scale parameter is also discussed. The results are applied to a biological problem that involves the estimation of root weights for experimental plants, where the expense of measurement implies the need to minimize the number of observations taken.     

Estimation of the common mean of two univariate normal populations

The problem of estimating the common mean μ of two univariate normal populations with unknown and unequal variances is considered from a decision-theoretic point of view. We restrict our attention to an appropriate class C and its three subclasses C_0C1C2of un-biased estimates of μ. We consider the usual estimate μ⁰ of μ which is the weighted linear combination of the sample means with weights as reciprocals of the sample variances. Its admissibility in C₀ and extended admissibility in C is proved. Admissible estimates in C₁ and C₂are also obtained.The loss is always assumed to be squared error. The question of admissibility of μ⁰ in the class of all estimators is still open.     

SMALL AREA ESTIMATION USING SURVEY WEIGHTS WITH FUNCTIONAL MEASUREMENT ERROR IN THE COVARIATE

Nested error linear regression models using survey weights have been studied in small area estimation to obtain efficient model‐based and design‐consistent estimators of small area means. The covariates in these nested error linear regression models are not subject to measurement errors. In practical applications, however, there are many situations in which the covariates are subject to measurement errors. In this paper, we develop a nested error linear regression model with an area‐level covariate subject to functional measurement error. In particular, we propose a pseudo‐empirical Bayes (PEB) predictor to estimate small area means. This predictor borrows strength across areas through the model and makes use of the survey weights to preserve the design consistency as the area sample size increases. We also employ a jackknife method to estimate the mean squared prediction error (MSPE) of the PEB predictor. Finally, we report the results of a simulation study on the performance of our PEB predictor and associated jackknife MSPE estimator.