What do midwives fear?

BackgroundThere is evidence that a significant number of women are fearful about birth but less is known about the fears of maternity health providers and how their fear may impact on the women they care for.AimThe aim of this study was to determine the top fears midwives in Australia and New Zealand hold when it comes to caring for childbearing women.MethodFrom 2009 to 2011, 17 workshops were held in Australia and New Zealand supporting over 700 midwives develop skills to keep birth normal. During the workshop midwives were asked to write their top fear on a piece of paper and return it to the presenters. Similar concepts were grouped together to form 8 major categories.FindingsIn total 739 fears were reported and these were death of a baby (n = 177), missing something that causes harm (n = 176), obstetric emergencies (n = 114), maternal death (n = 83), being watched (n = 68), being the cause of a negative birth experience (n = 52), dealing with the unknown (n = 36) and losing passion and confidence around normal birth (n = 32). Student midwives were more concerned about knowing what to do, while homebirth midwives were mostly concerned with being blamed if something went wrong.ConclusionThere was consistency between the 17 groups of midwives regarding top fears held. Supporting midwives with workshops such as dealing with grief and loss and managing fear could help reduce their anxiety. Obstetric emergency skills workshops may help midwives feel more confident, especially those dealing with shoulder dystocia and PPH as they were most commonly recorded.     

Midwives’ self-reported knowledge and skills to assess and promote maternal health literacy: A national cross-sectional survey

BackgroundLittle is known about midwives’ knowledge and skills to assess and promote maternal health literacy.AimsTo test the reliability and validity of a new tool to assess midwives’ health literacy knowledge, skills and attitudes.MethodsUsing a cross-sectional design, midwives were recruited through professional and social media networks. The online survey included demographic and professional questions and a new measure on midwives’ health literacy knowledge, skills and attitudes. Convergent validity was assessed using ten items from the Caring Assessment Scale. Perceived barriers to promoting maternal health literacy were sought.FindingsThree hundred and seven participants completed the survey. A two-factor solution accounted for 41% of variance and resulted in 14 items, including all attitude items, being removed. Cronbach’s alpha reliability was acceptable (Skills = .76; Knowledge = .66). Convergent validity was established. Most midwives (77.1%, n = 221) reported giving limited attention to formally assessing women’s health literacy. Between 30 to 60% of midwives never or only sometimes used specific techniques to promote maternal health literacy. Most (75%, n = 201) had not received education about health literacy.Discussion and ConclusionsThe new Transforming Maternity Care Collaborative Health Literacy tool was valid and reliable. Few midwives formally assessed or promoted women’s health literacy. Midwives require education about maternal health literacy assessment and promotion to ensure women understand information being conveyed. A large national survey of midwives using the new tool is recommended.     

Pain relief for childbirth: The preferences of pregnant women,midwives and obstetricians

ObjectiveTo compare the personal preferences of pregnant women, midwives and obstetricians regarding a range of physical, psychosocial and pharmacological methods of pain relief for childbirth.MethodSelf-completed questionnaires were posted to a consecutive sample of 400 pregnant women booked-in to a large tertiary referral centre for maternity care in South Australia. A similar questionnaire was distributed to a national sample of 500 obstetricians as well as 425 midwives at: (1) the same hospital as the pregnant women, (2) an outer-metropolitan teaching hospital and (3) a district hospital. Eligible response rates were: pregnant women 31% (n = 123), obstetricians 50% (n = 242) and midwives 49% (n = 210).FindingsOverall, midwives had a greater personal preference for most of the physical pain relief methods and obstetricians a greater personal preference for pharmacological methods than the other groups. Pregnant women's preferences were generally located between the two care provider groups, though somewhat closer to the midwives. All groups had the greatest preference for having a support person for labour with more than 90% of all participants wanting such support. The least preferred method for pregnant women was pethidine/morphine (14%).ConclusionThere are differences in the personal preferences of pregnant women, midwives and obstetricians regarding pain relief for childbirth. It is important that the pain relief methods available in maternity care settings reflect the informed preferences of pregnant women.     

The profile of women who consult midwives in Australia

BackgroundThere is no Australian data on the characteristics of women who consult with midwives.AimTo determine the profile of women who consult midwives in Australia.MethodsThis cross-sectional research was conducted as part of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH). Participants were the younger (31–36 years) cohort of the ALSWH who completed a survey in 2009, and indicated that they were currently pregnant (n = 801). The main outcome measure was consultation with a midwife.FindingsOf the 801 women who indicated that they were currently pregnant at the time of the survey, 19%, 42%, and 70% of women in the first, second and third trimesters respectively had consulted with a midwife. Women were more likely to consult a midwife if they: also consulted with a hospital doctor (OR = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.66, 4.40); also consulted with a complementary and alternative medicine practitioner (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.25, 3.03); were depressed (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.28); constipated (OR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.04, 3.13); or had been diagnosed or treated for hypertension during pregnancy (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.27, 6.09). Women were less likely (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.56) to consult with a midwife if they had private health insurance.ConclusionWomen were more likely to consult with midwives in conjunction with consultations with hospital doctors or complementary and alternative medicine practitioners. Women with private health insurance were less likely to consult midwives. More research is necessary to determine the implications of the lack of midwifery care for these women.     

Understanding staff views and experiences of a clinical practice change to reduce stillbirth in South Asian women: A cross-sectional survey

BackgroundIn July 2017, Victoria’s largest maternity service implemented a new clinical practice guideline to reduce the rates of term stillbirth in women of South Asian background.AimTo capture the views and experiences of clinical staff following the implementation of the new clinical guideline.MethodsCross sectional survey of clinical staff providing maternity care in August 2018, 12 months post implementation. Staff were asked to provide their agreement with ten statements assessing: perceived need for the guideline, implementation processes, guideline clarity, and clinical application. Open-ended questions provided opportunities to express concerns and offer suggestions for improvement. The frequency of responses to each question were tabulated. Open ended responses were grouped together to identify themes.FindingsA total of 120 staff completed the survey, most (n = 89, 74%) of whom were midwives. Most staff thought the rationale (n = 95, 79%), the criteria for whom they applied (83%, n = 99), and the procedures and instructions within the guideline were clear (74%, n = 89). Staff reported an increase in workload (72%, n = 86) and expressed concerns related to rationale and evaluation of the guidelines, lack of education for both staff and pregnant South Asian women, increased workload and insufficient resources, patient safety and access to care. Challenges relating to shared decision making and communicating with women whose first language is not English were also identified.DiscussionThis study has identified key barriers to and opportunities for improving implementation and highlighted additional challenges relating to new clinical guidelines which focus on culturally and linguistically diverse women.     

Implementation of an obstetric triage decision aid into a maternity assessment unit and emergency department

BackgroundThe obstetric triage decision aid (OTDA) consists of 10 common pregnancy complaints with key signs and symptoms generating a triage score based on targeted questioning responses. It was developed to provide a standardised approach for obstetric triage conducted by midwives and emergency nurses as neither professional group are expert in the triage of pregnant and postpartum women.AimTo evaluate implementation of the OTDA into an emergency department (ED) and maternity assessment unit (MAU).MethodsThe OTDA was introduced to the ED and MAU of a hospital in Australia. A range of implementation strategies were utilised and assessed by pre and post staff survey, and a three-month post-audit of unscheduled maternity presentations. The primary outcome was adoption rate of the OTDA. Secondary outcomes were staff confidence and waiting times. Analyses were undertaken using SPSS (v24). Paired analysis was conducted on staff surveys.ResultsThere were a total of 2829 unscheduled presentations: ED (n = 708) and MAU (n = 2121), 88.1% were triaged using the OTDA, used more in the MAU than the ED (93.2% vs 72.7%; p < .001). In the MAU, women seen within 15 min of arrival improved significantly from 42.0% to 78.0%. There was improvement in the self-rated confidence (p = .002) and competence (p = .004) by nurses and midwives to conduct obstetric triage.ConclusionThe introduction of the OTDA required different approaches to change practice. There were improvements in staff self-rated confidence and competence, a reduction in clinical risk associated with under-triage in the ED and improved prioritisation of care in the MAU.     

Health professionals’ perceptions of a midwifery model of woman-centred care implemented on a hospital labour ward

BackgroundTheoretical models as a basis for midwives’ care have been developed over recent decades. Although there are similarities between these models, their usefulness in practice needs to be researched in specific cultural contexts.AimTo explore whether, when adopted by midwives on labour wards, a midwifery model of woman-centred care (MiMo) was useful in practice from the viewpoint of a variety of health professionals.MethodsData were collected from a variety of health professionals before and after an intervention of implementating MiMo at a hospital-based labour ward in Sweden, using nine focus group interviews with a total of 43 participants: midwives (n = 16), obstetricians (n = 8), assistant nurses (n = 11) and managers (n = 8). The text from interviews was analysed using content analysis.FindingsFrom expressing no explicit need of a midwifery model of woman-centred care before the intervention, there was a shift in midwives, obstetricians and managers perceptions towards identifying advantages of using the MiMo as it gives words to woman-centred midwifery care. Such shift in perception was not found among the assistant nurses.DiscussionClarification of the various roles of health professionals is needed to develop the model. Heavy workloads and stress were barriers to implementing the model. Thus, more support is needed from organisational management.ConclusionsThe model was useful for all professional groups, except for assistant nurses. Further studies are needed in order to clarify the various professional roles and interdisciplinary collaborations in making the MiMo more useful in daily maternity care.     

Unintended pregnancy and intimate partner violence around pregnancy in a population-based study

BackgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) and unintended pregnancy are public health issues that can affect the health and well-being of women and their children. However, the relationship between IPV and women's ability to control their fertility has not been adequately explored.AimTo investigate the association between unintended pregnancy and emotional or physical violence perpetrated by partners around pregnancy.MethodsA population-based study was undertaken, recruiting women (n = 779) at the hospital obstetric departments and gathering social and family data. IPV was diagnosed by using the Index of Spouse Abuse (ISA). Data were gathered by trained midwives in 15 public hospitals in southern Spain and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.FindingsThe pregnancy was reported to be unintended by 118 (15.1%) of the study population. Unintended pregnancy was significantly associated with: physical and/or emotional IPV around pregnancy, age, marital status, cohabitation, educational level, and employment status. After adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics, emotional IPV around pregnancy was significantly associated with an unintended pregnancy (AOR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.5–4.3). Being in a non-committed relationship was a risk factor (AOR = 3.5; 95% CI = 1.8–6.1) and being in employment a protective factor (AOR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2–0.8) for an unintended pregnancy.ConclusionWomen who report an unintended pregnancy may be experiencing emotional IPV. The risk of emotional IPV is higher if women reporting an unintended pregnancy are in a committed relationship, married, or in employment. A better understanding of the relationship between unintended pregnancy and violence can aid midwives about potential reproductive health risk factors associated with abuse.     

An exploration of Australian midwives’ knowledge of intimate partner violence against women during pregnancy

BackgroundIntimate partner violence is recognised as a global public health issue. Living with intimate partner violence results in poorer health status with reduced quality of life and higher utilisation of health services. Increased awareness, education and training, and an understanding of multi-agency collaboration are vital in order for health practitioners to respond to women experiencing partner violence and abuse. Midwives are well placed to identify, provide immediate support, and refer women onto appropriate support agencies but may lack appropriate education, training or support.AimTo investigate midwives’ knowledge of intimate partner violence against women during pregnancy.MethodsAn online survey link was distributed through the Australian College of Midwives. The survey included personal, professional and practice details, and 25 questions that tested knowledge about intimate partner violence.Findings152 midwives completed the online questionnaire. Knowledge scores ranged from 27 to 48 (out of a possible 50), with the mean total score of 42.8 (SD = 3.3). Although 60% of participants scored 48, two-thirds did not know about the risks and signs of intimate partner violence. One-third of the midwives did not know about age risks associated with intimate partner violence. Around 25% incorrectly believed that perpetrators are violent because of alcohol or drug use. Nearly 90% (88%) of participants had some education or training about intimate partner violence. Those with some training achieved higher knowledge scores than those with no formal training (Mann–Whitney U = 1272, p = 0.003).ConclusionParticipating midwives generally reported a high level of knowledge about intimate partner violence but held misconceptions about risks and characteristics of perpetrators of violence. These knowledge gaps may adversely affect their ability to identify women at risk of violence. Education about intimate partner violence was associated with improved knowledge. Future training and education on intimate partner violence should target identified knowledge gaps.     

Professional responses to post bureaucratic hospital reforms and their impact on care provision

BackgroundPost bureaucracy is increasingly shaping how health care professionals work. Within hospital settings, post bureaucracy is frequently connected to loss of professional autonomy and protocol-based care. However, this development also affects relationships between care providers and care receivers.QuestionTo explore experiences of post bureaucratic hospital reforms and their impact on care provision.MethodData builds on nine mini group interviews with midwives (n = three), nurses (n = three) and physiotherapists (n = three), in all thirty participants. Data was analysed using existing theories of professionalism and post bureaucracy.FindingsTwo overarching themes were identified: ‘Time, tasks and institutional duties’ which referred to transformations in care practices, increased use of screening procedures, efficiency requirements and matching linear time to the psychosocial needs of patients. ‘Managerial control of work’ which described rising administrative demands, engaging in protective measures, younger professionals pressured by documentation obligations and fear of disciplinary procedures.ConclusionThe institutional context appears to play a key role shaping care practices. Although midwives, nurses and physiotherapists share similar experiences of post bureaucratic hospital reforms, changes in care provision can impact these professions in different ways. As a discipline, midwifery is founded on relationships between women and midwives. Standardised clinical care, performativity demands, litigation risks and rising administrative obligations are liable to challenge the provision of woman centred care. These changes may also result in increased inequity in maternity care by affecting some groups of women more than others.     

The views and attitudes of health professionals providing antenatal care to women with a high BMI: A qualitative research study

BackgroundThe prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing amongst women of child bearing age. The objective of this study was to investigate the views and attitudes of providers of antenatal care for women who have a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² and over.MethodsA qualitative study using focus groups was undertaken within the department of obstetrics and gynaecology at a large teaching hospital in south-eastern Australia. Three focus group discussions were held. One with hospital midwives (n = 10), one with continuity of care midwives (n = 18) and one with obstetricians (n = 5). Data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).FindingsSix dominant themes emerged: (1) obesity puts the health of mothers, babies and health professionals at risk; (2) overweight and obesity has become the norm; (3) weighing women and advising about weight gain is out of fashion; (4) weight is a sensitive topic to discuss; (5) there are significant barriers to weight control in pregnancy; and (6) health professionals and women need to deal with maternal obesity. These themes are drawn together to form a model representing current health care issues for these women.ConclusionHealth professionals, who have a high BMI, can find it difficult to discuss obesity during antenatal visits with obese women. Specialist dietary interventions and evidence based guidelines for working with child-bearing women is seen as a public health priority by health care professionals.     

Babies born before arrival to hospital and maternity unit closures in Queensland and Australia

BackgroundEvidence suggests the closure of maternity units is associated with an increase in babies born before arrival (BBA).AimTo explore the association between the number of maternity units in Australia and Queensland by birthing numbers, BBA rate and geographic remoteness of the health district where the mother lives.MethodsA retrospective study utilised routinely collected perinatal data (1992–2011). Pearson correlation tested the relationship between BBA rate and number of maternity units. Linear regression examined this association over time.FindingsDuring 1992–2011, the absolute numbers (N = 22,814) of women having a BBA each year in Australia increased by 47% (N = 836–1233); and 206% (n = 140–429) in Queensland. This coincided with a 41% reduction in maternity units in Australia (N = 623–368 = 18 per year) and a 28% reduction in Queensland (n = 129–93). BBA rates increased significantly across Australia, r = 0.837, n = 20 years, p < 0.001 and Queensland, r = 0.917, n = 20 years, p < 0.001 and this was negatively correlated with the number of maternity units in Australia, r = −0.804, n = 19 years, p < 0.001 and Queensland, r = −0.906, n = 19 years, p < 0.001.ConclusionsThe closure of maternity units over a 20-year period across Australia and Queensland is significantly associated with increased BBA rates. The distribution is not limited to rural and remote areas. Given the high risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with BBA, it is time to revisit the closure of units.     

Outcome evaluation of an educational program for Japanese midwives to promote breast awareness for women

AimThe objective of this study was to evaluate educational approaches for midwives to promote breast awareness for postnatal women by measuring the knowledge, attitude and practice of midwives.MethodsA nonequivalent control design comparing two intervention groups and control group was used. Participants were Japanese midwives agreeing to this study. Midwives in the program group attended the program; those in the text group only read the textbook. Midwives in the control group neither attended the program nor learned by textbook. All measurements were administered at baseline, one-month post-program, and three-month post-program.ResultsAmong 215 participants, 168 midwives (45 program, 62 text, and 61 control) remained until three month follow-up. The knowledge test score was found to have significant mutual interactions between the three groups and time (F = 14.2, df = 4, p < 0.001). However, the attitudes did not differ between the three groups. Implementation rates for midwifery practice incorporating breast awareness education for postpartum women were different at one month and three months between the three groups. Implementation of breast awareness education at three months revealed the following factors: program group (OR 5.4, 95%CI [1.3–21.8]; text group: OR 0.7, 95%CI [0.2–2.7]) and implementation of breast awareness education at the first time measurement (OR 18.6, 95%CI [4.6–73.9]).ConclusionsThe results of this study showed that the educational program increased midwives’ knowledge and contributed to the continuation implementing breast awareness education for postpartum women about three months after testing.     

Midwives’ provision of health promotion in antenatal care: A qualitative explorative study

ProblemStudies indicate that health promotion in antenatal care can be improved. Moreover, a schism seems to exist between health promotion and prevention in antenatal care.BackgroundAntenatal care to support and improve maternal health is a core midwifery activity in which prevention as well as HP and woman-centeredness are important.AimTo explore how Danish midwives experienced antenatal care and practiced health promotion.MethodsMidwives undertaking antenatal care were interviewed individually (n = 8) and two focus groups (n = 10) were created. Thematic analysis was performed inductively, and the theoretical models from Piper’s health promotion practice Framework for midwives were used to analyse the midwives’ health promotion approach.FindingsTwo major themes were highlighted. Theme 1: ‘The antenatal care context for health promotion’ described factors contributing to quality in health promotion in antenatal care, such as communication and building relationships with the pregnant women. Theme 2: ‘The health promotion approach in antenatal care’ described both midwife-focused and woman-focused approaches to pregnant women’s health. Barriers to high-quality antenatal care and a holistic health promotion approach were identified, such as shared-care issues, documentation demands and lack of time.DiscussionThe midwives’ experiences were discussed in the context of a health promotion approach. Why midwives practice using a midwife-centred approach has many explanations, but midwives need to learn and help each other understand how they can practice woman-focused care while simultaneously providing prophylactic, evidence-based care.ConclusionMidwives mainly had a midwife-focused approach. To further promote women’s health, midwives need to focus on a woman-focused approach.     

Women’s reports of satisfaction and respect with continuity of care experiences by students: Findings from a routine,online survey

BackgroundPre-registration midwifery students in Australia undertake a minimum of ten continuity of care experiences with childbearing women. However, women are rarely asked to formally evaluate this care by students.AimTo evaluate data from a routine, web-based survey of women about having a midwifery student provide a continuity of care experience.MethodsAll women (n = 886) recruited by a midwifery student for a continuity of care experience during a 12 month period received an email inviting them to complete an online survey. The survey included personal details, experiences of care, and two scales on Respect and Satisfaction.ResultsA response rate of 57% (n = 501) was achieved. On average students attended six antenatal visits (mean = 5.83) and had six postnatal contacts with women. Most students attended labour and birth (92.6% n = 464). Most women rated overall satisfaction with care by their student as ‘better than they had hoped’. Positive correlations were found between number of antenatal visits and postnatal contact with students on both levels of satisfaction and respect felt by women. Women felt more satisfied when their midwifery student attended labour and birth.ConclusionsThe online survey was feasible and provided valid and reliable feedback from women about their student during a continuity of care experience. Women valued having an ongoing relationship with a student during pregnancy, labour and birth, and postpartum. Pre-registration midwifery education programs should continue to privilege relationship-based care and national standards should support the effective integration of continuity of care experiences.     

Prenatal stress,health, and health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: An international survey

BackgroundPregnant women’s stress, mental and physical health, and health behaviours can have important implications for maternal and child health outcomes.AimTo examine pregnant women’s levels of stress, mental and physical health, and health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted online, with recruitment and data collection occurring between 16/6/20 and 17/7/20. Participants were pregnant women recruited via online pregnancy/parenting communities. Participants self-reported their levels of general stress, pregnancy-specific stress and COVID-19 related stress, mental and physical health, general health behaviours, and COVID-19 related health behaviours.Findings573 pregnant women participated in the survey. Participants were most commonly resident in the United States (42.6%, n = 243), Ireland (41.2%, n = 235) or the United Kingdom (10%, n = 57). The majority (80.0%, n = 457) were married and educated to degree level or above (79.3, n = 453). Pregnant women reported high levels of pregnancy-specific and COVID-19-related stress, and low levels of mental and physical health, during the pandemic. Encouragingly, pregnant women in this study generally reported high levels of adherence to public health advice and pregnancy health behaviours. Stress and general mental health outcomes were best predicted by well-being factors (including stress and social support). Health impairing behaviours (e.g. poor diet) were predicted by both well-being and demographic factors.DiscussionInterventions targeting pregnancy- and pandemic-specific stress at the population level will be essential to support mental health and minimise adverse outcomes for women and children during the pandemic.