独立逆抽样下优势比的置信区间

本文对独立逆抽样设计下优势比的置信区间的构造进行了研究,包括三个已有的方法,以及本文引入的鞍点逼近方法。通过模拟比较了这四个方法给出的置信区间。模拟结果表明,基于鞍点逼近方法给出的置信区间不比另外三种方法差。并且在一些情况下表现还优于其它三个方法。     

鞍点逼近法在NNT区间估计中的应用与模拟研究

需要治疗的病例数(NNT)是近年来国际上用于评价临床疗效的一个简单而有效的指标。运用鞍点逼近法构造了NNT的区间估计,并将其与Wald、Wilson score和Delta法进行比较。蒙特卡洛模拟研究结果表明,鞍点逼近法得到的区间估计覆盖率与名义水平接近程度总体上更高,平均区间长度更短,即鞍点逼近法优于Wald、Wilson score和Delta法。     

一种简单有效的二项分布比例参数似然比置信区间的求法

对二项分布比例参数p的似然比置信区间,提出一种简便求解方法。在平均覆盖率、平均区间长度及区间长度的95%置信区间准则下与WScore、Plus4、Jeffreys置信区间进行模拟比较。试验表明,在二项分布b(n,p)的参数n≥20且p∈(0.1,0.9)时,该方法获取的似然比置信区间性能优良。当点估计p值不是接近于0或1且n≥20时,推荐使用本方法获取p的置信区间。     

负二项分布参数的区间估计

文章研究了负二项分布的成功概率的区间估计,给出了成功概率的精确置信区间、不依赖于大样本的近似置信区间以及依赖于大样本的近似置信区间.     

广义卡方型混合分布的鞍点逼近

广义卡方型混合分布在许多非参数检验问题中有着广泛运用。通常采用正态分布近似这类分布,但是在非大样本的情况下,正态近似的效果并不理想。运用鞍点逼近技术近似广义卡方型混合随机变量的密度函数和分布函数,并且与正态近似方法以及卡方近似方法进行了比较。模拟表明鞍点逼近效果要优于其余两种方法,特别是密度函数尾部区域。     

不同总体量和样本量时如何计算比例的置信区间

在总体或者总体子集不大情况下的抽样调查中,往往不易得出合理的关于比例的区间估计。这一类问题在抽样调查实践中已经严重到非说不可的地步。文章讨论了在样本量不大或者(和)在总体不大时估计比例的置信区间时往往忽略的问题,并给出了在不同情况下如何计算置信区间的方法。     

齐次纯生过程中相关概率的鞍点逼近算法

文章考虑了齐次纯生过程在t时刻质点总数Nt的概率分布Pn(t)及第n个质点发生时刻Sn尾概率P(Sn≥x)的计算问题,由于传统的算法涉及微分方程、递归、矩阵指数等问题,计算量较大不易实现。本文提出了用鞍点逼近法计算Pn(t)及P(Sn≥x),这种方法不仅避免了上述的一些麻烦而且其精度足可以满足通常的要求。文中对两个特例(泊松过程和尤尔过程)进行了真实值和逼近值的比较,证实了鞍点逼近计算是一个好的方法。     

概化理论方差分量置信区间估计Bootstrap方法比较

使用Monte Carlo模拟技术生成多项分布数据,比较四种Bootstrap方法估计概化理论方差分量置信区间的性能,四种Bootstrap方法分别是Bootstrap-PC、Bootstrap-t、Bootstrap-BCa和Bootstrap-ABC方法.结果表明:(1)从整体上看,四种Bootstrap方法估计方差分量置信区间的包含率,校正的Bootstrap方法要优于未校正的Bootstrap方法;(2)校正的Bootstrap-PC和Bootstrap-t方法相当,校正的Bootstrap-BCa与Bootstrap-ABC方法相当,校正的Bootstrap-BCa和Bootstrap-ABC方法要优于校正的Bootstrap-PC和Bootstrap-t方法.     

基于贝叶斯的Bootstrap置信区间

在许多领域中,Bootstrap成为一种数据处理的有效方法。很多情况下,模型中感兴趣的参数的置信区间难以构建,为了解决这一问题,文章提出了一个新的贝叶斯Bootstrap置信区间的估计量,并做了蒙特卡洛模拟比较,结果比经典区间估计方法和经典Bootstrap方法更优,并进行了实例分析。     

Confidence Intervals for the Weighted Sum of Two Independent Binomial Proportions

Confidence intervals for the difference of two binomial proportions are well known, however, confidence intervals for the weighted sum of two binomial proportions are less studied. We develop and compare seven methods for constructing confidence intervals for the weighted sum of two independent binomial proportions. The interval estimates are constructed by inverting the Wald test, the score test and the Likelihood ratio test. The weights can be negative, so our results generalize those for the difference between two independent proportions. We provide a numerical study that shows that these confidence intervals based on large‐sample approximations perform very well, even when a relatively small amount of data is available. The intervals based on the inversion of the score test showed the best performance. Finally, we show that as for the difference of two binomial proportions, adding four pseudo‐outcomes to the Wald interval for the weighted sum of two binomial proportions improves its coverage significantly, and we provide a justification for this correction.     

Revisiting Beal's Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Two Binomial Proportions

Confidence interval construction for the difference of two independent binomial proportions is a well-known problem with a full panoply of proposed solutions. In this paper, we focus largely on the family of intervals proposed by Beal (1987 Beal , S. ( 1987 ). Asymptotic confidence intervals for the difference between two binomial parameters for use with small samples . Biometrics 43 : 941 – 950 . [CSA] [CROSSREF] [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). This family, which includes the Haldane and Jeffreys–Perks intervals as special cases, assumes a symmetric prior distribution for the population proportions p ₁ and p ₂. We propose new methods that allow the currently observed data to set the prior distribution by taking a parametric empirical-Bayes approach; in addition, we also provide an investigation of the new interval' behaviors in small-sample situations. Unlike other solutions, our intervals can be used adaptively for experiments conducted in multiple stages over time. We illustrate this notion using data from an Argentinean study involving the Mal Rio Cuarto virus and its transmission to susceptible maize crops.     

Approximate Bayesianity of Frequentist Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion

The well-known Wilson and Agresti–Coull confidence intervals for a binomial proportion p are centered around a Bayesian estimator. Using this as a starting point, similarities between frequentist confidence intervals for proportions and Bayesian credible intervals based on low-informative priors are studied using asymptotic expansions. A Bayesian motivation for a large class of frequentist confidence intervals is provided. It is shown that the likelihood ratio interval for p approximates a Bayesian credible interval based on Kerman’s neutral noninformative conjugate prior up to O(n^{? 1}) in the confidence bounds. For the significance level α ? 0.317, the Bayesian interval based on the Jeffreys’ prior is then shown to be a compromise between the likelihood ratio and Wilson intervals. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.     

Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Parameter after Observing No Successes

The easily computed, one-sided confidence interval for the binomial parameter provides the basis for an interesting classroom example of scientific thinking and its relationship to confidence intervals. The upper limit can be represented as the sample proportion from a number of “successes” in a future experiment of the same sample size. The upper limit reported by most people corresponds closely to that producing a 95 percent classical confidence interval and has a Bayesian interpretation.     

Coverage‐adjusted Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion

We consider the classic problem of interval estimation of a proportion p based on binomial sampling. The ‘exact’ Clopper–Pearson confidence interval for p is known to be unnecessarily conservative. We propose coverage adjustments of the Clopper–Pearson interval that incorporate prior or posterior beliefs into the interval. Using heatmap‐type plots for comparing confidence intervals, we show that the coverage‐adjusted intervals have satisfying coverage and shorter expected lengths than competing intervals found in the literature.     

Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for the Parameters of Pareto Distribution under Progressive Censoring

In this article, we consider the progressive Type II right censored sample from Pareto distribution. We introduce a new approach for constructing the simultaneous confidence interval of the unknown parameters of this distribution under progressive censoring. A Monte Carlo study is also presented for illustration. It is shown that this confidence region has a smaller area than that introduced by Ku? and Kaya (2007 Ku? , C. , Kaya , M. F. ( 2007 ). Estimation for the parameters of the Pareto distribution under progressive censoring . Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 36 : 1359 – 1365 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]).     

Approximate and Fiducial Confidence Intervals for the Difference Between Two Binomial Proportions

The problem of estimating the difference between two binomial proportions is considered. Closed-form approximate confidence intervals (CIs) and a fiducial CI for the difference between proportions are proposed. The approximate CIs are simple to compute, and they perform better than the classical Wald CI in terms of coverage probabilities and precision. Numerical studies indicate that these approximate CIs can be used safely for practical applications under a simple condition. The fiducial CI is more accurate than the approximate CIs in terms of coverage probabilities. The fiducial CIs, the Newcombe CIs, and the Miettinen–Nurminen CIs are comparable in terms of coverage probabilities and precision. The interval estimation procedures are illustrated using two examples.     

Empirical Likelihood Confidence Intervals for Distribution Functions under Negatively Associated Samples

In this article, we discuss the construction of the confidence intervals for distribution functions under negatively associated samples. It is shown that the blockwise empirical likelihood (EL) ratio statistic for a distribution function is asymptotically χ²-type distributed. The result is used to obtain an EL-based confidence interval for the distribution function.     

Confidence Intervals for Quantiles of a Two-parameter Exponential Distribution under Progressive Type-II Censoring

Confidence intervals for the pth-quantile Q of a two-parameter exponential distribution provide useful information on the plausible range of Q, and only inefficient equal-tail confidence intervals have been discussed in the statistical literature so far. In this article, the construction of the shortest possible confidence interval within a family of two-sided confidence intervals is addressed. This shortest confidence interval is always shorter, and can be substantially shorter, than the corresponding equal-tail confidence interval. Furthermore, the computational intensity of both methodologies is similar, and therefore it is advantageous to use the shortest confidence interval. It is shown how the results provided in this paper can apply to data obtained from progressive Type II censoring, with standard Type II censoring as a special case. The applications of more complex confidence interval constructions through acceptance set inversions that can employ prior information are also discussed.     

Confidence Intervals Based on Local Linear Smoother

Point-wise confidence intervals for a non-parametric regression function in conjunction with the popular local linear smoother are considered. The confidence intervals are based on the asymptotic normal distribution of the local linear smoother. Their coverage accuracy is evaluated by developing Edgeworth expansion for the coverage probability. It is found that the coverage error near the boundary of the support of the regression function is of a larger order than that in the interior, which implies that the local linear smoother is not adaptive to the boundary in terms of coverage. This is quite unexpected as the local linear smoother is adaptive to the boundary in terms of the mean squared error.