ECONOMIES OF SCALE IN BANKING,INDETERMINACY, AND MONETARY POLICY

This paper investigates economies of scale (ES) in financial intermediation as a source of equilibrium indeterminacy. Financial intermediation is embedded into a standard flexible‐price monetary model, and provides deposits (inside money) that substitute with currency to purchase consumption. The results indicate that equilibrium indeterminacy does not depend on a large degree of ES in intermediation nor a large intermediation sector, but on monetary policy and the determination of nominal interest rates. Monetary policies not targeting nominal rates allow for indeterminacy to arise for any positive degree of ES, while policies targeting nominal rates eliminate indeterminacy for all degrees of ES. (JEL C62, E44, E52)     

THE SHORT-RUN "TOBIN EFFECT" IN A MONETARY OPTIMIZING MODEL

In an economy in which households face a cash-in-advance constraint, the nominal interest rate acts like a tax on consumption. To the extent that investment is financed from current earnings and so escapes the interest rate tax, households will defer their consumption when the nominal interest rate is high. A short-run Tobin effect results: capital accumulates most rapidly when the interest rate is thought to be high relative to its past and future values.     

THE WORLD OIL CRISIS: A PORTFOLIO INTERPRETATION

This paper applies the mean-variance portfolio model to the analysis of one facet of the production decision confronting the oil exporting countries. Specifically we assume that the countries in question seek the optimal solution to the problem of diversifying their assets between oil reserves in the ground and other non-petroleum investment alternatives. With respect to the group of countries which tend to accumulate money resources in excess of their domestic development needs (e. g., Saudi Arabia and Kuwait) the availability of an "inflation-proof" investment outlet whose principal and interest are linked to a general index of the change in world prices is likely to enhance these countries' incentive to extract oil from the ground on portfolio considerations alone.     

THE REACTION OF INTEREST RATES TO UNANTICIPATED FEDERAL RESERVE ACTIONS AND STATEMENTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MONEY ANNOUNCEMENT CONTROVERSY

This paper examines the reaction of long- and short-term interest rates to monetary policy surprises that influenced market expectations of the future behavior of the federal funds rate in the period after October 1979. We find that the relative reaction of long- and short-term rates to policy surprises is similar to the relative reaction of these rates to money announcements. Consequently, we conclude that the large reaction of long-term interest rates to money announcements in the period after October 1979 is consistent with the "policy anticipations hypothesis" which views this reaction as a movement in real interest rates.     

Inflation and the real rate of interest

To test the published statement that ‘the rate of interest that people expect to receive from saving and investment is always positive’, a survey was conducted of 450 New York savings bank depositors, asking them the rate of interest that they were earning on their savings and the rate of inflation that they expected in the next twelve months. The results show that the great majority of respondents seem well informed concerning both inflation rates and the rates of interest that banks are paying. Eighty-seven percent expected either a zero or negative real rate of interest on their money. A few conjectures are added as to why this might be so.     

AGGREGATE DEMAND AND INTEREST RATES: A MACROECONOMIC APPROACH TO THE TERM STRUCTURE

This paper develops a model in which the term-structure of interest rates obtains as an equilibrium outcome of the interactions of firms, households and rationally informed speculators. Exogenous disturbances whose impact effects fall only in the market for short-term bonds generate equilibrium movements in the yield on long-term bonds and the level of investment spending. In the case of risk-averse speculators, a purely transitory, unanticipated shock to the money supply generates a long distributed-lag effect on the level of aggregate demand.     

ESTIMATING THE FISHER EFFECT AND THE STOCHASTIC MONEY GROWTH PROCESS

This paper demonstrates that a change in the stochastic process generating money can alter the relationships between money and inflation and between inflation and interest rates. The extent to which inflation is forecastable is shown to depend significantly on the extent to which money is forecastable. Thus, the greater the persistence and forecastability of money, the greater the likelihood of observing a statistically significant Fisher effect.
US. data over the 1953–86 period are used to demonstrate that instability in the Fisher effect coincides with changes in the stochastic process generating money. There is a significantly stronger Fisher effect during a subsample in which money—and hence inflation—are more predictable.     

MONEY DEMAND AND QUANTITY CONSTRAINTS: EVIDENCE FROM THE SOVIET INTERVIEW PROJECT

This paper examines the effects of shortages on the demand for money of Soviet citizens. It is the first to examine the demand for money in a centrally planned economy using cross-section data in which alternatives to income and interest rates are used to explain money demand. We find demand for broad money and liquid assets depends on income, illiquid wealth, participation in the underground economy, and the severity of quantity constraints as well as demographic factors. Our findings show that quantity constraints decrease demand for the national currency and increase demand for convertible currencies and barter transactions.     

MORE EVIDENCE ON THE MONEY-OUTPUT RELATIONSHIP

Recent studies have found that money loses its explanatory power over output if the 2980s are included in the sample. Interest rates, not money, appear to predict output. Using annual data for 1915–1993 and quarterly data for 1960–1993, we demonstrate that the supposed breakdown in the money-output relationship stems from the type of stationary assumption imposed on the data. Assuming difference-stationary produces results found in the literature. Assuming trend-stationary produces results indicating that money and output remain statistically related. Moreover, the change in the stationarity assumption greatly affects the quantitative importance cf interest rates in explaining output.     

THE VANISHING LIQUIDITY EFFECT OF MONEY ON INTEREST: ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY

This paper seeks to re-examine the effects of money on interest rates. The earlier literature on this topic determined, fairly well, the pattern of response of interest rates to changes in money growth. The notable studies of Cagan (1972), Cagan and Gandolfi (1969), and Gibson (1970) served to establish the professions "stylized pattern" as presented in section I. Section II presents new evidence on the subject and finds that the old empirical generalizations no longer hold. Specifically, the results suggest that the initial liquidity effect of faster money growth is likely to be offset within the month following the monetary policy change. Sections III and IV investigate the reasons for the changing pattern of monetary effects on interest rates and discuss the policy implications of the new pattern.     

INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE AND THE VELOCITY OF MONEY: A CENTURY OF EVIDENCE

We study common features in the income velocity of money, income, and interest rates for Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Sweden and Norway using annual data from 1870. The recently developed and refined techniques of testing for cointegration are employed.
The evidence suggests there is a unique long-run relationship in velocity but not in income and interest rates. Moreover, we find that only a model which includes institutional change proxies is properly specified. We argue that the evidence is best interpreted in the context of common historical developments in the respective countries' financial systems.     

GOVERNMENT DEBT AND THE DEMAND FOR MONEY: AN EXTREME BOUND ANALYSIS

The article provides evidence that there is a relationship between government debt and interest rates via the demand for money. This relationship is examined through the wealth effect of government debt on money demand, and the robustness of the results is tested by the use of extreme bound analysis in addition to standard econometric techniques. We find that OLS regression shows government debt fnfecting the demand for money positively, implying that Federal government debt is net wealth. In addition, the extreme bound analysis shows that the estimates of the government debt coefficient are robust under alternative specifications of the Goldfeld model.     

COSTLY INTERMEDIATION AND CONSUMPTION SMOOTHING

This paper studies quantitatively how intermediation costs affect household consumption loans and welfare. Agents face uninsurable idiosyncratic shocks to labor productivity in a production economy with costly financial intermediation and a borrowing limit. Reducing intermediation costs has two effects: (1) For a given decrease in the interest rate on borrowing, agents' ability to smooth consumption over time improves. (2) The demand for loans increases, which increases the interest rate. The net welfare gain of reducing intermediation costs from 3.927% (U.S. level) to 1% is about 1.14% of equivalent consumption in the baseline economy for an endogenous interest rate and 1.90% for an exogenous interest rate. The gains are distributed unevenly: households at the bottom wealth decile improve welfare by 3.96% and 5.86% of equivalent consumption, while those at the top decile have welfare gains of 0.35% and 0.2%, respectively. Sufficiently high intermediation costs eliminate borrowing and hence the welfare gain of reducing costs is not substantial. The welfare analysis includes transitional dynamics between steady states. (JEL D91, E60, G38)     

INFLATION, HEDGING AND THE DEMAND FOR MONEY: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE

This paper explores the role of nominal rate of return uncertainty and inflation hedging as potentially important factors explaining the pattern of money demand. Using U.S. quarterly data over the period 1952.2–1982.4, it is shown that in conformity with theoretical considerations the nominal rate of return uncertainty variable tends to have a significantly positive effect and the inflation hedging variable (the covariance between nominal rate of return and inflation rate) a significantly negative effect on the demand for money. These findings seem to be reasonably robust in terms of various definitions of income, interest rates, inflation rate and money variables as well as in terms of different estimation methods.     

THE CONSEQUENCES OF COSTLY DEFAULT

This paper investigates the consequences of assuming that default on loans or corporate debt is costly; that is, the act of default imposes a deadweight cost on the economy. The analysis deals with two simple capital market models. Conditions for capital market equilibrium nominal interest rates and probability of default to exist are given and the comparative statics of these equilibrium variables with respect to changes in expectations, productivity of investment, cost of default and riskless interest rates are examined. In many cases these comparative static results are unambiguous in sign.     

BANKING SPREADS IN LATIN AMERICA

Intermediation spreads in Latin America are high by international standards. This paper examines the determinants of bank interest margins in that region using bank- and country-level data from 85 countries, including 14 Latin American economies. The results suggest that Latin America has higher interest rates, less efficient banks, and larger reserve requirements than other regions and that these factors have a significant impact on spreads. However, Latin American countries do not differ markedly from their peers in other aspects that are found important in determining the cost of financial intermediation, such as inflation and bank profit taxation . ( JEL E43, E44, G21, O54)     

THE INTEREST ELASTICITY OF MONEY DEMAND, LIQUIDITY AND REVERSE CAUSATION

This paper employs theoretical neoclassical and Keynesian models which have been expanded to include near monies to demonstrate that the interest elasticity of money demand is a peripheral issue to more fundamental differences between monetarists and Keynesians. The analysis indicates that the money supply is endogenously determined by income in such models, i.e. the reverse causation argument applies, and money is therefore an inappropriate instrument of monetary policy. The analysis also reveals that necessary and sufficient conditions for fiscal policy to be impotent are that the interest elasticities of money demand, money supply and all near monies must be zero.     

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH

When considering how to allocate scarce resources for the development of public infrastructure, many countries have a tendency to neglect maintenance in favor of new infrastructure investment projects. We examine the role of maintenance expenditures on output and on the distribution of wealth in a heterogeneous agents model. In our model, maintenance affects the quality of existing infrastructure and thus the flow of services derived from it. Furthermore, maintenance expenditures also affect the depreciation rates of both public infrastructure and private capital. We calibrate our model to Mexico and consider several policies that increase the flow of resources to infrastructure and find that a policy that allocates all additional resources to new investment is dominated by policies that allocate at least some of the additional resources to maintenance. Specifically, focusing all additional resources on maintenance is shown to generate the largest reduction in inequality, while a more balanced policy that increases both investment and maintenance maximizes output growth. (JEL E00, E62, H54)     

Estimates of Money Demand Functions for Estonia

This paper examines the money demand function of Estonia in the period 1995–2006. Since Estonia has a currency board system, euro area interest rates are taken into account. We apply different cointegration procedures like the Engle–Granger, the dynamic OLS, and the Johansen procedure to estimate the long-run relationship among money, output, and interest rates. The results show that it is difficult to find a cointegrating relationship for the broad money aggregate M2. For the preferred relationship including euro area money market rate and euro area bond rate a dynamic equation is estimated. This dynamic equation is stable for the whole period. The change of the anchor curreny in the currency board and the accession to the European Union do not alter the relationship.      

THE IMPACT OF PAYING INTEREST ON RESERVES IN THE PRESENCE OF GOVERNMENT DEFICIT FINANCING

This paper reexamines the impact that paying interest on reserves has on price level indeterminacy, volatility, and economic well‐being. Unlike the previous literature, this model includes an after‐tax deficit financed by assets (bonds and reserves) whose returns are linked. I show that the number of steady‐state equilibria and the corresponding level of indeterminacy are equal to, or greater than, those arising in the no‐interest economy. When the level of indeterminacy is the same, the economic volatility is reduced by paying interest. However, greater indeterminacy in the interest economy results in greater volatility. Finally, paying interest on reserves can enhance welfare. (JEL D6, E3, E5)