中华优秀传统文化对实现中国式现代化的价值意蕴

中国式现代化深深植根于中华优秀传统文化。中华优秀传统文化中蕴含的“民惟邦本”的民本思想、“治国富民”的社会理想、“义利相兼”的价值理念、“天人合一”的自然哲学和“协和万邦”的世界胸怀是涵养中国式现代化的文化沃土。中华优秀传统文化有助于培育现代化建设的奋斗者,建设牢不可破的中华民族共同体,推进国家治理现代化,是推动实现中国式现代化的重要力量。中华优秀传统文化是中国式现代化的独特精神标识,中华优秀传统文化的现代化是中国式现代化的重要组成部分,中华优秀传统文化本身蕴含的软实力是赋能中国式现代化的重要因素,概言之,中华优秀传统文化是中国式现代化实现程度的重要衡量标准。     

浅析传统儒家的王道思想及现实意义

传统儒家的王道思想蕴涵着丰富的人文内涵和伦理底蕴 ,古为今用 ,这一思想对当前治理国家、管理企业、建立和谐的人际关系以及保护生态环境、追求人与自然的统一等都极具现实意义。本文将试从“内圣外王”及与之相关的仁爱思想出发 ,分析其当代意义及应用途径。     

重典治吏立国之本--浅析明初"重典治吏"思想的形成与表现

中国历代封建统治者都十分重视整饬吏治,而其中尤以明初表现突出。明朝处于封建社会末期,民族危机、阶级矛盾错综复杂,堪称乱世,明初统治者继承中国传统的“刑乱国,用重典”的治世思想,确立了“重典治国”的立法思想,“重典治国”的核心是“重典治吏”。明初统治者制定了一系列措施,实践了重典治吏的思想,写下了中国封建政治制度史上重要的一页。     

简论我国传统"德治"思想与现行的治国方略

本文通过对我国传统“德治”思想 ,特别是儒家“德治”思想的历史考察和与现代德治的对比分析 ,论证了我国实施“依法治国”与“以德治国”相结合治国方略的正确性和重要性     

论公法与德、英"法治国"思想传统

文章从政治哲学和法哲学的理论背景中确立公法与“法治国”的关系,指出公法在德国“法治国”和英国“普通法法治国”中所处的不同位置和作用。德国的法治国是一种以立法理性为基础的治理,而英国的法治国是一种司法理性形态的治理。考虑到中国的实际情况,我们很难撇开康德的“法治国家论”和黑格尔的“伦理国家论”理论谱系来进行公法问题的研究。     

继承与升华:习近平治国理政思想与中国传统文化

习近平总书记治国理政思想滋生于中国传统文化肥沃土壤之中。习近平从传统文化中、从中国古代治国理政的智慧中寻求有益的启发,在新的历史条件下,继承和升华传统文化、传统治国智慧,构建了当代中国共产党人的治国安邦之道。     

"以德治国"的涵载与升华

“以德治国”作为一种治国方式,是对传统的治国方式在新时期、新的形势下的一种创新和升华,它将其三种涵载体,即传统习惯、内心信念、社会舆论,赋予了新的内涵和新的基本环节:1.加强与“依法治国”方式的结合,增强社会舆论的强制力;2.加强实际的宣传教育,坚定人们与新时期相适应的正确的内心信念;3.冲破传统的治国方式,创立新的具体的德治环节,产生新的“传统习惯”力量。     

论“道治”政治哲学

“道治”是与“礼治”、“法治”相对的范畴,是对道家政治哲学的新概括,它揭示了道家思想的政治哲学性质。“道法自然”是“道治”政治哲学的核心,代表着中国古代的自由理念,也是中国古代民主观念的萌芽;“清静自治”是“道治”政治哲学的特征,无为和自治是其内在机制,“依道治国”和“以道治国”是其两种形态,二者之间体现为体与用、“道”与“术”的关系。     

《论语》的为政之道

本文梳理《论语》为政之道,指出"政者正也"是为政的核心理念;正己正人,德风德草是为政的首要前提;民无信不立是为政的基本原则;德礼为主,政刑为辅是为政的总体构架;王道政治是为政的理想模式,天下大同是为政的最高理想。今天应该重视儒家治道经验和教训的总结和整理,重建德治、礼治、法治三元和合的治国模式,推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化。     

论韩非对商鞅重刑思想的发展

商鞅在性恶论的基础上,第一个提出“禁奸止过,莫若重刑”的重刑论,韩非是中国法家思想的集大成者,他继承和发展了商鞅的重刑思想,进而强调“求过不求善”,严刑重罚。这一思想得到了秦始皇的重用,成为了秦代最重要的治国手段。但到秦汉以后,随着封建正统法律思想——儒家法律思想的确立,重刑思想逐步被儒家的“德主刑辅”所取代,但其并没有完全退出历史舞台,而是和儒家思想最终形成了儒法合流,从而影响了中国封建社会历代王朝的治国思想。     

“Social” “capital”?

This paper analyses several concepts of social capital to show what meanings have been constructed around the phrase, “social capital.” By looking at the roots of “social” and capital,” it demonstrates that the use of the phrase “social capital” is an inappropriate one. The phrase does not fit the phenomenon it tries to explain. Ideological roots of “capital” suggest that it is individualistic, that despite multiplication it tends to accumulate and concentrate often through exploitative means, and that it follows paths of gender and class discrimination. On the other hand, the phenomenon, which the phrase social capital captures, does not tend towards the individualistic, but to the social. It multiplies and spreads to families, communities, and groups. It also does not concentrate or accumulate like capital. By analyzing such contradictions in the phrase, the paper explores appropriate alternatives and suggests implications for policy and practice.     

‘‘With the greatest respect and fidelity:’ a Cherokee vision of the ‘Trust’ doctrine”

The trust relationship is the conceptual/philosophical framework against which all relations between the federal government and indigenous groups are conducted. Yet despite the centrality of this concept, federal policymakers have no consistent or agreed upon definition of what the trust relationship actually entails (Wilkins, 1997). And, more importantly, indigenous conceptions of trust have rarely been assessed. This article analyzes and advances one tribe's—the Cherokee—perspective on trust. In focusing on how the Cherokee perceive trust, this section emphasizes that from an indigenous viewpoint the trust relationship embodies a complex and sophisticated understanding that both the tribe and the United States have reciprocal responsibilities to maintain positive relations towards one another. The leaders of the Cherokee people—one of the more diverse indigenous groups— understood in the federal government's actions, whether these were expressed in treaties, policy statements, congressional laws, or court decisions, that the federal government was pledged to protect Cherokee property and sovereignty, would act with utmost integrity in its legal and political dealings with the people, and would insure that the United States political and judicial representatives would act in a moral manner regarding the tribe's rights. Notwithstanding the federal government's tremendous variety of treaty and trust violations, the Cherokee conception of trust is regenerative from generation to generation. This breathes new life into a seasoned concept and offers hope for the often difficult political/legal relations between the federal, state, and tribal governments. And here we beg leave to ask of our father that, in future transactions of a public nature between the United States and our nation, the American Government will not require of our nation any thing which, as our protectors and guardians, they will not, after due deliberation, advise us to comply with; and having no doubt of the magnanimity and benignity of the Government, we shall return home satisfied, and report to our nation the result of our mission to this. With the greatest respect and fidelity, we subscribe our names (Going Snake, et al., 1817, p. 147)     

‘Techniques’ for governance

Issues relating to governance are among the most critical in terms of sustaining viable political and social arrangements. In terms of democracies and their bureaucratic organizations, understanding how governing works leads to improved understandings of how to government best. In this article, the works of three important political thinkers, Alexis de Tocqueville, Max Weber and Michel Foucault are synthesized to create a tool for analyzing the effects of certain techniques used to govern. In particular, aspects of the techniques known as Zero Based Budgeting and the GPRA of 1993 are subjects of analysis.     

“官场+市场”与中国增长故事

本文运用和拓展了“官场+市场”理论,重新解析中国独具特色的经济增长机制以及政府与市场的互动模式。地方官员之间围绕着辖区经济发展的官场竞争嵌入在不同辖区企业之间的市场竞争之中,而辖区企业参与的市场竞争又嵌入在官场竞争之中。作为一种分析框架,“官场+市场”的理论贡献在于揭示了政府与市场的良性互动、政企的有效合作必备的三个条件,即内部的政治激励（“把事做对”）、外部的市场约束（“防止做坏事”）和必要的信息反馈（“做对的事”）。中国“官场+市场”的增长模式在总体上提供了这三个关键条件,在最积极的意义上实现了辖区内政治企业家与民间企业家精神的结合,政治精英与经济精英的结合,中国历史悠久的官僚政治传统与西方国家市场经济传统的结合,为我们揭示中国增长之谜开辟了新的视角。     

"VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN" REVISITED

A reanalysis of the child abuse data collected by David Gil in his study Violence Against Children indicates a strong role for child related variables in predicting abuse severity. Of particular importance is the child's age, with younger children experiencing more severe abuse. The data further suggests that the abuse of adolescents may be caused by different factors than those affecting the abuse of young children. This analysis may be of use to practitioners in helping them to identify abusive situations involving the greatest risk for severe physical injury to children.     

现代生命的“社会化”图景

齐美尔在与康德的对话中提出“社会何以可能”的问题,将社会学确立为对社会化形式的研究,探究现代个体如何与周遭世界产生联系并由此构建自我。齐美尔通过对比古今社会化形式,进而得出对现代生命内在困境的基本洞察。面对现代世界的外在化和碎片化的生活感受,他并未完全采取康德的思路--用认知的方式构建统一的世界来解决主客体冲突,而是参照歌德的生命观,提出一种介于康德与歌德之间的生命学说,使个体能从自身生命的根基生长出与世界的深刻关联,在生命直观之中达成自我与外在世界的和解。