A survey and evaluation of methods for determination of combinatorial equivalence of factorial designs

Equivalent factorial designs have identical statistical properties for estimation of factorial contrasts and for model fitting. Non-equivalent designs, however, may have the same statistical properties under one particular model but different properties under a different model. In this paper, we describe known methods for the determination of equivalence or non-equivalence of two-level factorial designs, whether they be regular factorial designs, non-regular orthogonal arrays, or have no particular structure. In addition, we evaluate a number of potential fast screening methods for detecting non-equivalence of designs. Although the paper concentrates mainly on symmetric designs with factors at two levels, we also evaluate methods of determining combinatorial equivalence and non-equivalence of three-level designs and indicate extensions to larger numbers of levels and to asymmetric designs.     

Indicator function and complex coding for mixed fractional factorial designs

In a general fractional factorial design, the n levels of a factor are coded by the nth roots of the unity. This device allows a full generalization to mixed-level designs of the theory of the polynomial indicator function which has already been introduced for two-level designs in a joint paper with Fontana. The properties of orthogonal arrays and regular fractions are discussed.     

Simultaneous confidence intervals in the analysis of orthogonal saturated designs

We present the first known method of constructing exact simultaneous confidence intervals for the analysis of orthogonal, saturated factorial designs. Given m independent, normally distributed, unbiased estimators of treatment contrasts, if there is an independent chi-squared estimator of error variance, then simultaneous confidence intervals based on the Studentized maximum modulus distribution are exact under all parameter configurations. In this paper, an analogous method is developed for the case of an orthogonal saturated design, for which the treatment contrasts are independently estimable but there is no independent estimator of error variance. Lacking an independent estimator of the error variance, the smallest sums of squares of effect estimators are pooled. The simultaneous confidence intervals are based on a probability inequality, for which the simultaneous confidence coefficient is achieved in the null case.     

Orthogonal three-level parallel flats designs for user-specified resolution

Orthogonal factorial and fractional factorial designs are very popular in many experimental studies, particularly the two-level and three-level designs used in screening experiments. When an experimenter is able to specify the set of possibly nonnegligible factorial effects, it is sometimes possible to obtain an orthogonal design belonging to the class of parallel flats designs, that has a smaller run-size than a suitable design from the class of classical fractional factorial designs belonging to the class of single flat designs. Sri-vastava and Li (1996) proved a fundamental theorem of orthogonal s-level, s being a prime, designs of parallel flats type for the user-specified resolution. They also tabulated a series of orthogonal designs for the two-level case. No orthogonal designs for three-level case are available in their paper. In this paper, we present a simple proof for the theorem given in Srivastava and Li (1996) for the three-level case. We also give a dual form of the theorem, which is more useful for developing an algorithm for construction of orthogonal designs. Some classes of three-level orthogonal designs with practical run-size are given in the paper.     

On the equivalence of definitions for regular fractions of mixed-level factorial designs

The notion of regularity for fractional factorial designs was originally defined only for two-level factorial designs. Recently, rather different definitions for regular fractions of mixed-level factorial designs have been proposed by Collombier [1996. Plans d’Expérience Factoriels. Springer, Berlin], Wu and Hamada [2000. Experiments. Wiley, New York] and Pistone and Rogantin [2008. Indicator function and complex coding for mixed fractional factorial designs. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 138, 787–802]. In this paper we prove that, surprisingly, these definitions are equivalent. The proof of equivalence relies heavily on the character theory of finite Abelian groups. The group-theoretic framework provides a unified approach to deal with mixed-level factorial designs and treat symmetric factorial designs as a special case. We show how within this framework each regular fraction is uniquely characterized by a defining relation as for two-level factorial designs. The framework also allows us to extend the result that every regular fraction is an orthogonal array of a strength that is related to its resolution, as stated in Dey and Mukerjee [1999. Fractional Factorial Plans. Wiley, New York] to mixed-level factorial designs.     

On equivalence of fractional factorial designs based on singular value decomposition

The singular value decomposition of a real matrix always exists and is essentially unique. Based on the singular value decomposition of the design matrices of two general 2-level fractional factorial designs, new necessary and sufficient conditions for the determination of combinatorial equivalence or non-equivalence of the corresponding designs are derived. Equivalent fractional factorial designs have identical statistical properties for estimation of factorial contrasts and for model fitting. Non-equivalent designs, however, may have the same statistical properties under one particular model but different properties under a different model. Results extend to designs with factors at larger number of levels.     

Partially replicated two-level fractional factorial designs via semifoldover

Most fractional factorial designs have no replicated points and thus do not provide a reliable estimate for experimental error. The objective of this paper is to study the issue of partially replicated two-level fractional factorial (FF) designs, thereby allowing for the unbiased estimation of the experimental error while maintaining the orthogonality of the main effects. Through the tool of indicator function and the idea of semifoldover, we propose two simple and effective techniques to produce designs with partially replicated points in general two-level FF designs, whether they are regular or not. The related properties of constructed partially replicated designs are investigated. Our results indicate that partially replicated FF are competitive in practice.     

(M,S)-optimality in selecting factorial designs

Use of the (M,S) criterion to select and classify factorial designs is proposed and studied. The criterion is easy to deal with computationally and it is independent of the choice of treatment contrasts. It can be applied to two-level designs as well as multi-level symmetrical and asymmetrical designs. An important connection between the (M,S) and minimum aberration criteria is derived for regular fractional factorial designs. Relations between the (M,S) criterion and generalized minimum aberration criteria on nonregular designs are also discussed. The (M,S) criterion is then applied to study the projective properties of some nonregular designs.     

Using orthogonal array for constructing three-level search designs

We consider the problem of constructing search designs for 3^m factorial designs. By using projection properties of some three-level orthogonal arrays, some search designs are obtained for 3 ? m ? 11. The new obtained orthogonal search designs are capable of searching and identifying up to four two-factor interactions and estimating them along with the general mean and main effects. The resulted designs have very high searching probabilities; it means that besides the well-known orthogonal structure, they have high ability in searching the true effects.     

De-aliasing effects using semifoldover techniques

Semifoldover designs, obtained by semifolding a regular two-level factorial design, have been discussed recently in the literature. In this article, with the use of indicator functions, we investigate various semifoldover designs that are obtained from a general two-level factorial design. We discuss when a main factor or a two-factor interaction can be de-aliased from their aliased two-factor interactions, and extend some of the existing results from regular designs to non-regular designs. Finally, we present some examples to illustrate the results developed here.     

Factorial-balance and the analysis of designs with factorial structure

Cotter, John and Smith (1973) have given conditions for an incomplete block design to have orthogonal factorial structure. Further results on the intra-block analysis of such designs are given. The concept of balance in factorial design is discussed and results are given which enable the degree of balance in generalised cyclic designs to be determined.     

Defining equations for two-level factorial designs

Defining equations are introduced in the context of two-level factorial designs and they are shown to provide a concise specification of both regular and nonregular designs. The equations are used to find orthogonal arrays of high strength and some optimal designs. The latter optimal designs are formed in a new way by augmenting notional orthogonal arrays which are allowed to have some runs with a negative number of replicates before augmentation. Defining equations are also shown to be useful when the factorial design is blocked.     

Two-level Orthogonal and Saturated Designs for Estimating Main Effects and Certain Important Interactions

In a two-level factorial experiment, we consider orthogonal designs that allow joint estimation of the grand mean, all main effects, and certain classes of two-level interactions, assuming that the remaining effects are all negligible. Based on a judicious allocation of the factorial effects of interest to the columns of a Hadamard matrix, we propose some general classes of orthogonal and saturated designs which include some existing orthogonal main-effect plans of asymmetric factorials as special cases.     

Some results on two-level factorial designs with dependent observations

There are many situations in which observations in factorial experiments may be dependent. When this is so, run orders are needed that result in efficient estimates of contrasts. The Cheng and Steinberg reverse foldover algorithm, which gives a maximal number of level changes, is known to produce very efficient main-effects two-level designs using the D-criterion, but less is known about other designs, models and criteria. We present some further theoretical results, and give another statistic of importance in predicting efficiency under strong dependence. The theory is illustrated using some 16-run designs.     

Fractional Factorial Designs for the Detection of Interactions between Design and Noise Factors

In industrial experiments on both design (control) factors and noise factors aimed at improving the quality of manufactured products, designs are needed which afford independent estimation of all design×noise interactions in as few runs as possible, while allowing aliasing between those factorial effects of less interest. An algorithm for generating orthogonal fractional factorial designs of this type is described for factors at two levels. The generated designs are appropriate for experimenting on individual factors or for experimentation involving group screening of factors.     

The analysis of unreplicated factorial experiments from a geometric perspective

The author investigates the analysis of unreplicated factorial experiments from a geometric perspective. He considers more specifically a (k + 1)‐run experiment used to estimate k orthogonal contrasts. He observes that once centered and scaled to unit length, the response vector can be viewed as a point on the unit sphere in the vector space spanned by the contrasts. In this context, a model selection procedure is equivalent to a partition of the unit sphere into regions corresponding to the different models considered. The author exploits this approach to gain useful insights into the analysis of such experiments.     

Generalization and efficient computation of the box-meyer analysis for orthogonal designs

Box and Meyer (1986) [1] proposed a Bayesian analysis for saturated orthogonal dedigns, based on the widely-used method of examining normal plots of effects estimates. Stephenson, Hulting, and Moore (1989) [5] give an algorithm for computing this analysis, but it can be quite slow for even 2⁵ designs. In this paper we extend the technique to cover all orthogonal factorial designs, rather than just saturated ones, and we show how the computational algorithm can be greatly improved, both in terms of accuracy and speed. With these extensions and improvements the Box-Meyer method becomes viable as a technique for interactive analysis of any orthogonal factorial design, not just small, saturated ones.     

AN ALGORITHM FOR THE DESIGN OF 2? FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS ON CONTINUOUS PROCESSES

Saunders & Eccleston (1992) presented an approach to the design of 2-level factorial experiments for continuous processes. It determined sets of contrasts between the observations that could be well estimated, and then selected a design so that those contrasts estimated the parameters of interest. This paper shows that a well-estimated contrast must have a large number of changes of sign or level, and also be ‘paired’ in a particular sense. It develops an algorithm which constructs designs that must have a large number of changes of sign, evenly spread among the contrasts and optimal or near optimal. When such designs exist they are often preferable to those produced by the reverse foldover algorithm of Cheng & Steinberg (1991).     

Irregular Four-level Response Surface Designs

Four-level response surface designs based on regular two-level fractional factorial designs were introduced by Edmondson (1991). Here, the methods are extended to include designs based on irregular two-level fractional factorials. These designs allow orthogonal blocking and require fewer experimental units than the regular designs.     

Constructing non-regular robust parameter designs

In recent years there has been considerable attention paid to robust parameter design as a strategy for variance reduction. Of particular concern is the selection of a good experimental plan in light of the two different types of factors in the experiment (control and noise) and the asymmetric manner in which effects of the same order are treated. Recent work has focussed on the selection of regular fractional factorial designs in this setting. In this article, we consider the construction and selection of optimal non-regular experiment plans for robust parameter design. Our approach defines the word-length pattern for non-regular fractional factorial designs with two different types of factors which allows for the choice of optimal design to emphasize the estimation of the effects of interest. We use this new word-length pattern to rank non-regular robust parameter designs. We show that one can easily find minimum aberration robust parameter designs from existing orthogonal arrays. The methodology is demonstrated by finding optimal assignments for control and noise factors for 12, 16 and 20-run orthogonal arrays.