Simultaneous selection and estimation in general linear models

The problem of selecting the largest treatment parameter, and simultaneously estimating the selected treatment parameter, in a general linear model is considered in the decision theoretic Bayes approach. Both cases, where the error variance is known or unknown, are included. Bayes decision rules are derived for noninformative priors and for normal priors. The problem of finding Bayes designs, i.e. designs that have minimum Bayes risk, within a given class of designs is also discussed.     

Bayesian multivariate normal analysis under the extended reflected normal loss function

This paper considers the Bayesian analysis of the multivariate normal distribution under a new and bounded loss function, based on a reflection of the multivariate normal density function. The Bayes estimators of the mean vector can be derived for an arbitrary prior distribution of [d]. When the covariance matrix has an inverted Wishart prior density, a Bayes estimator of[d] is obtained under a bounded loss function, based on the entropy loss. Finally the admissibility of all linear estimators c[d]+ d for the mean vector is considered     

On the problem of selecting good populations

The problem of selecting good populations out of k normal populations is considered in a Bayesian framework under exchangeable normal priors and additive loss functions. Some basic approximations to the Bayes rules are discussed. These approximations suggest that some well-known classical rules are "approximate" Bayes rules. Especially, it is shown that Gupta-type rules are extended Bayes with respect to a family of the exchangeable normal priors for any bounded and additive loss function. Furthermore, for a simple loss function, the results of a Monte Carlo comparison of Gupta-type rules and Seal-type rules are presented. They indicate that, in general, Gupta-type rules perform better than Seal-type rules     

On Bayes Linear Unbiased Estimator Under the Balanced Loss Function

In this paper, the Bayes linear unbiased estimator (Bayes LUE) is derived under the balanced loss function. Moreover, the superiority of Bayes LUE over ordinary least square estimator is studied under the mean square error matrix criterion and Pitman closeness criterion. Furthermore, we compare Bayes LUE under the balanced loss function with Bayes LUE under the quadratic loss function.     

The Bayes rule of the variance parameter of the hierarchical normal and inverse gamma model under Stein's loss

For the variance parameter of the hierarchical normal and inverse gamma model, we analytically calculate the Bayes rule (estimator) with respect to a prior distribution IG (alpha, beta) under Stein's loss function. This estimator minimizes the posterior expected Stein's loss (PESL). We also analytically calculate the Bayes rule and the PESL under the squared error loss. Finally, the numerical simulations exemplify that the PESLs depend only on alpha and the number of observations. The Bayes rules and PESLs under Stein's loss are unanimously smaller than those under the squared error loss.     

Robustness of Bayes Prediction Under Error-in-Variables Superpopulation Model

In this article, we consider Bayes prediction in a finite population under the simple location error-in-variables superpopulation model. Bayes predictor of the finite population mean under Zellner's balanced loss function and the corresponding relative losses and relative savings loss are derived. The prior distribution of the unknown location parameter of the model is assumed to have a non-normal distribution belonging to the class of Edgeworth series distributions. Effects of non normality of the “true” prior distribution and that of a possible misspecification of the loss function on the Bayes predictor are illustrated for a hypothetical population.     

Bayes prediction of Poisson regression superpopulation mean with a non gamma prior

We consider Khamis' (1960) Laguerre expansion with gamma weight function as a class of “near-gamma” priors (K-prior) to obtain the Bayes predictor of a finite population mean under the Poisson regression superpopulation model using Zellner's balanced loss function (BLF). Kullback–Leibler (K-L) distance between gamma and some K-priors is tabulated to examine the quantitative prior robustness. Some numerical investigations are also conducted to illustrate the effects of a change in skewness and/or kurtosis on the Bayes predictor and the corresponding minimal Bayes predictive expected loss (MBPEL). Loss robustness with respect to the class of BLFs is also examined in terms of relative savings loss (RSL).     

Nonparametric bayes estimates of estimable parameters with a dirichlet invarant process and inveriant u-statistics

Tne Bayes estimates of estimable parameters of arbitrary degree in the one sample case are obtained against a Dirichlet invariant. process prior and the squared error loss. We also oive the limits of Bayes estimates, which are related to the in- a- variant U-statistics. For a fixed distribution, the limits of Bayes estimates have the asymptotic normal distribution under certain conditjons.     

Bayes Prediction for a Stratified Regression Superpopulation Model Using Balanced Loss Function

We consider the stratified regression superpopulation model and obtain Bayes predictor of the finite population mean under Zellner's two-criterion balanced loss function (BLF). BLF predictor simplifies to a linear combination of the sample and predictive means. Furthermore, it reduces to some of the well-known classical and Bayes predictors. Relative losses and relative savings loss are obtained to investigate loss robustness of the BLF predictor. It is found to perform better than the usual sample mean as well as the predictive mean in the minimal Bayes predictive expected loss sense.     

Bayes Prediction for a Heteroscedastic Regression Superpopulation Model Using Balanced Loss Function

We consider Prais–Houthakker heteroscedastic normal regression model having variance of the dependent variable same as square of its expectation. Bayes predictors for the regression coefficient and the mean of a finite population are derived using Zellner's balanced loss function. Bayes predictive expected losses are obtained and compared with those of classical predictors and Bayes predictors under squared error loss function to examine their loss robustness.     

Bayes and robust Bayes predictions in a subfamily of scale parameters under a precautionary loss function

ABSTRACT

This paper deals with Bayes, robust Bayes, and minimax predictions in a subfamily of scale parameters under an asymmetric precautionary loss function. In Bayesian statistical inference, the goal is to obtain optimal rules under a specified loss function and an explicit prior distribution over the parameter space. However, in practice, we are not able to specify the prior totally or when a problem must be solved by two statisticians, they may agree on the choice of the prior but not the values of the hyperparameters. A common approach to the prior uncertainty in Bayesian analysis is to choose a class of prior distributions and compute some functional quantity. This is known as Robust Bayesian analysis which provides a way to consider the prior knowledge in terms of a class of priors Γ for global prevention against bad choices of hyperparameters. Under a scale invariant precautionary loss function, we deal with robust Bayes predictions of Y based on X. We carried out a simulation study and a real data analysis to illustrate the practical utility of the prediction procedure.     

On estimation and testing arising from order restricted balanced mixed model

The randomized complete block design is one of the most widely used experimental designs to systematically control the variability arising from known nuisance sources. The balanced mixed effects model is usually appropriate for such an experiment when the blocks used in the experiment are randomly chosen. In applications with k increasing or decreasing treatment levels, there is sometimes prior knowledge about the ordering of the treatment effects. The most commonly seen orderings include simple ordering, simple tree ordering and umbrella orderings with known or unknown peaks. A natural question is how to incorporate the prior ordering information in estimating the parameters in a balanced mixed effects model so that the estimated treatment effects are consistent with the prior information and the estimated variances of the block effects and experiment errors are nonnegative. In this paper we derive the maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters in a balanced mixed model subject to any partial ordering of the treatment effects, which includes the usual maximum likelihood estimators as a special case. An example is provided to illustrate the results.     

Pitman closeness for hierarchical bayes predictors in mixed linear models

The present article considers the Pitman Closeness (PC) criterion of certain hierarchical Bayes (HB) predictors derived under a normal mixed linear models for known ratios of variance components using a uniform prior for the vector of fixed effects and some proper or improper prior on the error variance. For a generalized Euclidean error, simultaneous HB predictors of several linear combinations of vector of effects are shown to be the Pitman-closest in the frequentist sense in the class of equivariant predictors for location group of transformations. The normality assumption can be relaxed to show that these HB predictors are the Pitman-closest for location-scale group of transformations for a wider family of elliptically symmetric distributions. Also for this family, the HB predictors turn out to be Pitman-closest in the class of all linear unbiased predictors (LUPs). All these results are extended for the HB predictor of finite population mean vector in the context of finite population sampling.     

Bayes Predictor of One-Parameter Exponential Family Type Population Mean Under Balanced Loss Function

We obtain a Bayes predictor and a Bayes prediction risk of the mean of a finite population relative to the balanced loss function. The predictive expected losses associated with classical and standard Bayes predictors are derived and compared with that of a Bayes predictor under a balanced loss function. Specific expressions for a regular exponential family distributed superpopulation are presented and illustrated for some well-known superpopulations.     

Bayes and empirical bayes estimation of the probability that z > x + y

Let X, Y and Z be independent random variables with common unknown distribution F. Using the Dirichlet process prior for F and squared erro loss function, the Bayes and empirical Bayes estimators of the parameters λ(F). the probability that Z > X + Y, are derived. The limiting Bayes estimator of λ(F) under some conditions on the parameter of the process is shown to be asymptotically normal. The aysmptotic optimality of the empirical Bayes estimator of λ(F) is established. When X, Y and Z have support on the positive real line, these results are derived for randomly right censored data. This problem relates to testing whether than used discussed by Hollander and Proshcan (1972) and Chen, Hollander and Langberg (1983).     

Empirical Bayes sequential estimation of a finite population mean

In this article, we consider the Bayes and empirical Bayes problem of the current population mean of a finite population when the sample data is available from other similar (m-1) finite populations. We investigate a general class of linear estimators and obtain the optimal linear Bayes estimator of the finite population mean under a squared error loss function that considered the cost of sampling. The optimal linear Bayes estimator and the sample size are obtained as a function of the parameters of the prior distribution. The corresponding empirical Bayes estimates are obtained by replacing the unknown hyperparameters with their respective consistent estimates. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed empirical Bayes procedure.     

Lower bounds on Bayes risks for estimating a normal variance: With applications

Brown and Gajek (1990) gave useful lower bounds on Bayes risks, which improve on earlier bounds by various authors. Many of these use the information inequality. For estimating a normal variance using the invariant quadratic loss and any arbitrary prior on the reciprocal of the variance that is a mixture of Gamma distributions, we obtain lower bounds on Bayes risks that are different from Borovkov-Sakhanienko bounds. The main tool is convexity of appropriate functionals as opposed to the information inequality. The bounds are then applied to many specific examples, including the multi-Bayesian setup (Zidek and his coauthors). Subsequent use of moment theory and geometry gives a number of new results on efficiency of estimates which are linear in the sufficient statistic. These results complement earlier results of Donoho, Liu and MacGibbon (1990), Johnstone and MacGibbon (1992) and Vidakovic and DasGupta (1994) for the location case.     

Robustness of designed experiments against missing data

This paper investigates the robustness of designed experiments for estimating linear functions of a subset of parameters in a general linear model against the loss of any t( ≥1) observations. Necessary and sufficient conditions for robustness of a design under a homoscedastic model are derived. It is shown that a design robust under a homoscedastic model is also robust under a general heteroscedastic model with correlated observations. As a particular case, necessary and sufficient conditions are obtained for the robustness of block designs against the loss of data. Simple sufficient conditions are also provided for the binary block designs to be robust against the loss of data. Some classes of designs, robust up to three missing observations, are identified. A-efficiency of the residual design is evaluated for certain block designs for several patterns of two missing observations. The efficiency of the residual design has also been worked out when all the observations in any two blocks, not necessarily disjoint, are lost. The lower bound to A-efficiency has also been obtained for the loss of t observations. Finally, a general expression is obtained for the efficiency of the residual design when all the observations of m ( ≥1) disjoint blocks are lost.     

Simultaneous estimation of the hardy-weinberg proportions

We consider the problem of simultaneously estimating k + 1 related proportions, with a special emphasis on the estimation of Hardy-Weinberg (HW) proportions. We prove that the uniformly minimum-variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of two proportions which are individually admissible under squared-error loss are inadmissible in estimating the proportions jointly. Furthermore, rules that dominate the UMVUE are given. A Bayesian analysis is then presented to provide insight into this inadmissibility issue: The UMVUE is undesirable because the two estimators are Bayes rules corresponding to different priors. It is also shown that there does not exist a prior which yields the maximum-likelihood estimators simultaneously. When the risks of several estimators for the HW proportions are compared, it is seen that some Bayesian estimates yield significantly smaller risks over a large portion of the parameter space for small samples. However, the differences in risks become less significant as the sample size gets larger.     

Nonproper variance balanced designs and optimality

This communication deals with the construction and optimality of non-proper (unequal block sized) variance balanced (VB) designs obtainable under linear homoscedastic normal model. Several methods of construction of non-proper VB designs have been given. Some constructed designs are universally optimal non-proper variance balanced designs.