Simultaneous confidence sets and confidence intervals for multiple ratios

This paper deals with the problem of simultaneously estimating multiple ratios. In the simplest case of only one ratio parameter, Fieller's theorem (J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 16 (1954) 175) provides a confidence interval for the single ratio. For multiple ratios, there is no method available to construct simultaneous confidence intervals that exactly satisfy a given familywise confidence level. Many of the methods in use are conservative since they are based on probability inequalities. In this paper, first we consider exact simultaneous confidence sets based on the multivariate t-distribution. Two approaches of determining the exact simultaneous confidence sets are outlined. Second, approximate simultaneous confidence intervals based on the multivariate t-distribution with estimated correlation matrix and a resampling approach are discussed. The methods are applied to ratios of linear combinations of the means in the one-way layout and ratios of parameter combinations in the general linear model. Extensive Monte Carlo simulation is carried out to compare the performance of the various methods with respect to the stability of the estimated critical points and of the coverage probabilities.     

Robustness of confidence intervals for scale parameters based on m-estimators

The robustness of confidence intervals for a scale parameter based on M-esimators is studied, especially in small size samples. The coverage probablity is used as measure of robustness. A theorem for a lower bound of the minimum coverage probability of M-estimators is presented and it is applied in order to examine the behavior of the standard deviation and the median absolute deviation, as interval estimators. This bound can confirm the robustness of any other scale M-estimator in interval estimation. The idea of stretching is used to formulate the family of distributions that are considered as underlying. Critical values for the confidence interval are computed where it is needed, that is for the median absolute deviation in the Normal, Uniform and Cauchy distribution and for the standard deviation in the Uniform and Cauchy distribution. Simulation results have been achieved for the estimation of the coverage probabilities and the critical values.     

Simultaneous pseudo confidence regions for ratios of the discriminant coefficients

We consider simultaneous confidence regions for some hypotheses on ratios of the discriminant coefficients of the linear discriminant function when the population means and common covariance matrix are unknown. This problem, involving hypotheses on ratios, yields the so-called ‘pseudo’ confidence regions valid conditionally in subsets of the parameter space. We obtain the explicit formulae of the regions and give further discussion on the validity of these regions. Illustrations of the pseudo confidence regions are given.     

Simultaneous confidence regions for the parameters of damage processes

In connection with the investigation of the reliability of products it is often necessary to consider the development of damage processes of such products to calculate parameters of reliability. The parameters of the damage process can be estimated by observations at discrete time points. If the limit level of damage is known the parameters of life distributions can be calculated by the estimated values of these parameters.     

Simultaneous confidence intervals in the analysis of orthogonal saturated designs

We present the first known method of constructing exact simultaneous confidence intervals for the analysis of orthogonal, saturated factorial designs. Given m independent, normally distributed, unbiased estimators of treatment contrasts, if there is an independent chi-squared estimator of error variance, then simultaneous confidence intervals based on the Studentized maximum modulus distribution are exact under all parameter configurations. In this paper, an analogous method is developed for the case of an orthogonal saturated design, for which the treatment contrasts are independently estimable but there is no independent estimator of error variance. Lacking an independent estimator of the error variance, the smallest sums of squares of effect estimators are pooled. The simultaneous confidence intervals are based on a probability inequality, for which the simultaneous confidence coefficient is achieved in the null case.     

Improved simultaneous confidence intervals for linear contrasts and regression parameters

A well known method for obtaining conservative simultaneous confidence intervals for the K parameters in a linear regression model, or for K linear contrasts, is based on the percentage points of the Studentized maximum modulus distribution. From an inequality due to Sidak, conservative yet uniformly shorter confidence intervals would be possible if the percentage points of a particular form of the multivariate t distribution were available. The purpose of this paper is to provide the required percentage points. For K<8 the resulting confidence intervals can be substantially shorter.     

Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing several inverse Gaussian means under heteroscedasticity

Recently, Zhang [Simultaneous confidence intervals for several inverse Gaussian populations. Stat Probab Lett. 2014;92:125–131] proposed simultaneous pairwise confidence intervals (SPCIs) based on the fiducial generalized pivotal quantity concept to make inferences about the inverse Gaussian means under heteroscedasticity. In this paper, we propose three new methods for constructing SPCIs to make inferences on the means of several inverse Gaussian distributions when scale parameters and sample sizes are unequal. One of the methods results in a set of classic SPCIs (in the sense that it is not simulation-based inference) and the two others are based on a parametric bootstrap approach. The advantages of our proposed methods over Zhang’s (2014) method are: (i) the simulation results show that the coverage probability of the proposed parametric bootstrap approaches is fairly close to the nominal confidence coefficient while the coverage probability of Zhang’s method is smaller than the nominal confidence coefficient when the number of groups and the variance of groups are large and (ii) the proposed set of classic SPCIs is conservative in contrast to Zhang’s method.     

Simultaneous confidence intervals for one-way layout based on generalized pivotal quantities

In this paper, we consider simultaneous confidence intervals for all-pairwise comparisons of treatment means in a one-way layout under heteroscedasticity. Two kinds of simultaneous intervals are provided based on the fiducial generalized pivotal quantities of the interest parameters. We prove that they both have asymptotically correct coverage. Simulation results and an example are also reported. It is concluded from calculational evidence that the second kind of simultaneous confidence intervals, which we provide, performs better than existing methods.     

Effective procedures for estimating beta distribution's parameters and Their confidence intervals

First, we compare several methods for computing the ML estimators of the two-parameter beta distribution; the most effective one is identified. Second, a simple way is found to characterize the sampling distribution of the ML estimators; this characterization leads to a practical way of establishing confidence intervals for the ML estimators.     

Comparing the overlapping of two independent confidence intervals with a single confidence interval for two normal population parameters

Two overlapping confidence intervals have been used in the past to conduct statistical inferences about two population means and proportions. Several authors have examined the shortcomings of Overlap procedure and have determined that such a method distorts the significance level of testing the null hypothesis of two population means and reduces the statistical power of the test. Nearly all results for small samples in Overlap literature have been obtained either by simulation or by formulas that may need refinement for small sample sizes, but accurate large sample information exists. Nevertheless, there are aspects of Overlap that have not been presented and compared against the standard statistical procedure. This article will present exact formulas for the maximum % overlap of two independent confidence intervals below which the null hypothesis of equality of two normal population means or variances must still be rejected for any sample sizes. Further, the impact of Overlap on the power of testing the null hypothesis of equality of two normal variances will be assessed. Finally, the noncentral t-distribution is used to assess the Overlap impact on type II error probability when testing equality of means for sample sizes larger than 1.     

Simultaneous confidence intervals by iteratively adjusted alpha for relative effects in the one-way layout

A bootstrap based method to construct 1−α simultaneous confidence intervals for relative effects in the one-way layout is presented. This procedure takes the stochastic correlation between the test statistics into account and results in narrower simultaneous confidence intervals than the application of the Bonferroni correction. Instead of using the bootstrap distribution of a maximum statistic, the coverage of the confidence intervals for the individual comparisons are adjusted iteratively until the overall confidence level is reached. Empirical coverage and power estimates of the introduced procedure for many-to-one comparisons are presented and compared with asymptotic procedures based on the multivariate normal distribution.     

Bootstrap confidence intervals for smoothing splines and their comparison to bayesian confidence intervals

We construct bootstrap confidence intervals for smoothing spline estimates based on Gaussian data, and penalized likelihood smoothing spline estimates based on data from .exponential families. Several vari- ations of bootstrap confidence intervals are considered and compared. We find that the commonly used ootstrap percentile intervals are inferior to the T intervals and to intervals based on bootstrap estimation of mean squared errors. The best variations of the bootstrap confidence intervals behave similar to the well known Bayesian confidence intervals. These bootstrap confidence intervals have an average coverage probability across the function being estimated, as opposed to a pointwise property.     

Smoothed empirical likelihood confidence intervals for quantile regression parameters with auxiliary information

This paper develops a smoothed empirical likelihood (SEL)-based method to construct confidence intervals for quantile regression parameters with auxiliary information. First, we define the SEL ratio and show that it follows a Chi-square distribution. We then construct confidence intervals according to this ratio. Finally, Monte Carlo experiments are employed to evaluate the proposed method.     

Simultaneous confidence intervals on partial means of classes in the two-stage stratified sampling

Let’s consider a finite population of P units, each of them assumes a specific amount of the quantitative variable X. Moreover we assume that the range of values of X is subdivided into k classes and the sampling data come out from a two stage stratified sampling. The main purpose of the work is to determine the estimators, as well as their asymptotic distribution, of the partial means of classes, each of them is defined as a non linear function of the other parameters. Particularly, we are interested in determining the linear approximation estimators and, under convergence theorems, the asymptotic distribution. Afterwards we define the estimator of the vector of the partial means of classes and its asymptotic convergence to multivariate normal distribution is determined. These results are useful to develop simultaneous inferential procedures.     

Optimal confidence intervals for the geometric parameter

Abstract

This article discusses optimal confidence estimation for the geometric parameter and shows how different criteria can be used for evaluating confidence sets within the framework of tail functions theory. The confidence interval obtained using a particular tail function is studied and shown to outperform others, in the sense of having smaller width or expected width under a specified weight function. It is also shown that it may not be possible to find the most powerful test regarding the parameter using the Neyman-Pearson lemma. The theory is illustrated by application to a fecundability study.     

Wavelet-based confidence intervals for the self-similarity parameter

We propose and compare several methods of constructing wavelet-based confidence intervals for the self-similarity parameter in heavy-tailed observations. We use empirical coverage probabilities to assess the procedures by applying them to Linear Fractional Stable Motion with many choices of parameters. We find that the asymptotic confidence intervals provide empirical coverage often much lower than nominal. We recommend the use of resampling confidence intervals. We also propose a procedure for monitoring the constancy of the self-similarity parameter and apply it to Ethernet data sets.