Marginally restricted sequential D‐optimal designs

In many experiments, not all explanatory variables can be controlled. When the units arise sequentially, different approaches may be used. The authors study a natural sequential procedure for “marginally restricted” D‐optimal designs. They assume that one set of explanatory variables (x₁) is observed sequentially, and that the experimenter responds by choosing an appropriate value of the explanatory variable x₂. In order to solve the sequential problem a priori, the authors consider the problem of constructing optimal designs with a prior marginal distribution for x₁. This eliminates the influence of units already observed on the next unit to be designed. They give explicit designs for various cases in which the mean response follows a linear regression model; they also consider a case study with a nonlinear logistic response. They find that the optimal strategy often consists of randomizing the assignment of the values of x₂.     

Bayesian and maximin optimal designs for heteroscedastic regression models

The authors consider the problem of constructing standardized maximin D‐optimal designs for weighted polynomial regression models. In particular they show that by following the approach to the construction of maximin designs introduced recently by Dette, Haines & Imhof (2003), such designs can be obtained as weak limits of the corresponding Bayesian _q‐optimal designs. They further demonstrate that the results are more broadly applicable to certain families of nonlinear models. The authors examine two specific weighted polynomial models in some detail and illustrate their results by means of a weighted quadratic regression model and the Bleasdale–Nelder model. They also present a capstone example involving a generalized exponential growth model.     

for misspecified regression models

The authors propose minimax robust designs for regression models whose response function is possibly misspecified. These designs, which minimize the maximum of the mean squared error matrix, can control the bias caused by model misspecification and provide the desired efficiency through one parameter. The authors call on a nonsmooth optimization technique to derive these designs analytically. Their results extend those of Heo, Schmuland & Wiens (2001). The authors also discuss several examples for approximately polynomial regression.     

Information in an observation in robust designs

We consider the Information contained 1n each observation in a given design robust with respect to the estlmability of parameters and against the unavailability of observations. We compare the observations in various 1-, 2- and 3- dimensional designs on the basis of their informations.     

A relaxation procedure for calculating (G–)minimax optimal designs

Summary: In nonlinear statistical models, standard optimality functions for experimental designs depend on the unknown parameters of the model. An appealing and robust concept for choosing a design is the minimax criterion. However, so far, minimax optimal designs have been calculated efficiently under various restrictive conditions only. We extend an iterative relaxation scheme originally proposed by Shimizu and Aiyoshi (1980) and prove its convergence under very general assumptions which cover a variety of situations considered in experimental design. Application to different specific design criteria is discussed and issues of practical implementation are addressed. First numerical results suggest that the method may be very efficient with respect to the number of iterations required.*Supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We are grateful to a referee for his constructive suggestions.     

Restricted minimax robust designs for misspecified regression models

The authors propose and explore new regression designs. Within a particular parametric class, these designs are minimax robust against bias caused by model misspecification while attaining reasonable levels of efficiency as well. The introduction of this restricted class of designs is motivated by a desire to avoid the mathematical and numerical intractability found in the unrestricted minimax theory. Robustness is provided against a family of model departures sufficiently broad that the minimax design measures are necessarily absolutely continuous. Examples of implementation involve approximate polynomial and second order multiple regression.     

Robust estimation and design procedures for the random effects model

The authors discuss two robust estimators for estimating variance components in the random effects model, and they obtain finite‐sample breakdown points for the estimators. Based on the finite‐sample breakdown point, they propose a criterion for selecting robust designs. With robust designs, one can get efficient and reliable estimates for variance components regardless of outliers which may happen in the experiment. The authors give examples to show the performance of robust estimators and to compare robust designs with optimal designs based on the traditional analysis of variance estimation method.     

D-optimal minimax design criterion for two-level fractional factorial designs

A D-optimal minimax design criterion is proposed to construct two-level fractional factorial designs, which can be used to estimate a linear model with main effects and some specified interactions. D-optimal minimax designs are robust against model misspecification and have small biases if the linear model contains more interaction terms. When the D-optimal minimax criterion is compared with the D-optimal design criterion, we find that the D-optimal design criterion is quite robust against model misspecification. Lower and upper bounds derived for the loss functions of optimal designs can be used to estimate the efficiencies of any design and evaluate the effectiveness of a search algorithm. Four algorithms to search for optimal designs for any run size are discussed and compared through several examples. An annealing algorithm and a sequential algorithm are particularly effective to search for optimal designs.     

On minimax designs when there are two candidate models

This work is motivated by the need to find experimental designs which are robust under different model assumptions. We measure robustness by calculating a measure of design efficiency with respect to a design optimality criterion and say that a design is robust if it is reasonably efficient under different model scenarios. We discuss two design criteria and an algorithm which can be used to obtain robust designs. The first criterion employs a Bayesian-type approach by putting a prior or weight on each candidate model and possibly priors on the corresponding model parameters. We define the first criterion as the expected value of the design efficiency over the priors. The second design criterion we study is the minimax design which minimizes the worst value of a design criterion over all candidate models. We establish conditions when these two criteria are equivalent when there are two candidate models. We apply our findings to the area of accelerated life testing and perform sensitivity analysis of designs with respect to priors and misspecification of planning values.     

On Robust and Efficient Designs for Risk Estimation in Epidemiological Studies

Abstract.  We consider the design problem for the estimation of several scalar measures suggested in the epidemiological literature for comparing the success rate in two samples. The designs considered so far in the literature are local in the sense that they depend on the unknown probabilities of success in the two groups and are not necessarily robust with respect to their misspecification. A maximin approach is proposed to obtain efficient and robust designs for the estimation of the relative risk, attributable risk and odds ratio, whenever a range for the success rates can be specified by the experimenter. It is demonstrated that the designs obtained by this method are usually more efficient than the commonly used uniform design, which allocates equal sample sizes to the two groups.     

Partially replicated two‐level fractional factorial designs

In a two‐level factorial experiment, the authors consider designs with partial duplication which permit estimation of the constant term, all main effects and some specified two‐factor interactions, assuming that the other effects are negligible. They construct parallel‐flats designs with two identical parallel flats that meet prior specifications; they also consider classes of 3‐flat and 4‐flat designs. They show that the designs obtained can have a very simple covariance structure and high D‐efficiency. They give an algorithm from which they generate a series of practical designs with run sizes 12, 16, 24, and 32.     

Design and analysis of computer experiments when the output is highly correlated over the input space

To build a predictor, the output of a deterministic computer model or “code” is often treated as a realization of a stochastic process indexed by the code's input variables. The authors consider an asymptotic form of the Gaussian correlation function for the stochastic process where the correlation tends to unity. They show that the limiting best linear unbiased predictor involves Lagrange interpolating polynomials; linear model terms are implicitly included. The authors then develop optimal designs based on minimizing the limiting integrated mean squared error of prediction. They show through several examples that these designs lead to good prediction accuracy.     

Optimal parametric design with applications to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic trials

This paper considers optimal parametric designs, i.e. designs represented by probability measures determined by a set of parameters, for nonlinear models and illustrates their use in designs for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) trials. For some practical problems, such as designs for modelling PK/PD relationship, this is often the only feasible type of design, as the design points follow a PK model and cannot be directly controlled. Even for ordinary design problems the parametric designs have some advantages over the traditional designs, which often have too few design points for model checking and may not be robust to model and parameter misspecifications. We first describe methods and algorithms to construct the parametric design for ordinary nonlinear design problems and show that the parametric designs are robust to parameter misspecification and have good power for model discrimination. Then we extend this design method to construct optimal repeated measurement designs for nonlinear mixed models. We also use this parametric design for modelling a PK/PD relationship and propose a simulation based algorithm. The application of parametric designs is illustrated with a three-parameter open one-compartment PK model for the ordinary design and repeated measurement design, and an Emax model for the phamacokinetic/pharmacodynamic trial design.     

On D-optimal robust second order slope-rotatable designs

Das and Park (2006) introduced slope-rotatable designs overall directions for correlated observations which is known as A-optimal robust slope-rotatable designs. This article focuses D-optimal slope-rotatable designs for second-order response surface model with correlated observations. It has been established that robust second-order rotatable designs are also D-optimal robust slope-rotatable designs. A class of D-optimal robust second-order slope-rotatable designs has been derived for special correlation structures of errors.     

Robust designs for experiments with blocks

ABSTRACT

For experiments running in field plots or over time, the observations are often correlated due to spatial or serial correlation, which leads to correlated errors in a linear model analyzing the treatment means. Without knowing the exact correlation matrix of the errors, it is not possible to compute the generalized least-squares estimator for the treatment means and use it to construct optimal designs for the experiments. In this paper, we propose to use neighborhoods to model the covariance matrix of the errors, and apply a modified generalized least-squares estimator to construct robust designs for experiments with blocks. A minimax design criterion is investigated, and a simulated annealing algorithm is developed to find robust designs. We have derived several theoretical results, and representative examples are presented.     

Robust integer-valued designs for linear random intercept models

This article considers the robust design problem for linear random intercept models with both departures from fixed effects and correlated errors on a finite design space. Two strategies are proposed. One is a worst-case method minimizing the maximum value of the MSE of estimates for the fixed effects over the departure. The other is an average-case method minimizing the average value of the MSE with respect to some priors for the class of departure functions and correlation structures of random errors. Two examples are given to show robust designs for two polynomial models.     

Robust sequential designs for nonlinear regression

The authors introduce the formal notion of an approximately specified nonlinear regression model and investigate sequential design methodologies when the fitted model is possibly of an incorrect parametric form. They present small‐sample simulation studies which indicate that their new designs can be very successful, relative to some common competitors, in reducing mean squared error due to model misspecifi‐cation and to heteroscedastic variation. Their simulations also suggest that standard normal‐theory inference procedures remain approximately valid under the sequential sampling schemes. The methods are illustrated both by simulation and in an example using data from an experiment described in the chemical engineering literature.     

Minimum breakdown designs in blocks of size two

In scientific investigations, there are many situations where each two experimental units have to be grouped into a block of size two. For planning such experiments, the variance-based optimality criteria like A-, D- and E-criterion are typically employed to choose efficient designs, if the estimation efficiency of treatment contrasts is primarily concerned. Alternatively, if there are observations which tend to become lost during the experimental period, the robustness criteria against the unavailability of data should be strongly recommended for selecting the planning scheme. In this study, a new criterion, called minimum breakdown criterion, is proposed to quantify the robustness of designs in blocks of size two. Based on the proposed criterion, a new class of robust designs, called minimum breakdown designs, is defined. When various numbers of blocks are missing, the minimum breakdown designs provide the highest probabilities that all the treatment contrasts are estimable. An exhaustive search procedure is proposed to generate such designs. In addition, two classes of uniformly minimum breakdown designs are theoretically verified.     

Optimal designs for copula models

Copula modelling has in the past decade become a standard tool in many areas of applied statistics. However, a largely neglected aspect concerns the design of related experiments. Particularly the issue of whether the estimation of copula parameters can be enhanced by optimizing experimental conditions and how robust all the parameter estimates for the model are with respect to the type of copula employed. In this paper an equivalence theorem for (bivariate) copula models is provided that allows formulation of efficient design algorithms and quick checks of whether designs are optimal or at least efficient. Some examples illustrate that in practical situations considerable gains in design efficiency can be achieved. A natural comparison between different copula models with respect to design efficiency is provided as well.     

Optimum Designs for Estimation of Parameters in a Quadratic Mixture-Amount Model

The authors propose a mixture-amount model, which is quadratic both in the proportions of mixing components and the amount of mixture. They attempt to find the A- and D-optimal designs for the estimation of the model parameters within a subclass of designs. The optimality of the derived designs in the entire class of competing designs has been investigated through equivalence theorem.