Bias Correction in the Type I Generalized Logistic Distribution

Four strategies for bias correction of the maximum likelihood estimator of the parameters in the Type I generalized logistic distribution are studied. First, we consider an analytic bias-corrected estimator, which is obtained by deriving an analytic expression for the bias to order n ^?1; second, a method based on modifying the likelihood equations; third, we consider the jackknife bias-corrected estimator; and fourth, we consider two bootstrap bias-corrected estimators. All bias correction estimators are compared by simulation. Finally, an example with a real data set is also presented.     

Bias evaluation in the proportional hazards model

We consider two approaches for bias evaluation and reduction in the proportional hazards model proposed by Cox. The first one is an analytical approach in which we derive the n^-1 bias term of the maximum partial likelihood estimator. The second approach consists of resampling methods, namely the jackknife and the bootstrap. We compare all methods through a comprehensive set of Monte Carlo simulations. The results suggest that bias-corrected estimators have better finite-sample performance than the standard maximum partial likelihood estimator. There is some evidence oithe bootstrap-correction superiority over the jackknife-correction but its performance is similar to the analytical estimator. Finaily an application iliustrates the proposed approaches.     

Some Second-Order Asymptotics for Extreme Value Linear Regression Models

ABSTRACT

In this article we derive finite-sample corrections in matrix notation for likelihood ratio and score statistics in extreme-value linear regression models. We consider three corrected score tests that perform better than the usual score test. We also derive general formulae for second-order biases of maximum likelihood estimates of the linear parameters. Some simulations are performed to compare the likelihood ratio and score statistics with their modified versions and to illustrate the bias correction.     

Heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimation:white's estimator and the bootstrap ∗

This paper considers the issue of estimating the covariance matrix of ordinary least squares estimates in a linear regression model when heteroskedasticity is suspected. We perform Monte Carlo simulation on the White estimator, which is commonly used in.

empirical research, and also on some alternatives based on different bootstrapping schemes. Our results reveal that the White estimator can be considerably biased when the sample size is not very large, that bias correction via bootstrap does not work well, and that the weighted bootstrap estimators tend to display smaller biases than the White estimator and its variants, under both homoskedasticity and heteroskedasticity. Our results also reveal that the presence of (potentially) influential observations in the design matrix plays an important role in the finite-sample performance of the heteroskedasticity-consistent estimators.     

Bias-Corrected Estimation in Dynamic Panel Data Models

This study develops a new bias-corrected estimator for the fixed-effects dynamic panel data model and derives its limiting distribution for finite number of time periods, T, and large number of cross-section units, N. The bias-corrected estimator is derived as a bias correction of the least squares dummy variable (within) estimator. It does not share some of the drawbacks of recently developed instrumental variables and generalized method-of-moments estimators and is relatively easy to compute. Monte Carlo experiments provide evidence that the bias-corrected estimator performs well even in small samples. The proposed technique is applied in an empirical analysis of unemployment dynamics at the U.S. state level for the 1991–2000 period.     

Finite-Sample Properties of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator for the Poisson Regression Model With Random Covariates

We examine the small-sample behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator for the Poisson regression model with random covariates. Analytic expressions for the second-order bias and mean squared error are derived, and we undertake some numerical evaluations to illustrate these results for the single covariate case. The properties of the bias-adjusted maximum likelihood estimator are investigated in a Monte Carlo experiment. Correcting the estimator for its second-order bias is found to be effective in the cases considered, and we recommend its use when the Poisson regression model is estimated by maximum likelihood with small samples.     

Improved maximum-likelihood estimation of the shape parameter in the Nakagami distribution

We develop and evaluate analytic and bootstrap bias-corrected maximum-likelihood estimators for the shape parameter in the Nakagami distribution. This distribution is widely used in a variety of disciplines, and the corresponding estimator of its scale parameter is trivially unbiased. We find that both ‘corrective’ and ‘preventive’ analytic approaches to eliminating the bias, to O(n ^?2), are equally, and extremely, effective and simple to implement. As a bonus, the sizeable reduction in bias comes with a small reduction in the mean-squared error. Overall, we prefer analytic bias corrections in the case of this estimator. This preference is based on the relative computational costs and the magnitudes of the bias reductions that can be achieved in each case. Our results are illustrated with two real-data applications, including the one which provides the first application of the Nakagami distribution to data for ocean wave heights.     

Semiparametric multiple kernel estimators and model diagnostics for count regression functions

Abstract

This study concerns semiparametric approaches to estimate discrete multivariate count regression functions. The semiparametric approaches investigated consist of combining discrete multivariate nonparametric kernel and parametric estimations such that (i) a prior knowledge of the conditional distribution of model response may be incorporated and (ii) the bias of the traditional nonparametric kernel regression estimator of Nadaraya-Watson may be reduced. We are precisely interested in combination of the two estimations approaches with some asymptotic properties of the resulting estimators. Asymptotic normality results were showed for nonparametric correction terms of parametric start function of the estimators. The performance of discrete semiparametric multivariate kernel estimators studied is illustrated using simulations and real count data. In addition, diagnostic checks are performed to test the adequacy of the parametric start model to the true discrete regression model. Finally, using discrete semiparametric multivariate kernel estimators provides a bias reduction when the parametric multivariate regression model used as start regression function belongs to a neighborhood of the true regression model.     

IMPROVED SCORE TESTS FOR VON MISES REGRESSION MODELS

We present, in matrix notation, a finite-sample correction formula to improve score tests in von Mises regression models with concentration covariates. The formula only requires simple operations on matrices and can be used to obtain analytically closed-form corrections for score test statistics in a variety of special von Mises models. The paper also provides a numerical comparison of the size of two score test statistics with bootstrap-based critical values.     

Reducing Bias and Mean Squared Error Associated With Regression-Based Odds Ratio Estimators

Ratio estimators of effect are ordinarily obtained by exponentiating maximum-likelihood estimators (MLEs) of log-linear or logistic regression coefficients. These estimators can display marked positive finite-sample bias, however. We propose a simple correction that removes a substantial portion of the bias due to exponentiation. By combining this correction with bias correction on the log scale, we demonstrate that one achieves complete removal of second-order bias in odds ratio estimators in important special cases. We show how this approach extends to address bias in odds or risk ratio estimators in many common regression settings. We also propose a class of estimators that provide reduced mean bias and squared error, while allowing the investigator to control the risk of underestimating the true ratio parameter. We present simulation studies in which the proposed estimators are shown to exhibit considerable reduction in bias, variance, and mean squared error compared to MLEs. Bootstrapping provides further improvement, including narrower confidence intervals without sacrificing coverage.     

On the bias and mean square error of the least square estimator in a regression model with two inequality constraints and multivariate t error terms

We derive and numerically evaluate the bias and mean square error of the inequality constrained least squares estimator in a model with two inequality constraints and multivariate terror terms. Our results suggest that qualitatively, the estimator properties found for models with normal errors carry over to the case of multivariate terrors.     

Improved point estimation for the Kumaraswamy distribution

We develop nearly unbiased estimators for the Kumaraswamy distribution proposed by Kumaraswamy [Generalized probability density-function for double-bounded random-processes, J. Hydrol. 46 (1980), pp. 79–88], which has considerable attention in hydrology and related areas. We derive modified maximum-likelihood estimators that are bias-free to second order. As an alternative to the analytically bias-corrected estimators discussed, we consider a bias correction mechanism based on the parametric bootstrap. We conduct Monte Carlo simulations in order to investigate the performance of the corrected estimators. The numerical results show that the bias correction scheme yields nearly unbiased estimates.     

Bias Reduction for the Maximum Likelihood Estimators of the Parameters in the Half-Logistic Distribution

We derive analytic expressions for the biases of the maximum likelihood estimators of the scale parameter in the half-logistic distribution with known location, and of the location parameter when the latter is unknown. Using these expressions to bias-correct the estimators is highly effective, without adverse consequences for estimation mean squared error. The overall performance of the first of these bias-corrected estimators is slightly better than that of a bootstrap bias-corrected estimator. The bias-corrected estimator of the location parameter significantly out-performs its bootstrapped-based counterpart. Taking computational costs into account, the analytic bias corrections clearly dominate the use of the bootstrap.     

Adaptive wavelet estimation of a function from an m-dependent process with possibly unbounded m

The estimation of a multivariate function from a stationary m-dependent process is investigated, with a special focus on the case where m is large or unbounded. We develop an adaptive estimator based on wavelet methods. Under flexible assumptions on the nonparametric model, we prove the good performances of our estimator by determining sharp rates of convergence under two kinds of errors: the pointwise mean squared error and the mean integrated squared error. We illustrate our theoretical result by considering the multivariate density estimation problem, the derivatives density estimation problem, the density estimation problem in a GARCH-type model and the multivariate regression function estimation problem. The performance of proposed estimator has been shown by a numerical study for a simulated and real data sets.     

Bootstrap methods for bias correction and confidence interval estimation for nonlinear quantile regression of longitudinal data

This paper examines the use of bootstrapping for bias correction and calculation of confidence intervals (CIs) for a weighted nonlinear quantile regression estimator adjusted to the case of longitudinal data. Different weights and types of CIs are used and compared by computer simulation using a logistic growth function and error terms following an AR(1) model. The results indicate that bias correction reduces the bias of a point estimator but fails for CI calculations. A bootstrap percentile method and a normal approximation method perform well for two weights when used without bias correction. Taking both coverage and lengths of CIs into consideration, a non-bias-corrected percentile method with an unweighted estimator performs best.     

Sur un test d'égalité des autocovariances de deux séries chronologiques

We propose a test for the equality of the autocovariance functions of two independent and stationary time series. The test statistic is a quadratic form in the vector of differences of the first J + 1 autocovariances. Its asymptotic distribution is derived under the null hypothesis, and the finite-sample properties of the test, namely the bias and the power, are investigated by Monte Carlo methods. A by-product of this study is a new estimator of the covariance between two sample autocovariances which provides a positive definite covariance matrix. We establish the convergence of this estimator in the L₁ norm.     

Estimation bias and bias correction in reduced rank autoregressions

This paper characterizes the finite-sample bias of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) in a reduced rank vector autoregression and suggests two simulation-based bias corrections. One is a simple bootstrap implementation that approximates the bias at the MLE. The other is an iterative root-finding algorithm implemented using stochastic approximation methods. Both algorithms are shown to be improvements over the MLE, measured in terms of mean square error and mean absolute deviation. An illustration to US macroeconomic time series is given.     

Efficient estimation for incomplete multivariate data

We review the Fisher scoring and EM algorithms for incomplete multivariate data from an estimating function point of view, and examine the corresponding quasi-score functions under second-moment assumptions. A bias-corrected REML-type estimator for the covariance matrix is derived, and the Fisher, Godambe and empirical sandwich information matrices are compared. We make a numerical investigation of the two algorithms, and compare with a hybrid algorithm, where Fisher scoring is used for the mean vector and the EM algorithm for the covariance matrix.     

Finite-sample properties of the maximum likelihood estimator for the binary logit model with random covariates

We examine the finite sample properties of the maximum likelihood estimator for the binary logit model with random covariates. Previous studies have either relied on large-sample asymptotics or have assumed non-random covariates. Analytic expressions for the first-order bias and second-order mean squared error function for the maximum likelihood estimator in this model are derived, and we undertake numerical evaluations to illustrate these analytic results for the single covariate case. For various data distributions, the bias of the estimator is signed the same as the covariate’s coefficient, and both the absolute bias and the mean squared errors increase symmetrically with the absolute value of that parameter. The behaviour of a bias-adjusted maximum likelihood estimator, constructed by subtracting the (maximum likelihood) estimator of the first-order bias from the original estimator, is examined in a Monte Carlo experiment. This bias-correction is effective in all of the cases considered, and is recommended for use when this logit model is estimated by maximum likelihood using small samples.     

Reducing bias in parameter estimates from stepwise regression in proportional hazards regression with right-censored data

When variable selection with stepwise regression and model fitting are conducted on the same data set, competition for inclusion in the model induces a selection bias in coefficient estimators away from zero. In proportional hazards regression with right-censored data, selection bias inflates the absolute value of parameter estimate of selected parameters, while the omission of other variables may shrink coefficients toward zero. This paper explores the extent of the bias in parameter estimates from stepwise proportional hazards regression and proposes a bootstrap method, similar to those proposed by Miller (Subset Selection in Regression, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2002) for linear regression, to correct for selection bias. We also use bootstrap methods to estimate the standard error of the adjusted estimators. Simulation results show that substantial biases could be present in uncorrected stepwise estimators and, for binary covariates, could exceed 250% of the true parameter value. The simulations also show that the conditional mean of the proposed bootstrap bias-corrected parameter estimator, given that a variable is selected, is moved closer to the unconditional mean of the standard partial likelihood estimator in the chosen model, and to the population value of the parameter. We also explore the effect of the adjustment on estimates of log relative risk, given the values of the covariates in a selected model. The proposed method is illustrated with data sets in primary biliary cirrhosis and in multiple myeloma from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.