Efficiency of ranked set sampling in tests for normality

In this article, we consider the ranked set sampling (RSS) and investigate seven tests for normality under RSS. Each test is described and then power of each test is obtained by Monte Carlo simulations under various alternatives. Finally, the powers of the tests based on RSS are compared with the powers of the tests based on the simple random sampling and the results are discussed.     

A new test for multivariate normality by combining extreme and nonextreme BHEP tests

In this article, we propose a new multiple test procedure for assessing multivariate normality, which combines BHEP (Baringhaus–Henze–Epps–Pulley) tests by considering extreme and nonextreme choices of the tuning parameter in the definition of the BHEP test statistic. Monte Carlo power comparisons indicate that the new test presents a reasonable power against a wide range of alternative distributions, showing itself to be competitive against the most recommended procedures for testing a multivariate hypothesis of normality. We further illustrate the use of the new test for the Fisher Iris dataset.     

A re-appraisal of tests for normality

Tests for normality can be divided into two groups - those based upon a function of the empirical distribution function and those based upon a function of the original observations. The latter group of statistics test spherical symmetry and not necessarily normality. If the distribution is completely specified then the first group can be used to test for ‘spherical’ normality. However, if the distribution is incompletely specified and F‘‘x_i - x’/s’ is used these test statistics also test sphericity rather than normality. A Monte Carlo study was conducted for the completely specified case, to investigate the sensitivity of the distance tests to departures from normality when the alternative distributions are non-normal spherically symmetric laws. A “new” test statistic is proposed for testing a completely specified normal distribution     

Normality testing: two new tests using L-moments

Establishing that there is no compelling evidence that some population is not normally distributed is fundamental to many statistical inferences, and numerous approaches to testing the null hypothesis of normality have been proposed. Fundamentally, the power of a test depends on which specific deviation from normality may be presented in a distribution. Knowledge of the potential nature of deviation from normality should reasonably guide the researcher's selection of testing for non-normality. In most settings, little is known aside from the data available for analysis, so that selection of a test based on general applicability is typically necessary. This research proposes and reports the power of two new tests of normality. One of the new tests is a version of the R-test that uses the L-moments, respectively, L-skewness and L-kurtosis and the other test is based on normalizing transformations of L-skewness and L-kurtosis. Both tests have high power relative to alternatives. The test based on normalized transformations, in particular, shows consistently high power and outperforms other normality tests against a variety of distributions.     

A MATLAB package for multivariate normality test

A MATLAB package testing for multivariate normality (TMVN) is implemented as an interactive and graphical tool to examine multivariate normality (MVN). Monte Carlo simulation studies have failed to find a uniformly most powerful MVN test, which requires a rather extensive statistical inference procedure. TMVN contains several competitive MVN tests and provides a flexible and extensive testing environment for univariate or multivariate data analyses. Simulated results provide information of which test may possess more power for the selected non-MVN alternatives. Fisher's Iris data are used to show how TMVN can be used in practice.     

Empirical behavior of some tests for normality

The behavior of a range of tests assessing the normality of a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables is investigated.An examination of the empirical significance level of the tests is undertaken for different sample sizes. The empirical power associated with these tests is also calculated under some alternative distributions.     

Testing high-dimensional normality based on classical skewness and Kurtosis with a possible small sample size

Abstract

By using the idea of principal component analysis, we propose an approach to applying the classical skewness and kurtosis statistics for detecting univariate normality to testing high-dimensional normality. High-dimensional sample data are projected to the principal component directions on which the classical skewness and kurtosis statistics can be constructed. The theory of spherical distributions is employed to derive the null distributions of the combined statistics constructed from the principal component directions. A Monte Carlo study is carried out to demonstrate the performance of the statistics on controlling type I error rates and a simple power comparison with some existing statistics. The effectiveness of the proposed statistics is illustrated by two real-data examples.     

Invariant tests for multivariate normality: a critical review

d -dimensional random vector X is some nondegenerate d-variate normal distribution, on the basis of i.i.d. copies X ₁, ..., X _x of X. Particular emphasis is given to progress that has been achieved during the last decade. Furthermore, we stress the typical diagnostic pitfall connected with purportedly ‘directed’ procedures, such as tests based on measures of multivariate skewness. Received: April 30, 2001; revised version: October 30, 2001     

Graphical comparison of normality tests for unimodal distribution data

A methodology is proposed to compare the power of normality tests with a wide variety of alternative unimodal distributions. It is based on the representation of a distribution mosaic in which kurtosis varies vertically and skewness horizontally. The mosaic includes distributions such as exponential, Laplace or uniform, with normal occupying the centre. Simulation is used to determine the probability of a sample from each distribution in the mosaic being accepted as normal. We demonstrate our proposal by applying it to the analysis and comparison of some of the most well-known tests.     

Performance of unit-root tests for non linear unit-root and partial unit-root processes

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the finite-sample performance of the augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF), Phillips–Perron (PP), momentum threshold autoregressive (M-TAR), Kapetanios–Shin–Snell (KSS), and the inf-t unit-root tests. Simulation results show that the ADF and KSS tests have better size, whereas other tests generate severe size distortions when the date-generating processes are non linear unit-root processes. In general, with regard to the combination of test powers with test sizes, the ADF and KSS tests are comparatively better than the PP, M-TAR, and inf-t tests; moreover, the inf-t test exhibits the poorest performance even for larger sample sizes.     

The power of some tests of normality against weibull alternatives

The powers of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Weisberg-Bingham and Anderson-Darling tests of normality are determined by Monte Carlo sampling ror Weibull alternatives with 10 shape parameters ranging from 1.0 to 10.0 and seven sample sizes from 10 to 100. There is, in general, good agreement at the relatively few points for which power values have previously been published. The usefulness of examining the power as a function of the parameter(s) of an alternate distribution family is outlined.     

Recent and classical tests for normality - a comparative study

We give a critical synopsis of classical and recent tests for univariate normality, our emphasis being on procedures which are consistent against all alternatives. The power performance of some selected tests (Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, Shapiro-Francia, Epps-Pulley) is assessed in a simulation study. Numerical results are illuminated by plots of isodynes, i.e., lines of constant estimated power, for the Johnson-system of distributions.     

Asymptotic normality of estimators for parameters of a multivariate skew-normal distribution

In this paper, asymptotic normality is established for the parameters of the multivariate skew-normal distribution under two parametrizations. Also, an analytic expression and an asymptotic normal law are derived for the skewness vector of the skew-normal distribution. The estimates are derived using the method of moments. Convergence to the asymptotic distributions is examined both computationally and in a simulation experiment.     

The sensitivity of robust unit root tests

The power properties of the rank-based Dickey–Fuller (DF) unit root test of Granger and Hallman [C. Granger and J. Hallman, Nonlinear transformations of integrated time series, J. Time Ser. Anal. 12 (1991), pp. 207–218] and the range unit root tests of Aparicio et al. [F. Aparicio, A. Escribano, and A. Siplos, Range unit root (RUR) tests: Robust against non-linearities, error distributions, structural breaks and outliers, J. Time Ser. Anal. 27 (2006), pp. 545–576] are considered when applied to near-integrated time series processes with differing initial conditions. The results obtained show the empirical powers of the tests to be generally robust to smaller deviations of the initial condition of the time series from its underlying deterministic component, particularly for more highly stationary processes. However, dramatic decreases in power are observed when either the mean or variance of the deviation of the initial condition is increased. The robustness of the rank- and range-based unit root tests and their higher power results relative to the seminal DF test have both been noted previously in the econometrics literature. These results are questioned by the findings of the present paper.     

A wide review on exponentiality tests and two competitive proposals with application on reliability

In this paper, two new statistics based on comparison of the theoretical and empirical distribution functions are proposed to test exponentiality. Critical values are determined by means of Monte Carlo simulations for various sample sizes and different significance levels. Through an extensive simulation study, 50 selected exponentiality tests are studied for a wide collection of alternative distributions. From the empirical power study, it is concluded that, firstly, one of our proposals is preferable for IFR (increasing failure rate) and UFR (unimodal failure rate) alternatives, whereas the other one is preferable for DFR (decreasing failure rate) and BFR (bathtub failure rate) alternatives and, secondly, the new tests can be considered serious and powerful competitors to other existing proposals, since they have the same (or higher) level of performance than the best tests in the statistical literature.     

A continuously adaptive nonparametric two–sample test

A two–sample test statistic for detecting shifts in location is developed for a broad range of underlying distributions using adaptive techniques. The test statistic is a linear rank statistics which uses a simple modification of the Wilcoxon test; the scores are Winsorized ranks where the upper and lower Winsorinzing proportions are estimated in the first stage of the adaptive procedure using sample the first stage of the adaptive procedure using sample measures of the distribution's skewness and tailweight. An empirical relationship between the Winsorizing proportions and the sample skewness and tailweight allows for a ‘continuous’ adaptation of the test statistic to the data. The test has good asymptotic properties, and the small sample results are compared with other populatr parametric, nonparametric, and two–stage tests using Monte Carlo methods. Based on these results, this proposed test procedure is recommended for moderate and larger sample sizes.     

A tool for systematically comparing the power of tests for normality

In this article, we describe a new approach to compare the power of different tests for normality. This approach provides the researcher with a practical tool for evaluating which test at their disposal is the most appropriate for their sampling problem. Using the Johnson systems of distribution, we estimate the power of a test for normality for any mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis. Using this characterization and an innovative graphical representation, we validate our method by comparing three well-known tests for normality: the Pearson χ² test, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and the D'Agostino–Pearson K ² test. We obtain such comparison for a broad range of skewness, kurtosis, and sample sizes. We demonstrate that the D'Agostino–Pearson test gives greater power than the others against most of the alternative distributions and at most sample sizes. We also find that the Pearson χ² test gives greater power than Kolmogorov–Smirnov against most of the alternative distributions for sample sizes between 18 and 330.     

Percentage points for directional anderson-darling goodness-of-fit tests

This paper discusses the problem of assessing the asymptotic distribution when parameters of the hypothesized distribution are estimated from a sample, pointing out a common mistake included in the paper by Sinclair, Spurr, and Ahmad (1990) which introduced two modifications of the Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit test statistic. Their two test statistics modify the popular Anderson-Darling test statistic to be sensitive to departures of the fitted distribution from the true distribution in one or the other of the tails. This paper uses these new test statistics to develop tests of fit for the normal and exponential distributions. Easy to use formulas are given so the reader can perform these tests at any sample size without consulting exhaustive tables of percentage points. Finally a power study is given to demonstrate the test statistics’ viability against a broad range of alternatives.