Wild-bootstrapped variance-ratio test for autocorrelation in the presence of heteroskedasticity

The Breusch–Godfrey LM test is one of the most popular tests for autocorrelation. However, it has been shown that the LM test may be erroneous when there exist heteroskedastic errors in a regression model. Recently, remedies have been proposed by Godfrey and Tremayne [9] and Shim et al. [21]. This paper suggests three wild-bootstrapped variance-ratio (WB-VR) tests for autocorrelation in the presence of heteroskedasticity. We show through a Monte Carlo simulation that our WB-VR tests have better small sample properties and are robust to the structure of heteroskedasticity.     

A test of linearity against functional coefficient autoregressive models

Our object in this paper is to propose a powerful test for detecting a broad class of nonlinearity of time series as one application of the method by Matsuda (1998). Consider autoregresive models X_t=Φ₁X_t?1+…+Φ_ρX_t?ρ+ε_t and we propose a statistic for testing whether or not Φ_i depends on delayed values X_t?d for some i. We compare the power of our test with that of tests proposed by Luukkonen, Saikkonen and Teräsvirta (1988a) and Hjellvik and TjΦstheim (1995) by simulation studies and our test is shown to be satisfactory.     

Robust tests for equality of two population means under the normal model

A robust procedure is developed for testing the equality of means in the two sample normal model. This is based on the weighted likelihood estimators of Basu et al. (1993). When the normal model is true the tests proposed have the same asymptotic power as the two sample Student's t-statistic in the equal variance case. However, when the normality assumptions are only approximately true the proposed tests can be substantially more powerful than the classical tests. In a Monte Carlo study for the equal variance case under various outlier models the proposed test using Hellinger distance based weighted likelihood estimator compared favorably with the classical test as well as the robust test proposed by Tiku (1980).     

Reconsidering LM unit root testing

Non-rejection of a unit root hypothesis by usual Dickey & Fuller (1979) (DF, hereafter) or Phillips & Perron (1988) (hereafter PP) tests should not be taken as strong evidence in favour of unit root presence. There are less popular, but more powerful, unit root tests that should be employed instead of DF-PP tests. A prime example of an alternative test is the LM unit root test developed by Schmidt & Phillips (1992) (hereafter SP) and Schmidt & Lee (1991) (hereafter SL). LM unit root tests are easy to calculate and invariant (similar); they employ optimal detrending and are more powerful than usual DF-PP tests. Asymptotic theory and finite sample critical values (with inaccuracies that we correct in this paper) are available for SP-SL tests. However, the usefulness of LM tests is not fully understood, due to ambiguity over test type recommendation, as well as potentially inefficient derivation of the test that might confuse applied researchers. In this paper, we reconsider LM unit root testing in a model with linear trend. We derive asymptotic distribution theory (in a new fashion), as well as accurate appropriate critical values. We undertake Monte Carlo investigation of finite sample properties of SP-SL LM tests, along with applications to the Nelson & Plosser (1982) time series and real quarterly UK GDP.     

Detecting parameter shift in garch models

This paper applies recent theories of testing for parameter constancy to the conditional variance in a GARCH model. The supremum Lagrange multiplier test for conditional Gaussian GARCH models and its robustified variants are discussed. The asymptotic null distribution of the test statistics are derived from the weak convergence of the scores, and the critical values from the hitting probability of squared Bessel process.

Monte Carlo studies on the finite sample size and power performance of the supremum LM tests are conducted. Applications of these tests to S&P 500 indicate that the hypothesis of stable conditional variance parameters can be rejected.     

Looking for max-semistability: A new test for the extreme value condition

To test the extreme value condition, Cramér-Von Mises type tests were recently proposed by Drees et al. (2006) and Dietrich et al. (2002). Hüsler and Li (2006) presented a simulation study on the behavior of these tests and verified that they are not robust for models in the domain of attraction of a max-semistable distribution function. In this work we develop a test statistic that distinguishes quite well distribution functions which belong to a max-stable domain of attraction from those in a max-semistable one. The limit law is deduced and the results from a numerical simulation study are presented.     

固定效应模型基于个体LM的新可混合性检验

对固定效应模型,本文基于拉格朗日乘数（LM）原理提出了一种新的可混合性检验。不同于已有的LM型可混合性检验,这里使用每个截面个体的LM统计量构建可混合性检验统计量。数理分析表明,本文所提的方法有着渐进正态性,对于扰动项的异方差和非正态均稳健,且与PY检验（Pesaran&Yamagata,2008）渐近等价。Monte Carlo模拟实验表明,相对于PY检验及另外两种LM型的可混合性检验,对于不同大小的 ,本文提出的方法有着良好的水平表现和更优越的检验势。     

Detecting parameter shift in garch models

This paper applies recent theories of testing for parameter constancy to the conditional variance in a GARCH model. The supremum Lagrange multiplier test for conditional Gaussian GARCH models and its robustified variants are discussed. The asymptotic null distribution of the test statistics are derived from the weak convergence of the scores, and the critical values from the hitting probability of squared Bessel process.

Monte Carlo studies on the finite sample size and power performance of the supremum LM tests are conducted. Applications of these tests to S&P 500 indicate that the hypothesis of stable conditional variance parameters can be rejected.     

Testing for structural change in cointegrated regression models: some comparisons and generalizations

This paper compares and generalizes some testing procedures for structural change in the context of cointegrated regression models. The Lagrange Multiplier (LM) tests proposod by Hansen (1992) are generalized to testing for partial structural change. An exponential average LM test is also suggested following the idea of Andrews and Ploberger (1992). In particular, an optimal test for cointegration is developed. We also propose a new cointegration test which is robust to a possible one-time discrete jump in the intercept. We tabulate the asymptotic critical values for the above tests and conduct a small Monte Carlo simulation to investigate their finite sample performance.     

Testing for structural change in cointegrated regression models: some comparisons and generalizations

This paper compares and generalizes some testing procedures for structural change in the context of cointegrated regression models. The Lagrange Multiplier (LM) tests proposod by Hansen (1992) are generalized to testing for partial structural change. An exponential average LM test is also suggested following the idea of Andrews and Ploberger (1992). In particular, an optimal test for cointegration is developed. We also propose a new cointegration test which is robust to a possible one-time discrete jump in the intercept. We tabulate the asymptotic critical values for the above tests and conduct a small Monte Carlo simulation to investigate their finite sample performance.     

Decisions on Seasonal Unit Roots

Decisions on the presence of seasonal unit roots in economic time series are commonly taken on the basis of statistical hypothesis tests. Some of these tests have absence of unit roots as the null hypothesis, while others use unit roots as their null. Following a suggestion by Hylleberg (1995) to combine such tests in order to reach a clearer conclusion, we evaluate the merits of such test combinations on the basis of a Bayesian decision setup. We find that the potential gains over a pure application of the most common test due to Hylleberg et al. (1990) can be small.     

Hypothesis testing in smoothing spline models

Nonparametric regression models are often used to check or suggest a parametric model. Several methods have been proposed to test the hypothesis of a parametric regression function against an alternative smoothing spline model. Some tests such as the locally most powerful (LMP) test by Cox et al. (Cox, D., Koh, E., Wahba, G. and Yandell, B. (1988). Testing the (parametric) null model hypothesis in (semiparametric) partial and generalized spline models. Ann. Stat., 16, 113–119.), the generalized maximum likelihood (GML) ratio test and the generalized cross validation (GCV) test by Wahba (Wahba, G. (1990). Spline models for observational data. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, SIAM.) were developed from the corresponding Bayesian models. Their frequentist properties have not been studied. We conduct simulations to evaluate and compare finite sample performances. Simulation results show that the performances of these tests depend on the shape of the true function. The LMP and GML tests are more powerful for low frequency functions while the GCV test is more powerful for high frequency functions. For all test statistics, distributions under the null hypothesis are complicated. Computationally intensive Monte Carlo methods can be used to calculate null distributions. We also propose approximations to these null distributions and evaluate their performances by simulations.     

Testing linearity against nonlinear moving average models

Lagrange multiplier (LM) test statistics are derived for testing a linear moving average model against an asymmetric moving average model and an LM type test against an additive smooth transition moving average model. The latter model is introduced in the paper. The small sample performance of the proposed tests are evaluated in a Monte Carlo study and compared to Wald and likelihood ratio statistics. The size properties of the Lagrange multiplier test are better than those of other tests.     

A joint test for arch and bilinearity in the regression model

In this paper we argue that a simultaneous test for ARCH and bilinearity should be used to test for the possible nonlinearity of the error process in the regression model. We suggest such a joint test statistic. An empirical example shows that the individual tests of ARCH and bilinearity may not be conclusive while a joint test clearly rejects the linearity hypothesis. Our results are also applicable to pure time series models.     

Local power of some tests in exponential family nonlinear models

In this paper we obtain asymptotic expansions up to order n^−1/2 for the nonnull distribution functions of the likelihood ratio, Wald, score and gradient test statistics in exponential family nonlinear models (Cordeiro and Paula, 1989), under a sequence of Pitman alternatives. The asymptotic distributions of all four statistics are obtained for testing a subset of regression parameters and for testing the dispersion parameter, thus generalising the results given in Cordeiro et al. (1994) and Ferrari et al. (1997). We also present Monte Carlo simulations in order to compare the finite-sample performance of these tests.     

A class of robust stepwise alternatives to Hotelling's T 2 tests

Hotelling's T 2 test is known to be optimal under multivariate normality and is reasonably validity-robust when the assumption fails. However, some recently introduced robust test procedures have superior power properties and reasonable type I error control with non-normal populations. These, including the tests due to Tiku & Singh (1982), Tiku & Balakrishnan (1988) and Mudholkar & Srivastava (1999b, c), are asymptotically valid but are useful with moderate size samples only if the population dimension is small. A class of B-optimal modifications of the stepwise alternatives to Hotellings T 2 introduced by Mudholkar & Subbaiah (1980) are simple to implement and essentially equivalent to the T 2 test even with small samples. In this paper we construct and study the robust versions of these modified stepwise tests using trimmed means instead of sample means. We use the robust one- and two-sample trimmed- t procedures as in Mudholkar et al. (1991) and propose statistics based on combining them. The results of an extensive Monte Carlo experiment show that the robust alternatives provide excellent type I error control and a substantial gain in power.     

Robust Test for Spatial Error Model: Considering Changes of Spatial Layouts and Distribution Misspecification

This article suggests a robust LM (Lagrange Multiplier) test for spatial error model which not only reduces the influence of spatial lag dependence immensely, but also presents robust changes of spatial layouts and distribution misspecification. Monte Carlo simulation results imply that existing LM tests have serious size and power distortion with the presence of spatial lag dependence, group interaction or nonnormal distribution, but the robust LM test of this article shows well performance.     

Testing for Serial Correlation in Fixed-Effects Panel Data Models

In this article, we propose various tests for serial correlation in fixed-effects panel data regression models with a small number of time periods. First, a simplified version of the test suggested by Wooldridge (2002) and Drukker (2003) is considered. The second test is based on the Lagrange Multiplier (LM) statistic suggested by Baltagi and Li (1995), and the third test is a modification of the classical Durbin–Watson statistic. Under the null hypothesis of no serial correlation, all tests possess a standard normal limiting distribution as N tends to infinity and T is fixed. Analyzing the local power of the tests, we find that the LM statistic has superior power properties. Furthermore, a generalization to test for autocorrelation up to some given lag order and a test statistic that is robust against time dependent heteroskedasticity are proposed.     

Estimation and test of several multivariate normal means under an order restriction when the dimension is larger than two

Suppose that an order restriction is imposed among several p-variate normal mean vectors. We are interested in the problems of estimating these mean vectors and testing their homogeneity under this restriction. These problems are multivariate extensions of Bartholomew's (1959) ones. For the bivariate case, these problems have been studied by Sasabuchi et al. (1983) and (1998) and some others. In the present paper we examine the convergence of an iterative algorithm for computing the maximum likelihood estimator when p is larger than two. We also study some test procedures for testing homogeneity when p is larger than two.     

A non-nested test of level-differenced versus log-differenced stationary models

This paper considersthe applicationof the simulated Cox test procedure developed in Pesaran and Pesaran (1993) to test linear versus log-linear models. The test procedure can also be applied to other generalized linear regression models such as level-difference stationary models versus the log-difference stationary models. In order to compare the small sample performanceof the proposed test with other tests extant in the literature, the paper also reports the resultsof a numberof Monte Carlo experiments using the experimental framework of Godfrey et al. (1988). The Monte Carlo results provide strong support for a simplified version of the simulatedCox test over the PE and the BM tests, but suggest that there is little to choose between the simulated Cox test and the DL test.