Lower confidence bounds for percentiles of weibull and birnbaum-saunders distributions

Approximate lower confidence bounds on percentiles of the Weibull and the Birnbaum-Saunders distributions are investigated. Asymptotic lower confidence bounds based on Bonferroni's inequality and the Fisher information are discussed, and parametric bootstrap methods to provide better bounds are considered. Since the standard percentile bootstrap method typically does not perform well for confidence bounds on quantiles, several other bootstrap procedures are studied via extensive computer simulations. Results of the simulations indicate that the bootstrap methods generally give sharper lower bounds than the Bonferroni bounds but with coverages still near the nominal confidence level. Two illustrative examples are also presented, one for tensile strength of carbon micro-composite specimens and the other for cycles-to-failure data.     

Interval estimators for reliability: the bivariate normal case

This paper proposes procedures to provide confidence intervals (CIs) for reliability in stress–strength models, considering the particular case of a bivariate normal set-up. The suggested CIs are obtained by employing either asymptotic variances of maximum-likelihood estimators or a bootstrap procedure. The coverage and the accuracy of these intervals are empirically checked through a simulation study and compared with those of another proposal in the literature. An application to real data is provided.     

Adjusting Cornish–Fisher expansions and confidence intervals for the effect of roundoff

Suppose we want to estimate some smooth function of two types of parameters. The first can be estimated by sample means, while the second is known exactly up to the number of decimal places recorded, that is they are subject to roundoff. We obtain the Cornish–Fisher expansions and associated nonparametric confidence intervals for such functions. These results are illustrated by a simulation study.     

Bootstrap confidence intervals of CNpk for inverse Rayleigh and log-logistic distributions

In this article bootstrap confidence intervals of process capability index as suggested by Chen and Pearn [An application of non-normal process capability indices. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 1997;13:355–360] are studied through simulation when the underlying distributions are inverse Rayleigh and log-logistic distributions. The well-known maximum likelihood estimator is used to estimate the parameter. The bootstrap confidence intervals considered in this paper consists of various confidence intervals. A Monte Carlo simulation has been used to investigate the estimated coverage probabilities and average widths of the bootstrap confidence intervals. Application examples on two distributions for process capability indices are provided for practical use.     

Confidence intervals for the correlation from a bivariate normal

Improved confidence intervals are given for the correlation coefficient of the bivariate normal distribution. These are based on Cornish–Fisher expansions for the distribution, density and quantiles of the sample correlation.     

Optimal Bootstrap Sample Size in Construction of Percentile Confidence Bounds

In traditional bootstrap applications the size of a bootstrap sample equals the parent sample size, n say. Recent studies have shown that using a bootstrap sample size different from n may sometimes provide a more satisfactory solution. In this paper we apply the latter approach to correct for coverage error in construction of bootstrap confidence bounds. We show that the coverage error of a bootstrap percentile method confidence bound, which is of order O ( n ^−2/2) typically, can be reduced to O ( n ⁻¹) by use of an optimal bootstrap sample size. A simulation study is conducted to illustrate our findings, which also suggest that the new method yields intervals of shorter length and greater stability compared to competitors of similar coverage accuracy.     

Percentile-t Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Period Using Periodogram

The magnitude of light intensity of many stars varies over time in a periodic way. Therefore, estimation of period and making inference about this parameter are of great interest in astronomy. The periodogram can be used to estimate period, properly. Bootstrap confidence intervals for period suggested here, are based on using the periodogram and constructed by percentile-t methods. We prove that the equal-tailed percentile-t bootstrap confidence intervals for period have an error of order n ^?1. We also show that the symmetric percentile-t bootstrap confidence intervals reduce the error to order n ^?2, and hence have a better performance. Finally, we assess the theoretical results by conducting a simulation study, compare the results with the coverages of percentile bootstrap confidence intervals for period and then analyze a real data set related to the eclipsing system R Canis Majoris collected by Shiraz Biruni Observatory.     

Comparing point and interval estimates in the bivariate <Emphasis Type="Italic">t</Emphasis>-copula model with application to financial data

The paper considers joint maximum likelihood (ML) and semiparametric (SP) estimation of copula parameters in a bivariate t-copula. Analytical expressions for the asymptotic covariance matrix involving integrals over special functions are derived, which can be evaluated numerically. These direct evaluations of the Fisher information matrix are compared to Hessian evaluations based on numerical differentiation in a simulation study showing a satisfactory performance of the computationally less demanding Hessian evaluations. Individual asymptotic confidence intervals for the t-copula parameters and the corresponding tail dependence coefficient are derived. For two financial datasets these confidence intervals are calculated using both direct evaluation of the Fisher information and numerical evaluation of the Hessian matrix. These confidence intervals are compared to parametric and nonparametric BCA bootstrap intervals based on ML and SP estimation, respectively, showing a preference for asymptotic confidence intervals based on numerical Hessian evaluations.     

Comparison of confidence intervals for the Behrens-Fisher problem

The Behrens–Fisher problem concerns the inferences for the difference between means of two independent normal populations without the assumption of equality of variances. In this article, we compare three approximate confidence intervals and a generalized confidence interval for the Behrens–Fisher problem. We also show how to obtain simultaneous confidence intervals for the three population case (analysis of variance, ANOVA) by the Bonferroni correction factor. We conduct an extensive simulation study to evaluate these methods in respect to their type I error rate, power, expected confidence interval width, and coverage probability. Finally, the considered methods are applied to two real dataset.     

IMPORTANCE BOOTSTRAP RESAMPLING FOR PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS REGRESSION

Importance resampling is an approach that uses exponential tilting to reduce the resampling necessary for the construction of nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals. The properties of bootstrap importance confidence intervals are well established when the data is a smooth function of means and when there is no censoring. However, in the framework of survival or time-to-event data, the asymptotic properties of importance resampling have not been rigorously studied, mainly because of the unduly complicated theory incurred when data is censored. This paper uses extensive simulation to show that, for parameter estimates arising from fitting Cox proportional hazards models, importance bootstrap confidence intervals can be constructed if the importance resampling probabilities of the records for the n individuals in the study are determined by the empirical influence function for the parameter of interest. Our results show that, compared to uniform resampling, importance resampling improves the relative mean-squared-error (MSE) efficiency by a factor of nine (for n = 200). The efficiency increases significantly with sample size, is mildly associated with the amount of censoring, but decreases slightly as the number of bootstrap resamples increases. The extra CPU time requirement for calculating importance resamples is negligible when compared to the large improvement in MSE efficiency. The method is illustrated through an application to data on chronic lymphocytic leukemia, which highlights that the bootstrap confidence interval is the preferred alternative to large sample inferences when the distribution of a specific covariate deviates from normality. Our results imply that, because of its computational efficiency, importance resampling is recommended whenever bootstrap methodology is implemented in a survival framework. Its use is particularly important when complex covariates are involved or the survival problem to be solved is part of a larger problem; for instance, when determining confidence bounds for models linking survival time with clusters identified in gene expression microarray data.     

New bootstrap confidence intervals for means of positively skewed distributions

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we consider the problem of constructing non parametric confidence intervals for the mean of a positively skewed distribution. We suggest calibrated, smoothed bootstrap upper and lower percentile confidence intervals. For the theoretical properties, we show that the proposed one-sided confidence intervals have coverage probability α + O(n^{? 3/2}). This is an improvement upon the traditional bootstrap confidence intervals in terms of coverage probability. A version smoothed approach is also considered for constructing a two-sided confidence interval and its theoretical properties are also studied. A simulation study is performed to illustrate the performance of our confidence interval methods. We then apply the methods to a real data set.     

Estimation of P(Y < X) for progressively first-failure-censored generalized inverted exponential distribution

In this article, we consider the problem of estimation of the stress–strength parameter δ?=?P(Y?<?X) based on progressively first-failure-censored samples, when X and Y both follow two-parameter generalized inverted exponential distribution with different and unknown shape and scale parameters. The maximum likelihood estimator of δ and its asymptotic confidence interval based on observed Fisher information are constructed. Two parametric bootstrap boot-p and boot-t confidence intervals are proposed. We also apply Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques to carry out Bayes estimation procedures. Bayes estimate under squared error loss function and the HPD credible interval of δ are obtained using informative and non-informative priors. A Monte Carlo simulation study is carried out for comparing the proposed methods of estimation. Finally, the methods developed are illustrated with a couple of real data examples.     

Exact distribution of the MLEs of the parameters and of the quantiles of two-parameter exponential distribution under hybrid censoring

Epstein [Truncated life tests in the exponential case, Ann. Math. Statist. 25 (1954), pp. 555–564] introduced a hybrid censoring scheme (called Type-I hybrid censoring) and Chen and Bhattacharyya [Exact confidence bounds for an exponential parameter under hybrid censoring, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 17 (1988), pp. 1857–1870] derived the exact distribution of the maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE) of the mean of a scaled exponential distribution based on a Type-I hybrid censored sample. Childs et al. [Exact likelihood inference based on Type-I and Type-II hybrid censored samples from the exponential distribution, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 55 (2003), pp. 319–330] provided an alternate simpler expression for this distribution, and also developed analogous results for another hybrid censoring scheme (called Type-II hybrid censoring). The purpose of this paper is to derive the exact bivariate distribution of the MLE of the parameter vector of a two-parameter exponential model based on hybrid censored samples. The marginal distributions are derived and exact confidence bounds for the parameters are obtained. The results are also used to derive the exact distribution of the MLE of the pth quantile, as well as the corresponding confidence bounds. These exact confidence intervals are then compared with parametric bootstrap confidence intervals in terms of coverage probabilities. Finally, we present some numerical examples to illustrate the methods of inference developed here.     

The Finite Sample Performance of Inference Methods for Propensity Score Matching and Weighting Estimators

ABSTRACT

This article investigates the finite sample properties of a range of inference methods for propensity score-based matching and weighting estimators frequently applied to evaluate the average treatment effect on the treated. We analyze both asymptotic approximations and bootstrap methods for computing variances and confidence intervals in our simulation designs, which are based on German register data and U.S. survey data. We vary the design w.r.t. treatment selectivity, effect heterogeneity, share of treated, and sample size. The results suggest that in general, theoretically justified bootstrap procedures (i.e., wild bootstrapping for pair matching and standard bootstrapping for “smoother” treatment effect estimators) dominate the asymptotic approximations in terms of coverage rates for both matching and weighting estimators. Most findings are robust across simulation designs and estimators.     

Confidence intervals based on the deviance statistic for the hyperparameters in state space models

The main objective of this work is to evaluate the performance of confidence intervals, built using the deviance statistic, for the hyperparameters of state space models. The first procedure is a marginal approximation to confidence regions, based on the likelihood test, and the second one is based on the signed root deviance profile. Those methods are computationally efficient and are not affected by problems such as intervals with limits outside the parameter space, which can be the case when the focus is on the variances of the errors. The procedures are compared to the usual approaches existing in the literature, which includes the method based on the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator, as well as bootstrap confidence intervals. The comparison is performed via a Monte Carlo study, in order to establish empirically the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The results show that the methods based on the deviance statistic possess a better coverage rate than the asymptotic and bootstrap procedures.     

Simultaneous confidence intervals for pairwise multiple comparisons in a two-way unbalanced design with unequal variances

In this research, we propose simultaneous confidence intervals for all pairwise multiple comparisons in a two-way unbalanced design with unequal variances, using a parametric bootstrap approach. Simulation results show that Type 1 error of the multiple comparison test is close to the nominal level even for small samples. They also show that the proposed method outperforms Tukey–Kramer procedure when variances are heteroscedastic and group sizes are unequal.     

Interval estimation for a binomial proportion: a bootstrap approach

This paper discusses the classic but still current problem of interval estimation of a binomial proportion. Bootstrap methods are presented for constructing such confidence intervals in a routine, automatic way. Three confidence intervals for a binomial proportion are compared and studied by means of a simulation study, namely: the Wald confidence interval, the Agresti–Coull interval and the bootstrap-t interval. A new confidence interval, the Agresti–Coull interval with bootstrap critical values, is also introduced and its good behaviour related to the average coverage probability is established by means of simulations.     

Exact bootstrap confidence intervals for regression coefficients in small samples

ABSTRACT

Regression analysis is one of the important tools in statistics to investigate the relationships among variables. When the sample size is small, however, the assumptions for regression analysis can be violated. This research focuses on using the exact bootstrap to construct confidence intervals for regression parameters in small samples. The comparison of the exact bootstrap method with the basic bootstrap method was carried out by a simulation study. It was found that on a very small sample (n ≈ 5) under Laplace distribution with the independent variable treated as random, the exact bootstrap was more effective than the standard bootstrap confidence interval.     

Inference using attributable risk for a 2×2 case–control study

Asymptotic variance plays an important role in the inference using interval estimate of attributable risk. This paper compares asymptotic variances of attributable risk estimate using the delta method and the Fisher information matrix for a 2×2 case–control study due to the practicality of applications. The expressions of these two asymptotic variance estimates are shown to be equivalent. Because asymptotic variance usually underestimates the standard error, the bootstrap standard error has also been utilized in constructing the interval estimates of attributable risk and compared with those using asymptotic estimates. A simulation study shows that the bootstrap interval estimate performs well in terms of coverage probability and confidence length. An exact test procedure for testing independence between the risk factor and the disease outcome using attributable risk is proposed and is justified for the use with real-life examples for a small-sample situation where inference using asymptotic variance may not be valid.     

Approximate Bayesianity of Frequentist Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion

The well-known Wilson and Agresti–Coull confidence intervals for a binomial proportion p are centered around a Bayesian estimator. Using this as a starting point, similarities between frequentist confidence intervals for proportions and Bayesian credible intervals based on low-informative priors are studied using asymptotic expansions. A Bayesian motivation for a large class of frequentist confidence intervals is provided. It is shown that the likelihood ratio interval for p approximates a Bayesian credible interval based on Kerman’s neutral noninformative conjugate prior up to O(n^{? 1}) in the confidence bounds. For the significance level α ? 0.317, the Bayesian interval based on the Jeffreys’ prior is then shown to be a compromise between the likelihood ratio and Wilson intervals. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.