Estimating the Mean with Known Coefficient of Variation

Searls in 1964 showed that when the coefficient of variation is known, the sample mean is dominated with respect to mean squared error by an improved estimator that makes use of that coefficient. In this article we illustrate that this is true for a general class of estimators. Expressions for the minimum mean squared error and the relative efficiency are given for general distributions. The improvement, as measured by relative efficiency, is seen to be independent of the form of the distribution.     

Asymptotic equivalence of the harrell-davis median estimator and the sample median

This paper presents an asymptotic equivalence result with a sharp rate of convergence forthe sample median and the Harrell-Davis median estimator. The consequences of this result are discussed.     

Estimating variance components by using survey data

Summary. Inflation-type weighted estimators for variance components can be badly biased. Modified weighted estimators suggested in the literature are also badly biased for certain sampling designs. We propose new estimators for variance components, some of which are approximately unbiased regardless of the sampling design. These estimators require knowledge of the joint inclusion probabilities of the observations. The small sample properties of the estimators are studied via simulation for the simple one-way random-effects model. An application is given by using data from the US Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.     

Estimating powers of the generalized variance under the Pitman closeness criterion

For estimating powers of the generalized variance under a multivariate normal distribution with an unknown mean, the inadmissibility of the closest affine equivariant estimator is shown for the Pitman closeness criterion.     

On the optimality of the sample variance

The present paper explores the structure of linear exponential families for which the sample variance is a uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator.     

More powerful sign test using median ranked set sample: Finite sample power comparison

Sign test using median ranked set samples (MRSS) is introduced and investigated. We show that, this test is more powerful than the sign tests based on simple random sample (SRS) and ranked set sample (RSS) for finite sample size. It is found that, when the set size of MRSS is odd, the null distribution of the MRSS sign test is the same as the sign test obtained by using SRS. The exact null distributions and the power functions, in case of finite sample sizes, of these tests are derived. Also, the asymptotic distribution of the MRSS sign tests are derived. Numerical comparison of the MRSS sign test power with the power of the SRS sign test and the RSS sign test is given. Illustration of the procedure, using real data set of bilirubin level in Jaundice babies who stay in neonatal intensive care is introduced.     

Estimating the variance of a normal population by utilizing the information in a sample from a second related normal population

A class of estimators of the variance σ₁ ² of a normal population is introduced, by utilization the information in a sample from a second normal population with different mean and variance σ₂ ², under the restriction that σ₁ ²?≤?σ₂ ². Simulation results indicate that some members of this class are more efficient than the usual minimum variance unbiased estimator (MVUE) of σ₁ ², Stein estimator and Mehta and Gurland estimator. The case of known and unknown means are considered.     

On the sample characterization criterion for normal distributions

Conventionally, it was shown that the underlying distribution is normal if and only if the sample mean and sample variance from a random sample are independent. This paper focusses on the normal population characterization theorem by showing that, if the joint distribution of a skew normal sample follows certain multivariate skew normal distribution, the sample mean and sample variance are still independent.     

An extension of the median test to analysis of variance

In a k-way analysis of variance model, the major concern is testing for main effects and for the presence of interaction between the factors. When the assumptions of normality and equal variances are satisfied, the appropriate test to use is the usual F-test for ANOVA. However, when the normality assumption is not satisfied then a robust or nonparametric test is needed to conduct the analysis. In this paper a nonparametric method based on cell counts is proposed. Each cell is divided into L subcells based on predetermined outpoints and the resulting frequencies are laid out in a contingency table. Then the Pearson x² and tne likelihood ratio tests are performed. A comparison with the classical ANOVA F-test indicates that the proposed method is preferable when the data comes from a thick-tailed highly skewed distribution.     

Estimate of variance of u-statistics

Let g(x₁,… , x_k) be a symmetric function with k arguments. Let U be a U-statistic based on a random sample of size n with kernel function g . In this paper, the problem of estimating var(U) is considered. Several estimators are compared by computer simulations and we conclude that two estimators, one is constructed as a U-statistic and the other is the bootstrap estimator, give good estimates for many U-statistics.     

A comparison of methods for studentizing the sample median

Various methods for “Studentizing” the sample median are com-pared on the basis of a Monte Carlo study. Several of the methods do rather poorly while two, the bootstrap and the standardized length of a distribution free confidence interval, behave accept-ably acrors a wide range of sample sizes and several distributions of varying tail length. These two methods seem to agree closely with the distribution free confidence intervals and moreover, un-like these intervals, the methods can be extended to a method of accurate inference for λ₁ regreasion.     

Maximum likelihood estimation for the generalized poisson distribution when sample mean is larger than sample variance

The generalized Poisson distribution (GPD), studied by many researchers and containing two parameters θ and λ, has been found to fit very well data sets arising in biological, ecological, social and marketing fields. Consul and Shoukri (1985) have shown that for negative values of λ the GPD gets truncated and the model becomes deficient; however, the truncation error becomes less than 0.0005 if the minimum number of non-zero probability classes ≥ 4 for all values of θ and λ and the GPD model can be safely used in all such cases. The problem of admissible maximum likelihood (ML) estimation when the sample mean is larger than the sample variance is considered in this paper which complements the earlier work of Consul and Shoukri (1984) on the existence of unique ML estimators of θ and λ when the sample mean is smaller than or equal to the sample variance.     

Estimating the population median using only a central subset of observations

In estimating the population median, it is common to encounter estimators which are linear combinations of a small number of central observations. Sample medians, sample quasi medians, trimmed means, jackknifed (and delete‐d jackknifed) medians and jackknifed quasi medians are all familiar examples. The objective of this paper is to show that within this class the quasi medians turn out to have the best asymptotic mean squared error.     

Estimating variances of strata in ranked set sampling

In RSS, the variance of observations in each ranked set plays an important role in finding an optimal design for unbalanced RSS and in inferring the population mean. The empirical estimator (i.e., the sample variance in a given ranked set) is most commonly used for estimating the variance in the literature. However, the empirical estimator does not use the information in the entire data over different ranked sets. Further, it is highly variable when the sample size is not large enough, as is typical in RSS applications. In this paper, we propose a plug-in estimator for the variance of each set, which is more efficient than the empirical one. The estimator uses a result in order statistics which characterizes the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the rth order statistics as a function of the population CDF. We analytically prove the asymptotic normality of the proposed estimator. We further apply it to estimate the standard error of the RSS mean estimator. Both our simulation and empirical study show that our estimators consistently outperform existing methods.     

Estimating a uniform distribution when data are measured with a normal additive error with unknown variance

The problem of estimating the width of a symmetric uniform distribution on the line together with the error variance, when data are measured with normal additive error, is considered. The main purpose is to analyse the maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator and to compare it with the moment-method estimator. It is shown that this two-parameter model is regular so that the ML estimator is asymptotically efficient. Necessary and sufficient conditions are given for the existence of the ML estimator. As numerical problems are known to frequently occur while computing the ML estimator in this model, useful suggestions for computing the ML estimator are also given.     

A simple variance formula for population size estimators by conditioning

This note considers the variance estimation for population size estimators based on capture–recapture experiments. Whereas a diversity of estimators of the population size has been suggested, the question of estimating the associated variances is less frequently addressed. This note points out that the technique of conditioning can be applied here successfully which also allows us to identify sources of variation: the variance due to estimation of the model parameters and the binomial variance due to sampling n units from a population of size N. It is applied to estimators typically used in capture–recapture experiments in continuous time including the estimators of Zelterman and Chao and improves upon previously used variance estimators. In addition, knowledge of the variances associated with the estimators by Zelterman and Chao allows the suggestion of a new estimator as the weighted sum of the two. The decomposition of the variance into the two sources allows also a new understanding of how resampling techniques like the Bootstrap could be used appropriately. Finally, the sample size question for capture–recapture experiments is addressed. Since the variance of population size estimators increases with the sample size, it is suggested to use relative measures such as the observed-to-hidden ratio or the completeness of identification proportion for approaching the question of sample size choice.     

Estimation of variance components in an unbalanced one-way classification

In the unbalanced one-way random effects model the weighted least squares approach with estimated weights is used to develop a relatively simple estimator of variance components. As the number of classes increases, the proposed estimator is seen not only to be best asymptotically normal but also to be asymptotically equivalent to the maximum likelihood estimator.