Empirical Bayes Confidence Intervals for Means of Natural Exponential Family-Quadratic Variance Function Distributions with Application to Small Area Estimation

Abstract.  The paper develops empirical Bayes (EB) confidence intervals for population means with distributions belonging to the natural exponential family-quadratic variance function (NEF-QVF) family when the sample size for a particular population is moderate or large. The basis for such development is to find an interval centred around the posterior mean which meets the target coverage probability asymptotically, and then show that the difference between the coverage probabilities of the Bayes and EB intervals is negligible up to a certain order. The approach taken is Edgeworth expansion so that the sample sizes from the different populations need not be significantly large. The proposed intervals meet the target coverage probabilities asymptotically, and are easy to construct. We illustrate use of these intervals in the context of small area estimation both through real and simulated data. The proposed intervals are different from the bootstrap intervals. The latter can be applied quite generally, but the order of accuracy of these intervals in meeting the desired coverage probability is unknown.     

Bootstrap confidence intervals of generalized process capability index Cpyk for Lindley and power Lindley distributions

One of the indicators for evaluating the capability of a process is the process capability index. In this article, bootstrap confidence intervals of the generalized process capability index (GPCI) proposed by Maiti et al. are studied through simulation, when the underlying distributions are Lindley and Power Lindley distributions. The maximum likelihood method is used to estimate the parameters of the models. Three bootstrap confidence intervals namely, standard bootstrap (SB), percentile bootstrap (PB), and bias-corrected percentile bootstrap (BCPB) are considered for obtaining confidence intervals of GPCI. A Monte Carlo simulation has been used to investigate the estimated coverage probabilities and average width of the bootstrap confidence intervals. Simulation results show that the estimated coverage probabilities of the percentile bootstrap confidence interval and the bias-corrected percentile bootstrap confidence interval get closer to the nominal confidence level than those of the standard bootstrap confidence interval. Finally, three real datasets are analyzed for illustrative purposes.     

Generalized confidence intervals for the process capability indices in general random effect model with balanced data

In this paper, we consider the interval estimation problem on the process capability indices in general random effect model with balanced data. The confidence intervals for three commonly used process capability indices are developed by using the concept of generalized confidence interval. Furthermore, some simulation results on the coverage probability and expected value of the generalized lower confidence limits are reported. The simulation results indicate that the proposed confidence intervals do provide quite satisfactory coverage probabilities.     

Empirical likelihood inference for a common mean in the presence of heteroscedasticity

The authors develop empirical likelihood (EL) based methods of inference for a common mean using data from several independent but nonhomogeneous populations. For point estimation, they propose a maximum empirical likelihood (MEL) estimator and show that it is n‐consistent and asymptotically optimal. For confidence intervals, they consider two EL based methods and show that both intervals have approximately correct coverage probabilities under large samples. Finite‐sample performances of the MEL estimator and the EL based confidence intervals are evaluated through a simulation study. The results indicate that overall the MEL estimator and the weighted EL confidence interval are superior alternatives to the existing methods.     

Interval estimation for the scale parameter of the two-parameter exponential distribution based on time-censored data

This paper is concerned with developing procedures for construcing confidence intervals, which would hold approximately equal tail probabilities and coverage probabilities close to the normal, for the scale parameter θ of the two-parameter exponential lifetime model when the data are time censored. We use a conditional approach to eliminate the nuisance parameter and develop several procedures based on the conditional likelihood. The methods are (a) a method based on the likelihood ratio, (b) a method based on the skewness corrected score (Bartlett, Biometrika 40 (1953), 12–19), (c) a method based on an adjustment to the signed root likelihood ratio (Diciccio, Field et al., Biometrika 77 (1990), 77–95), and (d) a method based on parameter transformation to the normal approximation. The performances of these procedures are then compared, through simulations, with the usual likelihood based procedure. The skewness corrected score procedure performs best in terms of holding both equal tail probabilities and nominal coverage probabilities even for small samples.     

Confidence intervals for coefficients of variation in two-parameter exponential distributions

This article examines confidence intervals for the single coefficient of variation and the difference of coefficients of variation in the two-parameter exponential distributions, using the method of variance of estimates recovery (MOVER), the generalized confidence interval (GCI), and the asymptotic confidence interval (ACI). In simulation, the results indicate that coverage probabilities of the GCI maintain the nominal level in general. The MOVER performs well in terms of coverage probability when data only consist of positive values, but it has wider expected length. The coverage probabilities of the ACI satisfy the target for large sample sizes. We also illustrate our confidence intervals using a real-world example in the area of medical science.     

Comparison of Interval Estimators of Pr(X < Y) in the Two-parameter Exponential Distribution

We consider confidence intervals for the stress–strength reliability Pr(X< Y) in the two-parameter exponential distribution. We have derived the Bayesian highest posterior density interval using non-informative prior distributions. We have compared its performance with the intervals based on the generalized pivot variable intervals in terms of their coverage probabilities and expected lengths. Our simulation study shows that the Bayesian interval performs better according to the criteria used, especially when the sample sizes are very small. An example is given.     

On the distribution-free confidence intervals and universal bounds for quantiles based on joint records

In this paper, we consider three distribution-free confidence intervals for quantiles given joint records from two independent sequences of continuous random variables with a common continuous distribution function. The coverage probabilities of these intervals are compared. We then compute the universal bounds of the expected widths of the proposed confidence intervals. These results naturally extend to any number of independent sequences instead of just two. Finally, the proposed confidence intervals are applied for a real data set to illustrate the practical usefulness of the procedures developed here.     

Confidence intervals for the closed population size under inverse sampling without replacement

Inverse sampling is an appropriate design for the second phase of capture-recapture experiments which provides an exactly unbiased estimator of the population size. However, the sampling distribution of the resulting estimator tends to be highly right skewed for small recapture samples, so, the traditional Wald-type confidence intervals appear to be inappropriate. The objective of this paper is to study the performance of interval estimators for the population size under inverse recapture sampling without replacement. To this aim, we consider the Wald-type, the logarithmic transformation-based, the Wilson score, the likelihood ratio and the exact methods. Also, we propose some bootstrap confidence intervals for the population size, including the with-replacement bootstrap (BWR), the without replacement bootstrap (BWO), and the Rao–Wu’s rescaling method. A Monte Carlo simulation is employed to evaluate the performance of suggested methods in terms of the coverage probability, error rates and standardized average length. Our results show that the likelihood ratio and exact confidence intervals are preferred to other competitors, having the coverage probabilities close to the desired nominal level for any sample size, with more balanced error rate for exact method and shorter length for likelihood ratio method. It is notable that the BWO and Rao–Wu’s rescaling methods also may provide good intervals for some situations, however, those coverage probabilities are not invariant with respect to the population arguments, so one must be careful to use them.     

Robust simultaneous confidence interval estimation of principal component loadings

We propose a method that integrates bootstrap into the forward search algorithm in the construction of robust confidence intervals for elements of the eigenvectors of the correlation matrix in the presence of outliers. Coverage probability of the bootstrap simultaneous confidence intervals was compared to the coverage probabilities of regular asymptotic confidence region and asymptotic confidence region based on the minimum covariance determinant (MCD) approach through a simulation study. The method produced more stable coverage probabilities for datasets with or without outliers and across several sample sizes compared to approaches based on asymptotic confidence regions.     

The Coverage Probability of Confidence Intervals in One‐Way Analysis of Covariance after Two F Tests

Volume 3 of Analysis of Messy Data by Milliken & Johnson (2002) provides detailed recommendations about sequential model development for the analysis of covariance. In his review of this volume, Koehler (2002) asks whether users should be concerned about the effect of this sequential model development on the coverage probabilities of confidence intervals for comparing treatments. We present a general methodology for the examination of these coverage probabilities in the context of the two‐stage model selection procedure that uses two F tests and is proposed in Chapter 2 of Milliken & Johnson (2002). We apply this methodology to an illustrative example from this volume and show that these coverage probabilities are typically very far below nominal. Our conclusion is that users should be very concerned about the coverage probabilities of confidence intervals for comparing treatments constructed after this two‐stage model selection procedure.     

What Do Interpolated Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Population Quantiles Guarantee?

The interval between two prespecified order statistics of a sample provides a distribution-free confidence interval for a population quantile. However, due to discreteness, only a small set of exact coverage probabilities is available. Interpolated confidence intervals are designed to expand the set of available coverage probabilities. However, we show here that the infimum of the coverage probability for an interpolated confidence interval is either the coverage probability for the inner interval or the coverage probability obtained by removing the more likely of the two extreme subintervals from the outer interval. Thus, without additional assumptions, interpolated intervals do not expand the set of available guaranteed coverage probabilities.     

Confidence and prediction intervals based on interpolated records

In several statistical problems, nonparametric confidence intervals for population quantiles can be constructed and their coverage probabilities can be computed exactly, but cannot in general be rendered equal to a pre-determined level. The same difficulty arises for coverage probabilities of nonparametric prediction intervals for future observations. One solution to this difficulty is to interpolate between intervals which have the closest coverage probability from above and below to the pre-determined level. In this paper, confidence intervals for population quantiles are constructed based on interpolated upper and lower records. Subsequently, prediction intervals are obtained for future upper records based on interpolated upper records. Additionally, we derive upper bounds for the coverage error of these confidence and prediction intervals. Finally, our results are applied to some real data sets. Also, a comparison via a simulation study is done with similar classical intervals obtained before.     

On the construction of Bayes–confidence regions

We obtain approximate Bayes–confidence intervals for a scalar parameter based on directed likelihood. The posterior probabilities of these intervals agree with their unconditional coverage probabilities to fourth order, and with their conditional coverage probabilities to third order. These intervals are constructed for arbitrary smooth prior distributions. A key feature of the construction is that log-likelihood derivatives beyond second order are not required, unlike the asymptotic expansions of Severini.     

Robust confidence regions for multinomial probabilities

Generally, confidence regions for the probabilities of a multinomial population are constructed based on the Pearson χ² statistic. Morales et al. (Bootstrap confidence regions in multinomial sampling. Appl Math Comput. 2004;155:295–315) considered the bootstrap and asymptotic confidence regions based on a broader family of test statistics known as power-divergence test statistics. In this study, we extend their work and propose penalized power-divergence test statistics-based confidence regions. We only consider small sample sizes where asymptotic properties fail and alternative methods are needed. Both bootstrap and asymptotic confidence regions are constructed. We consider the percentile and the bias corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence regions. The latter confidence region has not been studied previously for the power-divergence statistics much less for the penalized ones. Designed simulation studies are carried out to calculate average coverage probabilities. Mean absolute deviation between actual and nominal coverage probabilities is used to compare the proposed confidence regions.     

Bias corrected empirical Bayes confidence intervals for the selected mean

Empirical Bayes (EB) methods are very useful for post selection inference. Following Datta et al. (2002 Datta, G. S., M. Ghosh, D. D. Smith, and P. Lahiri. 2002. On an asymptotic theory of conditional and unconditional coverage probabilities of empirical Bayes confidence intervals. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 29:139–52.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), we construct EB confidence intervals for the selected population mean. The EB intervals are adjusted to achieve the target coverage probabilities asymptotically up to the second order. Both unconditional coverage probabilities of EB intervals and corresponding probabilities conditional on ancillary statistics are found.     

A Simple Approximate Procedure for Constructing Binomial and Poisson Tolerance Intervals

The problems of constructing tolerance intervals for the binomial and Poisson distributions are considered. Closed-form approximate equal-tailed tolerance intervals (that control percentages in both tails) are proposed for both distributions. Exact coverage probabilities and expected widths are evaluated for the proposed equal-tailed tolerance intervals and the existing intervals. Furthermore, an adjustment to the nominal confidence level is suggested so that an equal-tailed tolerance interval can be used as a tolerance interval which includes a specified proportion of the population, but does not necessarily control percentages in both tails. Comparison of such coverage-adjusted tolerance intervals with respect to coverage probabilities and expected widths indicates that the closed-form approximate tolerance intervals are comparable with others, and less conservative, with minimum coverage probabilities close to the nominal level in most cases. The approximate tolerance intervals are simple and easy to compute using a calculator, and they can be recommended for practical applications. The methods are illustrated using two practical examples.     

Small sample performance of jackknife confidence intervals for the james-stein estimator

The primary goal of this paper is to examine the small sample coverage probability and size of jackknife confidence intervals centered at a Stein-rule estimator. A Monte Carlo experiment is used to explore the coverage probabilities and lengths of nominal 90% and 95% delete-one and infinitesimal jackknife confidence intervals centered at the Stein-rule estimator; these are compared to those obtained using a bootstrap procedure.     

Coverage Properties of Confidence Intervals for Generalized Additive Model Components

Abstract. We study the coverage properties of Bayesian confidence intervals for the smooth component functions of generalized additive models (GAMs) represented using any penalized regression spline approach. The intervals are the usual generalization of the intervals first proposed by Wahba and Silverman in 1983 and 1985, respectively, to the GAM component context. We present simulation evidence showing these intervals have close to nominal ‘across‐the‐function’ frequentist coverage probabilities, except when the truth is close to a straight line/plane function. We extend the argument introduced by Nychka in 1988 for univariate smoothing splines to explain these results. The theoretical argument suggests that close to nominal coverage probabilities can be achieved, provided that heavy oversmoothing is avoided, so that the bias is not too large a proportion of the sampling variability. The theoretical results allow us to derive alternative intervals from a purely frequentist point of view, and to explain the impact that the neglect of smoothing parameter variability has on confidence interval performance. They also suggest switching the target of inference for component‐wise intervals away from smooth components in the space of the GAM identifiability constraints.     

Matching pseudocounts for interval estimation of binomial and Poisson parameters

ABSTRACT

For interval estimation of a binomial proportion and a Poisson mean, matching pseudocounts are derived, which give the one-sided Wald confidence intervals with second-order accuracy. The confidence intervals remove the bias of coverage probabilities given by the score confidence intervals. Partial poor behavior of the confidence intervals by the matching pseudocounts is corrected by hybrid methods using the score confidence interval depending on sample values.