Comparison of efficiencies of some symmetry tests around an unknown centre

In this paper, some recent and classical tests of symmetry are modified for the case of an unknown centre. The unknown centre is estimated with its α-trimmed mean estimator. The asymptotic behaviour of the new tests is explored. The local approximate Bahadur efficiency is used to compare the tests to each other as well as to some other tests.     

New tests for multivariate normality based on Small's and Srivastava's graphical methods

In this paper, we propose a new measure of fit which can be used in the case of quantile–quantile plots. This measure, when applied to Small's and Srivastava's graphical methods provides two new tests for assessing multivariate normality. For different sample sizes and numbers of variables, the critical values of these tests were evaluated via simulations. The power of the new tests and its comparison with some other tests for multivariate normality are presented herein.     

Empirical likelihood test via estimating equations

It has been a long history for testing whether the underlying distribution belongs to a particular one or a parametric class of distributions. In this paper, we propose some empirical likelihood ratio tests via estimating equations. The proposed new tests allow one to add more relevant constraints so as to improve the powers. A simulation study shows the effectiveness of the new tests. The new method is then used to test employer size and market value distributions of US firms.     

On Estimation and Tests of Time-Varying Effects in the Proportional Hazards Model

Abstract.  Cox's proportional hazards model is routinely used in many applied fields, some times, however, with too little emphasis on the fit of the model. In this paper, we suggest some new tests for investigating whether or not covariate effects vary with time. These tests are a natural and integrated part of an extended version of the Cox model. An important new feature of the suggested test is that time constancy for a specific covariate is examined in a model, where some effects of other covariates are allowed to vary with time and some are constant; thus making successive testing of time-dependency possible. The proposed techniques are illustrated with the well-known Mayo liver disease data, and a small simulation study investigates the finite sample properties of the tests.     

Goodness-of-fit tests based on Verma Kullback–Leibler information

In this article, a new consistent estimator of Veram’s entropy is introduced. We establish the entropy test based on the new information namely Verma Kullback–Leibler discrimination methodology. The results are used to introduce goodness-of-fit tests for normal and exponential distributions. The root of mean square errors, critical values, and powers for some alternatives are obtained by simulation. The proposed test is compared with other tests.     

Moments of nonparametric probability density functions of entropy estimators applied to testing the inverse Gaussian distribution

The inverse Gaussian (IG) distribution is widely used to model data and then it is important to develop efficient goodness of fit tests for this distribution. In this article, we introduce some new test statistics for examining the IG goodness of fit based on correcting moments of nonparametric probability density functions of entropy estimators. These tests are consistent against all alternatives. Critical points and power of the tests are explored by simulation. We show that the proposed tests are more powerful than competitor tests. Finally, the proposed tests are illustrated by real data examples.     

An R package for testing goodness of fit: goft

This R package implements three types of goodness-of-fit tests for some widely used probability distributions where there are unknown parameters, namely tests based on data transformations, on the ratio of two estimators of a dispersion parameter, and correlation tests. Most of the considered tests have been proved to be powerful against a wide range of alternatives and some new ones are proposed here. The package's functionality is illustrated with several examples by using some data sets from the areas of environmental studies, biology and finance, among others.     

Jackknife empirical likelihood tests for distribution functions

It has been a long history for testing whether the underlying distribution belongs to a particular family. In this paper, we propose some jackknife empirical likelihood tests via estimating equations. The proposed new tests allow one to add more relevant constraints so as to improve the powers. A simulation study shows the effectiveness of the new tests.     

Random Weighting Empirical Distribution Function and its Applications to Goodness-of-Fit Testing

In this article, a randomized estimator of the empirical distribution function (EDF) called random weighting empirical distribution function (RWEDF) is introduced, one special case of which is just equivalent to the Bayesian bootstrap. The consistency of the RWEDF is established under certain conditions. By substituting this new EDF for the classical EDF, we obtain new versions of some EDF test statistics for goodness-of-fit. The simulation results show that the new tests are more powerful than the corresponding tests based on the classical EDF under some cases.     

Data Driven Rank Test for Two-Sample Problem

Traditional linear rank tests are known to possess low power for large spectrum of alternatives. In this paper we introduce a new rank test possessing a considerably larger range of sensitivity than linear rank tests. The new test statistic is a sum of squares of some linear rank statistics while the number of summands is chosen via a data-based selection rule. Simulations show that the new test possesses high and stable power in situations when linear rank tests completely break down, while simultaneously it has almost the same power under alternatives which can be detected by standard linear rank tests. Our approach is illustrated by some practical examples. Theoretical support is given by deriving asymptotic null distribution of the test statistic and proving consistency of the new test under essentially any alternative.     

Simultaneous semi-sequential testing of dual alternatives for pattern recognition

In this paper, we propose a new nonparametric simultaneous test for dual alternatives. Simultaneous tests for dual alternatives are used for pattern detection of arsenic contamination level in ground water. We consider two possible patterns, namely, monotone shift and an umbrella-type location alternative, as the dual alternatives. Pattern recognition problems of this nature are addressed in Bandyopadhyay et al. [5], stretching the idea of multiple hypotheses tests as in Benjamini and Hochberg [6]. In the present context, we develop an alternative approach based on contrasts that helps us to detect three underlying pattern much more efficiently. We illustrate the new methodology through a motivating example related to highly sensitive issue of arsenic contamination in ground water. We provide some Monte-Carlo studies related to the proposed technique and give a comparative study between different detection procedures. We also obtain some related asymptotic results.     

Goodness-of-fit tests for lifetime distributions based on Type II censored data

In this article, the general test statistic introduced by Alizadeh Noughabi and Balakrishnan [Goodness of fit using a new estimate of Kullback-Leibler information based on Type II censored data. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2015;64:627–635.] is applied for testing goodness of fit of lifetime distributions based on Type II censored data. The test statistic is constructed based on an estimate of Kullback–Leibler (KL) information. We investigate the properties of the proposed test statistic such as the test statistic is nonnegative, just like KL information. We apply this test statistic to following distributions: Exponential, Weibull, Log-normal and Pareto. The critical values and Type I error of the proposed tests are obtained. It is shown that the proposed tests have an excellent Type I error and hence can be used confidently in practice. Then, by Monte Carlo simulations, the power values of the proposed tests are computed against several alternatives and compared with those of the existing tests. Finally, some real-world reliability data are used for illustrative purpose.     

For what use are tests of hypotheses and tests of significance

Tests of sharp null hypotheses, although frequently computed, are.rarely appropriate as the major end product of statistical analyses, except possibly in some, areas of the natural sciences. But procedures closely akin to tests, although often less formal, are needed in almost every investigation in which exploratory data analysis is used to help to decide upon the statistical model appropriate for the final analysis. The term “diagnostic check”has been suggested by Box and Jenkins for these procedures. Traditional statistical tests often suggest useful diagnostic checks -and this, in my view, is what tests are mainly good for-but visual examination and interpretation of data plots are often equally important. Biere is also much to be gained by the development of new diagnostic checks, and testing theory may be useful as one guide to this development.     

Homogeneity test for functional data

In the context of functional data analysis, we propose new sample tests for homogeneity. Based on some well-known depth measures, we construct four different statistics in order to measure distance between the two samples. A simulation study is performed to check the efficiency of the tests when confronted with shape and magnitude perturbation. Finally, we apply these tools to measure the homogeneity in some samples of real data, and we obtain good results using this new method.     

Sequential LND sensitivity test for binary response data

Sensitivity tests are used to make inferences about a sensitivity, a characteristic property of some products that cannot be observed directly. For binary response sensitivity data (dead or alive, explode or unexplode), the Langlie and Neyer are two well-known sensitivity tests. The priorities of the Langlie and Neyer tests are investigated in this paper. It is shown that the Langlie test has an advantage in getting an overlap, while the Neyer test has better estimation precision. Aiming at improving both the speed of getting an overlap and the estimation precision, we propose a new sensitivity test which replaces the first part of the Neyer test with the Langlie test. Our simulation studies indicate that the proposed test outperforms the Langlie, Neyer and Dror and Steinberg tests from the viewpoints of estimation precision and probability of obtaining an overlap.     

Permutation tests for homogeneity based on some characterizations

In this work, non parametric tests are proposed for testing the homogeneity of two or more populations. The tests are based on recently obtained characterizations. The test procedure is based on the permutation bootstrap technique. For the two-sample case the new tests are compared with permutation tests based on the empirical characteristic function and some other tests. The comparison is fulfilled via a Monte Carlo simulation.     

A HEURISTIC TECHNIQUE FOR TESTING FOR THE PRESENCE OF INTERACTION IN NONREPLICATED FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS

Abstract  This paper suggests univariate and multivariate techniques for investigating interaction in nonreplicated factorial experiments. The tests can detect certain types of interaction, but they are not powerful against all possible alternative hypotheses. The two-way factorial experiment is discussed in some detail and an example is used to demonstrate the procedure. The procedure is compared to other tests for interaction. These comparisons show that the procedure can detect some types of interaction which other tests cannot. Likewise other tests can detect interaction this procedure cannot.     

Selection criteria for the construction of efficient diagnostic keys

A diagnostic key defines a hierarchial sequence of tests used to identify a specimen from a set of known taxa. The usual measure of the efficiency of a key, the expected number of tests per identification, may not be appropriate when the responses to tests are not known for all taxon/test pairs. An alternative measure is derived and it is shown that the test selected for use at each point in the sequence should depend on which measure is used. Two suggestions of Gower and Payne (1975), regarding test selection, are shown to be appropriate only to the new measure. Tests are usually selected by calculating the value of some selection criterion function. Functions are reviewed for use in each of the two situations, and new functions are derived. The functions discussed are shown to be interpretable in terms of the number of tests required to complete the key from the current point in the sequence, given that a particular test is selected. This interpretation enables the functions to be extended to select tests with different costs and allows recommendations to be made as to which function to use, depending on how many ‘good’ tests are available.     

On Charlier polynomials in testing Poissonity

This article discusses applications of Charlier polynomials when checking how well classic Poisson model fits the data. We show that smooth components pertaining to the polynomials can be effectively used in preliminary analysis of data at hand and we propose and discuss some tests based on them. Our extensive simulations shed new light on power behavior of the best tests in the area.     

Inference procedures for the variance gamma model and applications

Goodness-of-fit tests for the family of the four-parameter normal–variance gamma distribution are constructed. The tests are based on a weighted integral incorporating the empirical characteristic function of suitably standardized data. Non-standard algorithms are employed for the computation of the maximum-likelihood estimators of the parameters involved in the test statistic, while Monte Carlo results are used in order to compare the new test with some classical goodness-of-fit methods. A real-data application is also included.