A MATLAB package for multivariate normality test

A MATLAB package testing for multivariate normality (TMVN) is implemented as an interactive and graphical tool to examine multivariate normality (MVN). Monte Carlo simulation studies have failed to find a uniformly most powerful MVN test, which requires a rather extensive statistical inference procedure. TMVN contains several competitive MVN tests and provides a flexible and extensive testing environment for univariate or multivariate data analyses. Simulated results provide information of which test may possess more power for the selected non-MVN alternatives. Fisher's Iris data are used to show how TMVN can be used in practice.     

A power study of goodness-of-fit tests for multivariate normality implemented in R

Multivariate statistical analysis procedures often require data to be multivariate normally distributed. Many tests have been developed to verify if a sample could indeed have come from a normally distributed population. These tests do not all share the same sensitivity for detecting departures from normality, and thus a choice of test is of central importance. This study investigates through simulated data the power of those tests for multivariate normality implemented in the statistic software R and pits them against the variant of testing each marginal distribution for normality. The results of testing two-dimensional data at a level of significance α=5% showed that almost one-third of those tests implemented in R do not have a type I error below this. Other tests outperformed the naive variant in terms of power even when the marginals were not normally distributed. Even though no test was consistently better than all alternatives with every alternative distribution, the energy-statistic test always showed relatively good power across all tested sample sizes.     

New tests for multivariate normality based on Small's and Srivastava's graphical methods

In this paper, we propose a new measure of fit which can be used in the case of quantile–quantile plots. This measure, when applied to Small's and Srivastava's graphical methods provides two new tests for assessing multivariate normality. For different sample sizes and numbers of variables, the critical values of these tests were evaluated via simulations. The power of the new tests and its comparison with some other tests for multivariate normality are presented herein.     

A re-appraisal of tests for normality

Tests for normality can be divided into two groups - those based upon a function of the empirical distribution function and those based upon a function of the original observations. The latter group of statistics test spherical symmetry and not necessarily normality. If the distribution is completely specified then the first group can be used to test for ‘spherical’ normality. However, if the distribution is incompletely specified and F‘‘x_i - x’/s’ is used these test statistics also test sphericity rather than normality. A Monte Carlo study was conducted for the completely specified case, to investigate the sensitivity of the distance tests to departures from normality when the alternative distributions are non-normal spherically symmetric laws. A “new” test statistic is proposed for testing a completely specified normal distribution     

Normality testing: two new tests using L-moments

Establishing that there is no compelling evidence that some population is not normally distributed is fundamental to many statistical inferences, and numerous approaches to testing the null hypothesis of normality have been proposed. Fundamentally, the power of a test depends on which specific deviation from normality may be presented in a distribution. Knowledge of the potential nature of deviation from normality should reasonably guide the researcher's selection of testing for non-normality. In most settings, little is known aside from the data available for analysis, so that selection of a test based on general applicability is typically necessary. This research proposes and reports the power of two new tests of normality. One of the new tests is a version of the R-test that uses the L-moments, respectively, L-skewness and L-kurtosis and the other test is based on normalizing transformations of L-skewness and L-kurtosis. Both tests have high power relative to alternatives. The test based on normalized transformations, in particular, shows consistently high power and outperforms other normality tests against a variety of distributions.     

Invariant tests for multivariate normality: a critical review

d -dimensional random vector X is some nondegenerate d-variate normal distribution, on the basis of i.i.d. copies X ₁, ..., X _x of X. Particular emphasis is given to progress that has been achieved during the last decade. Furthermore, we stress the typical diagnostic pitfall connected with purportedly ‘directed’ procedures, such as tests based on measures of multivariate skewness. Received: April 30, 2001; revised version: October 30, 2001     

Efficiency of ranked set sampling in tests for normality

In this article, we consider the ranked set sampling (RSS) and investigate seven tests for normality under RSS. Each test is described and then power of each test is obtained by Monte Carlo simulations under various alternatives. Finally, the powers of the tests based on RSS are compared with the powers of the tests based on the simple random sampling and the results are discussed.     

Empirical behavior of some tests for normality

The behavior of a range of tests assessing the normality of a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables is investigated.An examination of the empirical significance level of the tests is undertaken for different sample sizes. The empirical power associated with these tests is also calculated under some alternative distributions.     

Comparisons of various types of normality tests

Normality tests can be classified into tests based on chi-squared, moments, empirical distribution, spacings, regression and correlation and other special tests. This paper studies and compares the power of eight selected normality tests: the Shapiro–Wilk test, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, the Lilliefors test, the Cramer–von Mises test, the Anderson–Darling test, the D'Agostino–Pearson test, the Jarque–Bera test and chi-squared test. Power comparisons of these eight tests were obtained via the Monte Carlo simulation of sample data generated from alternative distributions that follow symmetric short-tailed, symmetric long-tailed and asymmetric distributions. Our simulation results show that for symmetric short-tailed distributions, D'Agostino and Shapiro–Wilk tests have better power. For symmetric long-tailed distributions, the power of Jarque–Bera and D'Agostino tests is quite comparable with the Shapiro–Wilk test. As for asymmetric distributions, the Shapiro–Wilk test is the most powerful test followed by the Anderson–Darling test.     

Recent and classical tests for normality - a comparative study

We give a critical synopsis of classical and recent tests for univariate normality, our emphasis being on procedures which are consistent against all alternatives. The power performance of some selected tests (Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, Shapiro-Francia, Epps-Pulley) is assessed in a simulation study. Numerical results are illuminated by plots of isodynes, i.e., lines of constant estimated power, for the Johnson-system of distributions.     

New invariant and consistent chi-squared type goodness-of-fit tests for multivariate normality and a related comparative simulation study

ABSTRACT

New invariant and consistent goodness-of-fit tests for multivariate normality are introduced. Tests are based on the Karhunen–Loève transformation of a multidimensional sample from a population. A comparison of simulated powers of tests and other well-known tests with respect to some alternatives is given. The simulation study demonstrates that power of the proposed McCull test almost does not depend on the number of grouping cells. The test shows an advantage over other chi-squared type tests. However, averaged over all of the simulated conditions examined in this article, the Anderson–Darling type and the Cramer–von Mises type tests seem to be the best.     

A new large sample goodness of fit test for multivariate normality based on chi squared probability plots

Based on a chi square transform of the multivariate normal data set, we proposed a technique for testing multinormality which is the sum of interpoint squared distances between an ordered set of the transformed observations and the set of the population pth quantiles of the chi squared distribution. The critical values of the test were evaluated for different sample sizes and random vector dimensions through extensive simulations. The empirical type-I-error rates and powers of the proposed test were compared with those of some other well known tests for MVN with the proposed test showing excellent results at large sample sizes.     

A general algorithm fob,univariate and multivariate goodness of pit tests based on graphical representation

This paper presents a general algorithm tor assessing the distributional assumptions. Empirical distributions of the corresponding test statistics are obtained and examples are given to illustrate various applications of the proposed test. By using the squared radii and angles, it is shown that the problem of assessing multivariate normality can be reduced to that of testing for a univariate distribution. A limited comparison is made to investigate the power of the proposed test. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant NO.G88135. Support from the Computer Applications ami Software Engineering (CASE) Center of Syracuse University is also gratefully acknowledged     

Graphical comparison of normality tests for unimodal distribution data

A methodology is proposed to compare the power of normality tests with a wide variety of alternative unimodal distributions. It is based on the representation of a distribution mosaic in which kurtosis varies vertically and skewness horizontally. The mosaic includes distributions such as exponential, Laplace or uniform, with normal occupying the centre. Simulation is used to determine the probability of a sample from each distribution in the mosaic being accepted as normal. We demonstrate our proposal by applying it to the analysis and comparison of some of the most well-known tests.     

A powerful test for multivariate normality

This paper investigates a new test for normality that is easy for biomedical researchers to understand and easy to implement in all dimensions. In terms of power comparison against a broad range of alternatives, the new test outperforms the best known competitors in the literature as demonstrated by simulation results. In addition, the proposed test is illustrated using data from real biomedical studies.     

Percentage points for directional anderson-darling goodness-of-fit tests

This paper discusses the problem of assessing the asymptotic distribution when parameters of the hypothesized distribution are estimated from a sample, pointing out a common mistake included in the paper by Sinclair, Spurr, and Ahmad (1990) which introduced two modifications of the Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit test statistic. Their two test statistics modify the popular Anderson-Darling test statistic to be sensitive to departures of the fitted distribution from the true distribution in one or the other of the tails. This paper uses these new test statistics to develop tests of fit for the normal and exponential distributions. Easy to use formulas are given so the reader can perform these tests at any sample size without consulting exhaustive tables of percentage points. Finally a power study is given to demonstrate the test statistics’ viability against a broad range of alternatives.     

A method for constructing exact tests from test statistics that have unknown null distributions

A randomized procedure is described for constructing an exact test from a test statistic F for which the null distribution is unknown. The procedure is restricted to cases where F is a function of a random element U that has a known distribution under the null hypothesis. The power of the exact randomized test is shown to be greater in some cases than the power of the exact nonrandomized test that could be constructed if the null distribution of Fwere known.     

A powerful affine invariant test for multivariate normality based on interpoint distances of principal components

In this paper, a probability plots class of tests for multivariate normality is introduced. Based on independent standardized principal components of a d-variate normal data set, we obtained the sum of squared differences between corresponding observations of an ordered set of each principal component observations and the set of the population pth quantiles of the standard normal distribution. We proposed the sum of these d-sums of squared differences as an appropriate statistic for testing multivariate normality. We evaluated empirical critical values of the statistic and compared its power with those of some highly regarded techniques with a wonderful result.     

Extended critical vawes of the multivariate extreme deviate test for detecting a single spurious observation

The Institute of Mathematical Statistics has published a table of critical values for the multivariate extreme deviate test. However, the critical values, derived by a Monte Carlo simulation, are given for only the dimensions 2 through 5. We present new critical values for the dimensions 6 through 10, 12, 15, and 20. The results are presented in both table and graphical form. All critical values for the test statistic have been generated by a Monte Carlo simulation using 10,000 observations per case. An example is presented using the new critical values.