Setting confidence intervals by ratio estimator

For the survey population total of a variable y when values of an auxiliary variable x are available a popular procedure is to employ the ratio estimator on drawing a simple random sample without replacement (SRSWOR) especially when the size of the sample is large. To set up a confidence interval for the total, various variance estimators are available to pair with the ratio estimator. We add a few more variance estimators studded with asymptotic design-cum-model properties. The ratio estimator is traditionally known to be appropriate when the regression of y on x is linear through the origin and the conditional variance of y given x is proportional to x. But through a numerical exercise by simulation we find the confidence intervals to fare better if the regression line deviates from the origin or if the conditional variance is disproportionate with x. Also, comparing the confidence intervals using alternative variance estimators we find our newly proposed variance estimators to yield favourably competitive results.     

Empirical Bayes confidence intervals shrinking both means and variances

Summary.  We construct empirical Bayes intervals for a large number p of means. The existing intervals in the literature assume that variances     are either equal or unequal but known. When the variances are unequal and unknown, the suggestion is typically to replace them by unbiased estimators     . However, when p is large, there would be advantage in 'borrowing strength' from each other. We derive double-shrinkage intervals for means on the basis of our empirical Bayes estimators that shrink both the means and the variances. Analytical and simulation studies and application to a real data set show that, compared with the t -intervals, our intervals have higher coverage probabilities while yielding shorter lengths on average. The double-shrinkage intervals are on average shorter than the intervals from shrinking the means alone and are always no longer than the intervals from shrinking the variances alone. Also, the intervals are explicitly defined and can be computed immediately.     

One-sided confidence intervals for population variances of skewed distributions

In this article we study the coverage accuracy of one-sided bootstrap-t confidence intervals for the population variances combined with Hall's and Johnson's transformation. We compare the coverage accuracy of all suggested intervals and intervals based on the Chi-square statistic for variances of positively skewed distributions. In addition, we describe and discuss an application of the presented methods for measuring and analyzing revenue variability within the food retail industry. The results show that both Hall's transformation and Johnson's transformation approaches yield good coverage accuracy of the lower endpoint confidence intervals, better than method based on the Chi-square statistic. For the upper endpoint confidence intervals Hall's bootstrap-t method yields the best coverage accuracy when compared with other methods.     

One-sided confidence intervals for the positive linear combination of two variances

In this article the existing methods for determining the approximate onesided confidence intervals on the positive linear combinations of two variances are examined. In addition, an iterative algorithm which can be used to obtain an 'exact' one-sided confidence intervals is presented.     

Small sample performance of jackknife confidence intervals for the james-stein estimator

The primary goal of this paper is to examine the small sample coverage probability and size of jackknife confidence intervals centered at a Stein-rule estimator. A Monte Carlo experiment is used to explore the coverage probabilities and lengths of nominal 90% and 95% delete-one and infinitesimal jackknife confidence intervals centered at the Stein-rule estimator; these are compared to those obtained using a bootstrap procedure.     

Bayesian confidence intervals for means and variances of lognormal and bivariate lognormal distributions

The lognormal distribution is currently used extensively to describe the distribution of positive random variables. This is especially the case with data pertaining to occupational health and other biological data. One particular application of the data is statistical inference with regards to the mean of the data. Other authors, namely Zou et al. (2009), have proposed procedures involving the so-called “method of variance estimates recovery” (MOVER), while an alternative approach based on simulation is the so-called generalized confidence interval, discussed by Krishnamoorthy and Mathew (2003). In this paper we compare the performance of the MOVER-based confidence interval estimates and the generalized confidence interval procedure to coverage of credibility intervals obtained using Bayesian methodology using a variety of different prior distributions to estimate the appropriateness of each. An extensive simulation study is conducted to evaluate the coverage accuracy and interval width of the proposed methods. For the Bayesian approach both the equal-tail and highest posterior density (HPD) credibility intervals are presented. Various prior distributions (Independence Jeffreys' prior, Jeffreys'-Rule prior, namely, the square root of the determinant of the Fisher Information matrix, reference and probability-matching priors) are evaluated and compared to determine which give the best coverage with the most efficient interval width. The simulation studies show that the constructed Bayesian confidence intervals have satisfying coverage probabilities and in some cases outperform the MOVER and generalized confidence interval results. The Bayesian inference procedures (hypothesis tests and confidence intervals) are also extended to the difference between two lognormal means as well as to the case of zero-valued observations and confidence intervals for the lognormal variance. In the last section of this paper the bivariate lognormal distribution is discussed and Bayesian confidence intervals are obtained for the difference between two correlated lognormal means as well as for the ratio of lognormal variances, using nine different priors.     

Relationships between confidence intervals for the ratio of two variances of independent normal distributions

Burk at al (1984) gave a results concerning the comparison of the length of the two different confidence intervals for variance ratio, when the construction of the intervals was based on the principle of “equal tails”11. The purpose of this paper is to be solve the similar problem in case of the principle of “minimal length”.     

Jackknife empirical likelihood method for testing the equality of two variances

In this paper, we propose a nonparametric method based on jackknife empirical likelihood ratio to test the equality of two variances. The asymptotic distribution of the test statistic has been shown to follow χ² distribution with the degree of freedom 1. Simulations have been conducted to show the type I error and the power compared to Levene's test and F test under different distribution settings. The proposed method has been applied to a real data set to illustrate the testing procedure.     

Simultaneous confidence intervals for pairwise multiple comparisons in a two-way unbalanced design with unequal variances

In this research, we propose simultaneous confidence intervals for all pairwise multiple comparisons in a two-way unbalanced design with unequal variances, using a parametric bootstrap approach. Simulation results show that Type 1 error of the multiple comparison test is close to the nominal level even for small samples. They also show that the proposed method outperforms Tukey–Kramer procedure when variances are heteroscedastic and group sizes are unequal.     

On confidence intervals for the among-group variance in the one-way random effects model with unequal error variances

Based on a quadratic form of the group means, we consider two different approaches to construct a confidence interval for the among-group variance in the one-way random effects model with unequal error variances. In one approach the limits of the interval are determined by solving non-linear equations whereas in the second approach the bounds are given explicitly. By using correction terms for convexity in both approaches, we improve the primary intervals and obtain intervals whose actual confidence coefficients are closer to the nominal confidence coefficient. By means of a simulation study, we show that an improved confidence interval from each approach can be recommended for the practical use.     

Expanded confidence intervals

Confidence intervals for location parameters are expanded (in either direction) to some “crucial” points and the resulting increase in the confidence coefficient investigated.Particaular crucial points are chosen to illuminate some hypothesis testing problems.Special results are dervied for the normal distribution with estimated variance and, in particular, for the problem of classifiying treatments as better or worse than a control.For this problem the usual two-sided Dunnett procedure is seen to be inefficient.Suggestions are made for the use of already published tables for this problem.Mention is made of the use of expanded confidence intervals for all pairwise comparisons of treatments using an “honest ordering difference” rather than Tukey's “honest siginificant difference”.     

Bootstrap confidence intervals for smoothing splines and their comparison to bayesian confidence intervals

We construct bootstrap confidence intervals for smoothing spline estimates based on Gaussian data, and penalized likelihood smoothing spline estimates based on data from .exponential families. Several vari- ations of bootstrap confidence intervals are considered and compared. We find that the commonly used ootstrap percentile intervals are inferior to the T intervals and to intervals based on bootstrap estimation of mean squared errors. The best variations of the bootstrap confidence intervals behave similar to the well known Bayesian confidence intervals. These bootstrap confidence intervals have an average coverage probability across the function being estimated, as opposed to a pointwise property.     

Confidence intervals for the ratio of two variances

In this paper we consider confidence intervals for the ratio of two population variances. We propose a confidence interval for the ratio of two variances based on the t-statistic by deriving its Edgeworth expansion and considering Hall's and Johnson's transformations. Then, we consider the coverage accuracy of suggested intervals and intervals based on the F-statistic for some distributions.     

Refining binomial confidence intervals

A method for refining an equivariant binomial confidence procedure is presented which, when applied to an existing procedure, produces a new set of equivariant intervals that are uniformly superior. The family of procedures generated from this method constitute a complete class within the class of all equivariant procedures. In certain cases it is shown that this class is also minimal complete. Also, an optimally property, monotone minimaxity, is investigated, and monotone minimax procedures are constructed.     

Model robust confidence intervals

Confidence intervals are constructed for real-valued parameter estimation in a general regression model with normal errors. When the error variance is known these intervals are optimal (in the sense of minimizing length subject to guaranteed probability of coverage) among all intervals estimates which are centered at a linear estimate of the parameter. When the error variance is unknown and the regression model is an approximately linear model (a class of models which permits bounded systematic departures from an underlying ideal model) then an independent estimate of variance is found and the intervals can then be appropriately scaled.     

Robust generalized confidence intervals

Most interval estimates are derived from computable conditional distributions conditional on the data. In this article, we call the random variables having such conditional distributions confidence distribution variables and define their finite-sample breakdown values. Based on this, the definition of breakdown value of confidence intervals is introduced, which covers the breakdowns in both the coverage probability and interval length. High-breakdown confidence intervals are constructed by the structural method in location-scale families. Simulation results are presented to compare the traditional confidence intervals and their robust analogues.     

Simultaneous confidence sets and confidence intervals for multiple ratios

This paper deals with the problem of simultaneously estimating multiple ratios. In the simplest case of only one ratio parameter, Fieller's theorem (J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 16 (1954) 175) provides a confidence interval for the single ratio. For multiple ratios, there is no method available to construct simultaneous confidence intervals that exactly satisfy a given familywise confidence level. Many of the methods in use are conservative since they are based on probability inequalities. In this paper, first we consider exact simultaneous confidence sets based on the multivariate t-distribution. Two approaches of determining the exact simultaneous confidence sets are outlined. Second, approximate simultaneous confidence intervals based on the multivariate t-distribution with estimated correlation matrix and a resampling approach are discussed. The methods are applied to ratios of linear combinations of the means in the one-way layout and ratios of parameter combinations in the general linear model. Extensive Monte Carlo simulation is carried out to compare the performance of the various methods with respect to the stability of the estimated critical points and of the coverage probabilities.     

Repeated confidence intervals and prediction intervals using stochastic curtailment

Jennlson and Turnbull (1984,1989) proposed procedures for repeated confidence intervals for parameters of interest In a clinical trial monitored with group sequential methods. These methods are extended for use with stochastic curtailment procedures for two samples in the estimation of differences of means, differences of proportions, odds ratios, and hazard ratios. Methods are described for constructing 1) confidence intervals for these estimates at repeated times In the course of a trial, and 2) prediction intervals for predicted estimates at the end of a trial. Specific examples from several clinical trials are presented.     

Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals

We investigate several nonparametric methods; the bootstrap, the jackknife, the delta method, and other related techniques. The first and simplest goal is the assignment of nonparametric standard errors to a real-valued statistic. More ambitiously, we consider setting nonparametric confidence intervals for a real-valued parameter. Building on the well understood case of confidence intervals for the median, some hopeful evidence is presented that such a theory may be possible.