Constructions of Residual Treatment Effects Designs for Comparing Test Treatments with a Control

This article deals with residual treatment effects designs for the purpose of comparing v test treatments with a control treatment when the number of periods is no larger than v + 1. Control balanced residual treatment effects designs, which are Schur-optimal, are considered. Some methods of their construction are given.     

Minimal balanced repeated measurements designs

Experimental designs in which treatments are applied to the experimental units, one at a time, in sequences over a number of periods, have been used in several scientific investigations and are known as repeated measurements designs. Besides direct effects, these designs allow estimation of residual effects of treatments along with adjustment for them. Assuming the existence of first-order residual effects of treatments, Hedayat & Afsarinejad (1975) gave a method of constructing minimal balanced repeated measurements [RM(v,n,p)] design for v treatments using n=2v experimental units for p [=(v+1)/2] periods when v is a prime or prime power. Here, a general method of construction of these designs for all odd v has been given along with an outline for their analysis. In terms of variances of estimated elementary contrasts between treatment effects (direct and residual), these designs are seen to be partially variance balanced based on the circular association scheme.     

A construction of repeated measurements designs with balance for residual effects

Families of Repeated Measurements Designs balanced for residual effects are constructed (whenever the divisibility conditions allow), under the assumption that the number of periods is less than the number of treatments and that each treatment precedes each other treatment once. These designs are then shown to be connected for both residual and direct treatment effects.     

BALANCED DESIGNS FOR ROW-AND-COLUMN EXPERIMENTS WITH TWO NON-INTERACTING SETS OF TREATMENTS, ONE SET NOT BEING APPLIED TO ALL THE ROWS1

This note gives and discusses balanced row-and-column designs for experiments with two non-interacting sets of treatments, one set not being applied to all the rows. These designs are potentially useful for occasions when trees that have tested one set of experimental treatments are needed for testing a second set before the residual effects of the first have become negligible, but when the experimenter wishes to apply the second set to only some of the rows. The designs are appropriate if the residual and new effects do not interact.     

Efficient crossover designs in the presence of interactions between direct and carry-over treatment effects

Crossover designs, or repeated measurements designs, are used for experiments in which t treatments are applied to each of n experimental units successively over p time periods. Such experiments are widely used in areas such as clinical trials, experimental psychology and agricultural field trials. In addition to the direct effect on the response of the treatment in the period of application, there is also the possible presence of a residual, or carry-over, effect of a treatment from one or more previous periods. We use a model in which the residual effect from a treatment depends upon the treatment applied in the succeeding period; that is, a model which includes interactions between the treatment direct and residual effects. We assume that residual effects do not persist further than one succeeding period.A particular class of strongly balanced repeated measurements designs with n=t² units and which are uniform on the periods is examined. A lower bound for the A-efficiency of the designs for estimating the direct effects is derived and it is shown that such designs are highly efficient for any number of periods p=2,…,2t.     

Construction of repeated measurements designs strongly balanced for residual effects

Abstract

Repeated Measurements Designs have been widely used in agriculture, animal husbandry, education, biology, botany and engineering. Balanced or strongly balanced repeated measurements designs are useful to balance out the residual effects. In this article, some new generators and construction procedures are proposed to obtain circular strongly balanced repeated measurements designs in periods of (a) equal sizes, (b) two different sizes, and (c) three different sizes.     

A review of uniform cross-over designs

Uniform cross-over designs form an important family of experimental designs. They have been applied in many scientific disciplines including clinical trials, agricultural studies and psychological experiments. In this paper we consider the four types of uniform cross-over design, as given by Williams [1949. Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Aust. J. Sci. Res. 2, 149–168], Cheng and Wu [1980. Balanced repeated measurements designs. Ann. Statist. 8, 1272–1283. Corrigendum 11 (1983) 349], Bate and Jones [2006. The construction of nearly balanced and nearly strongly balanced uniform cross-over designs. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 136, 3248–3267] and Kunert [1983. Optimal design and refinement of the linear model with applications to repeated measurements designs. Ann. Statist. 11, 247–257]. The efficiency of these designs, existence criteria and methods of construction are described.     

Designs balanced for circular residual effects

Magda (1980) introduced a model for repeated measurements designs with a circular structure of the residual effects. He proved the universal optimality of circular balanced uniform designs over a subclass of the possible designs. We strengthen his result to optimality over the set of all designs with the same number of experimental units, periods and treatments.     

Minimal circular balanced repeated measurement designs in unequal period sizes

Abstract

Repeated measurement designs (RMDs) are widely used in medicine, pharmacology, animal sciences and psychology. In these fields, there are several situations where these designs should be used in periods of different sizes. With the use of RMD, residual effects or carry over effects may arise and balanced RMDs are solution to this problem. In this article, therefore, some infinite series are developed through method of cyclic shifts to obtain circular balanced repeated measurements designs in periods of two different sizes.     

Balanced and partially balanced incomplete block designs with autocorrelation errors

The paper aims to find variance balanced and variance partially balanced incomplete block designs when observations within blocks are autocorrelated and we call them BIBAC and PBIBAC designs. Orthogonal arrays of type I and type II when used as BIBAC designs have smaller average variance of elementary contrasts of treatment effects compared to the corresponding Balanced Incomplete Block (BIB) designs with homoscedastic, uncorrelated errors. The relative efficiency of BIB designs compared to BIBAC designs depends on the block size k and the autocorrelation ρ and is independent of the number of treatments. Further this relative efficiency increases with increasing k. Partially balanced incomplete block designs with autocorrelated errors are introduced using partially balanced incomplete block designs and orthogonal arrays of type I and type II.     

Optimal Designs for the Carryover Model with Random Interactions Between Subjects and Treatments

The paper considers a model for crossover designs with carryover effects and a random interaction between treatments and subjects. Under this model, two observations of the same treatment on the same subject are positively correlated and therefore provide less information than two observations of the same treatment on different subjects. The introduction of the interaction makes the determination of optimal designs much harder than is the case for the traditional model. Generalising the results of Bludowsky's thesis, the present paper uses Kushner's method to determine optimal approximate designs. We restrict attention to the case where the number of periods is less than or equal to the number of treatments. We determine the optimal designs in the important special cases that the number of periods is 3, 4 or 5. It turns out that the optimal designs depend on the variance of the random interactions and in most cases are not binary. However, we can show that neighbour balanced binary designs are highly efficient, regardless of the number of periods and of the size of the variance of the interaction effects.     

The analysis of mixed and random effects models for equireplicate variance-balanced block designs

Equirephcate variance-balanced block designs possess many desirable properties and include several important subclasses of designs, such as balanced incomplete block designs. However, while attention has been paid to the derivation of properties and the construction of these designs, methods of analyzing experiments using these designs have not been developed completely. Thus, we consider models appropriate to these designs, construct test statistics for basic hypotheses and derive the distributions for these statistics. Four additive models that include all of the possible combinations of fixed and random effects are examined. The analyses are generalizations of the analyses for balanced incomplete block designs, and include the intra-block, intra-treatment and inter-block analyses, Estimators of fixed treatment effects and their distributions also are given.     

Some new construction of circular weakly balanced repeated measurements designs in periods of two different sizes

Abstract

Balanced repeated measurements designs (RMDs) balance out the residual effects. Williams Latin square designs work as minimal combinatorial balanced as well as variance balanced for RMDs for p (period sizes) = v (number of treatments). If minimal balanced RMDs cannot be constructed for the situations where p must be less than v then weakly balanced RMDs should be preferred. In this article, some generators are developed to generate circular weakly balanced RMDs in periods of two different sizes. To obtain the proposed designs, some construction procedures are also described for some of the cases where we could not develop generators.     

Construction of Cross-Over Designs for Comparing Test Treatments with Control Using Terraces

Segregated half-and-half and mutually orthogonal power sequence terraces have been used in this article for the construction of some new families of control balanced cross-over designs, which are Schur-optimal. One of the advantages of using terraces is that designs with larger number of treatments can also be constructed with relative ease. Designs up to 17 treatments have been constructed in this article.     

Row-column designs for comparing treatments with a control

This paper considers the problem of the design and analysis of experiments for comparing several treatments with a control when heterogeneity is to be eliminated in two directions. A class of row-column designs which are balanced for treatment vs. control comparisons (referred to as the balanced treatment vs. control row-column or BTCRC designs) is proposed. These designs are analogs of the so-called BTIB designs proposed by Bechhofer and Tamhane (Technometrics 23 (1981) 45–57) for eliminating heterogeneity in one direction. Some methods of analysis and construction of these designs are given. A measure of efficiency of BTCRC designs in terms of the A-optimality criterion is derived and illustrated by several examples.     

On selecting the best treatment in a generalized linear model

The problem of selecting the best treatment is studied under generalized linear models. For certain balanced designs, it is shown that simple rules are Bayes with respect to any non-informative prior on the treatment effects under any monotone invariant loss. When the nuisance parameters such as block effects are assumed to follow a uniform (improper) prior or a normal prior, Bayes rules are obtained for the normal linear model under more suitable balanced designs, keeping the generality of the loss and the generality of the non-informativeness on the prior of the treatment effects. These results are extended to certain types of informative priors on the treatment effects. When the designs are unbalanced, algorithms based on the Gibbs sampler and the Laplace method are provided to compute the Bayes rules.     

A Class of Experimental Designs Balanced for First Residuals

In this paper a new class of designs involving sequences of treatments balanced for first residual effects has been introduced. These designs require only t experimental units for 2t periods, t being the number of treatments to be tested. A unified method of constructing these designs for all values of t (≥2) along with an appropriate method of analysis is presented. Besides, their efficiency relative to some well known designs is investigated.     

Neighbor-Balanced Row-column Designs

In this article, row-column designs incorporating directional neighbor effects have been studied. A row-column design is said to be neighbor balanced if every treatment has all other treatments appearing as a neighbor a constant number of times. We considered here three different situations under row-column setup incorporating neighbor effects viz., row-column design with one-sided neighbor effect, two-sided neighbor effect, and four-sided neighbor effect. The information matrices for all the situations for estimating the direct and neighbor effects of treatments have been derived. Methods of constructing neighbor-balanced row-column designs have been developed and its characterization properties have been studied.     

Construction of circular partially balanced-Repeated measurement designs using cyclic shifts

Repeated measurement designs are widely used in medicine, pharmacology, animal sciences and psychology. These designs balance out the residual effects. The situations where balanced repeated measurements designs require a large number of the subjects, partially-balanced repeated measurements designs should be used. In this paper some infinite series are developed which provide circular partially-balanced repeated measurement designs for p (periods) even. Catalogues of circular partially-balanced repeated measurement designs are also presented for v (treatments) ≤ 100 with p = 5, 7 & 9.     

On estimation and testing arising from order restricted balanced mixed model

The randomized complete block design is one of the most widely used experimental designs to systematically control the variability arising from known nuisance sources. The balanced mixed effects model is usually appropriate for such an experiment when the blocks used in the experiment are randomly chosen. In applications with k increasing or decreasing treatment levels, there is sometimes prior knowledge about the ordering of the treatment effects. The most commonly seen orderings include simple ordering, simple tree ordering and umbrella orderings with known or unknown peaks. A natural question is how to incorporate the prior ordering information in estimating the parameters in a balanced mixed effects model so that the estimated treatment effects are consistent with the prior information and the estimated variances of the block effects and experiment errors are nonnegative. In this paper we derive the maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters in a balanced mixed model subject to any partial ordering of the treatment effects, which includes the usual maximum likelihood estimators as a special case. An example is provided to illustrate the results.