平滑转换自回归模型的单位根检验问题研究

 内容提要：针对非线性模型的单位根检验中存在的问题,本文认为非线性模型的单位根检验不应该在AR模型中进行,而应该在非线性模型中进行。以LSTAR(1)模型为例,本文给出了在其中进行单位根检验的统计量及其临界值。用蒙特卡洛试验证实,本文提出的单位根检验统计量的功效明显高于DF单位根检验,只有当非平稳特征十分明显时,DF检验才能检测出其中的单位根,因此,在非线性模型中进行单位根检验是必要的。     

货币流通速度的趋势稳定研究——基于弹性傅里叶单位根检验的实证分析

不同国家的货币流通速度在不同的经济发展阶段呈现出不同的趋势。传统的单位根检验忽视了货币流通速度本身可能存在的非线性趋势,将货币流通速度视为非平稳单位根过程。利用弹性傅里叶单位根检验方法,重点针对剔除了非线性趋势的货币流通速度时间序列,选取较有代表性的11个国家,对这些国家的货币流通速度时间序列进行实证分析。研究结果表明,多数国家的货币流通速度是非线性平稳过程,实证结果进一步支持了货币政策有效性的结论。     

基于奇异值分解去势的非线性趋势序列单位根检验研究

 如何克服ADF与PP单位根检验法对非线性趋势平稳序列的伪检验,提高单位根检验的功效,是非平稳时间序列分析的重要问题。本文基于奇异值分解的思路,构造出检验非平稳时间序列单位根的SVD-RMA检验法,此方法将时间序列的趋势项与干扰项分离,然后用递归均值调整法对干扰项进行检验。仿真实验表明,SVD-RMA法对线性与非线性趋势、甚至结构突变过程的检验功效都非常好;对非线性趋势平稳的检验而言,SVD-RMA检验得到正确结论的可能性要远远好于ADF与PP检验。     

ESTAR模型单位根检验的性质研究

文章以转移函数为指数形式的平滑转移自回归模型(ESTAR)作为典型代表,通过模拟实验考察了非线性单位根检验(包括ADF检验和PP检验)的小样本性质;以MA(1)和GARCH(1,1)过程为代表,研究了误差项服从序列相关和异方差时,非线性参数和滞后阶数对两类检验统计量实际水平和功效的影响,从而为非平稳STAR族模型的应用研究提供一定的理论支持.     

正交多项式逼近下非线性趋势序列单位根检验

 传统单位根检验方法常常假设带有线性的确定性趋势,但如果趋势是非线性的,通常将因为检验功效大幅下降而导致检验失败。本文研究用正交多项式逼近非线性趋势,然后对残差进行单位根检验的方法。研究了用正交多项式进行趋势逼近的性质,推导了这种方法进行单位根检验时统计量的极限分布,提出了正交多项式最高阶数的确定方法,仿真研究了残差相关与不相关时的检验功效。结果表明,检验方法是有效的。     

平行数据模型单位根的非参数检验方法——截面内误差项存在L阶自相关关系

时间序列单位根检验问题是现代经济计量学研究的一个焦点问题。由于平行数据模型研究的是跨横截面的时间序列问题,因此单位根检验问题对它来说也非常重要。这个问题目前在平行数据模型的研究领域备受关注。本文通过研究时间序列单位根的非参数Z检验方法与平行数据模型单位根的IPS检验方法,针对横截面内误差项存在L阶自相关关系的平行数据模型,提出了非参数单位根检验方法;并利用Monte-Carlo方法模拟比较了本文提出方法与LL单位根检验方法的效果。一、时间序列单位根的非参数Z检验方法Phillips(1988)考虑了时间序列可能出现的自相关关系…     

单位根的秩检验及其应用研究

 本文系统研究了单位根检验的三种非参数秩检验统计量：RDF检验、得分秩( )检验与逆得分秩( )检验,推导了逆得分秩的分布。然后运用Monte Carlo模拟给出了各种秩检验的临界值,将秩检验与传统检验的优劣进行了比较,并将这些方法应用于我国货币需求函数各变量月度序列的实证检验。Monte Carlo模拟和实证应用的结果表明,秩检验与传统单位根检验方法相结合可以发现序列中的非线性特征,这将有助于对时间序列特征的深入分析。     

我国费雪效应的非参数检验

本文基于我国1990:01—2007:04期间的名义利率与通货膨胀率月度数据非线性变化的特征,应用非参数单位根和非参数协整理论检验我国是否存在费雪效应, 进而应用非参数局部线性变窗宽估计计算我国的费雪系数。由此产生的结论为：第一,非参数单位根检验发现我国名义利率与通货膨胀率都是非平稳的单位根过程;第二,非参数协整检验的结论为, 我国名义利率与通胀变化率之间存在长期的非线性协整关系, 这一结论表明我国至少存在弱的费雪效应;第三,非参数局部线性变窗宽估计计算的费雪效应(系数)的均值为0.4055,这一结果进一步支持我国存在弱的费雪效应,其隐含的意义为,当前加息对稳定通胀将产生正面效应,进一步, 如适时适度的调整利率, 很可能抑制当前较高的CPI向高通胀的转化。     

门限自回归下的单位根检验可靠性研究

在非对称的门限自回归模型下,由于传统单位根检验式的误设,会导致单位根检验势下降。本文通过一系列的Monte-Carlo模拟表明：非对称性对ADF和PP检验的检验势会产生较大影响,而对其他四种常用的单位根检验势产生的影响较小,也就是说,在非对称的门限自回归下,非对称性对退势单位根检验势产生的影响较小。模拟中也发现：NP单位根检验对TAR模型和持久性都具有稳健性。     

STAR模型框架下的wild bootstrap单位根检验

考虑随机误差项存在异方差的情形,文章建立了STAR模型框架下的wild bootstrap单位根检验策略.Monte Carlo模拟研究的结果表明,若时间序列存在GARCH异方差,KSS非线性单位根检验统计量的检验水平扭曲程度要远高于线性ADF统计量,且GARCH特征越明显,扭曲程度越高.无论GARCH特征明显与否,wild bootstrap单位根检验方法都不存在检验水平扭曲,且具有理想的检验势.     

傅里叶型平滑结构突变下Dickey-Fuller检验的功效——兼论Shibor的平稳性

通过推导Dickey-Fuller检验功效函数,研究表明:即使中小型的傅里叶型结构突变,都会严重影响Dickey-Fuller检验的功效,从而使得含傅里叶型平滑结构突变的平稳过程被误判为单位根过程。使用3、6、9个月期和一年期Shibor日度数据发现:传统的ADF、PP、DF-GLS和KPSS几乎都指出Shibor是单位根过程;考虑平滑结构突变的单位根检验则在1%的显著性水平下拒绝了单位根的原假设,这表明Shibor是含结构突变的平稳过程。因此,预测Shibor和理解其动态行为必须考虑其结构突变特征。     

Reconsidering LM unit root testing

Non-rejection of a unit root hypothesis by usual Dickey & Fuller (1979) (DF, hereafter) or Phillips & Perron (1988) (hereafter PP) tests should not be taken as strong evidence in favour of unit root presence. There are less popular, but more powerful, unit root tests that should be employed instead of DF-PP tests. A prime example of an alternative test is the LM unit root test developed by Schmidt & Phillips (1992) (hereafter SP) and Schmidt & Lee (1991) (hereafter SL). LM unit root tests are easy to calculate and invariant (similar); they employ optimal detrending and are more powerful than usual DF-PP tests. Asymptotic theory and finite sample critical values (with inaccuracies that we correct in this paper) are available for SP-SL tests. However, the usefulness of LM tests is not fully understood, due to ambiguity over test type recommendation, as well as potentially inefficient derivation of the test that might confuse applied researchers. In this paper, we reconsider LM unit root testing in a model with linear trend. We derive asymptotic distribution theory (in a new fashion), as well as accurate appropriate critical values. We undertake Monte Carlo investigation of finite sample properties of SP-SL LM tests, along with applications to the Nelson & Plosser (1982) time series and real quarterly UK GDP.     

UNIT ROOT TESTING IN THE PRESENCE OF HEAVY‐TAILED GARCH ERRORS

We derive the asymptotic distributions of the Dickey–Fuller (DF) and augmented DF (ADF) tests for unit root processes with Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (GARCH) errors under fairly mild conditions. We show that the asymptotic distributions of the DF tests and ADF t‐type test are the same as those obtained in the independent and identically distributed Gaussian cases, regardless of whether the fourth moment of the underlying GARCH process is finite or not. Our results go beyond earlier ones by showing that the fourth moment condition on the scaled conditional errors is totally unnecessary. Some Monte Carlo simulations are provided to illustrate the finite‐sample‐size properties of the tests.     

A new nonlinear unit root test with Fourier function

Abstract

Traditional unit root tests display a tendency to be nonstationary in the case of structural breaks and nonlinearity. To eliminate this problem this paper proposes a new flexible Fourier form nonlinear unit root test. This test eliminates this problem to add structural breaks and nonlinearity together to the test procedure. In this test procedure, structural breaks are modeled by means of a Fourier function and nonlinear adjustment is modeled by means of an exponential smooth threshold autoregressive (ESTAR) model. The simulation results indicate that the proposed unit root test is more powerful than the Kruse and KSS tests.     

Performance of seasonal unit root tests for monthly data

This paper uses Monte Carlo simulations to analyze the performance of several seasonal unit root tests for monthly time series. The tests are those of Dickey, Hasza and Fuller (DHF), Hylleberg, Engle, Granger and Yoo (HEGY), and Osborn, Chui, Smith and Birchenhall (OCSB). The unit root test of Dickey and Fuller (DF) is also considered. The results indicate that users have to be particularly cautious when applying the monthly version of the HEGY test. In general, the DHF and OCSB tests are preferable in terms of size and power, but these procedures may impose invalid restrictions. An empirical illustration is undertaken for UK two-digit industrial production indicators.     

The sensitivity of robust unit root tests

The power properties of the rank-based Dickey–Fuller (DF) unit root test of Granger and Hallman [C. Granger and J. Hallman, Nonlinear transformations of integrated time series, J. Time Ser. Anal. 12 (1991), pp. 207–218] and the range unit root tests of Aparicio et al. [F. Aparicio, A. Escribano, and A. Siplos, Range unit root (RUR) tests: Robust against non-linearities, error distributions, structural breaks and outliers, J. Time Ser. Anal. 27 (2006), pp. 545–576] are considered when applied to near-integrated time series processes with differing initial conditions. The results obtained show the empirical powers of the tests to be generally robust to smaller deviations of the initial condition of the time series from its underlying deterministic component, particularly for more highly stationary processes. However, dramatic decreases in power are observed when either the mean or variance of the deviation of the initial condition is increased. The robustness of the rank- and range-based unit root tests and their higher power results relative to the seminal DF test have both been noted previously in the econometrics literature. These results are questioned by the findings of the present paper.     

检验式设定错误对时间序列单位根检验小样本性质的影响

首先对单位根检验的两类常见的数据生成系统进行比较，然后利用蒙特卡洛实验研究了时间序列单位根检验式的设定问题。研究发现在利用DF检验和DF-GLS检验进行时间序列的单位根检验时，检验式设定错误直接影响着检验结果，尤其在推断时间序列是趋势平稳过程还是有时间趋势项的随机游走过程或有二阶时间趋势多项式的随机游走过程时，检验式的错误设定很容易将趋势平稳过程误判为非平稳过程。     

A Nonparametric Test of the Predictive Regression Model

This article considers testing the significance of a regressor with a near unit root in a predictive regression model. The procedures discussed in this article are nonparametric, so one can test the significance of a regressor without specifying a functional form. The results are used to test the null hypothesis that the entire function takes the value of zero. We show that the standardized test has a normal distribution regardless of whether there is a near unit root in the regressor. This is in contrast to tests based on linear regression for this model where tests have a nonstandard limiting distribution that depends on nuisance parameters. Our results have practical implications in testing the significance of a regressor since there is no need to conduct pretests for a unit root in the regressor and the same procedure can be used if the regressor has a unit root or not. A Monte Carlo experiment explores the performance of the test for various levels of persistence of the regressors and for various linear and nonlinear alternatives. The test has superior performance against certain nonlinear alternatives. An application of the test applied to stock returns shows how the test can improve inference about predictability.     

How Do Nonlinear Unit Root Tests Perform with Non Normal Errors?

This article examines how popular nonlinear unit root tests perform in the presence of non normal errors. Non normal errors normally do not pose a problem in the usual linear unit root tests since the least squares estimator will still be the most efficient under certain ideal conditions regardless of normal or non normal errors. Whether similar results will carry over to nonlinear unit root tests with non normal errors is a question that merits examination. We find that in contrast to the linear tests, the presence of non normal errors in nonlinear unit root tests will lead to a significant loss of power.