门限自回归下的单位根检验可靠性研究

在非对称的门限自回归模型下,由于传统单位根检验式的误设,会导致单位根检验势下降。本文通过一系列的Monte-Carlo模拟表明：非对称性对ADF和PP检验的检验势会产生较大影响,而对其他四种常用的单位根检验势产生的影响较小,也就是说,在非对称的门限自回归下,非对称性对退势单位根检验势产生的影响较小。模拟中也发现：NP单位根检验对TAR模型和持久性都具有稳健性。     

具有GARCH（1，1）-正态误差项的非对称单位根检验研究

摘　　要:理论研究表明许多经济变量呈现出非对称的门限自回归（TAR）或动态门限自回归（M-TAR）数据生成机制,因而非对称单位根检验就成为该领域的主要研究方向之一。本文对非对称单位根检验Enders-Granger方法在GARCH（1,1）-正态误差项下的检验水平与检验势作了系统的仿真研究。研究表明：GARCH（1,1）-正态误差项的TAR或M-TAR模型会对该方法的检验水平和检验势产生重要影响。     

STAR模型中的递归退势单位根检验研究

在STAR模型框架下,考虑时间序列具有线性确定性趋势成分,本文建立了一个递归退势单位根检验统计量,推导了其渐近分布;并在考虑初始条件情形下,对递归退势、OLS和GLS退势单位根检验统计量的有限样本性质进行了细致的比较研究。若忽略初始条件的影响,GLS退势和递归退势单位根检验统计量的检验势都显著高于OLS退势。随着初始条件的增大,GLS退势单位根检验统计量的检验势下降得比较厉害,递归退势单位根检验统计量的检验势较为稳定,且在样本量较大情形下更具优势。     

一种新的阈值协整检验方法的仿真研究

文章基于ECM提出一个新的阈值协整检验方法,目的在于把部分协整从阈值协整中区分开来,并对检验法的检验水平和检验势进行仿真研究。仿真研究发现:首先该统计量采用固定回归元自助法具有较高的检验势,但具有较严重的检验水平扭曲,因此会增大"弃真"的概率。其次采取仿真临界值的检验法会随着数据序列"持久性"的增强检验势呈下降趋势,但EG两步法下降得更快。     

关于ADF与PP单位根检验方法的探讨

经济理论认为许多经济变量具有非对称的阈值自回归调整行为,而标准的单位根检验ADF和PP法都是基于线性自回归模型而构造的,因此对非对称单位根检验并不适用。本文应用Monte-Carlo模拟方法对ADF和PP检验在TAR与M-TAR模型下的检验势进行系统研究,并对模拟结果的产生原因进行了深入分析。模拟结果表明:当非对称程度较大时,ADF和PP的检验势都具有较大幅度的下降,但是ADF比PP法具有更大程度的下降。     

STAR模型下初始条件对退势单位根检验统计量的影响研究

在STAR模型框架下,文章分析了不同初始条件下OLS和GLS退势KSS统计量检验水平和检验势的特征,发现OLS退势KSS统计量的检验势随初始条件的增大而上升,GLS退势KSS统计量的检验势随初始条件的增大而下降,这与通常忽略初始条件影响下GLS退势比OLS退势KSS统计量有更高检验势的结论不一致.为此,进一步探讨了考虑初始条件情况下STAR模型中的退势单位根检验策略.     

退势单位根检验的小样本性质

在经验研究中,尽管Dickey-Fuller提出的 统计量是应用最广泛的单位根检验,但是,它的检验功效偏低是众所周知的。为了改善Dickey-Fuller检验的功效,本文将时间序列的四种退势方法和 检验、 检验、MAX检验和 检验相结合,通过蒙特卡洛模拟试验研究了16种退势单位根检验的小样本性质。研究发现,退势单位根检验均不同程度地改善了 型检验的功效,特别是退势单位根检验 -KGLS、MAX-KGLS、 -RLS和MAX-RLS具有更理想的小样本性质。     

平稳阈值自回归下的伪回归研究

 研究表明相互独立的平稳阈值自回归(TAR)模型之间的回归存在伪回归,且伪回归的产生与样本容量和随机干扰项的分布无关。通过一系列的MC模拟,不仅证实了理论结论,而且模拟结果还表明当持久性相同时,两机制TAR回归模型比三机制TAR回归模型具有更大的拒绝率,原因在于两机制TAR下,OLS法估计得到的标准误具有更厚的左尾。此外在模拟中也发现当随机干扰项服从TAR模型时,Newey-West(1987)的一致异方差估计法是不适用的。     

面板数据单位根似然比检验研究

本文采用似然比类检验统计量进行面板单位根检验（简称为LR检验）研究,在局部备择假设成立的条件下,推导了其在无确定项、仅含截距项以及存在线性时间趋势项三种模型下所对应的渐近分布与局部渐近势函数。Monte Carlo模拟结果显示,当面板数据中含确定项（截距项或时间趋势项）时,LR检验水平比LLC和IPS检验水平更接近于给定的显著性检验水平;此外,当面板数据中包含发散个体时,经水平修正后的LR检验势要远远高于经水平修正后的LLC与IPS检验势,其中,经水平修正后的LLC与IPS检验势接近于零。     

残差块形自助法在非对称单位根检验中的适用性

非对称单位根检验已成为时间序列分析中重要研究领域之一。而当随机干扰项之间具有一般性的自相关时,非对称单位根检验式中,由于不同的滞后阶会对统计量检验势产生至关重要的影响,因此采用残差块形自助法（RBB）对非对称单位根EG检验进行有效的改进研究,并对RBB法的适用性进行了模拟。结果表明：RBB法不仅在一定程度上降低了检验水平扭曲,而且大大提高了EG法的检验势。     

The Use of Permutation Tests for Variance Components in Linear Mixed Models

Standard asymptotic chi-square distribution of the likelihood ratio and score statistics under the null hypothesis does not hold when the parameter value is on the boundary of the parameter space. In mixed models it is of interest to test for a zero random effect variance component. Some available tests for the variance component are reviewed and a new test within the permutation framework is presented. The power and significance level of the different tests are investigated by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study. The proposed test has a significance level closer to the nominal one and it is more powerful.     

A modified Mack–Wolfe test for the umbrella alternative problem

ABSTRACT

The Mack–Wolfe test is the most frequently used non parametric procedure for the umbrella alternative problem. In this paper, modifications of the Mack–Wolfe test are proposed for both known peak and unknown peak umbrellas. The exact mean and variance of the proposed tests in the null hypothesis are also derived. We compare these tests with some of the existing tests in terms of the type I error rate and power. In addition, a real data example is presented.     

Testing overdispersion in the zero-inflated Poisson model

The zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model is used to account for commonly occurring overdispersion detected in data that are initially analyzed under the zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) model. Tests for overdispersion (Wald test, likelihood ratio test [LRT], and score test) based on ZINB model for use in ZIP regression models have been developed. Due to similarity to the ZINB model, we consider the zero-inflated generalized Poisson (ZIGP) model as an alternate model for overdispersed zero-inflated count data. The score test has an advantage over the LRT and the Wald test in that the score test only requires that the parameter of interest be estimated under the null hypothesis. This paper proposes score tests for overdispersion based on the ZIGP model and illustrates that the derived score statistics are exactly the same as the score statistics under the ZINB model. A simulation study indicates the proposed score statistics are preferred to other tests for higher empirical power. In practice, based on the approximate mean–variance relationship in the data, the ZINB or ZIGP model can be considered, and a formal score test based on asymptotic standard normal distribution can be employed for assessing overdispersion in the ZIP model. We provide an example to illustrate the procedures for data analysis.     

Choosing appropriate covariance matrices in a nonparametric analysis of factorials in block designs

The standard nonparametric, rank-based approach to the analysis of dependent data from factorial designs is based on an estimated unstructured (UN) variance–covariance matrix, but the large number of variance–covariance terms in many designs can seriously affect test performance. In a simulation study for a factorial arranged in blocks, we compared estimates of type-I error probability and power based on the UN structure with the estimates obtained with a more parsimonious heterogeneous-compound-symmetry structure (CSH). Although tests based on the UN structure were anti-conservative with small number of factor levels, especially with four or six blocks, they became conservative at higher number of factor levels. Tests based on the CSH structure were anti-conservative, and results did not depend on the number of factor levels. When both tests were anti-conservative, tests based on the CSH structure were less so. Although use of the CSH structure is concluded to be more suitable than use of the UN structure for the small number of blocks typical in agricultural experiments, results suggest that further improvement of test statistics is needed for such situations.     

A new computational approach test for one-way ANOVA under heteroscedasticity

This paper proposes a new test statistic based on the computational approach test (CAT) for one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) under heteroscedasticity. The proposed test was compared with other popular tests according to type I error and power of tests under different combinations of variances, means, number of groups and sample sizes. As a result, it was observed that the proposed test yields better results than other tests in many cases.     

Likelihood ratio test for simultaneous testing of the mean and the variance of a normal distribution

In this paper, we consider the simultaneous testing of the mean and the variance of a normal distribution. The exact distribution of the likelihood ratio test statistic is obtained, which is not available in the literature. The critical points of the exact test are reported. We also consider some of the other exact and asymptotic tests. The powers of these tests are compared using the Monte Carlo simulations.     

Odds ratio for a single 2 × 2 table with correlated binomials for two margins

While analyzing 2 × 2 contingency tables, the log odds ratio for measuring the strength of association is often approximated by a normal distribution with some variance. We show that the expression of that variance needs to be modified in the presence of correlation between two binomial distributions of the contingency table. In the present paper, we derive a correlation-adjusted variance of the limiting normal distribution of log odds ratio. We also propose a correlation adjusted test based on the standard odds ratio for analyzing matched-pair studies and any other study settings that induce correlated binary outcomes. We demonstrate that our proposed test outperforms the classical McNemar’s test. Simulation studies show the gains in power are especially manifest when sample size is small and strong correlation is present. Two examples of real data sets are used to demonstrate that the proposed method may lead to conclusions significantly different from those reached using McNemar’s test.     

Comparison of unweighted and weighted rank based tests for an ordered alternative in randomized complete block designs

In randomized complete block designs, a monotonic relationship among treatment groups may already be established from prior information, e.g., a study with different dose levels of a drug. The test statistic developed by Page and another from Jonckheere and Terpstra are two unweighted rank based tests used to detect ordered alternatives when the assumptions in the traditional two-way analysis of variance are not satisfied. We consider a new weighted rank based test by utilizing a weight for each subject based on the sample variance in computing the new test statistic. The new weighted rank based test is compared with the two commonly used unweighted tests with regard to power under various conditions. The weighted test is generally more powerful than the two unweighted tests when the number of treatment groups is small to moderate.     

Likelihood ratio tests for multivariate normality

This paper presents some powerful omnibus tests for multivariate normality based on the likelihood ratio and the characterizations of the multivariate normal distribution. The power of the proposed tests is studied against various alternatives via Monte Carlo simulations. Simulation studies show our tests compare well with other powerful tests including multivariate versions of the Shapiro–Wilk test and the Anderson–Darling test.     

Variance Shifts,Structural Breaks,and Stationarity Tests

This article considers the problem of testing the null hypothesis of stochastic stationarity in time series characterized by variance shifts at some (known or unknown) point in the sample. It is shown that existing stationarity tests can be severely biased in the presence of such shifts, either oversized or undersized, with associated spurious power gains or losses, depending on the values of the breakpoint parameter and on the ratio of the prebreak to postbreak variance. Under the assumption of a serially independent Gaussian error term with known break date and known variance ratio, a locally best invariant (LBI) test of the null hypothesis of stationarity in the presence of variance shifts is then derived. Both the test statistic and its asymptotic null distribution depend on the breakpoint parameter and also, in general, on the variance ratio. Modifications of the LBI test statistic are proposed for which the limiting distribution is independent of such nuisance parameters and belongs to the family of Cramér–von Mises distributions. One such modification is particularly appealing in that it is simultaneously exact invariant to variance shifts and to structural breaks in the slope and/or level of the series. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the power loss from using our modified statistics in place of the LBI statistic is not large, even in the neighborhood of the null hypothesis, and particularly for series with shifts in the slope and/or level. The tests are extended to cover the cases of weakly dependent error processes and unknown breakpoints. The implementation of the tests are illustrated using output, inflation, and exchange rate data series.